Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

BIG ISSUE: Auto renewal and the Terms of Service (TOS)

1235

Comments

  • ohioastroohioastro Member UncommonPosts: 534

    Do you have any answer to the obvious counterexamples - namely, the numerous people (like me) who had no charges?  Or the people who canceled without being charged an extra month?

    I want to turn this around: what are the motives of the people pushing this sort of smear?

  • RusqueRusque Member RarePosts: 2,785
    Originally posted by Bigdaddyx
    Originally posted by kage71
    Originally posted by JeroKane
    Originally posted by kage71
     

    This change in itself is a prime example of a company that knows that "validation of a credit card" and "authorization charge" are two different terms. Validation of a credit does not mean they have to pend a person account for any reason. Validation on means to show that the account exist. A person can have a credit card/debt card without any money to back it up however this card is still in fact valid, it is valid without funds yet still valid. What they are trying to do is exactly the following:

    For credit cards, debit cards and PayPal there is no charge made until after your included 30 days of game time has expired. For these payment methods, there is an authorization check performed to ensure the payment method is valid. You may see a temporary account authorization hold put on funds in your account while the verification completes.

    The underlined above: why exactly does a person who buys a game and it comes with 30 days of free time have to show any proof of having a payment valid? This is not a statement that should apply to anyone who purchase a game that comes with 30 days of free time or any amount of time until the due date is close.

    Ever heard of Credit Card fraud? Credit Cards that get stolen?

    The authorization charge is to check the card is legal and tied to the person in question and not blocked due to fraud / Theft!

    It's a Security messure! Plain and simple!

    And it's for our own protection! And if they don't do this, we would see these exact same threads appear With People raging how EVIL Zenimax is, With bad Security, not checking Cards to be valid.... yada yada!

     

    TDLR: A Company can never do anything right! There are always trolls....ehh People finding something to rage and complain about!

    /FACEPALM

    Checking to make sure a card does not mean that a company should place a charge such as this regardless. You are so missing the point here. A company can still validate a card without pending someone's credit card period. This is used when a person makes a pre order also. Have you ever been to Gamestop or any other gaming company online and made a purchase? Do they Pend your account for the full amount? Dude I purchased the $99 collection edition of this game and I know first of all they would not accept my money at all until they shipped the product out. However the only thing that was charge was $5 dollars to the account in the first place. This is a plain and simple way of a company doing this exact thing by charging $1-$5 dollars to someone who is using a credit card online. Not by Pending an account for an entire sub. 

     

    This is not a security measure at all however what this did was only hurt their business. I can afford to pay for this game it does not matter to me. Yet I am not willing to just hand over my credit card to a company who is only promoting a "Bait and Switch" type of ToS. I will give you a plain example on how this company really is destroying their own subscription base:

    I received my box today (ended up having to order it late due to real life issues) I already told my girlfriend I was going to sub for 6 months because I can't stand the 1 month type of bills that always seem to come around too fast while gaming. So I went to input my code and give my information and here is where I was stopped dead in my tracks. While a few people are complaining about $15 this 6 months sub is at $77 dollars. Now what does my subscription have to do with the validation of my credit card is beyond me. I have seen people time and time again trying to say that all game companies are doing this and it is a lie. All a validation (like I said before and it is evident you missed it or didn't read it) is to show that this is your card and this can be handled by pending a card with $1 amount.

    This $1 amount also saves the company the problem of refunding someone's cash in case this is a stolen card. What's the difference if you find out if someone steals your card and uses it to play a game. On one hand they use it to Pend a game for $77 dollars and on the other hand they uses it to Pend it for $1? The difference is you will raise much more hell with a $77 dollar Pend on a stolen account than one with $1.

    Now if this is actually the case the what do you have to say about a person who is not using a card? Are you going to do the childish /facepalm again? So the ToS is telling players who don't have a card that they would have to go and purchase a gamecard just to use their 30 day access. Does this seem like they are still trying to validate anything here? I mean seriously dude what are they validating with someone who has neither debit or credit card? Yet this person still have to buy the game go and purchase a game card just to use the free 30 days and if they don't like the game then what? They don't get the refund for this money they spent on the game card. So you see the holes in your story?

    You select part of what I had to say yet you failed to even mention any parts of the (UPDATE) that was even listed in their website. Yes they are changing their minds on the way this is being handled and no they did not do it right in the first place. And why would people complain? Because they are paying for something and feel as if they are in a shady business deal which is very much wrong.

    Very nice post.

    No wonder not even one of the usual defenders of Zenimax  bothered to reply to your post because they know you are right.

    There's nothing to "defend". They set up a poor billing system and anyone who is impacted by it can have it fixed by contacting customer service. The idea that a software company spent years and hundreds of thousands of man-hours creating a game just so they could run a credit card scheme is asinine.

    Whoever created the system is likely getting reamed or fired for the bad PR it's caused.

    Yes they can pre-authorize for $1 or less. Whichever accountant came up with charging the full amount is clearly a rere.

     

  • Pratt2112Pratt2112 Member UncommonPosts: 1,636
    Originally posted by ohioastro

    Do you have any answer to the obvious counterexamples - namely, the numerous people (like me) who had no charges?  Or the people who canceled without being charged an extra month?

    I want to turn this around: what are the motives of the people pushing this sort of smear?

    To warn people that it can happen, and has happened, perhaps?

    Because it didn't happen to you personally doesn't mean it hasn't happened to anyone else. 

    And so long as it has happened to some people, then it is true and, hence, not a 'smear'.

    I realize there are people who are going to try and defend Zenimax against any and all criticism, spinning any situation any way they can think of to try and make sure Zeni comes out smelling like a rose every time - every MMO has these people, including ESO. 

    However, if you're going to accuse people of "smearing" the company, make sure you're at least using the term correctly.

  • BigdaddyxBigdaddyx Member UncommonPosts: 2,039
    Originally posted by Rusque

     

    There's nothing to "defend". They set up a poor billing system and anyone who is impacted by it can have it fixed by contacting customer service. The idea that a software company spent years and hundreds of thousands of man-hours creating a game just so they could run a credit card scheme is asinine.

    Whoever created the system is likely getting reamed or fired for the bad PR it's caused.

    Yes they can pre-authorize for $1 or less. Whichever accountant came up with charging the full amount is clearly a rere.

     

    If you read all the topics related to this issue, you will realise that other than usual trolls no one is even entertaining this idea.The guy i quoted doesn't believe that. However he did explain his point regarding why it is not a usual practise and that pre authorisation can also be done without taking money from your account.

    Honestly, the more the fans try to defend Zenimax more this issue will escalate. Since the very first topic regarding this came up..fans have been making excuses for the company and bashing those who are upset about being charged.

    Even now you can see same people are trying to make it look as if there is some kind of agenda behind these complaints. that is how deluded they are.

    So i doubt this is going to calm down that easily.

  • BetaBlockaBetaBlocka Member Posts: 222
    Originally posted by TangentPoint
    Originally posted by ohioastro

    Do you have any answer to the obvious counterexamples - namely, the numerous people (like me) who had no charges?  Or the people who canceled without being charged an extra month?

    I want to turn this around: what are the motives of the people pushing this sort of smear?

    To warn people that it can happen, and has happened, perhaps?

    Because it didn't happen to you personally doesn't mean it hasn't happened to anyone else. 

    And so long as it has happened to some people, then it is true and, hence, not a 'smear'.

    I realize there are people who are going to try and defend Zenimax against any and all criticism, spinning any situation any way they can think of to try and make sure Zeni comes out smelling like a rose every time - every MMO has these people, including ESO. 

    However, if you're going to accuse people of "smearing" the company, make sure you're at least using the term correctly.

    Exactly.

     

    It's not s "smear" if this is actually happening, and it is. Just becuase this issue has not affected 6 or so regular defenders on this forum (which as we all know represents a tiny fraction of the overall playerbase) does not mean it has not happened to thousands and thousands of others. Something those defending this have no way of knowing.

     

    So it's more a public service announcement than anything else. Only very paranoid individuals would see this as attacking their game rather than highlighting the pitfalls associated with a problematic billing system.

  • gervaise1gervaise1 Member EpicPosts: 6,919
    Originally posted by ohioastro

    Do you have any answer to the obvious counterexamples - namely, the numerous people (like me) who had no charges?  Or the people who canceled without being charged an extra month?

    I want to turn this around: what are the motives of the people pushing this sort of smear?

    Why do you see this as a smear - which suggest some untruth; what Kartelli has posted are TESO's T&Cs.

    It  hasn't happened to you - fine - so why are they there? Kartelli - and others - have had problems and possibly these T&Cs could be used to make things more difficult for people. Possibly because they probably won't stand up in the EU, US though hmmm ...

    Like I say above, if they have no basis, if there is no intention to use them; if they will never be used change the T&Cs and make them clearer. 

    WoWs T&Cs for example are radically different (cancel any time if requested, pro-rata refund based on time played / time left.)

  • killion81killion81 Member UncommonPosts: 995
    Originally posted by gervaise1

    IF this will never happen ....

    IF this is not what Zenimax are saying ...

    IF this is not what Zenimax have done today ....

    IF the EULA is simply badly worded ......

     

    THEN Zenimax should just change their EULA.

     

    Otherwise tomorrow ......

     

     

     

    It's this exactly.  It's the fact that they CAN do it and they have already notified you and you agreed to it.

     

    Lets take a ridiculous example and see how it sounds.  If someone puts a gun to your head, they CAN shoot and kill you or they can decide not to.  If they simply decide not to, is it ok that they ever put a gun to your head?  Nothing happened, so it should be fine, right (or so it would seem following the logic in some of these posts)?  

     

    Yes, I know that the ZOS ToS are no where near the severity of this example, but if you want an analogy, ZOS is essentially holding the gun to it's customer's head.  They can decide if they want to pull the trigger at any time and you have already agreed that it's ok whatever they decide to do.  That's the whole problem.  The door is open.  If ZOS has no intention of following the wording in their ToS, they should change the ToS.

  • BigdaddyxBigdaddyx Member UncommonPosts: 2,039
    Originally posted by Dewguy79
    Originally posted by BetaBlocka
    Originally posted by TangentPoint
    Originally posted by ohioastro

    Do you have any answer to the obvious counterexamples - namely, the numerous people (like me) who had no charges?  Or the people who canceled without being charged an extra month?

    I want to turn this around: what are the motives of the people pushing this sort of smear?

    To warn people that it can happen, and has happened, perhaps?

    Because it didn't happen to you personally doesn't mean it hasn't happened to anyone else. 

    And so long as it has happened to some people, then it is true and, hence, not a 'smear'.

    I realize there are people who are going to try and defend Zenimax against any and all criticism, spinning any situation any way they can think of to try and make sure Zeni comes out smelling like a rose every time - every MMO has these people, including ESO. 

    However, if you're going to accuse people of "smearing" the company, make sure you're at least using the term correctly.

    Exactly.

     

    It's not s "smear" if this is actually happening, and it is. Just becuase this issue has not affected 6 or so regular defenders on this forum (which as we all know represents a tiny fraction of the overall playerbase) does not mean it has not happened to thousands and thousands of others. Something those defending this have no way of knowing.

     

    So it's more a public service announcement than anything else. Only very paranoid individuals would see this as attacking their game rather than highlighting the pitfalls associated with a problematic billing system.

    And because the 6 or so most vocal about this have been bashing eso for months and were very vocal about their displeasure it had sub to begin with.  We all know that a small percentage of those who regularly bash and hate on a video game actually play the game.  So because a few have said that this has happened doesn't mean hundreds of thousands have not had this issue .  

    No only very paranoid individuals are those who hate on and bash a video game they don't play.  

    Do you even read the nonsense you post?

    Even if it is few hundred people doesn't mean the problem should be just shrugged off. What kind of stupid logic is this? a problem is only more relevant if it happens to everyone?

    Go have a look at the official customer care forums and you will see how many people have been effected by this.

  • GravargGravarg Member UncommonPosts: 3,424
    Give me a break people.  I swear I'm going to have to stop coming to gaming sites.  Everyone has devolved into a bashing hypocrites that will make up and find any little thing negative to say.  This one just takes the cake.
  • BigdaddyxBigdaddyx Member UncommonPosts: 2,039
    Originally posted by Gravarg
    Give me a break people.  I swear I'm going to have to stop coming to gaming sites.  Everyone has devolved into a bashing hypocrites that will make up and find any little thing negative to say.  This one just takes the cake.

    Yeah i think you should visit official ESO forums i heard everything is fine over there. image

  • GravargGravarg Member UncommonPosts: 3,424
    Originally posted by Bigdaddyx
    Originally posted by Gravarg
    Give me a break people.  I swear I'm going to have to stop coming to gaming sites.  Everyone has devolved into a bashing hypocrites that will make up and find any little thing negative to say.  This one just takes the cake.

    Yeah i think you should visit official ESO forums i heard everything is fine over there. image

    I've been there, it's even worse lol.  I'm just going to play the game that I think is the best game since Vanilla WoW, and the most fun I've had since the first time I stepped foot on the Frontiers of DAoC.  Just ignore all gaming sites for awhile :)

  • RusqueRusque Member RarePosts: 2,785
    Originally posted by Bigdaddyx
    Originally posted by Rusque

     

    There's nothing to "defend". They set up a poor billing system and anyone who is impacted by it can have it fixed by contacting customer service. The idea that a software company spent years and hundreds of thousands of man-hours creating a game just so they could run a credit card scheme is asinine.

    Whoever created the system is likely getting reamed or fired for the bad PR it's caused.

    Yes they can pre-authorize for $1 or less. Whichever accountant came up with charging the full amount is clearly a rere.

     

    If you read all the topics related to this issue, you will realise that other than usual trolls no one is even entertaining this idea.The guy i quoted doesn't believe that. However he did explain his point regarding why it is not a usual practise and that pre authorisation can also be done without taking money from your account.

    Honestly, the more the fans try to defend Zenimax more this issue will escalate. Since the very first topic regarding this came up..fans have been making excuses for the company and bashing those who are upset about being charged.

    Even now you can see same people are trying to make it look as if there is some kind of agenda behind these complaints. that is how deluded they are.

    So i doubt this is going to calm down that easily.

    He says it feels as if he's in a shady business deal and people are generally acting like this is was an intentional attempt to charge people before their 30 days. That's why I said what I said. Not only that, but ZOS has already shown good faith by giving early access folks 2 extra days before official billing starts due to downtime during early access.

    Like I said, there's nothing to defend here because it is what it is, a poorly thought out and set up system and ZOS has already commented saying that people will indeed get their 30 days for free and that if their billing system has caused a problem for you to contact them and they will fix it.

    Basically I'm not sure what exactly it is you (general you) want them to do. It seems like it would be more work on everyone's (players and ZOS) part for them to wipe all transactions and make everyone re-enter their card in order to be charged a $1 pre-auth fee instead. May as well let the pre-auth process complete itself and troubleshoot individuals on a case by case basis.

    Honestly, I'm not on the side of ZOS (and I will openly admit that I'm a fanboy of ESO itself - as a game), but all I see are people piling on about what I can only say is a resolved issue. Unless people are offering solutions, it amounts to bashing for the sake of bashing (and even if you're not intending to do that, you're opening it up to trolls who have not purchased ESO at all to come in and make claims about how they're being screwed just because they want to see another game fail).

     

     

  • BigdaddyxBigdaddyx Member UncommonPosts: 2,039
    Originally posted by Dewguy79
    Originally posted by Bigdaddyx
    Originally posted by Dewguy79
    Originally posted by BetaBlocka
    Originally posted by TangentPoint
    Originally posted by ohioastro

    Do you have any answer to the obvious counterexamples - namely, the numerous people (like me) who had no charges?  Or the people who canceled without being charged an extra month?

    I want to turn this around: what are the motives of the people pushing this sort of smear?

    To warn people that it can happen, and has happened, perhaps?

    Because it didn't happen to you personally doesn't mean it hasn't happened to anyone else. 

    And so long as it has happened to some people, then it is true and, hence, not a 'smear'.

    I realize there are people who are going to try and defend Zenimax against any and all criticism, spinning any situation any way they can think of to try and make sure Zeni comes out smelling like a rose every time - every MMO has these people, including ESO. 

    However, if you're going to accuse people of "smearing" the company, make sure you're at least using the term correctly.

    Exactly.

     

    It's not s "smear" if this is actually happening, and it is. Just becuase this issue has not affected 6 or so regular defenders on this forum (which as we all know represents a tiny fraction of the overall playerbase) does not mean it has not happened to thousands and thousands of others. Something those defending this have no way of knowing.

     

    So it's more a public service announcement than anything else. Only very paranoid individuals would see this as attacking their game rather than highlighting the pitfalls associated with a problematic billing system.

    And because the 6 or so most vocal about this have been bashing eso for months and were very vocal about their displeasure it had sub to begin with.  We all know that a small percentage of those who regularly bash and hate on a video game actually play the game.  So because a few have said that this has happened doesn't mean hundreds of thousands have not had this issue .  

    No only very paranoid individuals are those who hate on and bash a video game they don't play.  

    Do you even read the nonsense you post?

    Even if it is few hundred people doesn't mean the problem should be just shrugged off. What kind of stupid logic is this? a problem is only more relevant if it happens to everyone?

    Go have a look at the official customer care forums and you will see how many people have been effected by this.

    I never said it has not happened I'm saying it's not this HUGE DEAL that required some to make new accounts and act like it's some huge game breaking deal.

     Every game with a hundred thousand or a million players will have issues and some billing issues.  Instead of trying to smear it like some are why didnt the op post a link on how to contact customer service and correct the issue that has happened to a small percentage?  Why only act like it's some horrible unfixable issue?  Well those are two easy answers cause some have an agenda that's why.  

    Here is the problem. More you will tell people that their problem is insignificant or that it is not a big deal more they will retaliate. it is for not you to decide whose problem is bigger and smaller.

    As far as OP is concerned even i didn't know about EULA and i have been playing ESO since beta. He is simply trying to inform people about it..that is what these forums are for... to share information.

  • GravargGravarg Member UncommonPosts: 3,424
    Just and FYI, if you read any EULA, ToS, etc.  They all basically say things like this.  It's to cover their butts.  They all basically say, "We can do whatever we want, and you won't sue us"  If you haven't noticed that by now, you must be new to computers.  Windows and Mac EULA says that by having their software on your computer they are allowed at anytime to go onto your computer and remove it...
  • ohioastroohioastro Member UncommonPosts: 534
    Originally posted by Bigdaddyx
    Originally posted by Gravarg
    Give me a break people.  I swear I'm going to have to stop coming to gaming sites.  Everyone has devolved into a bashing hypocrites that will make up and find any little thing negative to say.  This one just takes the cake.

    Yeah i think you should visit official ESO forums i heard everything is fine over there. image

     

    I've seen game launches with actual problems, and I know what an official forum looks like for such a game.  There were reportedly something like 5 million people who tried the beta.  I have no idea what the subscription rate is, but I'd be shocked if it wasn't at least hundreds of thousands.  If tens of thousands of people had billing problems the web site would be shut down and unreadable, with every nook and cranny filled with complaints.  Because that's exactly what happened with, for example, Total War Rome 2.   Which had numerous game-ending crashes on release.

    Instead what I'm seeing is entirely typical for normal, relatively smooth launches.  There are always a few people who have problems, and the volume of complaints on the actual forums and the real fan sites is low.  Here, however, there are people who seem to absolutely hate this game and who just move from attack to attack.  After reading this sub-forum and looking at posting histories I fully expect the same people to pop up with some different reason why the game is terrible after this one fades.

    And, no, posting things that are not correct is not providing information.  It's called providing misinformation.

  • venatsvenats Member Posts: 106
    Originally posted by Gravarg
    Just and FYI, if you read any EULA, ToS, etc.  They all basically say things like this.  It's to cover their butts.  They all basically say, "We can do whatever we want, and you won't sue us"  If you haven't noticed that by now, you must be new to computers.  Windows and Mac EULA says that by having their software on your computer they are allowed at anytime to go onto your computer and remove it...

    You should probably read other EULAs...

  • BigdaddyxBigdaddyx Member UncommonPosts: 2,039
    Originally posted by ohioastro
    Originally posted by Bigdaddyx
    Originally posted by Gravarg
    Give me a break people.  I swear I'm going to have to stop coming to gaming sites.  Everyone has devolved into a bashing hypocrites that will make up and find any little thing negative to say.  This one just takes the cake.

    Yeah i think you should visit official ESO forums i heard everything is fine over there. image

     

    I've seen game launches with actual problems, and I know what an official forum looks like for such a game.  There were reportedly something like 5 million people who tried the beta.  I have no idea what the subscription rate is, but I'd be shocked if it wasn't at least hundreds of thousands.  If tens of thousands of people had billing problems the web site would be shut down and unreadable, with every nook and cranny filled with complaints.  Because that's exactly what happened with, for example, Total War Rome 2.   Which had numerous game-ending crashes on release.

    Instead what I'm seeing is entirely typical for normal, relatively smooth launches.  There are always a few people who have problems, and the volume of complaints on the actual forums and the real fan sites is low.  Here, however, there are people who seem to absolutely hate this game and who just move from attack to attack.  After reading this sub-forum and looking at posting histories I fully expect the same people to pop up with some different reason why the game is terrible after this one fades.

    And, no, posting things that are not correct is not providing information.  It's called providing misinformation.

    Well if you are saying EULA that OP posted is fake then yes it is mis information.

  • DistopiaDistopia Member EpicPosts: 21,183
    Originally posted by Bigdaddyx
     

    Here is the problem. More you will tell people that their problem is insignificant or that it is not a big deal more they will retaliate. it is for not you to decide whose problem is bigger and smaller.

    As far as OP is concerned even i didn't know about EULA and i have been playing ESO since beta. He is simply trying to inform people about it..that is what these forums are for... to share information.

    You might have a point if he didn't try and sway everyone to his interpretation of this whenever someone reads as something different than he's presenting it as.

    "come talk to me if you have questions" or something along those lines comes to mind.

    For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson


  • BetaguyBetaguy Member UncommonPosts: 2,629
    Originally posted by Teala
    Originally posted by SoMuchMass
    Anyone that has a ESO account can try and cancel right now.  When you cancel it specifically says you won't get charged next billing cycle. Don't worry, your money is not going anywhere.  Bethesda is not stupid enough to try and trick people to pay extra money.  If they did that, the Internet would be down on them instead of a dozen or so people right now.

    So you speak for Bethesda?

    He might not speak for them but he is the only logical person in this thread, oh and myself.

    "The King and the Pawn return to the same box at the end of the game"

  • BigbooBigboo Member Posts: 201
    Its a BIG issue that I cant sign up for more than 3 months... :/

    ----

    ----

  • JeroKaneJeroKane Member EpicPosts: 7,096
    Originally posted by bartoni33

    Two quick things:

    On topic: To those that think EULA/ToS are legally binding. They are only binding if they do not try to override any REAL laws, not ones they made up. This ToS would not hold up in court. It is very poorly worded yes. The "at least 30 days" part should not be there.  But they would not make people pay an extra month.

    Off topic: Here is my statement from Paypal showing that they did a hold of the $14.99 and gave it back

    Business Name:   Zenimax Online Studios 
    Email:   paypalEU@zenimaxonline.com

     
    Authorized Amount:   -$14.99 USD
    Fee amount:   $0.00 USD
    Net amount:   -$14.99 USD

     
    Item amount:   $14.99 USD
    Sales Tax:   $0.00 USD
    Shipping:   $0.00 USD
    Handling:   $0.00 USD
    Quantity:   1

     
    Order Description:   30 Days Game Time
    Invoice ID:   655000479239
    Date:   Apr 3, 2014
    Time:   21:21:51 PDT
    Status:   Canceled  
      The seller canceled this payment, and the money has been returned to your account.
    Shipping Address:   No Address Provided

     
     
    Business Contact Information
     
    Customer Service URL: http://www.zenimaxonline.com
    Customer Service Email:   paypalEU@zenimaxonline.com
    Customer Service Phone:   855-296-3170

    That's exactly how mine showed as well. They did an Auth charge that was canceled at same moment. So no actual charge was made!

     

  • killion81killion81 Member UncommonPosts: 995

    ITT a bunch of people that can't tell the difference between Terms of Service worded in a way that leaves the door wide open for Zenimax to take advantage of it's customers and the pre-authorization issue.

     

    This issue has nothing to do with the preauth.  It also has nothing to do with some desire for ESO to fail.  What it IS about is highlighting text in the Terms of Service that leave the consumer wide open for good bending over.  If Zenimax has no intention of bending its customers over, they should just change or remove that line of the Terms of Service.  Minimally they should explain what it means in plain English.

     

    Anyone arguing against this is essentially supporting Zenimax's ability to screw over consumers by their Terms of Service.  Even if you are the biggest ESO fanboy there is, you should be able to see that this isn't an "ESO sucks" or "I want ZOS to fail" issue.  In fact, changing the Terms of Service to more customer friendly text is GOOD for both the game and Zenimax as a company.

  • JeroKaneJeroKane Member EpicPosts: 7,096
    Originally posted by killion81

    ITT a bunch of people that can't tell the difference between Terms of Service worded in a way that leaves the door wide open for Zenimax to take advantage of it's customers and the pre-authorization issue.

     

    This issue has nothing to do with the preauth.  It also has nothing to do with some desire for ESO to fail.  What it IS about is highlighting text in the Terms of Service that leave the consumer wide open for good bending over.  If Zenimax has no intention of bending its customers over, they should just change or remove that line of the Terms of Service.  Minimally they should explain what it means in plain English.

     

    Anyone arguing against this is essentially supporting Zenimax's ability to screw over consumers by their Terms of Service.  Even if you are the biggest ESO fanboy there is, you should be able to see that this isn't an "ESO sucks" or "I want ZOS to fail" issue.  In fact, changing the Terms of Service to more customer friendly text is GOOD for both the game and Zenimax as a company.

    In this case. Uninstall all your Online Games. Delete your account from this website. Then throw your computer out of the window.

    Like the poster above me already said. TOS and EULA's are all the same. EVERYWHERE!

    If you don't like it. Better stop playing games althogether, throw away your computer and find a new hobby.

  • ohioastroohioastro Member UncommonPosts: 534
    Originally posted by Bigdaddyx
    Originally posted by ohioastro
    Originally posted by Bigdaddyx
    Originally posted by Gravarg
    Give me a break people.  I swear I'm going to have to stop coming to gaming sites.  Everyone has devolved into a bashing hypocrites that will make up and find any little thing negative to say.  This one just takes the cake.

    Yeah i think you should visit official ESO forums i heard everything is fine over there. image

     

    I've seen game launches with actual problems, and I know what an official forum looks like for such a game.  There were reportedly something like 5 million people who tried the beta.  I have no idea what the subscription rate is, but I'd be shocked if it wasn't at least hundreds of thousands.  If tens of thousands of people had billing problems the web site would be shut down and unreadable, with every nook and cranny filled with complaints.  Because that's exactly what happened with, for example, Total War Rome 2.   Which had numerous game-ending crashes on release.

    Instead what I'm seeing is entirely typical for normal, relatively smooth launches.  There are always a few people who have problems, and the volume of complaints on the actual forums and the real fan sites is low.  Here, however, there are people who seem to absolutely hate this game and who just move from attack to attack.  After reading this sub-forum and looking at posting histories I fully expect the same people to pop up with some different reason why the game is terrible after this one fades.

    And, no, posting things that are not correct is not providing information.  It's called providing misinformation.

    Well if you are saying EULA that OP posted is fake then yes it is mis information.

     I'm saying the conclusions that he drew from it, and the things that people are posting about it, are incorrect.  Do you dispute this?  There is a world of difference between pointing out an actual problem and spending a lot of effort trying to infer malevolent potential intent from one of those obscure computer software term of service agreements.

  • gervaise1gervaise1 Member EpicPosts: 6,919
    Originally posted by Dewguy79
    Originally posted by killion81

     

    Please post ONE tos that is customer friendly.  

     

    WoW.

     

    EvE and SWTOR - not as friendly but friendlier than TESO.

This discussion has been closed.