Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Google must divulge YouTube log

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7488009.stm

"Google must divulge the viewing habits of every user who has ever watched any video on YouTube, a US court has ruled."

"The viewing log, which will be handed to Viacom, contains the log-in ID of users, the computer IP address (online identifier) and video clip details.

While the legal battle between the two firms is being contested in the US, it is thought the ruling will apply to YouTube users and their viewing habits everywhere."

 

 

 

Comments

  • hadubnanohadubnano Member Posts: 82

    Now everyone is going to know about my booty shake video fetish!

     

     

  • TealaTeala Member RarePosts: 7,627
    Originally posted by hadubnano


    Now everyone is going to know about my booty shake video fetish!
     
     



     

    Who is going to shift through the hundreds upon hundreds of millions of users that will show up on the list. 

  • jackwhitejackwhite Member Posts: 106

    Wow this has to break some privacy law somewhere...

  • declaredemerdeclaredemer Member Posts: 2,698

    You are all just going to have to become comfortable with losing your rights.

     

     

    You are "safer" as a result. 

  • Originally posted by jackwhite


    Wow this has to break some privacy law somewhere...

     

    Privacy law? LMAO!

     

    You're a US american so you prolly don't know about this thing called the Patriot Act...basically gives the US government complete freedom to violate your rights to privacy, amongst other things.

  • SioBabbleSioBabble Member Posts: 2,803
    Originally posted by windstrike1


    news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7488009.stm
    "Google must divulge the viewing habits of every user who has ever watched any video on YouTube, a US court has ruled."
    "The viewing log, which will be handed to Viacom, contains the log-in ID of users, the computer IP address (online identifier) and video clip details.
    While the legal battle between the two firms is being contested in the US, it is thought the ruling will apply to YouTube users and their viewing habits everywhere."
     
     
     



     

    No doubt this is part of some sort of attempt by Viacom to get some of Google's YouTube money, or to extract royalties for any content on YouTube claimed by Viacom.

    It's all about Ferengi slimeballs arguing over latinum.

    CH, Jedi, Commando, Smuggler, BH, Scout, Doctor, Chef, BE...yeah, lots of SWG time invested.

    Once a denizen of Ahazi

  • jackwhitejackwhite Member Posts: 106
    Originally posted by poopypants

    Originally posted by jackwhite


    Wow this has to break some privacy law somewhere...

     

    Privacy law? LMAO!

     

    You're a US american so you prolly don't know about this thing called the Patriot Act...basically gives the US government complete freedom to violate your rights to privacy, amongst other things.

     

    This has nothing to do with the Patriot Act. Also stop flaming. I made a statement you don't have to flame me with some law that everyone knows about. Also, zeitgeist is full of shit. just another conspiracy theory movie.

  • hadubnanohadubnano Member Posts: 82

    I hope booty shake videos are not considered child pron!

     

  • ZanetanosZanetanos Member Posts: 146

    I don't understand why the Judge just didn't order YouTube to divulge usage logs that left out account names, ip address, other personally identifiable information, etc.  Viacom doesn't really need those to make a case against YouTube.  All they need is evidence which supports the notion that copyrighted material is being imporoperly posted on YouTube.  The personal information is completely unnecessary for this.

  • ZorvanZorvan Member CommonPosts: 8,912
    Originally posted by Zanetanos


    I don't understand why the Judge just didn't order YouTube to divulge usage logs that left out account names, ip address, other personally identifiable information, etc.  Viacom doesn't really need those to make a case against YouTube.  All they need is evidence which supports the notion that copyrighted material is being imporoperly posted on YouTube.  The personal information is completely unnecessary for this.



     

    More than likely, that judge has never used a computer for anything more than record keeping and e-mail. This is what most of these government agencies and corporations count on when they put these cases before judges.

  • Rikimaru_XRikimaru_X Member UncommonPosts: 11,718
    Originally posted by hadubnano


    Now everyone is going to know about my booty shake video fetish!

     

    QFT

    -In memory of Laura "Taera" Genender. Passed away on Aug/13/08-
    |
    RISING DRAGOON ~AION US ONLINE LEGION for Elyos

Sign In or Register to comment.