I would love to see a serious re-review of the top 5 MMOs on the Market, cause your rating is otherwise flawed. Cant be that some certain MMOs got top scores for those past years.
"We all do the best we can based on life experience, point of view, and our ability to believe in ourselves." - Naropa "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." SR Covey
It could be just a Popularity rating, that is rating on the past X days or something, to counter long-term ratings and provide something accurate towards how it would rank presently.
They could probably do something. But why wipe hundreds of reviews and hope to get 50? Players can go back and change their reviews or hype for a game at any time. But forcing it upon them might result in 20 reviews per game instead of 300-400.
Comments
"We all do the best we can based on life experience, point of view, and our ability to believe in ourselves." - Naropa "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." SR Covey
Anyhow the top 5 mmo's are scored by the players not the moderators.
How can Gloria Victis, one MMO that peaked at thousands and currently has 70 players online with the servers mostly empty... be on the that top?
Seriously the game doesn't get any new votes since June only because the votes it collected before it shall forever be there it seems.