ouch, lot of folks complaning about turbine's manouver
let's say that the F2P of LOTRO, which is restrict to 3 areas of the entire game, Bree, Eriador and Shire is some kind of trial. If you had payed the lifetime subs you can play the entire game, including expansions, with no restrictions AND you still gain coins to spend on the turbines lotro store to help your alts. You keep your status of lifetime subscriber as VIP-forever-and-ever
I can't see the fraud, since honestly, i didnt read the agreement condition ( if you say you read, you lying XD).
soon or later this would happen. FP2 games with store system is way more profitable than the P2P games.
I see the usual 'hey lets bend over for item stores' crowd is already in full swing to attack the OP... I have a lifetime sub myself (since launch) and have made good use of it and will probably see how this pans out. But I can quite easily see why someone would be upset about this happening so soon after getting on board with the offer.
Let's just put it like this, regardless of your views on item stores/cash shops, this guy bought a lifetime subscription to a game without one at a time when they must have already been aware that they planned to subsequently add one. Whether or not you like it or not, or regardless of whether any of you think it is value for money, he is receiving something different to what he paid for.
It's like buying a car with a petrol engine and getting one with a diesel engine.
They may have a line in the EULA that says they are able to do this but like others have said, this is not a get out of jail free card. Turbine were obviously aware that they were going to do this quite a while ago. Many players noticed that the skirmish system was a deliberate move towards modular content that would suit the MT model perfectly and that was released months ago. Turbine has essentially misrepresented what they are selling. Doing this is illegal regardless of what clauses Turbine has to protect themselves. End of story.
It doesn't matter what any of you personally think of the change, or even if it's 'the same thing' (which it isn't since there is no cash shop in LOTRO currently and many people would have chosen not to play if they knew it would eventually have one). If someone buys one thing and gets something else then they have been lied to about what they were buying. Just because you think the change is fine it doesn't mean everyone else should just accept it.
Otherwise what you and others are suggesting is that the store should all be free and that lifers should have unlimited access to as much as they want.
Yes. That is right - because they thought they were paying for the full game (minus expansions, I guess)
Does that also mean that lifers should have immediate access to all radiance gear without playing the game even though they paid? No, they have to go through regular game play in order to get it and take the time to do what is needed to get it.
What is radiance gear? Was in in the game when they bought the lifetime sub? Is it for sale for real money?
Same with this store.
The store which wasn't in game when they bought their lifetime subscription. They now are getting less of the full game (expressed as a percentage) than they were.
What's to keep Turbine from selling one use keys to dungeons in that store?
I don't have access to the original info regarding what a lifetime sub gave you. Mines of Moria came after the original shadows of angmar which is when the first offer of a lifetime sub was made available.
In any case, after two expansions (though some would say siege of mirkwood was a mini expansion) it is more than clear that they had to pay for expansions.
The first thing I find after doing a search is this post in 2007 from codemasters that does state that lifers still have to pay for expansions. My guess is that this was also clear for the U.S. players.
Radiance gear is the high end gear that is needed for certain high end raids. The idea is that the players are fighting such overhwelming evil that the radiance of the gear counters it. Without it the players would cower and not be able to do anyting.
And no, it won't be offered in the store.
My only thought, and I don't know if this is true but just a guess, is that f2p players who have to pay a la carte for content might have to buy admission to raids but I have no idea if this is true or not.
Saying that the store wasn't in game and now they aren't getting a full game is sort of like saying the expansions weren't in game and that they arent' getting them for free and therefore not getting the full game.
Again: All a lifetime sub ever offered was a "life time sub" which meant that you didnt' have to pay a monthly subscription. That is all. It does not imbue the player with anything more than that. Well, except in the new system they get automatic vip status and don't have to pay for a monthly allotment of 500 points.
Like Skyrim? Need more content? Try my Skyrim mod "Godfred's Tomb."
ouch, lot of folks complaning about turbine's manouver
let's say that the F2P of LOTRO, which is restrict to 3 areas of the entire game, Bree, Eriador and Shire is some kind of trial. If you had payed the lifetime subs you can play the entire game, including expansions, with no restrictions AND you still gain coins to spend on the turbines lotro store to help your alts. You keep your status of lifetime subscriber as VIP-forever-and-ever
I can't see the fraud, since honestly, i didnt read the agreement condition ( if you say you read, you lying XD).
soon or later this would happen. FP2 games with store system is way more profitable than the P2P games.
Actually that is not true. Lifetime subs did not get all the expansions for free. They had to pay for them. If they have not paid for them, I believe they are still restricted although if they are selling games via points, it sounds like they could possibly save up points and buy the expansions they passed over. In this case, it would be yet another benefit for the lifers, though i doubt many will see it that way.
Personally, I have no problem with the F2P portion of the game. I think people who stay F2P will have as much a chance to enjoy a quality game without paying cent as they would with other F2P models. My problem is the difference between the VIP and the Premium memberships. I do not necessarily think they should be equal, but there shouldn't be anything the VIPs get that the Premium members can't get with some sort of purchase except the "free" monthly points the VIps are getting. Gold limits, crafting limits, contact limits, all of that should be wiped at some price point. If they are worried about spam or auction manipulation, fine limit the F2P players who have nothing invested in the game and therefore nothing to lose if they get banned. As for the Premiums, some price point should be set to unlock those limits... if someone spends 100 dollars in one shot, and some people will.
They do it in DDO too. There is no reason why that person should get less service, actual customer service, and have gold limits and the other bs when they have essentially just paid for a years worth of the game. Now to those of you who say well that person should just sub... no, the other point to F2P is you pay once, and you get what you paid for and never have to worry about upkeep or keeping the account going. It's a sunk cost. Some people really love the idea of paying 100 dollars once and then, maybe, maybe later adding more bmoney but if they don't, nothing is taken away.
If Turbine keeps this rather distinct difference between VIP (monthly paying customers) and Premium (also paying customers), I think it's a clear misstep and will certainly not give them the success they have with DDO because the difference from VIP and Prem in DDO is either not as stark or can be purchased away.
parrotpholk-Because we all know the miracle patch fairy shows up the night before release and sprinkles magic dust on the server to make it allllll better.
The OP and people who have not read how the F2P works should either stop posting, or go read it.
It's been pointed out a number of times what is going to happen. You can check out the forums their, with their words on what will happen. You can check out the posts on their forums about questions people have asked.
Whether or not you like it or not, or regardless of whether any of you think it is value for money, he is receiving something different to what he paid for.
No, he bought the right to play the game free of additional charge for as long as it is in existence, subject only to certain additional charges such as paid-for expansions, and that right is precisely what he will continue to have after the Autumn, up until which he will continue exactly as at present in any event, and after which he may well find that he doesn't actually need to pay extra for those expansions after all.
He also bought it on the clear basis that Turbine/Codemasters were entitled to change the basis of the game at any time and if he had any knowledge of the genre he would also have known that this change was inevitable following the success of DDO Unlimited and may well have reasoned that this was why the lifetime price was so drastically reduced. However, I accept that he may be a complete newcomer to the genre and therefore wouldn't have known those things, although frankly I doubt it.
I accept entirely that he doesn't like it, and that his dislike is borne of a personal hatred of F2P games, which strictly speaking LoTRO isn't going to become anyway, rather it'll be more of a hybrid as there will still be a subscription option, but that doesn't make it "total fraud" as the OP is claiming.
As someone with two lifetime accounts I have looked carefully at the package on offer, and I am perfectly happy with it. It looks to me like I'll gain from it rather than lose by it. I too would have been unhappy at the sales practice of Turbine/Codemasters still offering the lifetime deal when they knew the business model was about to change if they weren't intending to offer at least as good a deal if not better to Lifers than formed the basis of that original deal but that is what they are doing and I'm happy with that. Total fraud it is not.
Whether or not you like it or not, or regardless of whether any of you think it is value for money, he is receiving something different to what he paid for.
No, he bought the right to play the game free of additional charge for as long as it is in existence, subject only to certain additional charges such as paid-for expansions, and that right is precisely what he will continue to have after the Autumn, up until which he will continue exactly as at present in any event, and after which he may well find that he doesn't actually need to pay extra for those expansions after all.
No, Alberel is right.
It isn't fraud, because there was no actual lie.
But in contract law, witholding pertinent information can constitute misrepresentation.
The facts.
1) Free-to-play and subscription games are very different. Item shops are positively loathed by a lot of players and many players who would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub wouldn't touch a free-to-play game with a ten-foot-pole.
2) Turbine ran a special offer, selling the lifetime subs at reduced cost just prior to switching to a free-to-play model. That's EXTREMELY suspicious. It's as if they knew that was the lifetime subscription was going to be FAR less appealing after the switch.
I don't know if there's enough there to win a case because laws vary from place to place. But the OP is right to be angry and to seek legal advice.
But the OP is right to be angry and to seek legal advice.
Except that competent legal advice from an attorney that would have the relevant expertise with respect to contract law and software licensing would cost a hell of a lot more than any potential losses that the OP thinks he's suffered. It would be the height of idiocy to talk to an attorney for what amounts to someone not liking a legitimate, perfectly legal change that a game developer made to their subscription model.
Also, the fact that Turbine is announcing this months before it goes into effect? That shows good faith on their part, since customers are being given plenty of public notice of impending changes that haven't happened yet. All the people crying doom and gloom now should take that into consideration, since any lawyer or courtroom would do the same thing. They're telling you in advance so you can decide if you want a part of it or not.
But the OP is right to be angry and to seek legal advice.
Except that competent legal advice from an attorney that would have the relevant expertise with respect to contract law and software licensing would cost a hell of a lot more than any potential losses that the OP thinks he's suffered. It would be the height of idiocy to talk to an attorney for what amounts to someone not liking a legitimate, perfectly legal change that a game developer made to their subscription model.
Which is why I earlier suggested that if there's any kind of free legal or consumer advice service in his area, that he use that.
And while the change to the subscription model itself might be "perfectly legal", the circumstances under which the OP purchased the lifetime subscription are suspect for the reasons I outlined.
So as I said, the OP is right to be angry and to seek legal advice.
Well Alberel is maybe partially correct. The game hasn't actually changed for VIPs. As of now, it's set to play the same as it always has. The real problem is it has the potential to change more rapidly than it did before. I mean the lifers were also unhappy about adventure packs and paying for a expansion they saw as barely more than a book update and lacking one book update.
In any event, I think the OP has the right to be unhappy, and question their tactics. 2 weeks ago Turbine certainly knew this was going to happen. On the other hand, the OP could be pleasantly surprised because so far, Turbine is bending over backwards for VIPs.
parrotpholk-Because we all know the miracle patch fairy shows up the night before release and sprinkles magic dust on the server to make it allllll better.
some of you guys that recently bought the lifetime sub can just do a charge back you have like 30 days to do so i think right?
i don't know if you could call it fraud technicly, but in the very least it was a very shitty thing to do on thier part. they SHOULD have waited to offer that deal AFTER they released the info about the game going F2P. it would have saved them the head ache and bad rep this is giving them. the ONLY reason they would have the offer a couple weeks prior to the announcement was to( like it or not) scam a few more people that wouldn't have other wise bought it after they annouced the F2P model.
i'm sure some people still woulda have bought the life sub after they knew it was going to have a F2P model included but its obvious some wouldn't have.
honestly you should stop complaining completely they could have shut the game down completely and you'd still be screwed out of your money ... read terms of service before you decide to buy. As I've stated before this game could have been completely shut down just weeks after you went and bought your lifetime sub and it's something you agreed to, and yes this does allow them to change their payment models as well.
------------------------------ We don't have a great war in our generation, or a great depression, but we do, we have a great war of the spirit. We have a great revolution against the culture. The great depression is our lives. ~Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
But the OP is right to be angry and to seek legal advice.
Except that competent legal advice from an attorney that would have the relevant expertise with respect to contract law and software licensing would cost a hell of a lot more than any potential losses that the OP thinks he's suffered. It would be the height of idiocy to talk to an attorney for what amounts to someone not liking a legitimate, perfectly legal change that a game developer made to their subscription model.
Which is why I earlier suggested that if there's any kind of free legal or consumer advice service in his area, that he use that.
And while the change to the subscription model itself might be "perfectly legal", the circumstances under which the OP purchased the lifetime subscription are suspect for the reasons I outlined.
So as I said, the OP is right to be angry and to seek legal advice.
They're not suspect at all. These changes have been announced months in advance of them taking effect. That counts for a lot.
This isn't SWG changing their entire game mechanic without any notice to their players at all, and within days of a paid expansion going live. THAT was a legitimate gripe. This is a developer introducing a subscription model that has already proven successful in one game to another one of their titles, and giving their paying customers MONTHS of notice before it actually happens.
So they had a sale on Lifetime subs then announced this. Big deal. That kind of stuff happens all the time in the real world. Say, for example, that you go and buy a new car. Two weeks later you find out that a sale on your make and model will be coming up in three months. Are you going to blame the dealer for having a sale in three months, or are you going to accept that you paid for something that someone else will get for a lower price down the line?
It's called caveat emptor. People really need to learn it and embrace it. You may not like a change that a game developer is making, but that doesn't automatically mean you have any standing to drag them to court or talk to a lawyer. Perspective helps, especially when there's nothing illegal or untoward happening here, and Turbine is giving people plenty of time to ask questions and come to terms with this new change.
1) Free-to-play and subscription games are very different. Item shops are positively loathed by a lot of players and many players who would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub wouldn't touch a free-to-play game with a ten-foot-pole.
You're making the mistake of confusing the new LoTRO with a purely free to play game. You state that some players would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub without acknowledging that that is precisely what they will still be able to do with LoTRO. If some players doesn't want to use the cash shop they don't have to, they can pay the monthly or lifetime sub and automatically get all the content they already enjoy. They won't miss out on any significant content except future expansions which aren't included in their current package anyway. If there are items that might be considered significant then Turbine/Codemasters have covered that by giving subscribers free points with which to buy those items, so the players aren't losing out. The courts won't regard personal preferences in relation to cash shops as constituting a valid point in law, the facility has been provided and it is entirely up to the customer whether he chooses to make use of it or not.
This is in no way as bad as the NGE change on SWG back in 2005. It completely changed the game to a FPS, and removed professions they were still showing future updates on, which was not happening. And gave only 10 days notice
People even paid £100 annual subscription, and still did not get those fees refunded.
There is absolutley nothing wrong with this F2P scheme. At first I thought It was going to be Free to Play, and everyone would not need to spend any money, but when looking at all the costs involved, the F2P scheme here is nothing more than a glorified free trial, which all P2P games have.
So they had a sale on Lifetime subs then announced this. Big deal. That kind of stuff happens all the time in the real world. Say, for example, that you go and buy a new car. Two weeks later you find out that a sale on your make and model will be coming up in three months. Are you going to blame the dealer for having a sale in three months, or are you going to accept that you paid for something that someone else will get for a lower price down the line?
It's called caveat emptor. People really need to learn it and embrace it. You may not like a change that a game developer is making, but that doesn't automatically mean you have any standing to drag them to court or talk to a lawyer. Perspective helps, especially when there's nothing illegal or untoward happening here, and Turbine is giving people plenty of time to ask questions and come to terms with this new change.
That's absolute rubbish. Your analogy is terrible. LoTRO didn't offer a lifetime subscription sale and then announce LOTRO 2 was about to be launched.
Consumers have rights. And in this case Turbine clearly knew that the lifetime subscription was going to be much less appealing after switching to the free-to-play model and ran the sale accordingly.
That's really dirty. Whether it constitutes contractual misrepresentation or some other breach of law will depend on the local laws - which I don't know.
But I hope the OP does follow it up or does what abyss suggested and cancel the charge on his credit card.
Whether or not you like it or not, or regardless of whether any of you think it is value for money, he is receiving something different to what he paid for.
No, he bought the right to play the game free of additional charge for as long as it is in existence, subject only to certain additional charges such as paid-for expansions, and that right is precisely what he will continue to have after the Autumn, up until which he will continue exactly as at present in any event, and after which he may well find that he doesn't actually need to pay extra for those expansions after all.
No, Alberel is right.
It isn't fraud, because there was no actual lie.
But in contract law, witholding pertinent information can constitute misrepresentation.
The facts.
1) Free-to-play and subscription games are very different. Item shops are positively loathed by a lot of players and many players who would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub wouldn't touch a free-to-play game with a ten-foot-pole.
2) Turbine ran a special offer, selling the lifetime subs at reduced cost just prior to switching to a free-to-play model. That's EXTREMELY suspicious. It's as if they knew that was the lifetime subscription was going to be FAR less appealing after the switch.
I don't know if there's enough there to win a case because laws vary from place to place. But the OP is right to be angry and to seek legal advice.
I don't know anything about contract law. Now bankrupcy law i know. In bankrupcy law you must turn in your credit cards at least 90 days before you file. The reason is simple it is called fraud to use them and then file. Those laws were changed a couple of years back as some folks were always running it up then filing the next day, and new they were filing.
This is the same thing almost. Proving they knew they were going to ftp while offering a lifetime is going to be the issue. That will take discovery, that in itself will be a lawsuit unto its own. So they will first have to sue and get and injunction by a judge to get the discovery documents. Once that happens if they find proof that there was delierate attempts at fraud then another law suit can be filed. However my first step would be with the SEC, get them involved and the lawyers who approved the merger of WB/Turbine. No mater what your going to do your going to need a great contract lawyer as WB has deep pockets and contacts that go all the way up the food chain, and it will be ugly and take years to resolve.
The thing to do now would be get a bench warent that issued and injunction to stop the payment change plans from going forward. That takes you back into contract law not my area of knowing to much.
If you want to create a real stink contact your senator and complain that the merger lead to this and it looks like fraud that might get something rolling. Nothing like have the senate to call you in to explain.
So people are telling him to cancel the charge via his credit card company everyone, which are the people against the change etc etc etc, yet the op is not taking responsibility for his own actions or being misinformed from his own doing?
------------------------------ We don't have a great war in our generation, or a great depression, but we do, we have a great war of the spirit. We have a great revolution against the culture. The great depression is our lives. ~Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
1) Free-to-play and subscription games are very different. Item shops are positively loathed by a lot of players and many players who would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub wouldn't touch a free-to-play game with a ten-foot-pole.
You're making the mistake of confusing the new LoTRO with a purely free to play game. You state that some players would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub without acknowledging that that is precisely what they will still be able to do with LoTRO. If some players doesn't want to use the cash shop they don't have to, they can pay the monthly or lifetime sub and automatically get all the content they already enjoy.
No, no mistake on my part.
I read all the details about their plan. I know how it's going to work.
That doesn't change the fact that many players wouldn't touch a free-to-play game or one with an item mall with a ten foot pole. There's no way I'd ever consider subscribing to DDO or LOTRO now purely because of the payment models.
As a consumer, that's my prerogative. It's the OP's as well - or would have been if Turbine hadn't done this bait and switch.
And if this wasn't the case, why run this special offer just before making the switch?
So they had a sale on Lifetime subs then announced this. Big deal. That kind of stuff happens all the time in the real world. Say, for example, that you go and buy a new car. Two weeks later you find out that a sale on your make and model will be coming up in three months. Are you going to blame the dealer for having a sale in three months, or are you going to accept that you paid for something that someone else will get for a lower price down the line?
It's called caveat emptor. People really need to learn it and embrace it. You may not like a change that a game developer is making, but that doesn't automatically mean you have any standing to drag them to court or talk to a lawyer. Perspective helps, especially when there's nothing illegal or untoward happening here, and Turbine is giving people plenty of time to ask questions and come to terms with this new change.
That's absolute rubbish. Your analogy is terrible. LoTRO didn't offer a lifetime subscription sale and then announce LOTRO 2 was about to be launched.
Consumers have rights. And in this case Turbine clearly knew that the lifetime subscription was going to be much less appealing after switching to the free-to-play model and ran the sale accordingly.
That's really dirty. Whether it constitutes contractual misrepresentation or some other breach of law will depend on the local laws - which I don't know.
But I hope the OP does follow it up or does what abyss suggested and cancel the charge on his credit card.
The Lifetime subscriptions are not less appealing. Even with this announcement I would still pay for the Lifetime subs even at full price, let alone half price.
F2P customers will have to pay more than Lifetime subs or montjly subs, if they want to experience the same game.
All MMOs have free trials with restrictions to gameplay, and people still pay the subs as don't want to be restricted.
Consumers have rights. And in this case Turbine clearly knew that the lifetime subscription was going to be much less appealing after switching to the free-to-play model and ran the sale accordingly.
That's really dirty. Whether it constitutes contractual misrepresentation or some other breach of law will depend on the local laws - which I don't know.
But I hope the OP does follow it up or does what abyss suggested and cancel the charge on his credit card.
Exactly how is a Lifetime sub less appealing in this new model? You get everything the game has to offer AND 500 Turbine points a month for the entire life of the game, and for a single price. That's hardly a bad deal at all.
For a consumer that's coming in new to LOTRO, it would actually be MORE appealing, not less. All they have to do is pay one price and never have to deal with monthly fees or spend a single dime again if they don't want to? Done and done. For existing Lifetime subs, like mine, it's a sweet deal. Nothing actually changes in the current sub and you get extras.
I really think the people complaining about this don't understand the gaming market anymore. This isn't 2004. Things have changed. Consumers might have rights, but they've ALSO shown game developers that they're perfectly open to these newer subscription and pricing models and the developers are reacting accordingly.
If someone is upset and can still get a chargeback on their credit card, then do it. If you can't, then just deal with it, or cancel your sub and move on.
I don't know anything about contract law. Now bankrupcy law i know. In bankrupcy law you must turn in your credit cards at least 90 days before you file. The reason is simple it is called fraud to use them and then file. Those laws were changed a couple of years back as some folks were always running it up then filing the next day, and new they were filing.
This is the same thing almost.
No it isn't, and the rest of your scenario is pure fantasy.
Turbine are giving their customers MONTHS of public notice about this change to their subscription model. That alone counts for a hell of a lot. They're being open about what is happening, and they are answering questions long before anything ever goes into effect.
This isn't some guy charging $250,000 on credit cards then filing bankruptcy so he doesn't have to pay them. This is a game developer applying an already successful -- and LEGAL -- subscription model that they already use for one game to another one of their titles, and giving their paying customers plenty of time to get the answers they need before it happens.
1) Free-to-play and subscription games are very different. Item shops are positively loathed by a lot of players and many players who would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub wouldn't touch a free-to-play game with a ten-foot-pole.
You're making the mistake of confusing the new LoTRO with a purely free to play game. You state that some players would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub without acknowledging that that is precisely what they will still be able to do with LoTRO. If some players doesn't want to use the cash shop they don't have to, they can pay the monthly or lifetime sub and automatically get all the content they already enjoy.
No, no mistake on my part.
I read all the details about their plan. I know how it's going to work.
That doesn't change the fact that many players wouldn't touch a free-to-play game or one with an item mall with a ten foot pole. There's no way I'd ever consider subscribing to DDO or LOTRO now purely because of the payment models.
As a consumer, that's my prerogative. It's the OP's as well - or would have been if Turbine hadn't done this bait and switch.
And if this wasn't the case, why run this special offer just before making the switch?
It would be better if they didn't do the offer?
Buying Lifetime subs is always risky, and them being on offer should have raised the red alert.
If the OP was so against F2P then should have considered it a possibility that this may happen.
Changing the payment model of the game is no where near as bad as cahnges that have happened to other games, and there is still 3 or 4 months left before it changes, so if didn't go for lifetime sub then still would have paid £40 until it did. Then play game for 3 or 4 more months, and see if game is as bad as he thinks, and then the payment for the LT sub will be paid and used up, as though paid monthly.
Comments
ouch, lot of folks complaning about turbine's manouver
let's say that the F2P of LOTRO, which is restrict to 3 areas of the entire game, Bree, Eriador and Shire is some kind of trial. If you had payed the lifetime subs you can play the entire game, including expansions, with no restrictions AND you still gain coins to spend on the turbines lotro store to help your alts. You keep your status of lifetime subscriber as VIP-forever-and-ever
I can't see the fraud, since honestly, i didnt read the agreement condition ( if you say you read, you lying XD).
soon or later this would happen. FP2 games with store system is way more profitable than the P2P games.
LOTRO player
I'm going to sing the Doom Song now!
I see the usual 'hey lets bend over for item stores' crowd is already in full swing to attack the OP... I have a lifetime sub myself (since launch) and have made good use of it and will probably see how this pans out. But I can quite easily see why someone would be upset about this happening so soon after getting on board with the offer.
Let's just put it like this, regardless of your views on item stores/cash shops, this guy bought a lifetime subscription to a game without one at a time when they must have already been aware that they planned to subsequently add one. Whether or not you like it or not, or regardless of whether any of you think it is value for money, he is receiving something different to what he paid for.
It's like buying a car with a petrol engine and getting one with a diesel engine.
They may have a line in the EULA that says they are able to do this but like others have said, this is not a get out of jail free card. Turbine were obviously aware that they were going to do this quite a while ago. Many players noticed that the skirmish system was a deliberate move towards modular content that would suit the MT model perfectly and that was released months ago. Turbine has essentially misrepresented what they are selling. Doing this is illegal regardless of what clauses Turbine has to protect themselves. End of story.
It doesn't matter what any of you personally think of the change, or even if it's 'the same thing' (which it isn't since there is no cash shop in LOTRO currently and many people would have chosen not to play if they knew it would eventually have one). If someone buys one thing and gets something else then they have been lied to about what they were buying. Just because you think the change is fine it doesn't mean everyone else should just accept it.
I don't have access to the original info regarding what a lifetime sub gave you. Mines of Moria came after the original shadows of angmar which is when the first offer of a lifetime sub was made available.
In any case, after two expansions (though some would say siege of mirkwood was a mini expansion) it is more than clear that they had to pay for expansions.
The first thing I find after doing a search is this post in 2007 from codemasters that does state that lifers still have to pay for expansions. My guess is that this was also clear for the U.S. players.
https://lotrosupport.codemasters.com/index.php?_m=knowledgebase&_a=viewarticle&kbarticleid=3002
Radiance gear is the high end gear that is needed for certain high end raids. The idea is that the players are fighting such overhwelming evil that the radiance of the gear counters it. Without it the players would cower and not be able to do anyting.
And no, it won't be offered in the store.
My only thought, and I don't know if this is true but just a guess, is that f2p players who have to pay a la carte for content might have to buy admission to raids but I have no idea if this is true or not.
Saying that the store wasn't in game and now they aren't getting a full game is sort of like saying the expansions weren't in game and that they arent' getting them for free and therefore not getting the full game.
Again: All a lifetime sub ever offered was a "life time sub" which meant that you didnt' have to pay a monthly subscription. That is all. It does not imbue the player with anything more than that. Well, except in the new system they get automatic vip status and don't have to pay for a monthly allotment of 500 points.
Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w
Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547
Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo
Actually that is not true. Lifetime subs did not get all the expansions for free. They had to pay for them. If they have not paid for them, I believe they are still restricted although if they are selling games via points, it sounds like they could possibly save up points and buy the expansions they passed over. In this case, it would be yet another benefit for the lifers, though i doubt many will see it that way.
Personally, I have no problem with the F2P portion of the game. I think people who stay F2P will have as much a chance to enjoy a quality game without paying cent as they would with other F2P models. My problem is the difference between the VIP and the Premium memberships. I do not necessarily think they should be equal, but there shouldn't be anything the VIPs get that the Premium members can't get with some sort of purchase except the "free" monthly points the VIps are getting. Gold limits, crafting limits, contact limits, all of that should be wiped at some price point. If they are worried about spam or auction manipulation, fine limit the F2P players who have nothing invested in the game and therefore nothing to lose if they get banned. As for the Premiums, some price point should be set to unlock those limits... if someone spends 100 dollars in one shot, and some people will.
They do it in DDO too. There is no reason why that person should get less service, actual customer service, and have gold limits and the other bs when they have essentially just paid for a years worth of the game. Now to those of you who say well that person should just sub... no, the other point to F2P is you pay once, and you get what you paid for and never have to worry about upkeep or keeping the account going. It's a sunk cost. Some people really love the idea of paying 100 dollars once and then, maybe, maybe later adding more bmoney but if they don't, nothing is taken away.
If Turbine keeps this rather distinct difference between VIP (monthly paying customers) and Premium (also paying customers), I think it's a clear misstep and will certainly not give them the success they have with DDO because the difference from VIP and Prem in DDO is either not as stark or can be purchased away.
parrotpholk-Because we all know the miracle patch fairy shows up the night before release and sprinkles magic dust on the server to make it allllll better.
The OP and people who have not read how the F2P works should either stop posting, or go read it.
It's been pointed out a number of times what is going to happen. You can check out the forums their, with their words on what will happen. You can check out the posts on their forums about questions people have asked.
Good lord, shut up and read.
i see
there's people who see this in the legal point of view and others see the same change in the game point of view
sure, in the legal view might have something strange so read carefully the EULA and go ahead the sue the turbine if you feel depreciate
LOTRO player
No, he bought the right to play the game free of additional charge for as long as it is in existence, subject only to certain additional charges such as paid-for expansions, and that right is precisely what he will continue to have after the Autumn, up until which he will continue exactly as at present in any event, and after which he may well find that he doesn't actually need to pay extra for those expansions after all.
He also bought it on the clear basis that Turbine/Codemasters were entitled to change the basis of the game at any time and if he had any knowledge of the genre he would also have known that this change was inevitable following the success of DDO Unlimited and may well have reasoned that this was why the lifetime price was so drastically reduced. However, I accept that he may be a complete newcomer to the genre and therefore wouldn't have known those things, although frankly I doubt it.
I accept entirely that he doesn't like it, and that his dislike is borne of a personal hatred of F2P games, which strictly speaking LoTRO isn't going to become anyway, rather it'll be more of a hybrid as there will still be a subscription option, but that doesn't make it "total fraud" as the OP is claiming.
As someone with two lifetime accounts I have looked carefully at the package on offer, and I am perfectly happy with it. It looks to me like I'll gain from it rather than lose by it. I too would have been unhappy at the sales practice of Turbine/Codemasters still offering the lifetime deal when they knew the business model was about to change if they weren't intending to offer at least as good a deal if not better to Lifers than formed the basis of that original deal but that is what they are doing and I'm happy with that. Total fraud it is not.
No, Alberel is right.
It isn't fraud, because there was no actual lie.
But in contract law, witholding pertinent information can constitute misrepresentation.
The facts.
1) Free-to-play and subscription games are very different. Item shops are positively loathed by a lot of players and many players who would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub wouldn't touch a free-to-play game with a ten-foot-pole.
2) Turbine ran a special offer, selling the lifetime subs at reduced cost just prior to switching to a free-to-play model. That's EXTREMELY suspicious. It's as if they knew that was the lifetime subscription was going to be FAR less appealing after the switch.
I don't know if there's enough there to win a case because laws vary from place to place. But the OP is right to be angry and to seek legal advice.
Except that competent legal advice from an attorney that would have the relevant expertise with respect to contract law and software licensing would cost a hell of a lot more than any potential losses that the OP thinks he's suffered. It would be the height of idiocy to talk to an attorney for what amounts to someone not liking a legitimate, perfectly legal change that a game developer made to their subscription model.
Also, the fact that Turbine is announcing this months before it goes into effect? That shows good faith on their part, since customers are being given plenty of public notice of impending changes that haven't happened yet. All the people crying doom and gloom now should take that into consideration, since any lawyer or courtroom would do the same thing. They're telling you in advance so you can decide if you want a part of it or not.
Which is why I earlier suggested that if there's any kind of free legal or consumer advice service in his area, that he use that.
And while the change to the subscription model itself might be "perfectly legal", the circumstances under which the OP purchased the lifetime subscription are suspect for the reasons I outlined.
So as I said, the OP is right to be angry and to seek legal advice.
Well Alberel is maybe partially correct. The game hasn't actually changed for VIPs. As of now, it's set to play the same as it always has. The real problem is it has the potential to change more rapidly than it did before. I mean the lifers were also unhappy about adventure packs and paying for a expansion they saw as barely more than a book update and lacking one book update.
In any event, I think the OP has the right to be unhappy, and question their tactics. 2 weeks ago Turbine certainly knew this was going to happen. On the other hand, the OP could be pleasantly surprised because so far, Turbine is bending over backwards for VIPs.
parrotpholk-Because we all know the miracle patch fairy shows up the night before release and sprinkles magic dust on the server to make it allllll better.
some of you guys that recently bought the lifetime sub can just do a charge back you have like 30 days to do so i think right?
i don't know if you could call it fraud technicly, but in the very least it was a very shitty thing to do on thier part. they SHOULD have waited to offer that deal AFTER they released the info about the game going F2P. it would have saved them the head ache and bad rep this is giving them. the ONLY reason they would have the offer a couple weeks prior to the announcement was to( like it or not) scam a few more people that wouldn't have other wise bought it after they annouced the F2P model.
i'm sure some people still woulda have bought the life sub after they knew it was going to have a F2P model included but its obvious some wouldn't have.
honestly you should stop complaining completely they could have shut the game down completely and you'd still be screwed out of your money ... read terms of service before you decide to buy. As I've stated before this game could have been completely shut down just weeks after you went and bought your lifetime sub and it's something you agreed to, and yes this does allow them to change their payment models as well.
------------------------------
We don't have a great war in our generation, or a great depression, but we do, we have a great war of the spirit. We have a great revolution against the culture. The great depression is our lives.
~Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
They're not suspect at all. These changes have been announced months in advance of them taking effect. That counts for a lot.
This isn't SWG changing their entire game mechanic without any notice to their players at all, and within days of a paid expansion going live. THAT was a legitimate gripe. This is a developer introducing a subscription model that has already proven successful in one game to another one of their titles, and giving their paying customers MONTHS of notice before it actually happens.
So they had a sale on Lifetime subs then announced this. Big deal. That kind of stuff happens all the time in the real world. Say, for example, that you go and buy a new car. Two weeks later you find out that a sale on your make and model will be coming up in three months. Are you going to blame the dealer for having a sale in three months, or are you going to accept that you paid for something that someone else will get for a lower price down the line?
It's called caveat emptor. People really need to learn it and embrace it. You may not like a change that a game developer is making, but that doesn't automatically mean you have any standing to drag them to court or talk to a lawyer. Perspective helps, especially when there's nothing illegal or untoward happening here, and Turbine is giving people plenty of time to ask questions and come to terms with this new change.
You're making the mistake of confusing the new LoTRO with a purely free to play game. You state that some players would happily pay a monthly or lifetime sub without acknowledging that that is precisely what they will still be able to do with LoTRO. If some players doesn't want to use the cash shop they don't have to, they can pay the monthly or lifetime sub and automatically get all the content they already enjoy. They won't miss out on any significant content except future expansions which aren't included in their current package anyway. If there are items that might be considered significant then Turbine/Codemasters have covered that by giving subscribers free points with which to buy those items, so the players aren't losing out. The courts won't regard personal preferences in relation to cash shops as constituting a valid point in law, the facility has been provided and it is entirely up to the customer whether he chooses to make use of it or not.
This is in no way as bad as the NGE change on SWG back in 2005. It completely changed the game to a FPS, and removed professions they were still showing future updates on, which was not happening. And gave only 10 days notice
People even paid £100 annual subscription, and still did not get those fees refunded.
There is absolutley nothing wrong with this F2P scheme. At first I thought It was going to be Free to Play, and everyone would not need to spend any money, but when looking at all the costs involved, the F2P scheme here is nothing more than a glorified free trial, which all P2P games have.
Star Trek Online - Best Free MMORPG of 2012
That's absolute rubbish. Your analogy is terrible. LoTRO didn't offer a lifetime subscription sale and then announce LOTRO 2 was about to be launched.
Consumers have rights. And in this case Turbine clearly knew that the lifetime subscription was going to be much less appealing after switching to the free-to-play model and ran the sale accordingly.
That's really dirty. Whether it constitutes contractual misrepresentation or some other breach of law will depend on the local laws - which I don't know.
But I hope the OP does follow it up or does what abyss suggested and cancel the charge on his credit card.
I don't know anything about contract law. Now bankrupcy law i know. In bankrupcy law you must turn in your credit cards at least 90 days before you file. The reason is simple it is called fraud to use them and then file. Those laws were changed a couple of years back as some folks were always running it up then filing the next day, and new they were filing.
This is the same thing almost. Proving they knew they were going to ftp while offering a lifetime is going to be the issue. That will take discovery, that in itself will be a lawsuit unto its own. So they will first have to sue and get and injunction by a judge to get the discovery documents. Once that happens if they find proof that there was delierate attempts at fraud then another law suit can be filed. However my first step would be with the SEC, get them involved and the lawyers who approved the merger of WB/Turbine. No mater what your going to do your going to need a great contract lawyer as WB has deep pockets and contacts that go all the way up the food chain, and it will be ugly and take years to resolve.
The thing to do now would be get a bench warent that issued and injunction to stop the payment change plans from going forward. That takes you back into contract law not my area of knowing to much.
If you want to create a real stink contact your senator and complain that the merger lead to this and it looks like fraud that might get something rolling. Nothing like have the senate to call you in to explain.
So people are telling him to cancel the charge via his credit card company everyone, which are the people against the change etc etc etc, yet the op is not taking responsibility for his own actions or being misinformed from his own doing?
------------------------------
We don't have a great war in our generation, or a great depression, but we do, we have a great war of the spirit. We have a great revolution against the culture. The great depression is our lives.
~Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
No, no mistake on my part.
I read all the details about their plan. I know how it's going to work.
That doesn't change the fact that many players wouldn't touch a free-to-play game or one with an item mall with a ten foot pole. There's no way I'd ever consider subscribing to DDO or LOTRO now purely because of the payment models.
As a consumer, that's my prerogative. It's the OP's as well - or would have been if Turbine hadn't done this bait and switch.
And if this wasn't the case, why run this special offer just before making the switch?
The Lifetime subscriptions are not less appealing. Even with this announcement I would still pay for the Lifetime subs even at full price, let alone half price.
F2P customers will have to pay more than Lifetime subs or montjly subs, if they want to experience the same game.
All MMOs have free trials with restrictions to gameplay, and people still pay the subs as don't want to be restricted.
Star Trek Online - Best Free MMORPG of 2012
Exactly how is a Lifetime sub less appealing in this new model? You get everything the game has to offer AND 500 Turbine points a month for the entire life of the game, and for a single price. That's hardly a bad deal at all.
For a consumer that's coming in new to LOTRO, it would actually be MORE appealing, not less. All they have to do is pay one price and never have to deal with monthly fees or spend a single dime again if they don't want to? Done and done. For existing Lifetime subs, like mine, it's a sweet deal. Nothing actually changes in the current sub and you get extras.
I really think the people complaining about this don't understand the gaming market anymore. This isn't 2004. Things have changed. Consumers might have rights, but they've ALSO shown game developers that they're perfectly open to these newer subscription and pricing models and the developers are reacting accordingly.
If someone is upset and can still get a chargeback on their credit card, then do it. If you can't, then just deal with it, or cancel your sub and move on.
No it isn't, and the rest of your scenario is pure fantasy.
Turbine are giving their customers MONTHS of public notice about this change to their subscription model. That alone counts for a hell of a lot. They're being open about what is happening, and they are answering questions long before anything ever goes into effect.
This isn't some guy charging $250,000 on credit cards then filing bankruptcy so he doesn't have to pay them. This is a game developer applying an already successful -- and LEGAL -- subscription model that they already use for one game to another one of their titles, and giving their paying customers plenty of time to get the answers they need before it happens.
It would be better if they didn't do the offer?
Buying Lifetime subs is always risky, and them being on offer should have raised the red alert.
If the OP was so against F2P then should have considered it a possibility that this may happen.
Changing the payment model of the game is no where near as bad as cahnges that have happened to other games, and there is still 3 or 4 months left before it changes, so if didn't go for lifetime sub then still would have paid £40 until it did. Then play game for 3 or 4 more months, and see if game is as bad as he thinks, and then the payment for the LT sub will be paid and used up, as though paid monthly.
Star Trek Online - Best Free MMORPG of 2012