Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Star Citizen and refunds.

Octagon7711Octagon7711 Member LegendaryPosts: 9,004
Anyone who backed Star Citizen, which has received an insane amount of crowdfunding, can no longer ask to be refunded by developer Cloud Imperium Games (CIG). Although standard means of asking for refunds were removed through the Star Citizen’s June 6, 2016 Terms of Service (TOS) update, CIG stopped issuing them completely in December 2017.

Star Citizen Backer Loses in Small Claims Court to RSI
A backer of Star Citizen who sought to see their $4500 refunded after losing faith in the project has officially lost their case. The RSI small claims lawsuit was tossed out by the presiding judge, moving the matter to arbitration in spite of the fact that the backer in question offered their fiscal support before the company changed their terms of service.

A lot of big companies are making agreements that state they can't be sued but must have the matter settled by arbitration.  I saw a video on arbitration in which an arbitrator said that if you don't side with the business, they tend to not hire you for further work.


Supreme Court's arbitration ruling is another blow to consumer rights

The U.S. Supreme Court made clear this week that, regardless of what the Constitution says about a consumer's right to sue, businesses are absolutely entitled to block people from banding together and taking a dispute to court.

It was the court's latest ruling in favor of arbitration, rather than class-action lawsuits, as a preferred method for resolving issues between companies and their customers — which is exactly how the business world wants it.

Mandatory arbitration overwhelmingly favors business interests, consumer advocates say, and prevents people from closing ranks to challenge unfair fees and conditions.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus-20151218-column.html













"We all do the best we can based on life experience, point of view, and our ability to believe in ourselves." - Naropa      "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are."  SR Covey

«134567

Comments

  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member LegendaryPosts: 7,846
    edited July 2018
    Actually started a post on this related thing:
    https://new.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/8zbz59/refunds_cig_should_just_say_no_instead_of/

    CIG is taking one ridiculous approach to the requests, they already changed their policy over 2 years ago, yet they kept granting refunds, either they do or do not presently is of little bother to me, the problem is their refusal to clarify their position, and stonewalling the requests for months giving people false hopes.
    KyleranOctagon7711
  • PhaserlightPhaserlight Member EpicPosts: 3,075
    edited July 2018
    MaxBacon said:
    Actually started a post on this related thing:
    https://new.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/8zbz59/refunds_cig_should_just_say_no_instead_of/

    CIG is taking one ridiculous approach to the requests, they already changed their policy over 2 years ago, yet they kept granting refunds, either they do or do not presently is of little bother to me, the problem is their refusal to clarify their position, and stonewalling the requests for months giving people false hopes.
    They are stonewalling because right now it's their best option.

    Denying a refund on a purchase in which G/S were not conferred is illegal (edit: in some cases), and right now CIG is operating in kind of a grey area (if it's not a purchase then why is VAT being applied?).

    If they came right out and stated "no refunds" to each and every backer requesting a refund that might open them up to a consumer fraud suit if it could be proven that "pledges" are in fact purchases and CIG failed to deliver; something that remains to be seen.  Their policy is obviously no refunds... but beyond their TOS they can't continually state that to every backer trying to get one because it would be feeding them ammo.

    For the record, I have very little sympathy for people who pledged thousands of dollars back in the day and are now trying to get it back.  Use better judgement, if that money is important to you.

    /2c
    Kyleran

    "The simple is the seal of the true and beauty is the splendor of truth" -Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
    Authored 139 missions in Vendetta Online and 6 tracks in Distance

  • kikoodutroa8kikoodutroa8 Member RarePosts: 565
    That firefly dude must be bitter now but when the game releases he'll be happy he didn't refund!!!
    PhaserlightalkarionlogKrematoryRhime
  • cmacqcmacq Member UncommonPosts: 331
    That firefly dude must be bitter now but when the game releases he'll be happy he didn't refund!!!
    Yeah if he lives that long
    ScotalkarionlogKyleranKrematoryRhimeUnicron-postlarvalDeVoDeVoNevereverlandRinswind89
  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member LegendaryPosts: 7,846
    edited July 2018
    They are stonewalling because right now it's their best option.

    Denying a refund on a purchase in which G/S were not conferred is illegal (edit: in some cases), and right now CIG is operating in kind of a grey area (if it's not a purchase then why is VAT being applied?).
    So other crowdfunded projects, with NO-REFUND policies, such as Crowfall, are committing crimes?

    Why can they refuse refunds (mind projects like Crowfall are also years late) but SC can't? Also we need to consider one most important thing, there is no such thing as a "world wide" law or regulation, the company for all we know can even just be testing murky waters on small court cases and see what happens before they clarify their standing.
    Phaserlight
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,273
    cmacq said:
    That firefly dude must be bitter now but when the game releases he'll be happy he didn't refund!!!
    Yeah if he lives that long
    He put the firefly in his will, just in case. :)
  • alkarionlogalkarionlog Member EpicPosts: 3,584
    edited July 2018
    MaxBacon said:
    They are stonewalling because right now it's their best option.

    Denying a refund on a purchase in which G/S were not conferred is illegal (edit: in some cases), and right now CIG is operating in kind of a grey area (if it's not a purchase then why is VAT being applied?).
    So other crowdfunded projects, with NO-REFUND policies, such as Crowfall, are committing crimes?

    Why can they refuse refunds (mind projects like Crowfall are also years late) but SC can't? Also we need to consider one most important thing, there is no such thing as a "world wide" law or regulation, the company for all we know can even just be testing murky waters on small court cases and see what happens before they clarify their standing.
    I don't read anyone saying others can do that and only SC can't, if others are doing the same more the reason to everyone stop tossing money before the product is done. but speding anything over then 100 on any project with you will not profit from is beyond stupidity, I don't feel pride is saying I spend 1k over a product who is now being sold for 60, I would feel cheated
    FOR HONOR, FOR FREEDOM.... and for some money.
  • Octagon7711Octagon7711 Member LegendaryPosts: 9,004
    Can't really say anything about set amounts of spending.  A single person making eight hundred thousand a year who likes gaming is going to have a different gaming budget then a single person who works at McDonald's and likes gaming.

    "We all do the best we can based on life experience, point of view, and our ability to believe in ourselves." - Naropa      "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are."  SR Covey

  • kikoodutroa8kikoodutroa8 Member RarePosts: 565
    MaxBacon said:
    They are stonewalling because right now it's their best option.

    Denying a refund on a purchase in which G/S were not conferred is illegal (edit: in some cases), and right now CIG is operating in kind of a grey area (if it's not a purchase then why is VAT being applied?).
    So other crowdfunded projects, with NO-REFUND policies, such as Crowfall, are committing crimes?

    Why can they refuse refunds (mind projects like Crowfall are also years late) but SC can't? Also we need to consider one most important thing, there is no such thing as a "world wide" law or regulation, the company for all we know can even just be testing murky waters on small court cases and see what happens before they clarify their standing.
    There's a huge difference between Crowfall and Star Citizen though: Crowfall is sorely lacking fidelity.
    Also, the crowfall team seems to be working on making a game.
    MaxBaconRhime
  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member LegendaryPosts: 7,846
    edited July 2018
    kikoodutroa8 said:
    There's a huge difference between Crowfall and Star Citizen though: Crowfall is sorely lacking fidelity.
    Also, the crowfall team seems to be working on making a game.
    That's a petty non-argument, there is no difference, both crowdfunded titles, both facing years of delays, both had requests for refunds, even like SC, it allowed no questions asked refunds until they enforced the policy years ago, SC has also offered them for years; law would apply to both (and every other title in-dev on the same reality) the same way.
  • kikoodutroa8kikoodutroa8 Member RarePosts: 565
    MaxBacon said:
    kikoodutroa8 said:
    There's a huge difference between Crowfall and Star Citizen though: Crowfall is sorely lacking fidelity.
    Also, the crowfall team seems to be working on making a game.
    That's a petty non-argument, there is no difference, both crowdfunded titles, both facing years of delays, both had requests for refunds, even like SC, it allowed no questions asked refunds until they enforced the policy years ago, SC has also offered them for years; law would apply to both (and every other title in-dev on the same reality) the same way.
    Nice try fudster goonie but afaik you can't fly a medic ship in crowfall, nor can you hunt procedural wildlife.
    Seriously you're such an entitled smartie it's disgusting.
    Phaserlightrpmcmurphy
  • ArglebargleArglebargle Member EpicPosts: 3,465
    Really, if you didn't see the writing on the wall about SC by this point, might as well stay a dewy eyed believer.
    postlarval

    If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.

  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,317
    Since 2012 there always was a policy that you are only allowed a refund for SC in the first 14 days. Any other refunds by CIG were VOLUNTARY! And easy to get in the first 3 years. Then harder to get for the next 2 years. Especially for grey and black market traders that are not interested in SC but only in ripping off others with inflated resale prices for LTI ships. No sympathy there from me. 


    Have fun
  • WizardryWizardry Member LegendaryPosts: 19,332
    The reason this sort of RUBBISH and yes it is rubbish should not exist is just imagine if EVERY business operated like that.Then consumers would have NO RIGHTS.

    Now i am not just a person trying to side with anyone not Cloud Imperium,i am for a fair shake for BOTH sides.

    So a normal procedure would be as such,if you have actually played a certain amount of time deemed "a long time"then you would be in essence lying if said to be unhappy.
    There is one other topic under the same premise and that is the often used statement of "we reserve the right to change anything at anytime"
    Well that part of a TOS is imo 100% bull crap,it is purposely trying to undermine consumer rights and put ALL OF the protection in the hands of the business and naturally that is NOT a fair shake.

    The fact businesses are allowed to get away with so much and laws are so scummy is beyond me,i feel it is simply a matter of "the law only matters when you have lot's of money"to the rest,your just little men with no say,no power.

    Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.

  • rpmcmurphyrpmcmurphy Member EpicPosts: 3,502
    edited July 2018
    MaxBacon said:
    Actually started a post on this related thing:
    https://new.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/8zbz59/refunds_cig_should_just_say_no_instead_of/

    CIG is taking one ridiculous approach to the requests, they already changed their policy over 2 years ago, yet they kept granting refunds, either they do or do not presently is of little bother to me, the problem is their refusal to clarify their position, and stonewalling the requests for months giving people false hopes.
    That's a perfectly reasonable suggestion but as one can see the fanatics on the subreddit clearly think otherwise (your thread currently sits at 0 points (48% upvoted)). The responses to that thread are so damn depressing, although it really should come as no surprise given how irrational these fanatics are.
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 43,975
    MaxBacon said:
    Actually started a post on this related thing:
    https://new.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/8zbz59/refunds_cig_should_just_say_no_instead_of/

    CIG is taking one ridiculous approach to the requests, they already changed their policy over 2 years ago, yet they kept granting refunds, either they do or do not presently is of little bother to me, the problem is their refusal to clarify their position, and stonewalling the requests for months giving people false hopes.
    They are stonewalling because right now it's their best option.

    Denying a refund on a purchase in which G/S were not conferred is illegal (edit: in some cases), and right now CIG is operating in kind of a grey area (if it's not a purchase then why is VAT being applied?).

    If they came right out and stated "no refunds" to each and every backer requesting a refund that might open them up to a consumer fraud suit if it could be proven that "pledges" are in fact purchases and CIG failed to deliver; something that remains to be seen.  Their policy is obviously no refunds... but beyond their TOS they can't continually state that to every backer trying to get one because it would be feeding them ammo.

    For the record, I have very little sympathy for people who pledged thousands of dollars back in the day and are now trying to get it back.  Use better judgement, if that money is important to you.

    /2c
    I'm not so sure, generally in consumer or civil law it's been my experience consistency in application is important.

    Take for example home owner association deed restriction rules such as no commercial vehicle allowed.

    My association had such a rule, however when they filed suit against a homeowner who clearly had one, the judge ruled against them because they had not been consistent in enforcement,  they previously had permitted sheriffs office vehicles to park unmolested. 

    Actually ruled HO assiciation had to pay defendents attorney fees which broke their bank, so officers themselves had liens put on their homes.

    Officers dissolved the HOA, and about ten years later when it came time to renew deed restrictions, no HOA existed to do so.

    So that's how.our community managed to get them stripped, for better and worse.

    ;)
    Phaserlight

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Erillion said:
    Since 2012 there always was a policy that you are only allowed a refund for SC in the first 14 days. Any other refunds by CIG were VOLUNTARY! And easy to get in the first 3 years. Then harder to get for the next 2 years. Especially for grey and black market traders that are not interested in SC but only in ripping off others with inflated resale prices for LTI ships. No sympathy there from me. 


    Have fun
    Who cares about the black market traders that CIG allowed to exist for years because it served their purpose?

    we are talking about people who don’t like the direction the company is going and want out. Since this is can be considered a pre order they should be getting their money back without any questions asked.

    Instead we have CIG sending canned responses saying they need an account specialist to look into their account before any refunds can be issued and that’s where people have been languishing for months because Chris Roberts is a terrible studio lead and has probably mismanaged the money so horribly he can’t afford to refund everyone now
    Kyleran
  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Anyone who backed Star Citizen, which has received an insane amount of crowdfunding, can no longer ask to be refunded by developer Cloud Imperium Games (CIG). Although standard means of asking for refunds were removed through the Star Citizen’s June 6, 2016 Terms of Service (TOS) update, CIG stopped issuing them completely in December 2017.

    Star Citizen Backer Loses in Small Claims Court to RSI
    A backer of Star Citizen who sought to see their $4500 refunded after losing faith in the project has officially lost their case. The RSI small claims lawsuit was tossed out by the presiding judge, moving the matter to arbitration in spite of the fact that the backer in question offered their fiscal support before the company changed their terms of service.

    A lot of big companies are making agreements that state they can't be sued but must have the matter settled by arbitration.  I saw a video on arbitration in which an arbitrator said that if you don't side with the business, they tend to not hire you for further work.


    Supreme Court's arbitration ruling is another blow to consumer rights

    The U.S. Supreme Court made clear this week that, regardless of what the Constitution says about a consumer's right to sue, businesses are absolutely entitled to block people from banding together and taking a dispute to court.

    It was the court's latest ruling in favor of arbitration, rather than class-action lawsuits, as a preferred method for resolving issues between companies and their customers — which is exactly how the business world wants it.

    Mandatory arbitration overwhelmingly favors business interests, consumer advocates say, and prevents people from closing ranks to challenge unfair fees and conditions.

    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus-20151218-column.html










    Want to make CIG hurt. Have thousands of backers who want out of the project start filing cases for arbritration and have watch as CIG has to pay for each and every case. Of course knowing the zealots they would probably spite donate in order to cover court costs.
  • lahnmirlahnmir Member LegendaryPosts: 5,050
    I "bought" SC two weeks ago and got a huge warning telling me since this was a donation there were absolutely no refunds given. They're pretty clear about that to new customers.

    Why would VAT apply to a donation though? Have your cake AND eat it CIG? Tsk tsk. Alpha is decent, definitely not bad, definitely not mind blowing, the graphics and scale of it all is though.

    /Cheers,
    Lahnmir
    'the only way he could nail it any better is if he used a cross.'

    Kyleran on yours sincerely 


    'But there are many. You can play them entirely solo, and even offline. Also, you are wrong by default.'

    Ikcin in response to yours sincerely debating whether or not single-player offline MMOs exist...



    'This does not apply just to ED but SC or any other game. What they will get is Rebirth/X4, likely prettier but equally underwhelming and pointless. 

    It is incredibly difficult to design some meaningfull leg content that would fit a space ship game - simply because it is not a leg game.

    It is just huge resource waste....'

    Gdemami absolutely not being an armchair developer

  • kikoodutroa8kikoodutroa8 Member RarePosts: 565
    lahnmir said:
    I "bought" SC two weeks ago and got a huge warning telling me since this was a donation there were absolutely no refunds given. They're pretty clear about that to new customers.

    Why would VAT apply to a donation though? Have your cake AND eat it CIG? Tsk tsk. Alpha is decent, definitely not bad, definitely not mind blowing, the graphics and scale of it all is though.

    /Cheers,
    Lahnmir
    Gratz, welcome to the verse!
    Now you need a decent ship, I have a friend who's selling his AMD mustang wink wink nudge nudge
    Phaserlight
  • Jamar870Jamar870 Member UncommonPosts: 573
    In those countries that have VAT are donations exempt?  I'm taking from your question there, lahnmir that VAT is only applied to purchases and not donation to your understanding. So you question, Is it really a donation or a purchase?

  • lahnmirlahnmir Member LegendaryPosts: 5,050
    Jamar870 said:
    In those countries that have VAT are donations exempt?  I'm taking from your question there, lahnmir that VAT is only applied to purchases and not donation to your understanding. So you question, Is it really a donation or a purchase?

    Indeed, afaik VAT does not apply to donations still I had to pay it for mine. I am no expert on the matter so perhaps I am missing something.

    /Cheers,
    Lahnmir
    'the only way he could nail it any better is if he used a cross.'

    Kyleran on yours sincerely 


    'But there are many. You can play them entirely solo, and even offline. Also, you are wrong by default.'

    Ikcin in response to yours sincerely debating whether or not single-player offline MMOs exist...



    'This does not apply just to ED but SC or any other game. What they will get is Rebirth/X4, likely prettier but equally underwhelming and pointless. 

    It is incredibly difficult to design some meaningfull leg content that would fit a space ship game - simply because it is not a leg game.

    It is just huge resource waste....'

    Gdemami absolutely not being an armchair developer

  • krgwynnekrgwynne Member UncommonPosts: 119
    kickstarters are a donation to an idear so cant see refunds ever being a thing unless you accidently bought in a few days before trying to refund.
  • mmoloummolou Member UncommonPosts: 256
    If vat is added, then it's not a donation, it is a purchase, as donations are either exempt or zero rated afaik, depends where you live when you made the purchase/donation I guess.
    TheScavenger
    It is a funny world we live in.
    We had Empires run by Emperors, we had Kingdoms run by Kings, now we have Countries...
  • rpmcmurphyrpmcmurphy Member EpicPosts: 3,502
    krgwynne said:
    kickstarters are a donation to an idear so cant see refunds ever being a thing unless you accidently bought in a few days before trying to refund.
    This is no longer a kickstarter though, the period for pledging to the kickstarter ended in 2012. Since then it has been stretch goals (finished many years ago), pre-purchases and pre-orders through their private website.

    mmolou said:
    If vat is added, then it's not a donation, it is a purchase, as donations are either exempt or zero rated afaik, depends where you live when you made the purchase/donation I guess.
    Yep. It's a digital purchase. Funnily enough the CIG representative argued that it is a donation much like a person would give to a church. So for 30 days it is a purchase as they have to give your money back if not satisfied, after 30 days they consider it a donation.
Sign In or Register to comment.