Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Really low performance?

CPU: E6850 C2D, OC'd @ 3.6GHz

GPU: 8800 GTS 512, OC'd with shader clock @ 730 and memory clock @ 1000

RAM: 2GB @ 800MHz

OS: XP Pro & 7 Ultimate

 

...and my performance is really low, even on the lowest graphical settings. My PC is about 3 years old and it's not really anything special by todays standards, but even with all of the fancy graphics options turned off/down to low, I'm barely achieving 20 fps in that Limsa Lominsa place. The game is also stuttering all of the time, and the NPCs and player models are always slow to load on the screen. I was just wondering, is this normal?

I mean, I thought that my performance would be higher than this, since I scored a 3.5k on the benchmark...

[3000-4499] Fairly High Performance Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance.

I'm not even sure what the "default" settings are, since everything in the graphical options menu was automatically put on to the high/highest settings (which brought my PC down to its knees when I got in to the game).

Comments

  • Shoko_LiedShoko_Lied Member UncommonPosts: 2,193

    Originally posted by nekrothing

    CPU: E6850 C2D, OC'd @ 3.6GHz

    GPU: 8800 GTS 512, OC'd with shader clock @ 730 and memory clock @ 1000

    RAM: 2GB @ 800MHz

    OS: XP Pro & 7 Ultimate

     

    ...and my performance is really low, even on the lowest graphical settings. My PC is about 3 years old and it's not really anything special by todays standards, but even with all of the fancy graphics options turned off/down to low, I'm barely achieving 20 fps in that Limsa Lominsa place. The game is also stuttering all of the time, and the NPCs and player models are always slow to load on the screen. I was just wondering, is this normal?

    I mean, I thought that my performance would be higher than this, since I scored a 3.5k on the benchmark...

    [3000-4499] Fairly High Performance Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance.

    I'm not even sure what the "default" settings are, since everything in the graphical options menu was automatically put on to the high/highest settings (which brought my PC down to its knees when I got in to the game).

    You scored higher than me on both my resolution benchmarks... And every peice of hardware I have is better than yours. 5770, q6600, 8gig... Shows how accurate the shitty benchmark is.

  • jdnewelljdnewell Member UncommonPosts: 2,237

    I am not playing FF yet but my opinion is that you could use another 2gb RAM and upgrade your video card to something a step or 2 above the 8800.

    Maybe a 5750 or somthing along those lines.

    Just a suggestion. Good luck and I hope your problem gets fixed. =)

  • DignaDigna Member UncommonPosts: 1,994

    My PC scored 450 on the high res benchmark and 1200-1300 o the low. I am running the game fine at med/high settings.

  • PresbytierPresbytier Member UncommonPosts: 424

    My PC has gotten three scores: one at about 400 one at 2500 and one just over 3000.

    "Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game."-Guybrush Threepwood
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me."-Hunter S. Thompson

  • nekrothingnekrothing Member Posts: 302

    Still not having any luck. I tried putting that buffer size thing down to a quarter (the game was unplayable with this setting, but I just wanted to see how it would run), but it still ran very badly.

    Also, unfortunately, with the OC on my CPU, I can't add anymore RAM. If I do, the OC become unstable. It doesn't really matter though, since on the lowest settings, my RAM usage only goes up to 1.1GB.

  • DignaDigna Member UncommonPosts: 1,994

    You are dual booting. Have you tried installing to both OS(s)?

     

    And are your vid drivers current?

  • nekrothingnekrothing Member Posts: 302

    Originally posted by Digna

    You are dual booting. Have you tried installing to both OS(s)?

     

    And are your vid drivers current?

    Yeah, I've tried running it on both 7 and XP, and the performance is about the same. My drivers are also current for my GPU, my chipset, my BIOS, and my sound device. I also have the latest physx software and DirectX as well.

  • RelGnRelGn Member Posts: 494

    man your rig is lower than my laptop.Lol.

    You better buy a new pc.

    My laptop cant run this game even at low.

    Also your shaders are very low i think

    Hopefuly im getting an xtreme rig in few days cause my laptop cant play anything now.

    image
  • DignaDigna Member UncommonPosts: 1,994

    You aren't runnng it over a wireless connecton, correct? I only ask because a friend tried it....

  • nekrothingnekrothing Member Posts: 302

    Originally posted by Digna

    You aren't runnng it over a wireless connecton, correct? I only ask because a friend tried it....

    Nope, my PC is hooked up directly to my modem.

  • SatansPuppetSatansPuppet Member Posts: 55
    This is what I'm dreading... My PC is over min spec and vie ordered a new graphics card but I remain concerned :(

    Gonna rape the ram from another pc and install it while I'm putting in the new gfx card,.. :)
  • DignaDigna Member UncommonPosts: 1,994

    Originally posted by nekrothing

    Originally posted by Digna

    You aren't runnng it over a wireless connecton, correct? I only ask because a friend tried it....

    Nope, my PC is hooked up directly to my modem.

     

    Have you tried dropping your firewall and disabling your AV software (short term trial only!)

  • nekrothingnekrothing Member Posts: 302

    Originally posted by Digna

    Originally posted by nekrothing


    Originally posted by Digna

    You aren't runnng it over a wireless connecton, correct? I only ask because a friend tried it....

    Nope, my PC is hooked up directly to my modem.

     

    Have you tried dropping your firewall and disabling your AV software (short term trial only!)

    Yeah, I tried allowing anything with the words "FFXIV" in it through both my firewall and AV, afterwhich, I went ahead and disabled both my firewall and AV after adding exceptions for both of them (just to be sure they don't cause any problems).

  • DignaDigna Member UncommonPosts: 1,994

    YOu have 2 OS(s) so I assume 2 seperate partitions. Adequate free space and room for a large pagefile on each?

  • nekrothingnekrothing Member Posts: 302

    Originally posted by Digna

    YOu have 2 OS(s) so I assume 2 seperate partitions. Adequate free space and room for a large pagefile on each?

    Two separate hard drives, actually. Windows 7 is on my 640GB HD, and and XP is on my 250GB HD. There's also enough free space on both of them.

  • weslubowweslubow Member UncommonPosts: 163

    Minimum requirements say a gforce 9600 or higher. I believe this is the problem.

  • DignaDigna Member UncommonPosts: 1,994

    Originally posted by nekrothing

    Originally posted by Digna

    YOu have 2 OS(s) so I assume 2 seperate partitions. Adequate free space and room for a large pagefile on each?

    Two separate hard drives, actually. Windows 7 is on my 640GB HD, and and XP is on my 250GB HD. There's also enough free space on both of them.

     

    Sorry mate. I'm out of ideas short of moving parts out.

  • mmonoobletmmonooblet Member Posts: 336

    You're being held back by a) your video card, and b) only 2 gb ram.

  • BeansnBreadBeansnBread Member EpicPosts: 7,254

    Originally posted by nekrothing

    CPU: E6850 C2D, OC'd @ 3.6GHz

    GPU: 8800 GTS 512, OC'd with shader clock @ 730 and memory clock @ 1000

    RAM: 2GB @ 800MHz

    OS: XP Pro & 7 Ultimate

     

    ...and my performance is really low, even on the lowest graphical settings. My PC is about 3 years old and it's not really anything special by todays standards, but even with all of the fancy graphics options turned off/down to low, I'm barely achieving 20 fps in that Limsa Lominsa place. The game is also stuttering all of the time, and the NPCs and player models are always slow to load on the screen. I was just wondering, is this normal?

    I mean, I thought that my performance would be higher than this, since I scored a 3.5k on the benchmark...

    [3000-4499] Fairly High Performance Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance.

    I'm not even sure what the "default" settings are, since everything in the graphical options menu was automatically put on to the high/highest settings (which brought my PC down to its knees when I got in to the game).

    I basically have your system with 4 gigs of RAM instead of 2. The benchmark scored me at 1150.

     

    I have no clue how you got that high on the benchmark with your system.

  • nekrothingnekrothing Member Posts: 302

    Originally posted by colddog04

    I basically have your system with 4 gigs of RAM instead of 2. The benchmark scored me at 1150.

     

    I have no clue how you got that high on the benchmark with your system.

    Was that on high or low? Because my 3.5k score was on low (couldn't even run high, since my monitor doesn't support the high res).

     


    Originally posted by weslubow

    Minimum requirements say a gforce 9600 or higher. I believe this is the problem.

    The 8800 GTS 512 is more high-end than the 9600. From what I understand, its performance is more close to the 9800GTX. I also have it OC'd as well.

     


    Originally posted by mmonooblet

    You're being held back by a) your video card, and b) only 2 gb ram.

    Video card, maybe, but not my RAM. My RAM usage is peaking at 1.1GB in the crowded parts of Limsa Lominsa.

  • elihupelihup Member Posts: 102

    Like others have said, you need more memory and a better video card. 

    There is no way that you should have gotten a 3500 even on low with that PC.  I dont know what was up with that.

    image

  • FortencFortenc Member Posts: 427

    I'm finding that the retail client has far better optimization than the beta.  I can run it with 16x and AO on now, and wow.  It looks.. ridiculous.

    Objectivity is delivered with a lack of personality made for the mainstream but never used for the mainstream.

Sign In or Register to comment.