Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
What race will you pick for your 1st character? Why?
This discussion has been closed.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
Lizard part in the foretracted claws and horns. Seen some artwork with some of them not seeming so fuzzy as well.
Felines and mammels generally have receded claws. (That doesn't mean retractable always.)
Like a dog's nails are still grown from the top of the toe and curl about. Where as a reptile's nails grow at a more extended location and becomes part of the digit rather than just on the digit.
Huh?
You have to stop eating that granola.
The asura will win the day, silly bookah.
Why? Because asurans are small targets and have affinity with the arcane. I do tend to play offensive spellcasters and the attitude is hilarious.
I most certainly will not play a sylvari, those emo-hippies...
I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky
After reviewing a ton of goat horn pictures and lizard horns.. those are clearly goat horns. Their feet shape look more like a bird talon with more toes than a lizard:
Bird:
Lizard:
I think your picture of lizard feet looks funny for some reason.
I also think Charr feet are closer to lizard feet.
Edit: Or maybe dinosaur feet! Birds and reptiles are closely related.
http://bucketfoot-al.tripod.com/DinoModels/Rex_Rt_Frt.JPG
Yea, dinosaur feet are kinda like a mix between bird and modern lizard feet! that is it! they are like furry dinosaur feet!.. with more toes
I present exhibit B!
& C!
Lizards walk on more flat footed than charr. The charr seem to be walking more like Birds.. and T-rex. LOL
Someone seriously needs to ask the creator of the Charr what they based their design on.
Mike B needs to add that to the list of questions!
Lizards in motion walk almost exactly like birds do tho'. These guys are just being lazy.
I will probably pick Norn. I loved the whole - individual heros before organised armies / leaders thing they had going on in GW1. A Norn could have such an epic saga written of his adventures and that seems to fit best in my mind with the personal story aspect.
That said I would like to see the decendents of my GW1 Human characters realised in GW2 so I will definitely play a Human or two somewhere down the line.
Very interesting.
I feel EXACTLY the opposite. I think the inclusion of humans in FANTASY games is ridiculous. I "play" a human EVERY fucking day of my life. There is no way I would play one in a fantasy game. Oh sure...I had to play one in Fallen Earth, and I will play one in The Secret World, but...those games are based around real world "reality" type settings. Games with dragons and fairies and swords that glow are not in the same category (in my opinion).
Having said all that...I appreciate your opinion. The great thing about gaming is that it allows us to play with multiple "personas" within a game. So...I can hear where you're coming from, I just have a different take on it.
EDIT:
Oops...forgot to reply to the OP...lol
My first two characters will be Sylvari and Asura, probably in that order. Sylvari appeals to my joy of playing races that are sort of...I don't know...treehugger types, I guess. Asura appeals to my fantasy about being a genius (which, of course, in RL...I am NOT)! lol
President of The Marvelously Meowhead Fan Club
I actually like the traits of the Asura, but it would irritate me too much to play them because they are so creepy. LOL
I do not mind creatures in the game, It just annoys me when players play them and get " too" into character. I can just see it now when the Charr are in "season" LOL
Walk in to what you thought was an abandoned building only to find some kind of nekkid freak animal frenzy going on.. oh my! It was bad enough when you walk in on human characters.. but geeze there are going to be charr and asura everywhere . =0!
People can go ewww all they want, but we all know that is what happens on every game. I have never played a game where I didn't run into some kind of freak show. LOL
Go to hell master!
Creepy? Annoying, arrogant and irritating are words that fit but creepy?
Clowns are creepy, and mimes. Asuras ain't.
Yea.. mhmm.. you say that now, but if there was one standing in your bedroom while you were sleeping and you woke up to it breathing on you chances are you would grab something and start beating it till it couldn't anymore! LOL
They are like... Gremlins!!
So much arguing about the furries. Who gives a shit? There are real life furries, those are the ones you should worry about.
ok i will take your word then that you did not mean to offend me or anyone else (wasnt in much of a good mood yesterday which at least doubled the level of offense i took). and yiffing i have absolutely no idea what that is and i have a feeling i dont want to (main reason i picked that post to quote from you was because it was the last one you had made not in particular because of the content of that specific post).
as to the sexual part im thinking part of my brain made the short leap between the two words "Obsession" and "Fetish" since fetish in the way i was thinking is a very specified obsession mixed with one specific post where you said "well at least you admit it" i think i didnt quite understand your view of things and got a bit mixed up.
now onto the other matter as to what you consider freaky well i guess that is personal opinion ( i diverge heavily with you there as there is no true normal and the most cool and inturesting people are usualy a little bit crazy.). in the end what i think i got caught up on most was the word obsession which the way you said things in your posts came out to mean that anyone who didnt like non human characters was freaky and obsessed with them which would be a huge and very bad generalization.
in the end i think it is that generalization that is what offended people the most. (and i still contest your definition of a furry)
hopefully this puts things in order
(edited for length purposes)
Wait, then.... what is your stance on furries?
Are you pro or anti-furry?
I think after reading all of this, I deserve an answer. :P
This came to mind after reading this
March on! - Lets Invade Pekopon
i realy dont care so long as they dont bug me with it or anything (although i would need your definition of furrys as if your talking about the people who are obsessed with that type of stuff then what i said applys, if your talking about things like the charr or devils definition of furry as being non human sentient things then i think they are important pieces of lore and history in these fantasy settings and as being a huge lore person when it comes to games and fantasy settings i am for there being non human sentients).
That's what I was afraid of.
Furry neutrality.
ok answer me one question what is your problem with them and what definition of furry are you using (i am getting confused here lol)? ill make friends with anyone so long as they arent obnoxious or rude or anything.
Heh, furry political correctness, fun to see.
I'd recommend to not call them 'furries' anymore though since that could be perceived denigrating, but as 'fur covered people' or 'fur covered Tyrians'; just to avoid being called a furrist.
The ACTUAL size of MMORPG worlds: a comparison list between MMO's
The ease with which predictions are made on these forums:
Fratman: "I'm saying Spring 2012 at the earliest [for TOR release]. Anyone still clinging to 2011 is deluding themself at this point."
I'm just messing around.
My definition? I think furries are people that dress up in animal costumes and engage in... erm... coitus.
ah then u are with me in that one at least that was what i thought before i came into this thread lol now im confused, altho i would also add in an almost unhealthy obsession with fur covered cartoon characters