Yup, news have been out for a few days. Wouldn't surprise me if the new Everquest innovation is something nobody wants...like a mobile game.
Apparently your are still behind in the news. There is an EQ mobile game coming, but it's not being developed by the EQ team. They (the team) are supposedly working in a new EQ title not associated with the mobile game.
If they make a game that is the best parts of 1&2 I think they can make a successful game. My fear is DBG. I don't know enough about the company. I don't know if I played any of there game, save for the first 10 minutes of EQ2. However, I do know that not just on here but on MassivlyOP they are very much one of the most hated MMO companies
I'm with you there. I would of course like very much a new game in the EverQuest franchise but do I trust DBG to make it? I have no choice, but I also haven't a ton of faith. Has DBG actually built a game from the ground up? Pretty sure they just took over a bunch of pre-built titles. Of course, they've done expansions for some of those (old) titles but...I guess I'll revisit this thought again in 6-10 years if they've actually carried through with anything.
If they make a game that is the best parts of 1&2 I think they can make a successful game. My fear is DBG. I don't know enough about the company. I don't know if I played any of there game, save for the first 10 minutes of EQ2. However, I do know that not just on here but on MassivlyOP they are very much one of the most hated MMO companies
I'm with you there. I would of course like very much a new game in the EverQuest franchise but do I trust DBG to make it? I have no choice, but I also haven't a ton of faith. Has DBG actually built a game from the ground up? Pretty sure they just took over a bunch of pre-built titles. Of course, they've done expansions for some of those (old) titles but...I guess I'll revisit this thought again in 6-10 years if they've actually carried through with anything.
All true but a new beginning has to come from some place. Maybe developers want to do more than up keeps on cash shop technology ?
I would love another Everquest, but if this is a mobile title then NO!
I think they could just take EQ1 redo the graphic engine to be more modern and release it in the stages it was originally released. I think that would work. Retro ALL the way.
Which, as @ChildoftheShadows says is not news but "olds" as it dates back to Sept 2018. And if you haven't heard of Nantworks before that is because they hadn't done any games .....
As to the linked article the quote is:
"DarkPaw's mission is to continue to expand upon the unique and amazing fantasy adventure that is Everquest and Everquest II and develop the next innovation for the franchise"
Which, as @cheeba says, is the type of noise Holly has made before.
Holly might dream about a new EQ game. Holly might think about what they might do - if only they had the money, if only they had the devs, if only .... - travelling home from work.
Until something more concrete is said though - well there is a big difference between "mission" and desire and "seriously working on".
Maybe they're realizing that EQ is their only consistent revenue and the TLP servers are part of that. I doubt they'd make anything to capture that audience though. They seem to keep trying to get the twitch audience.
Knowing Holly Longdale's longstanding hatred toward casual gamers, I'm not interested in whatever kind of hardcore game she's going to spew out, even in the EQ IP. I figure it will be EQ raiding with a smidgeon of dungeon crawling and overland for flavor.
Knowing Holly Longdale's longstanding hatred toward casual gamers, I'm not interested in whatever kind of hardcore game she's going to spew out, even in the EQ IP. I figure it will be EQ raiding with a smidgeon of dungeon crawling and overland for flavor.
Then play one of the thousands of games that are designed for casual game play.
I think someone mentioned they were working on an EQ Battle Royale game. But that was before Darkpaw became it's own studio. So hopefully brighter minds have prevailed.
Knowing Holly Longdale's longstanding hatred toward casual gamers, I'm not interested in whatever kind of hardcore game she's going to spew out, even in the EQ IP. I figure it will be EQ raiding with a smidgeon of dungeon crawling and overland for flavor.
Then play one of the thousands of games that are designed for casual game play.
Amen! I'll gladly take a more hardcore game that I hope Holly puts out.
Knowing Holly Longdale's longstanding hatred toward casual gamers, I'm not interested in whatever kind of hardcore game she's going to spew out, even in the EQ IP. I figure it will be EQ raiding with a smidgeon of dungeon crawling and overland for flavor.
If they make a game that is the best parts of 1&2 I think they can make a successful game. My fear is DBG. I don't know enough about the company. I don't know if I played any of there game, save for the first 10 minutes of EQ2. However, I do know that not just on here but on MassivlyOP they are very much one of the most hated MMO companies
I'm with you there. I would of course like very much a new game in the EverQuest franchise but do I trust DBG to make it? I have no choice, but I also haven't a ton of faith. Has DBG actually built a game from the ground up? Pretty sure they just took over a bunch of pre-built titles. Of course, they've done expansions for some of those (old) titles but...I guess I'll revisit this thought again in 6-10 years if they've actually carried through with anything.
On the bright side, all of the launched games that Daybreak has made from scratch so far have been really good.
More seriously, I recommend waiting until we have more information before deciding if the game is good or not.
Hope is cheap, but development costs money. Developers have figured out how to monetize Hope with all the crowdfunded, early-access, pregame money-raising tactics. They simply give the players Hope and players give the developers money. Hope costs next-to-nothing to build, just some well-chosen words, a bit of conceptual level artwork, and a website (with store). The returns for almost no work seems unbounded so far. It's the same principle underlying every lottery system. Raise people's hope, rake in cash. Lottery systems at least actually deliver on their promises, for a very, very, very, very small number of individuals.
Conclusion: People really want new games, but developers aren't properly motivated to actually build new games. We've given them the keys to the kingdom.
Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.
Comments
---------------
Tested over a 115+ games since 1997.
Currently Playing:
Played(Retired): AOL NWN(91-95), UO, EQ1/2, DAoC, CoX, Lineage1/2, SWG(Pre CU/NGE), Planetside, Anarchy Online, FFXI, AC, Vanguard, D&D, AoC, DCUO, Rift, Eve, others
I'm with you there. I would of course like very much a new game in the EverQuest franchise but do I trust DBG to make it? I have no choice, but I also haven't a ton of faith. Has DBG actually built a game from the ground up? Pretty sure they just took over a bunch of pre-built titles. Of course, they've done expansions for some of those (old) titles but...I guess I'll revisit this thought again in 6-10 years if they've actually carried through with anything.
Sign me up!
Gut Out!
What, me worry?
https://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/475951/la-times-owner-nantworks-partner-with-daybreak-for-mobile-h1z1-everquest-games-more-mmorpg
Which, as @ChildoftheShadows says is not news but "olds" as it dates back to Sept 2018. And if you haven't heard of Nantworks before that is because they hadn't done any games .....
As to the linked article the quote is:
"DarkPaw's mission is to continue to expand upon the unique and amazing fantasy adventure that is Everquest and Everquest II and develop the next innovation for the franchise"
Which, as @cheeba says, is the type of noise Holly has made before.
Holly might dream about a new EQ game. Holly might think about what they might do - if only they had the money, if only they had the devs, if only .... - travelling home from work.
Until something more concrete is said though - well there is a big difference between "mission" and desire and "seriously working on".
Go around, capturing rats and snakes
Careful, the snakes kick.
Raquelis in various games
Played: Everything
Playing: Nioh 2, Civ6
Wants: The World
Anticipating: Everquest Next Crowfall, Pantheon, Elden Ring
Then play one of the thousands of games that are designed for casual game play.
I am pretty sure it is never, never ever, going to happen.
/Cheers,
Lahnmir
Kyleran on yours sincerely
'But there are many. You can play them entirely solo, and even offline. Also, you are wrong by default.'
Ikcin in response to yours sincerely debating whether or not single-player offline MMOs exist...
'This does not apply just to ED but SC or any other game. What they will get is Rebirth/X4, likely prettier but equally underwhelming and pointless.
It is incredibly difficult to design some meaningfull leg content that would fit a space ship game - simply because it is not a leg game.
It is just huge resource waste....'
Gdemami absolutely not being an armchair developer
More seriously, I recommend waiting until we have more information before deciding if the game is good or not.
EQ1, EQ2, SWG, SWTOR, GW, GW2 CoH, CoV, FFXI, WoW, CO, War,TSW and a slew of free trials and beta tests
Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.