Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Do you think Archlord is better than Lineage 2?

brihtwulfbrihtwulf Member UncommonPosts: 975

I'm just curious to see what people who have played both games think.  I'm still really new to Archlord (only level 8), but the feel of the games seems similar to me thus far.  So, I'm kindof wondering, what does Archlord have that Lineage 2 doesn't?  Of course, I'm guessing the main reason is that Archlord doesn't have a subscription fee, but you tell me...

Comments

  • lanthirelanthire Member Posts: 73
    archlord doesnt have cool wyverns , the games forces you to be a certain gender dependng on the class or race you play wich sucks, in l2 you can choose male or female with everyting..and those two tings were enough to keep me away from the game ....and i think lineage 2 is more beautifull



    i play non now though, im still looking for another mmorpg..so far i couldnt find any at all, ive played so many, but they just dont have ''it''
  • erinyserinys Member UncommonPosts: 395

    i have played L22 trial for 2 weeks, and played archlord.

     

    wanna compare archlord to something? then compare it to shadowbane

    EQ2, L2, FF, vangyard and WoW are a lot better..  just not a little, i mean 5 years of development better

     

    i really dont understand why anyone playing this game could have fun playing it

  • GameloadingGameloading Member UncommonPosts: 14,182
    I'm a bit mixed about it. Overall, I still think Lineage 2 is a better game, but there are certain area's where I think ArchLord stands out. It offers more room for customization (I'm talking about real cust, not the eye candy), and its weapon upgrade system is done better then in Lineage 2. ArchLord is also much more easy to start in. Graphics are better in Lineage 2, but the animations on the other hand are better in ArchLord.



    Erynis, You played Only 1 day. you don't know jack about the game. Don't pretend you even have a clue what your talking about.
  • RyuukoGoRyuukoGo Member Posts: 235


    Originally posted by erinys

    i have played L22 trial for 2 weeks, and played archlord.
     
    wanna compare archlord to something? then compare it to shadowbane
    EQ2, L2, FF, vangyard and WoW are a lot better..  just not a little, i mean 5 years of development better
     
    i really dont understand why anyone playing this game could have fun playing it


    Lol.. you played L2 2 weeks...I played it for a year and played AL since Beta...as well as ~ 300 Days in FFXI...btw its spelled Vanguard.
    L2 is better than AL in one aspect...player numbers...unfortunately both have farmer numbers in proportion to the population.

    AL was alot of fun before the "hell patch" now it is just about grinding/farming to 99.
    L2 was fun...but botters/farmers are ruining it.
    SB looks like a really dated MMORPG..because it is.

  • KrymsonSykkeKrymsonSykke Member Posts: 45
    I have only seen L2 and it look alright...But I have been playing archlords for awhile now still kinda new to the game but it is easer to start in then some of the games I have played in the past...For example Guild Wars is a good game but is not so simple to start up in...But for as Archlords I like the game and yes it might be behind alittle in the development curve but it still has time and room to grow in fact there are now more players in the world of Archlords....
  • RudedawgCDNRudedawgCDN Member UncommonPosts: 507

     

    I have played both games to high lvl.

    Both are similar in that the pve is a mindless repetitive grind. At least with L2 there are raids with nice drops.

    AL has more quests.

    AL has better customization of armour and weapons, one of the few really good things going for it.

    L2 lets you pick female or male - which I prefer.

    As far as pvp goes L2 hands down is better. AL has a bounty system that practically wrecks pvp, it also has a very narrow lvl range for free pvp - that doesnt encourage pvp, rather discourages it - which is odd for a "hard core" pvp game. I honestly think when they say hard core - its the pve they are talking about.

    There is absolutely nothing hardcore about the pvp in Archlord. NOTHING. You even have rez orbs you can buy and just keep rezzing in the same spot if you want.

    AL is free - so this has helped them raise the number of players who actually play the game - but heh - it's hard to boast how many people play your game and why they play it - when the main reason their playing is because its free.

    L2 has seiges, AL has not - only promises.

    The reason AL can only promise changes or future content because they are the distributor not the developer - alas this is the major downfall of the game , the CM's are nice and very involed with the community - but at the end of the day - they can't do much except - change the billing. (yup you guessed it the major game change they've made - was make it free).

    At the end of the day I really dont know why you would bother playing either game - their both a waste of time.

    If you like pve - their both extremely lacking with no challenge whatsoever - WoW and EQ2, AC1 are much much better games.

    If you like pvp - their both lacking and discourage open pvp because of their level restrictions - SB, DAOC and EVE are much much better pvp games.

    I have played pretty well every major mmo out there to high lvl.

    EQ1 EQ2 WoW DAOC AC1 AC2 EVE Shadowbane L2 UO AO CoH GW and yes I 'm sure I have forgotten some.

    I generally do not play Korean mmo's - so before you rag on me about neglecting them - they are not considered major titles in the Western Market like AC, EQ or WoW. ie: Ragonok is a childs game with childs graphics - and I'm an adult - sorry I wont play it. I also don't like mindless grind of many Korean mmo's. I've also noticed the games that players seem to like so much here are the ones that are free.

    Free doesn't make a good game, but I suppose if I was unemployed or a student, I'd have to suck it up and play one.

    AL and L2 are bad games imo, and yes I played them - I admit it.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • SovrathSovrath Member LegendaryPosts: 32,780
    Originally posted by Gameloading

    I'm a bit mixed about it. Overall, I still think Lineage 2 is a better game, but there are certain area's where I think ArchLord stands out. It offers more room for customization (I'm talking about real cust, not the eye candy), and its weapon upgrade system is done better then in Lineage 2. ArchLord is also much more easy to start in. Graphics are better in Lineage 2, but the animations on the other hand are better in ArchLord.



    Erynis, You played Only 1 day. you don't know jack about the game. Don't pretend you even have a clue what your talking about.



    I have to agree with you. L2 is a better game but Archlord's weapon and armor customization is far superior in my opinion.

    Though I don't think the animations are better in Archlord.

    Like Skyrim? Need more content? Try my Skyrim mod "Godfred's Tomb." 

    Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w


    Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547

    Try the "Special Edition." 'Cause it's "Special." https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/64878/?tab=description

    Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo 
  • GameloadingGameloading Member UncommonPosts: 14,182
    Originally posted by zigmund


     


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    I think the real reason is that you do not fit in the asian mindset, considering the vast majority of your list are only western games. People like you shouldn't even touch asian MMORPG's in the first place.
  • AbolithAbolith Member Posts: 34
    Lineage 2 is better than Archlord; the graphics, animations, sound, thrill, etc.....Lineage 2 is three yrs old, but has the best graphics for an MMORPG still today and, looking at some of the future games, better for a while even.
  • mbbladembblade Member Posts: 747

    well if your compareing todays L2 i would say any and all free MMOs are better then L2. L2 was a decent fun luving/hateing game, but now they butchered it so badly its not even worth looking at let alone pay for. So to answer your question "YES" Archlord is better then L2

  • erinyserinys Member UncommonPosts: 395

    thats your opinion, i liked L2, but i hate archlord.

     

  • horizon_holdhorizon_hold Member Posts: 16
    Originally posted by erinys


    thats your opinion, i liked L2, but i hate archlord.
     
    I Erinys, you say you hate Archlord and how you wasted your money, maybe you can save me from wasting mine, can I have your account?
  • rufusangusrufusangus Member Posts: 84
    L2 is a better game, but thats still not saying a whole lot. AL felt and played like a clone to me right from the start, but all the things it tries to copy it really doesn't do a very good job of. The customization is nice, but look at what you give up. PvP is so restricted, and somehow they managed to make PvE even more boring than it was in l2, atleast in l2 you could get together and team up on the bosses, it was a bit challanging at times.



    Besides, you can play l2 private servers for free, and there are alot of them. I know alot of long time players, myself included, got so tired of the Chinese botters on retail that we quit and went to private servers. L2 is a really good game at its heart; The rates are really low, i guess koreans have absolutly nothing else todo, but that aside, it had some great aspects to it you couldn't find anywhere else.  Sadly, the Koreans never seem to care about stopping farmers, so like most korean mmo's the farmers destroyed the economy and chased of alot of players.



    Thats the one thing i give Blizzard props on, they had the balls to simply ban all chinese players that try to connect to NA/Europe servers, even if it costs them some sub's. I have to wonder if l2 would even have enough sub's now to keep running if every last chinese was banned.



    So in conclusion, they both suck; If you must play one or the other, play an l2 private server, because its a whole lot more fun than leveling beside masses of bots for your first 3-6 months, or have to e-bay just to get anywhere because the economy is inflated beyond even God's saving. AL is an even worse knock off of l2, and eventually its going to be farmed out just as bad the way they are going. Niether of them is worth paying anything for at this point imo, there are completly free mmo's now that are more fun than either of them.
  • LucchenoLuccheno Member UncommonPosts: 65
    As zigmund says: grinding and mindless fights. I'm of the same opinion. I'm a student and I wish, that for once, an online game would have an interesting story. I really can't think how can people say: It's the best game ever, even if it's based on grinding quests. their fun to play once in while, but after some time you get tired of them. I mean, altough I've played several games such and L2 and Rappelz (just to quote 2) their always the same NO STORY WHAT SOEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This anoys me, and I got pretty sad when I knew turbine was doing Lotr, cause it was a really good chance of a nice rpg online. I guess I'll just have to keep wishing for a captivating story to come along. Or for a game to put in some storyline. Is it too much to ask? Instead of endless grinding? As for this topic, well, as far as i'm cocnerned, andhaving played both AL and L2, i think that L2 e better, but yet again, what is it worth a castle raid if it hasn't got any active background story?
  • NewMonsterNewMonster Member Posts: 417

    l2 is most currupted mmo..... insane economy.... 99.9% no1 play legit..... even the game itself sucks..... crappy skill animation..... less skill...... crappy enviorment with less objects...... only thing is awesome is the charecter modelings....... limit customization

    archlord rocks! plenty of skills! beautiful skill animation! also its customizable! u get 1 skill point each lv.... and to earn skill u need skill point.... theres plenty of skill to learn.... it let u be careful on what skill u spin on....... u gotta think carefully..... and what skill u want to max out...... its not like l2 where the skill tree is straight foward with no customization and mostly u can learn all skill which dont let the players think hard on skills they get but archlord... u gotta think hard since the skill point is limited....

  • Applesauce88Applesauce88 Member Posts: 1
    Originally posted by Gameloading

    I'm a bit mixed about it. Overall, I still think Lineage 2 is a better game, but there are certain area's where I think ArchLord stands out. It offers more room for customization (I'm talking about real cust, not the eye candy), and its weapon upgrade system is done better then in Lineage 2. ArchLord is also much more easy to start in. Graphics are better in Lineage 2, but the animations on the other hand are better in ArchLord.



    Erynis, You played Only 1 day. you don't know jack about the game. Don't pretend you even have a clue what your talking about.
    How can you even compare the two?
  • lanthirelanthire Member Posts: 73
    Lineage 2 is a better game a more fun game its the content the options the world the characters the style the armor the weapons the feeling you get when you play it its much better than archlord, if archlord wwas such a good succesfull game ti wouldnt have gone free to play now , some people liking archlord better , fine, i liked lineage 2 better so thats my opinion, i liked lineage2 alot , when i starded with archlord the graphics just looked so crap and it the world was just one big mess and i tought custimisation was so boring i almost wanted to quit right there , archlord doesnt have any eye candy, if i wanted to play a game for its gameplay  i put on my gamecube and play zelda or wii n64 wutever, mmorpgs usually got bad gameplay, its pritty much just clikcing a mob you see and it dies ( unless you suck , uopi`ll die instead) you gert some xp, when u got enough u level up (yAI) and you keep doing it till you cant anymore, i think mmorpgs are only fun if u play em with friends ...because u cant say u play em for intensity or wtutever..a monkey can play an mmorpgs and 0wn

    theyr all about look how fast i can click!

    dont get me wrong i luv em , you can chat with your friends there and click things and watc ur char do stuff, thats what your basicly doing (if you have friends ) otherwise u just lcik things and you watch your char do stuff and dont talk to friends duh

    i fell asleep last night because i was up late and my friends were asleep so i wasnt chatting , just killing things (clikcing things and watchving my char hit them ) lol.... mmorpgs......why do i even play them
  • GameloadingGameloading Member UncommonPosts: 14,182
    Originally posted by Applesauce88

    Originally posted by Gameloading

    I'm a bit mixed about it. Overall, I still think Lineage 2 is a better game, but there are certain area's where I think ArchLord stands out. It offers more room for customization (I'm talking about real cust, not the eye candy), and its weapon upgrade system is done better then in Lineage 2. ArchLord is also much more easy to start in. Graphics are better in Lineage 2, but the animations on the other hand are better in ArchLord.



    Erynis, You played Only 1 day. you don't know jack about the game. Don't pretend you even have a clue what your talking about.
    How can you even compare the two? Both are very similar, and its easy to see ArchLord took many things out of lineage 2.
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

    Waiting for:
    Swords of the new world: Granado espada
    DOMO

    Playing: Ge Sg beta test
    Rappelz
    trickster

  • AmaraoAmarao Member UncommonPosts: 650
    I really dont belong posting here because I havent played Archlord(played L2 to the 40s), but it looks pretty good to me.

    I played L2 in c1 and didnt get that far considering it was c1 so I quit.

    Came back in c5 and the game was 4 times better, although thats not saying much.

    When I came back I noticed finding other players that werent bots and not being in a town is some EXTREMELY rare shit.

    And no one can disagree with that because I played on Bartz and had gone all over the world, to every place survivable (remembers 40s).

    Well the point is, if Archlord isnt updating and has similar botting problems like L2, then its obvious that L2 is better.

    Once again, not saying much considering L2 is a decent game(with no chance of ever having PvE quality) with a huge botting issue.
  • joeybootsjoeyboots Member UncommonPosts: 628
    I believe they are very simillar, as far as design. Both are good games, and they are tied in my eyes.
  • sasuke17sasuke17 Member Posts: 18
    to put it simply L2 is a better game... the graphis are more crisp and clear and has a pretty good story line... however, their is the part of having pay monthly for one and the fact that NCsoft seems to come out with most of the really good looking games...
Sign In or Register to comment.