Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
IRONMAN vs. WARMACHINE..which of 'em will prevail??
bburn
Member Posts: 6
Initially War Machine was designed to be a more offensive version of Iron Man's armor, adding additional weaponry and offensive capability while sacrificing some of the protections and other elements.
The differences now are that the new Iron Man armor incorporates a number of the War Machine capabilities, and coupled with Stark's new power to influence and control mechanical devices makes the Iron Man armor more versatile.
The real similarity is both suits were designed by Tony Stark, and therefore have a similar design, but designed for different purposes.
So which of these two is stronger?? 
Comments
War without a doubt.
Apotheos
So how can warmachine survive ironma's proton cannon?
Dude, IronMan will surely win this.. First of all it was stark who designed the suit, meaning he knows what the good and bad points of his armor, IronMan has more mobility and i think since he created warmachine he will surely improve his own armor to be much stronger. Lastly his been piloting his suit for along time unlike his friend who pilots warmachine.
Due to their friendship, both armors are upgraded around the same time, although Tony’s suit is usually the forerunner of a given technology. That being said, with the new Iron Man 2.0, this debate leans in favor of War Machine, as it was leaked that there will be an upgraded War Machine armor featured in it. War Machine armor was designed for an all-out war situation, and is thus much more heavily armed than Tony’s suit. However, until someone reads the new Iron Man 2.0 comics, the outcome of this remains pending.
Well judging on looks, then War Machine takes it easy. Of course you should never judge a book by it’s color. As other people have said before, this is Tony Starks invention. He knows everything about it. Hell maybe he even created a weakness in case someone else does fight with it. Other than that, Tony’s screwed.
Ironman easily wins. Just like in the movie Iron man 2, Tony not only knows his own limitations but his opponents. he couldn't beat the arnor the guy was wearing so he came up with a way to beat him. Same would happen if war machine went after him. He keeps upgrading. Nothing can come out that he won't eventually prevail in the end. He can always upgrade and he is a genius in making weapons systems.
Now the comic writer can write whatever they want, similiar to how they killed off superman. But if they are going to be somewhat reasonable, Tony has a huge advantage. The easiest way to take him out is when he isn't in his armor. Don't let him get in his armor or its game over.
==========================
The game is dead not, this game is good we make it and Romania Tv give it 5 goat heads, this is good rating for game.
Initially War Machine was designed to be a more offensive version of Iron Man's armor, adding additional weaponry and offensive capability while sacrificing some of the protections and other elements. The differences now are that the new Iron Man armor incorporates a number of the War Machine capabilities, and coupled with Stark's new power to influence and control mechanical devices makes the Iron Man armor more versatile. The real similarity is both suits were designed by Tony Stark, and therefore have a similar design, but designed for different purposes.
Well, based on the game (Marvel vs. Capcom) Iron Man players can use near infinite combos. War Machine players tried to use near-infinite combos but they failed.
War Machine's advantage- more damages
Iron Man's advantage- great anti-air assist
I am not sure about more advantage or disadvantage. But Warmachine can do the infinite as well >_> they just end it differently (s.hk > war destroyer)
Ironman has a beam projectile, warmachine doesn't, however, he can chip iceman whilst Ironman can't
Ironman is simply a bit faster and easier to handle, his PC also does better damage and is more consistent than WM's proton cannon (IM proton cannon does more damage when closer than when they're full screen length, both of which are still painful, WM's does damage based on the number of missile hits but eachmissile will deal consistent damage regardless of screen length, but its really terrible, >_>)
Ironman does Proton cannon in a THC regardless of assist (like he has any other option >_>)
Warmachine does War destroyer when you pick AAA assist in a THC, not really a factor, since high level players rarely use THCs, but if you're using a gimmicky THC team that can help Ironman (like /Ironman/BBhood/Commando... trust me, I've seen one of the Philippines' best IM players use that for fun, and I'm a tournament player myself) That's just not going to cut it if Warmachine is the third member
In short, Ironman is a lot better than warmachine in general. There's a reason Warmachine is called "Ironman-lite" and is most likely the best non-god-or-top-tier character while ironman is arguably the 5th best character (arguable with Cyclops, Strider with doom)
They are both strong and have thier own specialties as i can see.. Well the odds of winning between them is 50 50 why? Because when it comes to fire power and raw power Warmachine is the best, while Ironman has power less than warmachine but when it comes to mobility in dodging and stuff ironman fits the most. So during their fight it all depends on the battle terrain that they will duel if it is spaceous then Ironman will win and if close combat and little space Warmachine will.
Who is piloting war machine? Doesn’t “stark” pilot both. It wouldn’t be fair to decide either way…haha,clone stark maybe?Anyway, if is regular suit ironman, then war machine wins without much diffuculty. He can take everything ironman can dish out whilst opening up multiple cans o’ whoop ass..