Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

VG or EQ2

I am a hard-core wow player point is i downed illidan and i feel that wow just isnt hard-core enough for me.(also way too many kids)



I researched both games a lot but wondering a few things still.



1. Which has better end-game content (raid/boss wise.)



2. Does EQ2 have any form of pvp?



3. Any1 know what is up with VG and loosing a lot of Dev's..... do you think VG is dying/dead?



4. What is the outlook for both?



5. Are both games leveling just .. quest....quest....quest



6. Which has more populated server's?



Overall I want a nice "old-school" type feel, and a game with a very bright (That is my main worry for either game) future,  and has lots of endgame content, nice community, leveling doesn't feel like a chore (not be questing all the time mix it up by finding FAST dungeon groups or maybe even something else that will help you gain levels), and a also not everyone looks the same armor wise (huge dislike for me).



Basically iam looking at VG since it is still new and has potential BUT!!! iam afraid that SOE is basically putting it on the backburner/not caring too much about VG (looks like they have alot more resources in Eq2 than VG..), and if that is the case i want a mmorpg that stays fresh has updates and fixes and has a mature and "large" population in-game and if there is no real development behind VG now there is no point to start it but iam not sure that is why i ask.



 



(Also too if you think there is a game i would like better please do suggest, no i do not want to play a old-school game like daoc ^^, but iam looking for the old school feel kinda.)



*Sorry for repeating myself on some things, just realized that now*

Comments

  • mahierl2005mahierl2005 Member UncommonPosts: 94

    I have played both, and they are both OK. I would wait tho, as both are on what would be perceived as sinking ships.. I dont think either are still growing, and with conan and war on the near horizon, I would say just wait for now.

  • puddinloverpuddinlover Member Posts: 30

    AoC, not for a few months and who knows when war is really coming out... :(     (I am a war man but i dont think i should stop gaming for almost a full year to wait for it)

     

    I really really wish i had a aoc beta, that would keep me interested till aoc.. but i dont.

  • alakramalakram Member UncommonPosts: 2,301

    First of all, I'll say, i played the both and actually I'm playing EQ2. I really like EQ2, But for a hardcore player, the more hardcore I played is Lineage 2. You may give it  try. But to choose between this two, I choose EQ2. VG is not finished, despite what peeps say here. The game is still bugged a lot. To give you some help, my comp. is Athlon 64 2,8, 2gb ram, nvidia 7900 gs 256, EQ2 runs fine and Vg does not.

    Talking about content, EQ2 for has far more content, if you play the "hardcore way", you will reach endagame soon and you will find only 1 Raid zone in VG, and You have a lot of Raid zones in EQ2 not only at the end, but on the way, some good places at 60, at 70 and at 80. And really good group dungeons at lower levels. And then you have City Task system, who gives you status points, this is like "money" to spend on housing, armors, mounts, items, titles, some of this is only buyable with status points. Ah well and the crafting, easy to learn and... well, grind to level thats true.



  • damkardamkar Member Posts: 83
    Originally posted by puddinlover


    I am a hard-core wow player point is i downed illidan and i feel that wow just isnt hard-core enough for me.(also way too many kids)



    I researched both games a lot but wondering a few things still.




    1. Which has better end-game content (raid/boss wise.)
    Eq2 has more end-game content raid wise. VG has more end-game options if you are not a raider as in diplomacy and crafting.




    2. Does EQ2 have any form of pvp?
    Unless you play on PVP servers neither of them do.


    3. Any1 know what is up with VG and loosing a lot of Dev's..... do you think VG is dying/dead?
    It is changing to be more like EQ2 which is decreasing customer base and not attracting enough new customers. No games on SOE station access are literally dead. However, I would say that development for VG will for the future lag behind EQ2.



    4. What is the outlook for both?
    VG will continue to evolve to be more like EQ2 and EQ2 will continue in its current state with new expansions.




    5. Are both games leveling just .. quest....quest....quest
    Games are what you make of them. There are more options in VG.



    6. Which has more populated server's?
    Obviously EQ2 considering VG has less than 5 servers total (including PVP).



    Overall I want a nice "old-school" type feel, and a game with a very bright (That is my main worry for either game) future,  and has lots of endgame content, nice community, leveling doesn't feel like a chore (not be questing all the time mix it up by finding FAST dungeon groups or maybe even something else that will help you gain levels), and a also not everyone looks the same armor wise (huge dislike for me).
    All of the games you are looking at will continue to have new endgame content added at different pace. Population isn't a problem in either of those games from my personal experience nor is there a grouping deficit. In this category, both of them will score pretty equally.


    Basically iam looking at VG since it is still new and has potential BUT!!! iam afraid that SOE is basically putting it on the backburner/not caring too much about VG (looks like they have alot more resources in Eq2 than VG..), and if that is the case i want a mmorpg that stays fresh has updates and fixes and has a mature and "large" population in-game and if there is no real development behind VG now there is no point to start it but iam not sure that is why i ask.



    Only SOE can answer the question and they will answer with the same PR answer. There is development in both games and there will continue to be at different paces.  As things are neither of those two games would fall into old school feel.  Check GU4 for hints as to why. VG has more freedom than EQ2 and EQ2 has more polish and updates than VG.  Given a choice between both of them I would choose VG personally as far as game mechanics and EQ2 as far as content.




    (Also too if you think there is a game i would like better please do suggest, no i do not want to play a old-school game like daoc ^^, but iam looking for the old school feel kinda.)
    Old school feel comes when you play old school games. I am finding some of the old charm (not the mechanics though) in LOTRO that I had in EQ. However, for the true hardcore old school game I still go back to EQ.




    *Sorry for repeating myself on some things, just realized that now*

     

  • puddinloverpuddinlover Member Posts: 30

    Great help!

    VG for some reason is saying "play-me" (i played it at very beginning of lunch and only had 1g than i upgraded to 2gigs corsair xms overclocked since, 7900GTO and Duo2 e6400. so i THINK Vg shouldnt be too bad, when i had 1gig on med settings i noticed medium fps if i remember right.. but  my crap 1gig ram was holding me back than, also reason i quit was becuase i went back to wow -.-, i just didnt see too many people in VG at that time which turned me off fast, and for EQ2 i tried trial but like i said not sure how the game is after the first few lvls)

    but as i stated many times, iam very worried about the state VG is in resource wise.

    and also i hated linage 2 with a passion ^^, but ty for the sugestion

    Ya, i hope i get a email within a few hours saying i got a aoc or war beta.. BUT that has happened for over a year so not sure why it would now.

  • TorakTorak Member Posts: 4,905

     

    Originally posted by puddinlover


    Great help!
    VG for some reason is saying "play-me" (i played it at very beginning of lunch and only had 1g than i upgraded to 2gigs corsair xms overclocked since, 7900GTO and Duo2 e6400. so i THINK Vg shouldnt be too bad, when i had 1gig on med settings i noticed medium fps if i remember right.. but  my crap 1gig ram was holding me back than, also reason i quit was becuase i went back to wow -.-, i just didnt see too many people in VG at that time which turned me off fast, and for EQ2 i tried trial but like i said not sure how the game is after the first few lvls)
    but as i stated many times, iam very worried about the state VG is in resource wise.
    and also i hated linage 2 with a passion ^^, but ty for the sugestion
    Ya, i hope i get a email within a few hours saying i got a aoc or war beta.. BUT that has happened for over a year so not sure why it would now.

    Give Vanguard a go.

     

    Don't worry about what resources SOE is throwing at what game, EQII is their flagship and thats not going to change. Although VG has some changes that are making more "friendly" its still a much different game then EQII and other fantasy games.

    The problem with not seeing other players is mainly because there are like 13 or 14 starter areas, you need to actually move on before you start hitting a good amount of people. The other issue is most of the pop is higher level, not many new players to hang out with. This creates a bit of a problem when it comes to grouping. You can solo but you miss out on some content. Maybe you will run into other players, who can say? Go on ebay and get the full collectors edition for under 10 dollars, nothing really lost and you get a buddy key or two maybe bring some friends in with you.

    You do a lot of questing as it pretty much is a strict PvE game. The nice thing is you can opt to do other things aside from "kill 10 rats" if you get bored. You can always craft or do some diplomacy which is amusing when you need a break. It would be nice if you could do it against other players. I like the diplomacy portion.

    I played them both and frankly I would rather stick forks in my eyes then play EQII.

    Good luck.

     PS - endgame... a dirty word for an MMO player, an actual MMO wouldn't have an "endgame".  But Vanguard has raids too...hooray for us. I'm sure SOE will pump in a bunch more, they created the raid mechanic and thrive on it as it keeps the raid minded players who stick with their half-arsed games, happy. SOE dev philosophy is when in doubt, add a raid.

     

  • puddinloverpuddinlover Member Posts: 30

    HeHe, nice reply.

    um thing yes idk why but the whole VG "flopping" thing bugs me knowing that i might be playing a game that has not devlopment future.

    mabey iam just a big baby when it comes to updates and active content and staff behind a game is all :|, either way i might sleep on it.

     

  • TorakTorak Member Posts: 4,905

    First thing I would do if I were interested in VG is get the heck off this site.

    Take a look at tentonhammer, there is an actual community there.

    vanguard.tentonhammer.com/

    Also, maybe next week there is a big patch for VG happening (GU4) look at the notes for that.

    Then if you do get the game make sure you add the Drox UI. That fixes a bunch of the UI issues.

    Take a look at this world map just to get an idea how big the scope of this gameworld is...click around on it...

    vanguard.gamepressure.com/world_of_telon_map.asp

     

  • puddinloverpuddinlover Member Posts: 30

    Ya, i have read alot at ten ton about both games.

     

    Still deciding -.-

  • grimbojgrimboj Member Posts: 2,102

    1. EQ2 has 8 expansions and raid content built up over years.

    2. It has PvP servers and duelling.

    3. I tried VG again when I resubbed station access and Its raw, it still feels like an alpha. No idea whats up with losing devs, they might be diverting resources?

    4. EQ2 is here to stay, finding a party is not a problem and people are returning after trying other games. Personally I get bored at lvl 50 but someone pvping may have a better experience.

    5. EQ2 has a zillion different things to do. You have epic quests that lvl up your guild and count towards mounts. There is 3 different types of skill tree that you can lvl up in advance if you do epic quests instead of xping. Best crafting of any game - people make pure crafting alts. You get crafting double xp in addition to adventure double xp.

    6. Vanguard is dead in comparison to an EU EQ2 server. SOE will never drop VG but dont expect any expansions with such a low player base.

    --
    Note: PlayNC will refuse to allow you access to your account if you forget your password and can't provide a scanned image of the product key for the first product you purchased..... LOL

  • puddinloverpuddinlover Member Posts: 30
    Originally posted by grimboj


    1. EQ2 has 8 expansions and raid content built up over years.
    2. It has PvP servers and duelling.
    3. I tried VG again when I resubbed station access and Its raw, it still feels like an alpha. No idea whats up with losing devs, they might be diverting resources?
    4. EQ2 is here to stay, finding a party is not a problem and people are returning after trying other games. Personally I get bored at lvl 50 but someone pvping may have a better experience.
    5. EQ2 has a zillion different things to do. You have epic quests that lvl up your guild and count towards mounts. There is 3 different types of skill tree that you can lvl up in advance if you do epic quests instead of xping. Best crafting of any game - people make pure crafting alts. You get crafting double xp in addition to adventure double xp.
    6. Vanguard is dead in comparison to an EU EQ2 server. SOE will never drop VG but dont expect any expansions with such a low player base.


     
    Is EQ2 crafting better than VG, and can u own houses in EQ2 like u can in VG? (not that those 2 things matter alot to me just curious)

    any1 have input how lotro is on end-game raiding?

  • puddinloverpuddinlover Member Posts: 30

    Bump before i goto bed, more input would be lovely (plan to buy a game once i wake up)

  • mindw0rkmindw0rk Member UncommonPosts: 1,356
    VG has a better graphics, world design and more fun classes. But EQ2 has more content and population. You decide
  • ThillianThillian Member UncommonPosts: 3,156
    Originally posted by puddinlover


    I am a hard-core wow player point is i downed illidan and i feel that wow just isnt hard-core enough for me.(also way too many kids)



    I researched both games a lot but wondering a few things still.



    1. Which has better end-game content (raid/boss wise.)
    EQ2 has more but far less entertaining (imho). EQ2 is out for 4 hours, VG for 1 year. So it's obvious EQ has more end-game content. VG has plants to increase level caps and add raids frequently.


    2. Does EQ2 have any form of pvp?
    If you are interested in PvP then both games are definetly not for you.


    3. Any1 know what is up with VG and loosing a lot of Dev's..... do you think VG is dying/dead?
    VG is not dying. The subscribtion numbers are rising at the moment as devs stated on the official forums.



    4. What is the outlook for both?
    VG looks far better than EQ2. EQ2 is instanced game divided into zones with a few exits that leads to another zones. Each zone has it's own level range. It's linear, you can't really enjoy scenery. VG has open world. The camps are scattered around the world that gives varius level quests. The view distance is huge, the graphics are excellent and the world is far far far bigger than EQ2 world.



    5. Are both games leveling just .. quest....quest....quest
    VG has more options for you to level. Apart from the fact there are more zones for each level range in VG, you can also level only with friends in dungeons or simply grinding.  The amount of content for leveling is more in VG which is suprising if you compare how old EQ2 is.



    6. Which has more populated server's?
    EQ2 has more servers, but the population on specific servers is a bit higher in VG. It may seem a bit emptier because the world could be ... 3-4 times bigger in VG (just guessing) but the amount of people online all the time is around 1200-1500 on Halgar which is the least populated VG server.
     


    Overall I want a nice "old-school" type feel, and a game with a very bright (That is my main worry for either game) future,  and has lots of endgame content, nice community, leveling doesn't feel like a chore (not be questing all the time mix it up by finding FAST dungeon groups or maybe even something else that will help you gain levels), and a also not everyone looks the same armor wise (huge dislike for me).



    Basically iam looking at VG since it is still new and has potential BUT!!! iam afraid that SOE is basically putting it on the backburner/not caring too much about VG (looks like they have alot more resources in Eq2 than VG..), and if that is the case i want a mmorpg that stays fresh has updates and fixes and has a mature and "large" population in-game and if there is no real development behind VG now there is no point to start it but iam not sure that is why i ask.



    SoE puts as many money into VG as many subscribers it has. Now the numbers are rising, so we might expect increasing the studio (or a luxury holiday), but in my opinion VG has brigther future than EQ2. Once the game will earn the popularity it deservers, I can't imagine why would people choose EQ2 over VG. The important factors like linearity of the world, atmosphere, classes/combat/crafting is simply on VG side. EQ2 is not even polished still after 4 years. I can't think of a single reason why would anyone choose EQ2 over VG.

     

    REALITY CHECK

  • ProfRedProfRed Member UncommonPosts: 3,495

    Don't go with EQ2 unless you want to be depressed about how much time you put into your character when you learn how to check how many players are on your server one morning.  Especially in the pvp servers.  Don't know about VG.  I'd say do something free like Mabinogi and if you like it let it hold you over until Warhammer, Age of Conan, or a different title, or an open beta of a game like this.  I wouldn't give my money to either game, or SOE for that matter.

  • lomillerlomiller Member Posts: 1,810
    1) EQ2 has more/better end game content by far

    2) EQ2 does have some PvP servers, but they are not for everyone.  It’s a very gank oriented PvP with few real goals beyond harassing other people and maybe the occasional battle to deny another guild access to a raid zone.  Some people like that kind of thing however.

    3) Vanguard continues to struggle to find some kind of viable identity and hang on to the handful of subscribers it has left.

    4) EQ2 is stable and probably gaining a few subscribers.  Expansions 3 and 4 easily outsold the first 2.

    5) You can grind or quest in both games.  On the EQ2 PvP servers a lot of people used to level lock their characters so they could gank new players trying to level, so now you get significant XP for PvP and it bypasses any level locking.  I.E. you could level up just on PvP if you wanted, but there are going to be some gaps where targets are hard come by.

    6) EQ2 has more servers, and while some levels/zones are not heavily populated the overall population is fine with most ranging from moderate to high populations.  Some Vanguard servers have ok populations, but the large world is difficult to fully populate.
  • NadiaNadia Member UncommonPosts: 11,798

    Originally posted by puddinlover


    the whole VG "flopping" thing bugs me knowing that i might be playing a game that has not development future.
    SOE doesnt abandon their games

     

    they keep changing / adding to *all* their online games,  including console mmos like EQOA

     

     

    whether you will LIKE the changes, is a different matter altogether

  • quixadhalquixadhal Member UncommonPosts: 215

    EQ2.

    I hate to say it, especially since I jumped on both games the day they launched (and was even in the beta for Vanguard)... but EQ2 has a very good community, a healthy in-game market, and just feels very polished and fun.

    Vanguard has awesome ideas, a nice complex crafting system, but even after all the bug fixes it still feels fragile.  More importantly to me, the community just isn't there.  Now, if it can manage to slowly grow a player base, it might turn into a great game, but I don't want to invest my time in that slim chance -- even if the player-crafted boats are cool. :)

    Put it another way... in EQ2, on a weekday at 10am, I can log in and see other players running by, even out in the middle of Nek forest.  In Vanguard, I can walk around Martok (the main city on Kojan) at 7pm and I'm shocked if I see anyone else there at all.  I don't need to pay a subscription fee to play a single player game.

    Although if you also play PotBS, you might just want to get a station pass and then you'd have both EQ2 and VG.

  • AntariousAntarious Member UncommonPosts: 2,843

    Originally posted by quixadhal


    Put it another way... in EQ2, on a weekday at 10am, I can log in and see other players running by, even out in the middle of Nek forest.  In Vanguard, I can walk around Martok (the main city on Kojan) at 7pm and I'm shocked if I see anyone else there at all. 
    I agreed with pretty much everything you wrote till that point.

    Martok is the main city on Kojan?

    Martok is the goblin city and was never that overly popular (goblins as a race).  They were popular to people who wanted to play them but not in the broad sense of the term popular.

    Now try... Tanvu... and I might agree with you.

    I logged into Vanguard yesterday and just now becuase yes.. *gasp* I forgot the name of the city myself and wanted to get it right.

    I'm actually suprised that the chat is very active now but then again there is only 4 servers.  Last night 3 were actually at "moderate" and the pvp server was "light".

    For vanguard that is better population than I have seen in a long... long... time (in fact one could say its better than Tabula Rasa had when I last logged in.. for a comparison to a newer game).

    I'd agree that if someoen is already playing potbs... and wants to stay there.  They are going to pay $30 for two games anyway.. so the station package for 29.99 and access to all the soe games is more or less.. a no brainer.

    If I had to pick one or the other... I'd probably go with EQ2 (I don't really like either as they are both level based games to be honest).

    However, as stated a few times... station access gives you access to both if you like some other game like potbs anyway.

  • fingisfingis Member Posts: 207

    Sounds like you're buned out on WoW.

    Switching to another WoW type game won't allieviate your burnout.  You'll still be doing similar things.  Go play RL golf for a month or two, imo.

     

  • ZorgoZorgo Member UncommonPosts: 2,254
    Originally posted by puddinlover


    I am a hard-core wow player point is i downed illidan and i feel that wow just isnt hard-core enough for me.(also way too many kids)



    I researched both games a lot but wondering a few things still.



    1. Which has better end-game content (raid/boss wise.)
    EQ2 has more end game content. Although there is a lot more content for the end game in EQ2, I find that the raids are all pretty similarly constructed. To me (not to everyone) it felt like you were doing the same raid with a different map and different mobs.
    VG has a lot less content and 99% is geared toward single group rather than raid, but I think the content is more varied.  ToT and RI are very different zones, for example, not only in layout, mobs but also in quest construction. VG only has one raid dungeon, but it is enormous with months of content to complete. VG has a fair number of overland raid targets as well.



    2. Does EQ2 have any form of pvp?

    they have a pvp server, no pvp on MOST servers, other than dueling.
    VG has one free for all pvp server - many think that the balancing of pvp in VG has taken a backseat to VG's other problems. There is no pvp on the regular servers, other than dueling.



    3. Any1 know what is up with VG and loosing a lot of Dev's..... do you think VG is dying/dead?
    VG is not thriving, but I don't think it is dying either. Active players seem to be on a steady increase (despite what others have said here). There are certainly a lot of questions about whether SOE is throwing its full support behind VG development. It certainly has a small dev team, and people do keep finding better jobs. My uneducated analysis is that, developers in VG may feel that SOE isn't giving them the tools/staff they need to stamp out the last bugs/performance issues and they are hindered in expanding the content of the game. They are moving forward, but more slowly than players (and probably developers) would want.



    4. What is the outlook for both?
    I think its a 'time will tell' issue. VG could be great with a lot of 'if's. EQ2 I think has a solid construction that will con't to appeal to its current customer base. I don't think it's ever going to jump beyond its current population, and may lose subscribers due to AoC, WAR and 'if' VG con't to improve.



    5. Are both games leveling just .. quest....quest....quest
    Yes. But I think you find more variety in quest construction in VG, it feels deeper and more immersive to me. IMO, VG's quests are the same as we've seen, they've just done a better job. EQ2 feels very stale in quest construction, IMO.



    6. Which has more populated server's?
    EQ2 has more servers with an over all greater population. VG has only a few servers, each with a decent enough population to play, but it could be better. Seradon is a good server for population, but if pvp is your aim, then each game limits your choices and the pvp servers are the lowest populated in both games.



    Overall I want a nice "old-school" type feel, and a game with a very bright (That is my main worry for either game) future,  and has lots of endgame content, nice community, leveling doesn't feel like a chore (not be questing all the time mix it up by finding FAST dungeon groups or maybe even something else that will help you gain levels), and a also not everyone looks the same armor wise (huge dislike for me).
    this kind of sounds like you want a bastard offspring of VG and EQ2. VG has more of the 'old-school feel', nice community, imo a varied leveling system, but EQ2 has more end game content and with their combat system, lots of dungeons feel like a fast paced zerg. I don't think either games will give you what you want armor-wise. But IMO VG's armor looks better, even if not more varied.



    Basically iam looking at VG since it is still new and has potential BUT!!! iam afraid that SOE is basically putting it on the backburner/not caring too much about VG (looks like they have alot more resources in Eq2 than VG..), and if that is the case i want a mmorpg that stays fresh has updates and fixes and has a mature and "large" population in-game and if there is no real development behind VG now there is no point to start it but iam not sure that is why i ask.
    Your assessment is correct, VG does have potential, but in addition, SOE may not be putting its full support behind it. EQ2 is definately the flagship of SOE atm. VG does have a lot of updates, with big improvements coming, but since it was released in alpha, has spent a year basically in beta, we are just now seeing VG fleshed out, so although they do a good job of updating, it really needs a bigger dev team to nip all the existing probs in the bud.



     



    (Also too if you think there is a game i would like better please do suggest, no i do not want to play a old-school game like daoc ^^, but iam looking for the old school feel kinda.)



    *Sorry for repeating myself on some things, just realized that now*

     

  • ZorgoZorgo Member UncommonPosts: 2,254
    Originally posted by damkar

    Originally posted by puddinlover


    3. Any1 know what is up with VG and loosing a lot of Dev's..... do you think VG is dying/dead?
    It is changing to be more like EQ2 which is decreasing customer base and not attracting enough new customers. No games on SOE station access are literally dead. However, I would say that development for VG will for the future lag behind EQ2.
    I don't believe it is changing to be more like EQ2 at all. I also don't believe that the customer base is decreasing. I think there are those that are leaving because they fear 'dumbing down' - but I think they are outweighed by new customers coming in. The dumbing down people talk about, imo, isn't a change in the basic mechanics of combat, quest construction or dungeon layouts, rather, they have been experimenting with getting rid of tedious time sinks that hindered you from progressing at a normal pace. Riftways in no way made combat easier, it made getting to your group and dungeon easier. To me that is a HUGE difference. If they started emulating a EQ2 combat system, I believe you could argue it was 'dumbing down', but long travel times didn't require skill, just time. Yes, riftways made the game easier - it eliminated a time sink rather than a core mechanic. It took no skill to travel for 30 minutes to get to your group, just time. So when people say the game is 'being dumbed down' take a closer look at what they've changed.



    4. What is the outlook for both?
    VG will continue to evolve to be more like EQ2 and EQ2 will continue in its current state with new expansions.
    I disagree completely. EQ2 will remain a button mashing zerg fest, VG will remain a slower paced strategy game. The combat systems are the central difference between these games, and I think that difference is enormous and will never change. VG will always be an open world where EQ2 will always rely on zoning and instancing. The similarities between the two are 'standardizing' various mmo mechanics that ALL mmo's have. Rest xp, riftways (versus griffons - which EQ2 took from WoW) these are the only two changes VG has made in the direction of EQ2, and they are mechanics that all mmo's have now. I don't think anyone could name one other change that remotely resembles a 'theft' from EQ2. And EQ2 thefted these two things from WoW.



    6. Which has more populated server's?
    Obviously EQ2 considering VG has less than 5 servers total (including PVP).



    Well, that's not exactly good math....if VG has 4 servers with an average of 10k on each (probably no more than 1500 active at any time) and EQ2 has a dozen servers with 10k each on them (probably 1500 active at any time). Then the servers are just as populated, with EQ2 far surpassing overall population.
    The real question is, do either of these games have enough of a population on their servers to find groups and guilds? For that, I think the answer is yes.
    (Please, no number police to the rescue, I admit that I am using hypothetical numbers right now - I could be off by thousands in either direction. Just illustrating a math point.

     

    I agree with everything else you answered completely. But I take special exception to the EQ2ification of VG. I just don't see it happening.

  • ZorgoZorgo Member UncommonPosts: 2,254

    Originally posted by puddinlover


     
     

    Is EQ2 crafting better than VG, and can u own houses in EQ2 like u can in VG? (not that those 2 things matter alot to me just curious)
    any1 have input how lotro is on end-game raiding?

    I have heard more people praise the VG crafting system than the EQ2 crafting system.

    Yes, you can own an instanced house in EQ2. You walk into the same door everyone else walks into to get to your house. In VG, you 'craft' your own free standing non-instanced house. Just that sentence shows me VG has both better crafting and better housing.

  • JK-KanosiJK-Kanosi Member Posts: 1,357

    Originally posted by puddinlover


    I am a hard-core wow player point is i downed illidan and i feel that wow just isnt hard-core enough for me.(also way too many kids)



    I researched both games a lot but wondering a few things still.



    1. Which has better end-game content (raid/boss wise.)



    2. Does EQ2 have any form of pvp?



    3. Any1 know what is up with VG and loosing a lot of Dev's..... do you think VG is dying/dead?



    4. What is the outlook for both?



    5. Are both games leveling just .. quest....quest....quest



    6. Which has more populated server's?



    Overall I want a nice "old-school" type feel, and a game with a very bright (That is my main worry for either game) future,  and has lots of endgame content, nice community, leveling doesn't feel like a chore (not be questing all the time mix it up by finding FAST dungeon groups or maybe even something else that will help you gain levels), and a also not everyone looks the same armor wise (huge dislike for me).



    Basically iam looking at VG since it is still new and has potential BUT!!! iam afraid that SOE is basically putting it on the backburner/not caring too much about VG (looks like they have alot more resources in Eq2 than VG..), and if that is the case i want a mmorpg that stays fresh has updates and fixes and has a mature and "large" population in-game and if there is no real development behind VG now there is no point to start it but iam not sure that is why i ask.



     



    (Also too if you think there is a game i would like better please do suggest, no i do not want to play a old-school game like daoc ^^, but iam looking for the old school feel kinda.)



    *Sorry for repeating myself on some things, just realized that now*
    1. EQ2 is better end-game wise. They have a lot of soloable and group based content after max level + they have many raids to play. Vanguard's end-game is still being fleshed out and at SOE's rate, will not be fleshed out until later this year.

    2. EQ2 has PvP servers, where it is Good v. Evil. Vanguard also has PvP servers, but they allow FFA PvP.

    3. No idea about Vanguard's Devs. I'm not sure if Vanguard is dead or dying, but when I last played in January, the game was low populated...even on the popular servers. The game had a horrid release and still is only playable by those with beefy computers on a decent graphics setting. This results in a very small community. Besides that, the devs has pissed off a lot of original Vanguard players by taking things away from the game that made it unique. Vanguard Devs are also slow at developing new content and fixing the game.

    4. I am not a soothsayer, but judging from past data, I'd say EQ2 has a better chance of longevity than Vanguard does. However, both games feel like they have smallish communities, EQ2 is just a much more stable game.

    5. EQ2 is just quest, quest, quest with some group dungeons and raids thrown in there. Vanguard is similar, except it has far fewer quests, a larger explorable world, boats, a diplomacy system, and people actually prefer to group up and just grind on mobs through out the game.

    6. EQ2 hands down.

    MMORPG's w/ Max level characters: DAoC, SWG, & WoW

    Currently Playing: WAR
    Preferred Playstyle: Roleplay/adventurous, in a sandbox game.

Sign In or Register to comment.