First, why the heck would anyone get angry over a game they're obviously not going to play? I hate Sims games, yet I'm not going to complain about them since I don't play them. What do I care what they do with those Sims games, I don't play them.
Second, good job on the violent tendencies represented in your article! That really sends your point home, how a game you wouldn't even play makes you want to act out violently, even if in a virtual world.
Third, your reason for hating these games (because you think others will see you as the type that plays these games that you don't like rather than the virile MMOs that you do play) is pure crap. That's like saying people see me as the type that plays sport games because I play video games. What do you care what someone who hasn't taken the time to learn what type of games you like to play cares anyway? Some parent sees me at Best Buy looking at the game section and thinks I'm the type that likes to play the most violent games just bother me at all because I know who the heck I am and what the heck I like, as do those who I share my gaming experiences with. All those other people are just generalizing me, like they do everything else, and that's fine. I don't care, and neither should you.
Join the fight against happy games? Can I join the fight against people who fight things they don't care about or even play while millions of others do? Oh, wait, I don't care that you hate these type of games, so my comments here will be all I have to say.
The best part about Dan's columns is reading all the serious responses he gets from folks regarding them. Folks....he is pulling your leg. This is his style of humor...yes, that's right...he's not really serious about these columns, he just writes them to get a rise out of self-rightous, sanctimonious people..... (though I'm sure he & Stradden laugh as hard as I do at some of the responses) As Dan said at the end of this article... "This concludes my weekly waste of column space."
I agree with his last sentiment, his writing is a waste of column space, but wish MMORPG.com would focus on people who don't waste time on the most vapid of conversations without any purpose or meaning. It's not even funny. My post above may be more serious than his, but I don't come here looking for drivel of this sort as if the writer finds it funny that he can write a few paragraphs drawn from some nebula of what he calls imagination or creativity when in fact it just makes him look like an idiot.
hmmmmm....... Which game would I rather play?...... A happy cartoony game where your killing weird monsters with weird music playing along or a game that desperately tries to seem 'realistic' but because of the bugs and bad graphics in it's game it ends up looking worse than the cartoony games hmmm... What to pick what to pick?
I would rather play Puzzle Bobble or Lemmings ( or even Team Fortress 2 seeing as how that has cartoony graphics too ) for several hours than have my eyes go unfocused as I watch an experience bar go up as I play an MMORPG that's only major selling point is that it has boobs showing and has blood or scantily dressed women, if it weren't for the incessant grind I can honestly say I would find Flyff and Trickster more fun than any of these loot based games, honestly....
Quoting people doesn't make you clever, in fact, it makes you all the more stupid for not bothering to read the quotes you post in the first place.
"Maybe all that aerosol I sniffed wiped my memory"
These two comments kind of sum up your mentality and the source of hatred for anything fluffy.
I don't enjoy these games but it doesn't effect me in any way that other people do. Some people don't require drama and death to be entertained... so what. Get over it.
You are clearly envious of their youth and ability to be silly... maybe even the fact they don't care what other people have to say, unlike you who are so insecure that you can't bear to be associated with such things.
I kinda feel sorry for you, go find someone special and get yourself a hug.
YES! This article is totally right. I definitely think pissing and moaning about it on a website will really change the amount of "cute, happy games" that show up on the Internet. This isn't your blog, you lousy hack. Get back to writing real articles and quit crying about the things that bug you as a gamer.
In summation: Quit whining, shut up, and let the rainbows and anime eyes take control.
I love this column. Every week is sends angry nerds into a frenzy of... Forum posting. HA!
Thing is, though, there's a very valid point here. Consider that we're currently living in an age where part of the populace thinks that videogames can be the next great art form, while others still see videogames as childish entertainment (hence the whole M-rated games controversy).
It's not a bad thing that the little kids get to try the whole online culture thing too, but there's a limit. There are certain developmental milestones a child needs to reach before the internet is an okay place for them to be interacting with other people. Obviously, countless people on the internet, and this site, never reached those milestones, which is why they rely on anonymity to be a complete douche-clown whenever possible.
Amazing that the OP can write the kinds of things that would either A: get a regular user here banned or B: get anyone else investigated by the FBI "...Make Me Want to Kill".
Im asking because of your inability to recognise an attempted joke without a canned laugh-track going off at the appropriate time.
Journalists, and people attempting the same, have certain character traits they value and try to develop.. to progress within their chosen class.
These include Witty, Provocative, and Controversial. Literate, educated is less important, and Accurate and Balanced are pretty much irrelevant.
I have never tried any of the genre he wrote about, I dont believe I would enjoy it much, and overdone cuteness does make my skin crawl. So I can see where he is coming from, but not enough to bother posting a reply to the article itself. However, the responses, and responses to the responses, have done their work, and dragged me into the arena as well.
This means the article has WORKED.
______
Thank you for sharing your opinion with us. Now .. Go away.
I say that if a 7 year old wants to play a kiddie game don't blow his head off for it. I say if a 40 year old wants to play a kiddie game, blow his head off for it. I don't think 7 year olds should play 'real' MMO's because most of them are immature, and it shapes their mind thinking that violence is a good thing. Most mature people can tell the difference between entertainment and promoting something. I also think these games should NOT be on MMORPG.com.
I've never read this guy's written work before. Is he always this way? If this isn't his attempt at humour then perhaps he needs to step away from the computer a while. A good looooooong while at that.
It's a pretty insulting piece and I could go into details on why I feel it is, but then again I'm not a psychologist. So I'm reading it the way I (for lack of better wording) want to read it. A touch sexist with a smear of macho BS.
Think I'll stop here before I get into my ranty mcrant rant.
PS - The guy/female that said we couldn't recognize humour. Perhaps if the humour wasn't written as if it were some insecure male in high school, then the humour would be legible. If this is humour then this is the worst satire I've ever read.
_______
Now Playing: EQ2 Prior Games (in no order): SWG, L2, RO, PT, ROSE, CoH/CoV, AO, UO, EVE, WoW and a bunch of others. _______
The author writes to get a rise of of people. That's his job. That said, there is one key word that everyone posting here has missed so far and frankly it shocks me. Impotent. Not in terms of his sexual functionality but rather his writing.
'This week I take my impotent aggressions out on....'
Mr Dan F is trying to butter his bread by getting folks to write. The more the better. The real problem is that he's not a great writer. He doesn't have a great deal of original thought ort provoking concepts to offer so he re-hashes arguements already done to death or finds a 'rant' to raise folks hackles and not even good ones at that. Usually, angry is better than happy because anger fuels more anger.
Some of you pointed out that Mr. Dan F. was writing a joke that no one was getting. Not so. You are giving the writer too much credit. For an example of true 'shock jokes', look up Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal," amusing if you understand it. Let's all think fuzzy-happy thoughts about articles with more meat to go with the potatoes... currently being served and move on to something more entertaining.
Well thats it for this week's debunking. Let's file this article under 'A Cute and Fluffy Article That Never Really Was'
"he just writes them to get a rise out of self-rightous, sanctimonious people..."
"I'm thinking that this article is more of a humorous one as opposed to a rant."
"WHen it works it is good stuff, but all too often it just comes off as being annoying and usually a bit offensive. Which in most cases is what they are shooting for anyhow."
"Mr Dan F is trying to butter his bread by getting folks to write. The more the better."
All the defenses offered for the kind of rant the OP did are EXACTLY what the staff at MMORPG.COM is censoring and banning other people for in the posts we make, i.e.:
You have been issued a temporary ban by one of our moderators.
Category: Trolling
Reason: Posting excessive negative comments or baiting others to respond in a negative manner is considered trolling on the MMORPG.com forums.
In other words, it's OK to bait people to respond in a negative manner as long as the person doing the baiting is an MMORPG.COM staff member, but if regular users here have actual grievances they need to vent about a game, company or product, unnamed moderators are quick to pounce, censoring posts and issuing bans like candy at Halloween.
The very capricious nature in which these bans are applied, combined with the heavy-handed censoring of posts that do not use profanity, obscenity, sexist or racist remarks (which are precisely the kind of posts that need to be removed) simply illustrates the incredible double-standard that exists here at MMORPG.COM.
I've seen this kind of double standard back in the days of DOS/Text-based BBSs and let me assure you, no BBS that ever moderated its fora in such a capricious and heavy-handed way - while letting privileged posters get away with the kind of thing the OP does - ever lasted very long.
You're either going to tolerate free speech or you aren't. But if you're going to have two separate sets of rules governing speech on this board, you're only - ultimately - assuring your demise.
The OP's posts of late are important not for what they say, but for highlighting the hypocrisy and caprice that exist among the MMORPG.COM moderators and staff.
The only part of the article that felt needed a revamp (well I felt the article as a whole needed one but...) was the 'I want to kill....' part. Unfortunately, while I am sure Dan F meant nothing by it, there are all too many impressionable people *cough* out there that might act on such a statement. Anger begets anger and regretfully often leads to violence. Hence the term 'senseless violence,' something all too prevalent in the world these days. Different words could have been used to say the same thing. In truth the 'Happy games make me want to kill' is something I would expect from an unthinking teen..not a supposedly mature author.
A note to all the apologists who say "if you were annoyed by this article, you must not have 'gotten' the joke": It is entirely possible to see that a writer is trying to be funny, but to simultaneously think the joke is stupid.
Originally posted by tapeworm00 Originally posted by daelnor Has anyone other than me noticed that everyone on this site seems to be an expert on psychology? Seriously, everyone's examination of TRUE reasoning of someone elses words is astounding. Everyone has an expert diagnosis for everything, ESPECIALLY when it is of a different opinion than theirs. D. p.s. Personally, I blame child abuse for any opinion that differs from mine. They musts obviously be caused by some childhood trauma, or they would always agree with me implicitly.
Just like the "columnist" thinks he knows what's best for the MMO genre, 'we all' know how his clueless mind works. It's really not that complicated, actually. The clumsiness behind the post is blatantly visible, and it's funny to an extent. It's not as funny when you start thinking that this guy thinks he's all very mature and adult playing a bloody dwarf who kills fantastic creatures in his weekly D&D sessions with his equally 15-year old minded friends. And they're not 15 year old minded for playing such things; they're so because they pretend to be superior to, I don't know, guys who watch cartoons or whatever. A discourse such as this "column" just goes to show how maturity-avid these kind of people are. Shows what they're lacking, doesn't it?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. One word. Editorial.
ed·i·to·ri·al /??d??t?ri?l, -?to?r-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ed-i-tawr-ee-uhl, -tohr-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun 1. an article in a newspaper or other periodical presenting the opinion of the publisher, editor, or editors.
Nobody ever said any of this is fact, just like nothing in your statement is fact, it's simply your opinion.
You guys crack me up.
By the way, with your own reasoning...you sound even more retarded than the writer of the article..and he wasn't even bashing anyone.
So that's what we're calling "trolling" these days?
Just want to know so that next time some spineless moderator - who refuses to use a name other than "mod" - censors or bans a user merely for expressing an opinion, we know the magic "get out of jail free" word.
Comments
Sorry, but this is an idiotic article.
First, why the heck would anyone get angry over a game they're obviously not going to play? I hate Sims games, yet I'm not going to complain about them since I don't play them. What do I care what they do with those Sims games, I don't play them.
Second, good job on the violent tendencies represented in your article! That really sends your point home, how a game you wouldn't even play makes you want to act out violently, even if in a virtual world.
Third, your reason for hating these games (because you think others will see you as the type that plays these games that you don't like rather than the virile MMOs that you do play) is pure crap. That's like saying people see me as the type that plays sport games because I play video games. What do you care what someone who hasn't taken the time to learn what type of games you like to play cares anyway? Some parent sees me at Best Buy looking at the game section and thinks I'm the type that likes to play the most violent games just bother me at all because I know who the heck I am and what the heck I like, as do those who I share my gaming experiences with. All those other people are just generalizing me, like they do everything else, and that's fine. I don't care, and neither should you.
Join the fight against happy games? Can I join the fight against people who fight things they don't care about or even play while millions of others do? Oh, wait, I don't care that you hate these type of games, so my comments here will be all I have to say.
Just an extremely idiotic article.
I agree with his last sentiment, his writing is a waste of column space, but wish MMORPG.com would focus on people who don't waste time on the most vapid of conversations without any purpose or meaning. It's not even funny. My post above may be more serious than his, but I don't come here looking for drivel of this sort as if the writer finds it funny that he can write a few paragraphs drawn from some nebula of what he calls imagination or creativity when in fact it just makes him look like an idiot.
hmmmmm....... Which game would I rather play?...... A happy cartoony game where your killing weird monsters with weird music playing along or a game that desperately tries to seem 'realistic' but because of the bugs and bad graphics in it's game it ends up looking worse than the cartoony games hmmm... What to pick what to pick?
I would rather play Puzzle Bobble or Lemmings ( or even Team Fortress 2 seeing as how that has cartoony graphics too ) for several hours than have my eyes go unfocused as I watch an experience bar go up as I play an MMORPG that's only major selling point is that it has boobs showing and has blood or scantily dressed women, if it weren't for the incessant grind I can honestly say I would find Flyff and Trickster more fun than any of these loot based games, honestly....
Quoting people doesn't make you clever, in fact, it makes you all the more stupid for not bothering to read the quotes you post in the first place.
"Happy Games make me want to kill"
"Maybe all that aerosol I sniffed wiped my memory"
These two comments kind of sum up your mentality and the source of hatred for anything fluffy.
I don't enjoy these games but it doesn't effect me in any way that other people do. Some people don't require drama and death to be entertained... so what. Get over it.
You are clearly envious of their youth and ability to be silly... maybe even the fact they don't care what other people have to say, unlike you who are so insecure that you can't bear to be associated with such things.
I kinda feel sorry for you, go find someone special and get yourself a hug.
YES! This article is totally right. I definitely think pissing and moaning about it on a website will really change the amount of "cute, happy games" that show up on the Internet. This isn't your blog, you lousy hack. Get back to writing real articles and quit crying about the things that bug you as a gamer.
In summation: Quit whining, shut up, and let the rainbows and anime eyes take control.
I love this column. Every week is sends angry nerds into a frenzy of... Forum posting. HA!
Thing is, though, there's a very valid point here. Consider that we're currently living in an age where part of the populace thinks that videogames can be the next great art form, while others still see videogames as childish entertainment (hence the whole M-rated games controversy).
It's not a bad thing that the little kids get to try the whole online culture thing too, but there's a limit. There are certain developmental milestones a child needs to reach before the internet is an okay place for them to be interacting with other people. Obviously, countless people on the internet, and this site, never reached those milestones, which is why they rely on anonymity to be a complete douche-clown whenever possible.
Amazing that the OP can write the kinds of things that would either A: get a regular user here banned or B: get anyone else investigated by the FBI "...Make Me Want to Kill".
Someone clearly has unresolved issues.
Jeez, are you people all American or something?
Im asking because of your inability to recognise an attempted joke without a canned laugh-track going off at the appropriate time.
Journalists, and people attempting the same, have certain character traits they value and try to develop.. to progress within their chosen class.
These include Witty, Provocative, and Controversial. Literate, educated is less important, and Accurate and Balanced are pretty much irrelevant.
I have never tried any of the genre he wrote about, I dont believe I would enjoy it much, and overdone cuteness does make my skin crawl. So I can see where he is coming from, but not enough to bother posting a reply to the article itself. However, the responses, and responses to the responses, have done their work, and dragged me into the arena as well.
This means the article has WORKED.
______
Thank you for sharing your opinion with us.
Now .. Go away.
I say that if a 7 year old wants to play a kiddie game don't blow his head off for it. I say if a 40 year old wants to play a kiddie game, blow his head off for it. I don't think 7 year olds should play 'real' MMO's because most of them are immature, and it shapes their mind thinking that violence is a good thing. Most mature people can tell the difference between entertainment and promoting something. I also think these games should NOT be on MMORPG.com.
Among The Shadows
http://atsdf.com/
I've never read this guy's written work before. Is he always this way? If this isn't his attempt at humour then perhaps he needs to step away from the computer a while. A good looooooong while at that.
It's a pretty insulting piece and I could go into details on why I feel it is, but then again I'm not a psychologist. So I'm reading it the way I (for lack of better wording) want to read it. A touch sexist with a smear of macho BS.
Think I'll stop here before I get into my ranty mcrant rant.
PS - The guy/female that said we couldn't recognize humour. Perhaps if the humour wasn't written as if it were some insecure male in high school, then the humour would be legible. If this is humour then this is the worst satire I've ever read.
_______
Now Playing:
EQ2
Prior Games (in no order):
SWG, L2, RO, PT, ROSE, CoH/CoV, AO, UO, EVE, WoW and a bunch of others.
_______
The author writes to get a rise of of people. That's his job. That said, there is one key word that everyone posting here has missed so far and frankly it shocks me. Impotent. Not in terms of his sexual functionality but rather his writing.
'This week I take my impotent aggressions out on....'
Mr Dan F is trying to butter his bread by getting folks to write. The more the better. The real problem is that he's not a great writer. He doesn't have a great deal of original thought ort provoking concepts to offer so he re-hashes arguements already done to death or finds a 'rant' to raise folks hackles and not even good ones at that. Usually, angry is better than happy because anger fuels more anger.
Some of you pointed out that Mr. Dan F. was writing a joke that no one was getting. Not so. You are giving the writer too much credit. For an example of true 'shock jokes', look up Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal," amusing if you understand it. Let's all think fuzzy-happy thoughts about articles with more meat to go with the potatoes... currently being served and move on to something more entertaining.
Well thats it for this week's debunking. Let's file this article under 'A Cute and Fluffy Article That Never Really Was'
All the defenses offered for the kind of rant the OP did are EXACTLY what the staff at MMORPG.COM is censoring and banning other people for in the posts we make, i.e.:
In other words, it's OK to bait people to respond in a negative manner as long as the person doing the baiting is an MMORPG.COM staff member, but if regular users here have actual grievances they need to vent about a game, company or product, unnamed moderators are quick to pounce, censoring posts and issuing bans like candy at Halloween.
The very capricious nature in which these bans are applied, combined with the heavy-handed censoring of posts that do not use profanity, obscenity, sexist or racist remarks (which are precisely the kind of posts that need to be removed) simply illustrates the incredible double-standard that exists here at MMORPG.COM.
I've seen this kind of double standard back in the days of DOS/Text-based BBSs and let me assure you, no BBS that ever moderated its fora in such a capricious and heavy-handed way - while letting privileged posters get away with the kind of thing the OP does - ever lasted very long.
You're either going to tolerate free speech or you aren't. But if you're going to have two separate sets of rules governing speech on this board, you're only - ultimately - assuring your demise.
The OP's posts of late are important not for what they say, but for highlighting the hypocrisy and caprice that exist among the MMORPG.COM moderators and staff.
The only part of the article that felt needed a revamp (well I felt the article as a whole needed one but...) was the 'I want to kill....' part. Unfortunately, while I am sure Dan F meant nothing by it, there are all too many impressionable people *cough* out there that might act on such a statement. Anger begets anger and regretfully often leads to violence. Hence the term 'senseless violence,' something all too prevalent in the world these days. Different words could have been used to say the same thing. In truth the 'Happy games make me want to kill' is something I would expect from an unthinking teen..not a supposedly mature author.
A note to all the apologists who say "if you were annoyed by this article, you must not have 'gotten' the joke": It is entirely possible to see that a writer is trying to be funny, but to simultaneously think the joke is stupid.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. One word. Editorial.
ed·i·to·ri·al /??d??t?ri?l, -?to?r-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ed-i-tawr-ee-uhl, -tohr-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
noun 1. an article in a newspaper or other periodical presenting the opinion of the publisher, editor, or editors.
Nobody ever said any of this is fact, just like nothing in your statement is fact, it's simply your opinion.
You guys crack me up.
By the way, with your own reasoning...you sound even more retarded than the writer of the article..and he wasn't even bashing anyone.
D.
So that's what we're calling "trolling" these days?
Just want to know so that next time some spineless moderator - who refuses to use a name other than "mod" - censors or bans a user merely for expressing an opinion, we know the magic "get out of jail free" word.
Simply call it "editorial."