Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Game Passes - Bane or Boss?

ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,271
edited May 18 in The Pub at MMORPG.COM
I have been sitting on the fence for some years on this issue and have finally come down on the side of bane for gaming. Passes are all about cheapness for as little as $120 dollars a year you get a stable of games to play. Well we have been here before guys, what was F2P all about? Cheapness.

You are not going to get quality without paying for it and a Pass system drives down the amount of money going into individual titles. If you expect to get less profit you are going to budget the games you are making accordingly. This principle is seen in much of entertainment, TV and films rely on production values just like gaming. Of course more money does not guarantee a good title, in fact it does not guarantee a more expensive game will be better than a less expensive one. But it sure does help especially in the graphics department which is crucial to gaming.

In it's infancy just like F2P a Pass system will not have much effect in the way I have descried on the industry as a whole, but as Passes become more predominant these effects will become more clear. Take BG3, remember players asking about when it is going on to the pass? The attitude there was "Game of the year but I am not buying what I can get effectively for free because I am paying for a pass anyway." That attitude is just like all the gamers we have that want every MMO to be FTP.

I vote for quality every time, I don't want second rate games, TV or films and I think that's something we should all be behind.
Brainy
«1

Comments

  • Slapshot1188Slapshot1188 Member LegendaryPosts: 17,585
    Not sure that’s necessarily correct.  Gamepass is probably closest to the concept of Netflix. Netflix has been around for a long time. I don’t think the quality of their shows is any worse than the content on a non-streaming competitor.

    Where we are feeling the pain is actually pricing. Because content is being fractured and now instead is “cable” we have Netflix, Prime Video, Hulu, Discovery Plus, Apple TV Plus, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, Max, Peacock, etc… (Here in the USA at least).


    All time classic  MY NEW FAVORITE POST!  (Keep laying those bricks)

    "I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator

    Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017. 

    Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018

    "Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited May 18
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited May 18
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Slapshot1188Slapshot1188 Member LegendaryPosts: 17,585
    tzervo said:

    Where we are feeling the pain is actually pricing. Because content is being fractured and now instead is “cable” we have Netflix, Prime Video, Hulu, Discovery Plus, Apple TV Plus, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, Max, Peacock, etc… (Here in the USA at least).
    I tend to cycle through the providers to watch what I like, subbing to a different one every couple months. A bit extra hassle every 2 or so months, but having grown during the videotape and dvd rental period I'd pick streaming over that every day, both in terms of convenience and price. Never did cable though, can't compare with that.

    Yeah I have always had most of the ones I listed.  But With Disney Plus I had an annual subscription that combined HULU and ESPN+ (for college sports).   They tried to raise my pricing by 2x.   So I cancelled. And I will now sub for just 2-3 months, watch the sports and binge watch the shows, and then cancel.

    Their loss as I will watch all the same stuff but pay them less than I was originally.  

    All time classic  MY NEW FAVORITE POST!  (Keep laying those bricks)

    "I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator

    Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017. 

    Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018

    "Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018

  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 8,164
    I think Netflix is sometimes producing good shows or they save some shows from the chopping block. Nothing upsets me more than seeing a good series get taken off after two seasons when they have ended season 2 on a cliffhanger and haven't been given the opportunity to wrap up the story.

    Can you imagine what a loss it would have been if Babylon 5 wasn't given the opportunity to develop the story and Michael Straczynski allowed to go at the pace he did. They say he had mapped out his story before the series began. I know nowadays a lot of series just think about 2 seasons and hope they get renewed and it has greatly hampered and stifled so many good stories that could have been great. 

    However Netflix has competitors. This has kept them on their toes.

    I feel if Gamepass is the only one and others are all teeny tiny we may see a drop in quality which is why I would hate for everything to go on Gamepass. No I absolutely do not want gamepass to control the whole market because then they will control what game developers can put out and that will be awful for us all. They will do it if they have the power. Developers will be at their mercy and that is horrific.

    Scot

  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,271
    edited May 18
    Not sure that’s necessarily correct.  Gamepass is probably closest to the concept of Netflix. Netflix has been around for a long time. I don’t think the quality of their shows is any worse than the content on a non-streaming competitor.

    Where we are feeling the pain is actually pricing. Because content is being fractured and now instead is “cable” we have Netflix, Prime Video, Hulu, Discovery Plus, Apple TV Plus, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, Max, Peacock, etc… (Here in the USA at least).
    Well we have yet to reach the point where there are multiple gaming passes for the same platform. Unless you want to count all the Studio Apps? That may happen for the PC but it is obviously not going to happen for consoles.

    Where your analogy falls down is that Netflix has not changed the way TV programs are made in this regard. Before streaming services, a channel would make a show knowing if it was good enough it would sell it to other channels. Now that includes streaming services which in turn make shows that can be sold on. So for this comparison streaming and non-streaming services/channels are no different from each other.

    But I agree with you that Netflix is as good as any of them.
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,271
    edited May 18
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:
    snip -- 

    1) what was F2P all about? Cheapness.

    snip --

    2) This principle is seen in much of entertainment, TV and films rely on production values just like gaming.

    snip --

    3) Take BG3, remember players asking about when it is going on to the pass? The  attitude there was "Game of the year but I am not buying what I can get effectively for free because I am paying for a pass anyway." That attitude is just like all the gamers we have that want every MMO to be FTP.

    4) I vote for quality every time, I don't want second rate games, TV or films and I think that's something we should all be behind.
    1) Some really good f2p games exist:

    - LoL, truly F2P
    - EVE, Albion, PoE: free to play with restrictions, but subbing is definitely recommended to experience the game "as intended"

    2) In movies what I have noticed is that "passes" gives you a lot of junk, but also a few great series/titles that justify the price. I assume those high production titles are paid well to be included in a sub service.

    3) Iirc bg3 was not included in a pass, given its value.

    4) I vote for quality as well, my time is valuable, but "should" is too strong. Not everyone has the same needs, means and requirements. Both schemes have their place.

    Yes really good F2P does exist, but overall B2P and subscription games are a lot better.

    I addressed your second point in my previous post.

    Not sure what you are getting at about BG3, obviously I don't think it should go to Pass.

    I would agree with your last point if we did not have gamers banging on about how "everything must be free to play" or "everything must be on my pass". So I am countering that by saying "should". :)
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited May 18
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited May 18
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited May 18
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
    Post edited by [Deleted User] on
  • BrainyBrainy Member EpicPosts: 2,162
    Scot said:
    I have been sitting on the fence for some years on this issue and have finally come down on the side of bane for gaming. Passes are all about cheapness for as little as $120 dollars a year you get a stable of games to play. Well we have been here before guys, what was F2P all about? Cheapness.


    You nailed it.  Exactly correct, its actually pretty obvious, and has already happened in other industries.

    Funny how someone brings up netflix as high quality success LOL.  Geez how the standards have fallen.

    Netflix example actually proves your point.

    I say netflix is just about an identical system, to the gamepass. I remember when netflix had tons of great movies.

    Starts off good when they are the only ones, but all they do is force all the other corporate industry to do the same thing, and then it lowers the standards for everyone.

    Gamepass is only working now because games can make their money 1 way, then put it on gamepass with a separate market to make a little more profit. Once every big company has a Gamepass option, then customers wont need to purchase as they wait for it on their "gamepass equivalent platform", quality wont matter at all.  No incentive really to make high quality, because there is no way to make more than any of the other trash game that exists.  Just pump out a bunch of low quality junk for the platforms.




    Scot
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited May 18
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • XiaokiXiaoki Member EpicPosts: 4,036
    Game Pass is almost as done as Xbox hardware.

    Microsoft has spent billions and billions trying to grow Game Pass and it has not worked. Game Pass subscribers stalled then they started losing people in droves. Now in a last ditch effort to save it they will put the next Call of Duty on Game Pass but the current rumor is they will make a new, more expensive tier of Game Pass just for Call of Duty.

    People keep calling Game Pass "the Netflix of gaming" which is somewhat appropriate. But, unlike Game Pass is successful, however despite that success Netflix is still $14 billion in debt with little hope of ever getting out of debt.
    Scot
  • SovrathSovrath Member LegendaryPosts: 32,779
    Not sure that’s necessarily correct.  Gamepass is probably closest to the concept of Netflix. Netflix has been around for a long time. I don’t think the quality of their shows is any worse than the content on a non-streaming competitor.

    Where we are feeling the pain is actually pricing. Because content is being fractured and now instead is “cable” we have Netflix, Prime Video, Hulu, Discovery Plus, Apple TV Plus, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, Max, Peacock, etc… (Here in the USA at least).



    Yeah, it's that fracturing that kind of sucks. Everyone wants their had in your wallet. That's why I only ever subscribe to one or another of these streaming services intermittently when something is offered that I want to watch. I watch as much as I can for the month and then cancel.

    Except for Amazon Prime and Netflix which I use regularly.
    Like Skyrim? Need more content? Try my Skyrim mod "Godfred's Tomb." 

    Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w


    Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547

    Try the "Special Edition." 'Cause it's "Special." https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/64878/?tab=description

    Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo 
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 43,975
    Not sure that’s necessarily correct.  Gamepass is probably closest to the concept of Netflix. Netflix has been around for a long time. I don’t think the quality of their shows is any worse than the content on a non-streaming competitor.

    Where we are feeling the pain is actually pricing. Because content is being fractured and now instead is “cable” we have Netflix, Prime Video, Hulu, Discovery Plus, Apple TV Plus, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, Max, Peacock, etc… (Here in the USA at least).


    What is interesting is  I can sub to every streaming channel you listed for far less money than the stupid cable companies were charging when I decided to drop them.

    I have no issue with game pass, I think they are a great deal for game hoppers of the world even if there isn't much appeal to someone like me who has averaged playing 3 or less games annually for the past 20 years.

    Now the real bane of online gaming IMO is seasonal passes which usually is just a bunch of low effort content that awards players a bunch of mostly useless junk they don't really want or need.



    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • vonryan123vonryan123 Member UncommonPosts: 514
    edited May 19
    I honestly hate gaming, movies and now software as a service....it's a scam and I for one have had enough.

    image
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,271
    Brainy said:

    ...Gamepass is only working now because games can make their money 1 way, then put it on gamepass with a separate market to make a little more profit. Once every big company has a Gamepass option, then customers wont need to purchase as they wait for it on their "gamepass equivalent platform", quality wont matter at all.  No incentive really to make high quality, because there is no way to make more than any of the other trash game that exists.  Just pump out a bunch of low quality junk for the platforms.
    Yes, this is when the issue would be obvious to all, when players transition from mostly purchasing first to mostly playing on a Pass. Thats when we will see quality really starting to fall.


    Brainy
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,271
    tzervo said:
    I am watching Monk on Netflix these days. Before that, Wednesday. It also has House MD on. But sure, it's bad if you guys say so. ^o^
    You can't take the best "new" detective on Netflix which they did not make and say that makes Netflix great. :smile:

    But overall I think Netflix is well worth the money.

    Blood of Zeus now has a new season not as good as the first but my favorite animation on NF.
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,271
    edited May 19
    Kyleran said:
    Not sure that’s necessarily correct.  Gamepass is probably closest to the concept of Netflix. Netflix has been around for a long time. I don’t think the quality of their shows is any worse than the content on a non-streaming competitor.

    Where we are feeling the pain is actually pricing. Because content is being fractured and now instead is “cable” we have Netflix, Prime Video, Hulu, Discovery Plus, Apple TV Plus, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, Max, Peacock, etc… (Here in the USA at least).


    What is interesting is  I can sub to every streaming channel you listed for far less money than the stupid cable companies were charging when I decided to drop them.

    I have no issue with game pass, I think they are a great deal for game hoppers of the world even if there isn't much appeal to someone like me who has averaged playing 3 or less games annually for the past 20 years.

    Now the real bane of online gaming IMO is seasonal passes which usually is just a bunch of low effort content that awards players a bunch of mostly useless junk they don't really want or need.
    You are just not seeing the Pass issue as yet, we are too focused on our way of gaming, that is what made me take years to make my mind up on this issue.

    The in game seasonal passes are just one of the latest in the never ending line of new ways to make money from a game, live service being the cash cow of gaming. So like all the others that have been created from pre-orders onwards, seasonal passes must move to every other game at lightspeed.

    Maybe this issue will never grow until it really starts to distort the gaming market, apparently from what Xiaoki said the Gamepass is not growing as MS would wish. But I don't see them cancelling it even if it just putters along.


  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 8,164
    How much is Gamepass costing Microsoft and can they keep it up until they dominate?

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited May 19
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • XiaokiXiaoki Member EpicPosts: 4,036
    kitarad said:
    How much is Gamepass costing Microsoft and can they keep it up until they dominate?

    There is no exact number for how much Game Pass costs.

    Phil Spencer said they spend over $1 billion on third party games but there is also the lost sales of first party games. One loss is quantifiable, the other is not.

    Xbox is being outside by PlayStation by a ratio of 5:1 in most regions currently so Xbox should be dominating any day now.
    kitaradScot
  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 8,164
    I have only bought one Xbox and that was the 360. I have however bought every PS console except the latest one. The reason being the Japanese RPGs. Nothing to do with the console quality or brand just that I enjoy JRPGs. Lot of Asian players do that and that could be why they are behind because of the Japanese games being a big favourite.

    Gamepass is a game changer for people who finish games fast. I cannot do that I like to own a game and play it a week or a year later. I don't enjoy having to finish games fast because I have a subscription. I want to buy and play which is why I monopolise Steam. I have no metrics I have no idea nor will I actually ever really be able to find out what most players want. So for me Gamepass is something I have not subscribed to. I have a free trial when I got my new PC which I have still not activated. I don't like the idea of renting games.

    Which I used to do in Malaysia, you rent games a lot there and even in Europe there are many renting opportunities for console games. With PC games I want a library which is mine. Well except for Ubisoft who sees fit to remove games from your library they are mostly safe. I don't feel my games are safe with Gamepass. They can just remove a game and they can arbitrarily do that. Not a good future for games when your only option is rental.

  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,271
    edited May 19
    tzervo said:
    Scot said:
    tzervo said:
    I am watching Monk on Netflix these days. Before that, Wednesday. It also has House MD on. But sure, it's bad if you guys say so. ^o^
    You can't take the best "new" detective on Netflix which they did not make and say that makes Netflix great. :smile:

    But overall I think Netflix is well worth the money.

    Blood of Zeus now has a new season not as good as the first but my favorite animation on NF.
    I do not agree with judging streaming providers only based on the originals they make. In my opinion part of the value of their service is also what they license to show. And since movies are still made outside the streaming platforms and licensed by them, I think there is no need for doom and gloom.

    Also, there are some streaming platform originals (although I would agree most are junk) that are really well made. Wednesday, Stranger Things and (part of) the Witcher for Netflix, Reacher and Mrs Maisel of Amazon Prime, off the top of my head, I am sure there are others.

    Disregarding all of the junk in these platforms, the few good movies and series already provide great value. I understand we agree on that.

    I would expect game services to be more or less the same.
    Quite so, the series they bring in count, but enough originals do have to be good to call the service good and I think Netflix is there, the amount I watch says that to me.

    One think that I am curious about is Netflix making series which are clearly for other regions including the Middle And Far East. How much do these regions watch each others Netflix output? I don't find much for me there, but the odd one like Alice in the Borderland and Shahmaran were really good.
  • TheocritusTheocritus Member LegendaryPosts: 9,974
    edited May 19
    "Yes really good F2P does exist, but overall B2P and subscription games are a lot better."

    A good game is a good game regardless of the pricing choice......Just because you pay more for something does not automatically make it better.
Sign In or Register to comment.