Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
BF2 vrs. CoD 4
Nierro
Member UncommonPosts: 1,755
Which game has better/funner multiplayer in your experience? I own BF2 and have been playing for a while, but I have yet to play CoD4.
When I get my new computer, should I buy CoD4 or just stick with BF2?
Comments
Really depends on what you like. I love both the games, but I pretty only Play CoD 4 now. Awesome multiplayer, especially if you like competitive gaming.
I can't speak for Battle Field 2, but I tried Battlefield 2142 and the whole game just felt clunky. The only gun that felt like it had any power was the LMG, and it didn't to shit. Half of the time everyone in one team would be in a vehicle and they'd just blow up the other team as they spawn. Might as well spawn without a gun.
Of course, 2142 ought to be a step forward in gameplay from Battlefield 2, thus I'm too wary to attempt a $40 experiment.
BF2, COD4 is ok but i prefer BF2.
Hold on Snow Leopard, imma let you finish, but Windows had one of the best operating systems of all time.
If the Powerball lottery was like Lotro, nobody would win for 2 years, and then everyone in Nebraska would win on the same day.
And then Nebraska would get nerfed.-pinkwood lotro fourms
AMD 4800 2.4ghz-3GB RAM 533mhz-EVGA 9500GT 512mb-320gb HD
At its height, Battlefield 2 was an awesome friggen game...Call of Duty was more consistent...The problem with Battlefield 2 was that you would often find yourself getting annihilated with artillery and you really had to learn how to stay away from vehicles and such if you wanted to play infantry...once you got to that point though, the good times were definitely there to be had...And I liked that you had the option of vehicles, in Call of Duty you never even get that chance...not that the game needs vehicles to be good, it's already outstanding.
Your argument is like a two legged dog with an eating disorder...weak and unbalanced.