Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

MMORPGs that don't condone genocide?

13567

Comments

  • 1m2m3m4m1m2m3m4m Member Posts: 60

    Originally posted by headphones

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by gimmesome

    The OP is just trying to explain that when a company/production party of any sort that provides entertainment for the public by creating a world to be experiencedand  intentionally does not include a demographic such as gays, or minorities, or women, or anything related to our society's politically correct issues, it promotes the idea of genocide.

    it's the same sort of conversation that could be had regarding Sci-fi novels.    Most of them are painting a picture of the author's 'ideal world' or 'ideal lifestyle', so, you find a lot of controversy surrounding them as some people may be offended at the omittance of, say, their entire race.

     

    "So, you're ideal world, Mr./Mrs. Developer/Writer, is a world without ______ people?"

     

    ah. thankyou!

    OP, could you please erase your confusing rant with this guy's rather pleasant premise? it's much better and something we could talk about.

    though, i have to say it still doesn't explain where the genocide is at. i was not aware that being gay constituted a religious or ethnic group as such. despite their accent.

    it's a bit of an extreme view, i think. there's a lot of games where you can play green guys as much as white guys. and most guys these days can be all manner of racial colours. there's a lot you can do with the sliders in swtor, even. i was surprised by that. most games these days do a reasonable job of representing most racial groups.

    not sure what kind of slider they'd have to put in a game to represent you as gay, though. but gw2 looks like it will have a purple caster? that's pretty gay-friendly, isn't it? especially if you make your shirt purple, too. or pink. or yellow.

    though, some gays may not like purple. so, we're back to where we started.

    OP, did you have any ideas on what sliders to include to show sexual orientation? maybe a tattoo on their forehead?

    It's not surprising that people don't consider gays when considering genocide, even despite the Holocaust and such. One thing one of my professors said is that you can determine who has the power in a culture by asking yourself if there are words to insult those people -- words that specifically insult the characteristics of their group. If anyone has a more precise word to use rather than genocide, I'm interested. However, I believe the correlation is close enough to be useful.

    Genocide is the elimination of an unwanted group of people to improve a society. How is the elimination of gays any different from the elimination of racial groups on those grounds?

    ah. back to a dictionary with you! you found plenty of other words. it's time you brushed up on genocide. it's an easy mistake to make.

    i'd be interested to see which games actively encourage the mass murder of gay people in their game. although, perhaps you could argue that world of warcraft encouraged the mass murder of gay people because did you ever see a female ogre? no, you didn't! so maybe they were gay ogres? i think i begin to see your point.

    or i'm giving you more inviting content for your next rant.

    to be fair, most mmos avoid sexuality as an overt feature because they're trying to appeal to a younger generation. this includes heterosexuality. can't recall seeing thrall's wife in wow. or indeed his bedroom where he presumably banged his wife? maybe he was gay. in which case, perhaps wow also had some gay heroes, too. the crazy lady leading the undead always struck me that way. and, let's face it, you couldn't get more gay than, well, the entire alliance.

    you may think i mock you. perhaps i do. but that's because these are not just mmogames. they are mmorpgs. and in an rpg, you can be whatever you want to be.

    that's why we play them. :)

    Mass murder that happens is one type of genocide. Another is the creation of world in which the unwanted element has already been eliminated.

    The issue is not how much sexuality is present in a game. The issue is that, when a game includes hetero themes, it has a responsibility to its audience to include gay themes. This is not a niche game. This is a game that targets millions of people. Star Wars is a product that doesn't need to be restricted to heterosexuals. There is nothing in the Star Wars universe that supports that position. It's not like Star Wars is a religion that preaches against gay people.

    Unfortunately, though, the creation of a game in which gay people have been eliminated does send a social message.

  • 1m2m3m4m1m2m3m4m Member Posts: 60

    I did not report you and would appreciate it if you would stop making false accusations. I created this topic and I'm here replying in good faith.

  • headphonesheadphones Member Posts: 611

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by gimmesome

    The OP is just trying to explain that when a company/production party of any sort that provides entertainment for the public by creating a world to be experiencedand  intentionally does not include a demographic such as gays, or minorities, or women, or anything related to our society's politically correct issues, it promotes the idea of genocide.

    it's the same sort of conversation that could be had regarding Sci-fi novels.    Most of them are painting a picture of the author's 'ideal world' or 'ideal lifestyle', so, you find a lot of controversy surrounding them as some people may be offended at the omittance of, say, their entire race.

     

    "So, you're ideal world, Mr./Mrs. Developer/Writer, is a world without ______ people?"

     

    It's impossible to be all things to all people. I don't think what I'm advocating here is that. I'm advocating the inclusion of gay customers in a product that is aimed at millions of people, including many potential gay customers.

    so, you're pro-homosexuality! there! two pages it took to get that out of you.

    yes, i agree. nothing wrong with having it in a game. except maybe coding and priority of time.

    and before you bite my head off, i would like to say there's a lot of people in the world who want their inner ninja expressed in a game, but there's precious few games that let you dress all black and cool despite half their npcs looking all black and cool.

    or a pirate hat.

    i always wanted a cool pirate hat.

    i'm interested to see how you want this implemented. in most games, both male and female forms are excessively overdrawn to the point of ridiculousness, so you can't point out that i, as a heterosexual male, have boobs to look at, because my wife is often pointing out the butts on the male characters if they're appealing to her.

    about the only mmo you could target with this accusation in a fair way is currently swtor, and that's because they're story based, and they didn't have a story for gay characters.

    but they announced they're making special ones just for that, so it's an invalid criticism. even the most anti-swtor person could feel chilled out about that.

    every game on the planet includes gay customers. they let you be anything you want.

    you made a harsh and confounding rant (which even included nazis! nazis in rants are awesome), but no real ideas or solutions.

     

    Whether or not I'm "pro-homosexuality" is relevant how, except as an ad hominem. But, since homosexuality isn't a disorder, there's no reason why anyone wouldn't be "pro-homosexuality".

    The statement that every gay on the planet is fair to gay gamers is one that I strongly disagree with.

    it was relevant to me because your OP is confusing and mostly gibberish masquerading as a sarcastic quip. though, it took me a while to figure out the sarcasm because you confounded me with genocide and then jumped into homosexuality.

    any gay person can purchase a game. therefore, they become a gay customer. i have never seen a game say, "anyone can buy our product. except gays. gay people can't buy our product." so, my comment remains correct in context with YOUR statement where you claimed gay people are excluded.

    i will also say, i don't often find a game where i can overtly express my heterosexuality other than whistling at my wife's pseudoboobs when she's jumping in front of me. but here's an interesting conundrum for you:

    i always roll female toons. their animations aren't as intrusive to my gaming. my wife always rolls female toons. if, in the game, i blow her a kiss, or tell her she looks hot, is that not almost a gay rpg? wow! what if we both rolled male toons? instant gay-on! the emotes are not exclusive. i can emote my heart off regardless of gender anyone else has rolled. there aren't exactly a high number of quests in any mmo that demand i run around seducing members of the opposite sex. even wow's valentine quests where you could sort of make out with others by kissing them etc made no reference to gender. your argument is petty and invalid as these games don't exactly try hard to enforce a heterosexual view either for fear of offending parents.

    as i said, the ONLY game you could make a respectable argument against currently is swtor, because it DOES include romantic scenes and they ARE heterosexual in nature. however, they are changing this. so there's no argument to make here.

    an rpg involves you actively roleplaying. woot!

    every game is now a gayfest if you want it to be.

     

  • noncleynoncley Member UncommonPosts: 718

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    I did not report you and would appreciate it if you would stop making false accusations. I created this topic and I'm here replying in good faith.

    No, It's obvious you reported me.

    One can easily derive that from the falsity of your arguments here. You're a dishonest person who likes to be the centre of attention but doesn't like to be criticised for that. That's that.

  • headphonesheadphones Member Posts: 611

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by gimmesome

    The OP is just trying to explain that when a company/production party of any sort that provides entertainment for the public by creating a world to be experiencedand  intentionally does not include a demographic such as gays, or minorities, or women, or anything related to our society's politically correct issues, it promotes the idea of genocide.

    it's the same sort of conversation that could be had regarding Sci-fi novels.    Most of them are painting a picture of the author's 'ideal world' or 'ideal lifestyle', so, you find a lot of controversy surrounding them as some people may be offended at the omittance of, say, their entire race.

     

    "So, you're ideal world, Mr./Mrs. Developer/Writer, is a world without ______ people?"

     

    ah. thankyou!

    OP, could you please erase your confusing rant with this guy's rather pleasant premise? it's much better and something we could talk about.

    though, i have to say it still doesn't explain where the genocide is at. i was not aware that being gay constituted a religious or ethnic group as such. despite their accent.

    it's a bit of an extreme view, i think. there's a lot of games where you can play green guys as much as white guys. and most guys these days can be all manner of racial colours. there's a lot you can do with the sliders in swtor, even. i was surprised by that. most games these days do a reasonable job of representing most racial groups.

    not sure what kind of slider they'd have to put in a game to represent you as gay, though. but gw2 looks like it will have a purple caster? that's pretty gay-friendly, isn't it? especially if you make your shirt purple, too. or pink. or yellow.

    though, some gays may not like purple. so, we're back to where we started.

    OP, did you have any ideas on what sliders to include to show sexual orientation? maybe a tattoo on their forehead?

    It's not surprising that people don't consider gays when considering genocide, even despite the Holocaust and such. One thing one of my professors said is that you can determine who has the power in a culture by asking yourself if there are words to insult those people -- words that specifically insult the characteristics of their group. If anyone has a more precise word to use rather than genocide, I'm interested. However, I believe the correlation is close enough to be useful.

    Genocide is the elimination of an unwanted group of people to improve a society. How is the elimination of gays any different from the elimination of racial groups on those grounds?

    ah. back to a dictionary with you! you found plenty of other words. it's time you brushed up on genocide. it's an easy mistake to make.

    i'd be interested to see which games actively encourage the mass murder of gay people in their game. although, perhaps you could argue that world of warcraft encouraged the mass murder of gay people because did you ever see a female ogre? no, you didn't! so maybe they were gay ogres? i think i begin to see your point.

    or i'm giving you more inviting content for your next rant.

    to be fair, most mmos avoid sexuality as an overt feature because they're trying to appeal to a younger generation. this includes heterosexuality. can't recall seeing thrall's wife in wow. or indeed his bedroom where he presumably banged his wife? maybe he was gay. in which case, perhaps wow also had some gay heroes, too. the crazy lady leading the undead always struck me that way. and, let's face it, you couldn't get more gay than, well, the entire alliance.

    you may think i mock you. perhaps i do. but that's because these are not just mmogames. they are mmorpgs. and in an rpg, you can be whatever you want to be.

    that's why we play them. :)

    Mass murder that happens is one type of genocide. Another is the creation of world in which the unwanted element has already been eliminated.

    The issue is not how much sexuality is present in a game. The issue is that, when a game includes hetero themes, it has a responsibility to its audience to include gay themes. This is not a niche game. This is a game that targets millions of people. Star Wars is a product that doesn't need to be restricted to heterosexuals. There is nothing in the Star Wars universe that supports that position. It's not like Star Wars is a religion that preaches against gay people.

    Unfortunately, though, the creation of a game in which gay people have been eliminated does send a social message.

    mass murder that happens is genocide? so, the US is currently involved in genocide because it's bombing afghanistan and iraq (among others)? actually, there's a valid argument there because everyone they're bombing is of a particular racial group. that argument is more valid than yours.

    and why should a game include gay themes when it hardly includes heterosexual themes? any kind of sexual theme in an mmo is traditionally excluded. perhaps the korean market forgets this. but even their market gets super-worked up over the male characters. ask my wife. she's korean.

    star wars, despite your rant, is changing their romantic stories.

    your argument has no rug.

  • 1m2m3m4m1m2m3m4m Member Posts: 60

    Originally posted by noncley

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    I did not report you and would appreciate it if you would stop making false accusations. I created this topic and I'm here replying in good faith.

    No, It's obvious you reported me.

    One can easily derive that from the falsity of your arguments here. You're a dishonest person who likes to be the centre of attention but doesn't like to be criticised for that. That's that.

    I have seen no posts thus far that would warrant taking that action. However, this post of yours is clearly in violation of the Rules of Conduct. I'm not going to report you, though.

  • headphonesheadphones Member Posts: 611

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by gimmesome

    The OP is just trying to explain that when a company/production party of any sort that provides entertainment for the public by creating a world to be experiencedand  intentionally does not include a demographic such as gays, or minorities, or women, or anything related to our society's politically correct issues, it promotes the idea of genocide.

    it's the same sort of conversation that could be had regarding Sci-fi novels.    Most of them are painting a picture of the author's 'ideal world' or 'ideal lifestyle', so, you find a lot of controversy surrounding them as some people may be offended at the omittance of, say, their entire race.

     

    "So, you're ideal world, Mr./Mrs. Developer/Writer, is a world without ______ people?"

     

    ah. thankyou!

    OP, could you please erase your confusing rant with this guy's rather pleasant premise? it's much better and something we could talk about.

    though, i have to say it still doesn't explain where the genocide is at. i was not aware that being gay constituted a religious or ethnic group as such. despite their accent.

    it's a bit of an extreme view, i think. there's a lot of games where you can play green guys as much as white guys. and most guys these days can be all manner of racial colours. there's a lot you can do with the sliders in swtor, even. i was surprised by that. most games these days do a reasonable job of representing most racial groups.

    not sure what kind of slider they'd have to put in a game to represent you as gay, though. but gw2 looks like it will have a purple caster? that's pretty gay-friendly, isn't it? especially if you make your shirt purple, too. or pink. or yellow.

    though, some gays may not like purple. so, we're back to where we started.

    OP, did you have any ideas on what sliders to include to show sexual orientation? maybe a tattoo on their forehead?

    It's not surprising that people don't consider gays when considering genocide, even despite the Holocaust and such. One thing one of my professors said is that you can determine who has the power in a culture by asking yourself if there are words to insult those people -- words that specifically insult the characteristics of their group. If anyone has a more precise word to use rather than genocide, I'm interested. However, I believe the correlation is close enough to be useful.

    Genocide is the elimination of an unwanted group of people to improve a society. How is the elimination of gays any different from the elimination of racial groups on those grounds?

    ah. back to a dictionary with you! you found plenty of other words. it's time you brushed up on genocide. it's an easy mistake to make.

    i'd be interested to see which games actively encourage the mass murder of gay people in their game. although, perhaps you could argue that world of warcraft encouraged the mass murder of gay people because did you ever see a female ogre? no, you didn't! so maybe they were gay ogres? i think i begin to see your point.

    or i'm giving you more inviting content for your next rant.

    to be fair, most mmos avoid sexuality as an overt feature because they're trying to appeal to a younger generation. this includes heterosexuality. can't recall seeing thrall's wife in wow. or indeed his bedroom where he presumably banged his wife? maybe he was gay. in which case, perhaps wow also had some gay heroes, too. the crazy lady leading the undead always struck me that way. and, let's face it, you couldn't get more gay than, well, the entire alliance.

    you may think i mock you. perhaps i do. but that's because these are not just mmogames. they are mmorpgs. and in an rpg, you can be whatever you want to be.

    that's why we play them. :)

    Mass murder that happens is one type of genocide. Another is the creation of world in which the unwanted element has already been eliminated.

    The issue is not how much sexuality is present in a game. The issue is that, when a game includes hetero themes, it has a responsibility to its audience to include gay themes. This is not a niche game. This is a game that targets millions of people. Star Wars is a product that doesn't need to be restricted to heterosexuals. There is nothing in the Star Wars universe that supports that position. It's not like Star Wars is a religion that preaches against gay people.

    Unfortunately, though, the creation of a game in which gay people have been eliminated does send a social message.

    you're wrong. i play an inquisitor most of the time. and talos drellik as as gay as they come.

  • Atlan99Atlan99 Member UncommonPosts: 1,332

    Wow. That's quite the leap.

    I like the part about intelligence being a detriment. Really?

    Bioware  already generally overrepresents gays in their games. There should be a roughly 9 hetero romances for every gay romance. This is not the case. There are more gay romances in Bioware games than statistically accurate. Far from Gay's being persecuted. More close to straight's being indoctrinated by the overrepresentation of gay romance.

     

  • 1m2m3m4m1m2m3m4m Member Posts: 60

    Originally posted by headphones

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by gimmesome

    The OP is just trying to explain that when a company/production party of any sort that provides entertainment for the public by creating a world to be experiencedand  intentionally does not include a demographic such as gays, or minorities, or women, or anything related to our society's politically correct issues, it promotes the idea of genocide.

    it's the same sort of conversation that could be had regarding Sci-fi novels.    Most of them are painting a picture of the author's 'ideal world' or 'ideal lifestyle', so, you find a lot of controversy surrounding them as some people may be offended at the omittance of, say, their entire race.

     

    "So, you're ideal world, Mr./Mrs. Developer/Writer, is a world without ______ people?"

     

    ah. thankyou!

    OP, could you please erase your confusing rant with this guy's rather pleasant premise? it's much better and something we could talk about.

    though, i have to say it still doesn't explain where the genocide is at. i was not aware that being gay constituted a religious or ethnic group as such. despite their accent.

    it's a bit of an extreme view, i think. there's a lot of games where you can play green guys as much as white guys. and most guys these days can be all manner of racial colours. there's a lot you can do with the sliders in swtor, even. i was surprised by that. most games these days do a reasonable job of representing most racial groups.

    not sure what kind of slider they'd have to put in a game to represent you as gay, though. but gw2 looks like it will have a purple caster? that's pretty gay-friendly, isn't it? especially if you make your shirt purple, too. or pink. or yellow.

    though, some gays may not like purple. so, we're back to where we started.

    OP, did you have any ideas on what sliders to include to show sexual orientation? maybe a tattoo on their forehead?

    It's not surprising that people don't consider gays when considering genocide, even despite the Holocaust and such. One thing one of my professors said is that you can determine who has the power in a culture by asking yourself if there are words to insult those people -- words that specifically insult the characteristics of their group. If anyone has a more precise word to use rather than genocide, I'm interested. However, I believe the correlation is close enough to be useful.

    Genocide is the elimination of an unwanted group of people to improve a society. How is the elimination of gays any different from the elimination of racial groups on those grounds?

    ah. back to a dictionary with you! you found plenty of other words. it's time you brushed up on genocide. it's an easy mistake to make.

    i'd be interested to see which games actively encourage the mass murder of gay people in their game. although, perhaps you could argue that world of warcraft encouraged the mass murder of gay people because did you ever see a female ogre? no, you didn't! so maybe they were gay ogres? i think i begin to see your point.

    or i'm giving you more inviting content for your next rant.

    to be fair, most mmos avoid sexuality as an overt feature because they're trying to appeal to a younger generation. this includes heterosexuality. can't recall seeing thrall's wife in wow. or indeed his bedroom where he presumably banged his wife? maybe he was gay. in which case, perhaps wow also had some gay heroes, too. the crazy lady leading the undead always struck me that way. and, let's face it, you couldn't get more gay than, well, the entire alliance.

    you may think i mock you. perhaps i do. but that's because these are not just mmogames. they are mmorpgs. and in an rpg, you can be whatever you want to be.

    that's why we play them. :)

    Mass murder that happens is one type of genocide. Another is the creation of world in which the unwanted element has already been eliminated.

    The issue is not how much sexuality is present in a game. The issue is that, when a game includes hetero themes, it has a responsibility to its audience to include gay themes. This is not a niche game. This is a game that targets millions of people. Star Wars is a product that doesn't need to be restricted to heterosexuals. There is nothing in the Star Wars universe that supports that position. It's not like Star Wars is a religion that preaches against gay people.

    Unfortunately, though, the creation of a game in which gay people have been eliminated does send a social message.

    mass murder that happens is genocide? so, the US is currently involved in genocide because it's bombing afghanistan and iraq (among others)? actually, there's a valid argument there because everyone they're bombing is of a particular racial group. that argument is more valid than yours.

    and why should a game include gay themes when it hardly includes heterosexual themes? any kind of sexual theme in an mmo is traditionally excluded. perhaps the korean market forgets this. but even their market gets super-worked up over the male characters. ask my wife. she's korean.

    star wars, despite your rant, is changing their romantic stories.

    your argument has no rug.

    Genocide is the elimination of a specific group based on traits that are considered incompatible with the culture. When the Nazis put homosexuals and Jews (among others) into death camps, that is genocidal. Homosexuality was deemed a characteristic that was incompatible with culture and homosexuals were thus considered a group for wholesale elimination. The same thing is true for the Jews.

    While religion is actually chosen, homosexuality is not. So, the argument that genocide applies less to homosexuality than religious identification seems weak.

  • just1opinionjust1opinion Member UncommonPosts: 4,641

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by gimmesome

    The OP is just trying to explain that when a company/production party of any sort that provides entertainment for the public by creating a world to be experiencedand  intentionally does not include a demographic such as gays, or minorities, or women, or anything related to our society's politically correct issues, it promotes the idea of genocide.

    it's the same sort of conversation that could be had regarding Sci-fi novels.    Most of them are painting a picture of the author's 'ideal world' or 'ideal lifestyle', so, you find a lot of controversy surrounding them as some people may be offended at the omittance of, say, their entire race.

     

    "So, you're ideal world, Mr./Mrs. Developer/Writer, is a world without ______ people?"

     

    ah. thankyou!

    OP, could you please erase your confusing rant with this guy's rather pleasant premise? it's much better and something we could talk about.

    though, i have to say it still doesn't explain where the genocide is at. i was not aware that being gay constituted a religious or ethnic group as such. despite their accent.

    it's a bit of an extreme view, i think. there's a lot of games where you can play green guys as much as white guys. and most guys these days can be all manner of racial colours. there's a lot you can do with the sliders in swtor, even. i was surprised by that. most games these days do a reasonable job of representing most racial groups.

    not sure what kind of slider they'd have to put in a game to represent you as gay, though. but gw2 looks like it will have a purple caster? that's pretty gay-friendly, isn't it? especially if you make your shirt purple, too. or pink. or yellow.

    though, some gays may not like purple. so, we're back to where we started.

    OP, did you have any ideas on what sliders to include to show sexual orientation? maybe a tattoo on their forehead?

    It's not surprising that people don't consider gays when considering genocide, even despite the Holocaust and such. One thing one of my professors said is that you can determine who has the power in a culture by asking yourself if there are words to insult those people -- words that specifically insult the characteristics of their group. If anyone has a more precise word to use rather than genocide, I'm interested. However, I believe the correlation is close enough to be useful.

    Genocide is the elimination of an unwanted group of people to improve a society. How is the elimination of gays any different from the elimination of racial groups on those grounds?

    ah. back to a dictionary with you! you found plenty of other words. it's time you brushed up on genocide. it's an easy mistake to make.

    i'd be interested to see which games actively encourage the mass murder of gay people in their game. although, perhaps you could argue that world of warcraft encouraged the mass murder of gay people because did you ever see a female ogre? no, you didn't! so maybe they were gay ogres? i think i begin to see your point.

    or i'm giving you more inviting content for your next rant.

    to be fair, most mmos avoid sexuality as an overt feature because they're trying to appeal to a younger generation. this includes heterosexuality. can't recall seeing thrall's wife in wow. or indeed his bedroom where he presumably banged his wife? maybe he was gay. in which case, perhaps wow also had some gay heroes, too. the crazy lady leading the undead always struck me that way. and, let's face it, you couldn't get more gay than, well, the entire alliance.

    you may think i mock you. perhaps i do. but that's because these are not just mmogames. they are mmorpgs. and in an rpg, you can be whatever you want to be.

    that's why we play them. :)

    Mass murder that happens is one type of genocide. Another is the creation of world in which the unwanted element has already been eliminated.

    The issue is not how much sexuality is present in a game. The issue is that, when a game includes hetero themes, it has a responsibility to its audience to include gay themes. This is not a niche game. This is a game that targets millions of people. Star Wars is a product that doesn't need to be restricted to heterosexuals. There is nothing in the Star Wars universe that supports that position. It's not like Star Wars is a religion that preaches against gay people.

    Unfortunately, though, the creation of a game in which gay people have been eliminated does send a social message.

     

    I was under the impression that this was being rectified.  Am I wrong?

    I'm also gay (female) and would appreciate being able to have a female companion in game and play out the romantic parts of the story.  Why?  For fun, of course.

    I do have to disagree with your use of the word "genocide" as I said in a previous post.  It does not apply to a game.  In a real world where REAL genocide happens....it's disrespectful to use that word in this way. 

    Otherwise....I hear where you're coming from.  I just think you're a bit misguided.

    President of The Marvelously Meowhead Fan Club

  • eyceleycel Member Posts: 1,334

    Originally posted by noncley

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    Originally posted by noncley

     

    You're going to have to do better than that.

    Homosexuality, as Hooker argued, isn't a sexual orientation at all. it's a sexual practice. You yourself would admit that there is not practical difference between heterosexual and homosexuals in any other sphere, would you?

    And don't be pompous - drawing attention to your appalling need for attention and approval is not ad hominem, it's the absolute res media of your posting.

    So take this hectoring, junior year argument to somewhere more appropriate.

    Flaming is not appreciated or warranted. Sexual orientation is the consensus of the legitimate psychological establishment. It goes beyond behavior. The idea that sexual orientation is merely a collection of sexual acts is false.

    I'm not flaming you. I'm disagreeing with you.  And you don't like it.

    I happen to be gay myself - and out too. But I rather resent your rather basic, rather hectoring, very sophomoric grandstanding on behalf of the LGBT community which, it seems to me, is like a B- high school essay designed to show off just how right on you are and defy the jocks who make youm feel small.

    Take it outside, kid, because this isn't about gay equality, it's about you - and you, per se, aren't tremendously interesting.

    I felt this way after a minute of reading.  Im not sure where the op is coming from, it was nice read but being homosexual it makes me feel like someone is fighting on my team for the wrong reasons.

    image

  • 1m2m3m4m1m2m3m4m Member Posts: 60

    Originally posted by just1opinion

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by gimmesome

    The OP is just trying to explain that when a company/production party of any sort that provides entertainment for the public by creating a world to be experiencedand  intentionally does not include a demographic such as gays, or minorities, or women, or anything related to our society's politically correct issues, it promotes the idea of genocide.

    it's the same sort of conversation that could be had regarding Sci-fi novels.    Most of them are painting a picture of the author's 'ideal world' or 'ideal lifestyle', so, you find a lot of controversy surrounding them as some people may be offended at the omittance of, say, their entire race.

     

    "So, you're ideal world, Mr./Mrs. Developer/Writer, is a world without ______ people?"

     

    ah. thankyou!

    OP, could you please erase your confusing rant with this guy's rather pleasant premise? it's much better and something we could talk about.

    though, i have to say it still doesn't explain where the genocide is at. i was not aware that being gay constituted a religious or ethnic group as such. despite their accent.

    it's a bit of an extreme view, i think. there's a lot of games where you can play green guys as much as white guys. and most guys these days can be all manner of racial colours. there's a lot you can do with the sliders in swtor, even. i was surprised by that. most games these days do a reasonable job of representing most racial groups.

    not sure what kind of slider they'd have to put in a game to represent you as gay, though. but gw2 looks like it will have a purple caster? that's pretty gay-friendly, isn't it? especially if you make your shirt purple, too. or pink. or yellow.

    though, some gays may not like purple. so, we're back to where we started.

    OP, did you have any ideas on what sliders to include to show sexual orientation? maybe a tattoo on their forehead?

    It's not surprising that people don't consider gays when considering genocide, even despite the Holocaust and such. One thing one of my professors said is that you can determine who has the power in a culture by asking yourself if there are words to insult those people -- words that specifically insult the characteristics of their group. If anyone has a more precise word to use rather than genocide, I'm interested. However, I believe the correlation is close enough to be useful.

    Genocide is the elimination of an unwanted group of people to improve a society. How is the elimination of gays any different from the elimination of racial groups on those grounds?

    ah. back to a dictionary with you! you found plenty of other words. it's time you brushed up on genocide. it's an easy mistake to make.

    i'd be interested to see which games actively encourage the mass murder of gay people in their game. although, perhaps you could argue that world of warcraft encouraged the mass murder of gay people because did you ever see a female ogre? no, you didn't! so maybe they were gay ogres? i think i begin to see your point.

    or i'm giving you more inviting content for your next rant.

    to be fair, most mmos avoid sexuality as an overt feature because they're trying to appeal to a younger generation. this includes heterosexuality. can't recall seeing thrall's wife in wow. or indeed his bedroom where he presumably banged his wife? maybe he was gay. in which case, perhaps wow also had some gay heroes, too. the crazy lady leading the undead always struck me that way. and, let's face it, you couldn't get more gay than, well, the entire alliance.

    you may think i mock you. perhaps i do. but that's because these are not just mmogames. they are mmorpgs. and in an rpg, you can be whatever you want to be.

    that's why we play them. :)

    Mass murder that happens is one type of genocide. Another is the creation of world in which the unwanted element has already been eliminated.

    The issue is not how much sexuality is present in a game. The issue is that, when a game includes hetero themes, it has a responsibility to its audience to include gay themes. This is not a niche game. This is a game that targets millions of people. Star Wars is a product that doesn't need to be restricted to heterosexuals. There is nothing in the Star Wars universe that supports that position. It's not like Star Wars is a religion that preaches against gay people.

    Unfortunately, though, the creation of a game in which gay people have been eliminated does send a social message.

     

    I was under the impression that this was being rectified.  Am I wrong?

    I'm also gay (female) and would appreciate being able to have a female companion in game and play out the romantic parts of the story.  Why?  For fun, of course.

    I do have to disagree with your use of the word "genocide" as I said in a previous post.  It does not apply to a game.  In a real world where REAL genocide happens....it's disrespectful to use that word in this way. 

    Otherwise....I hear where you're coming from.

    Gay kids are killing themselves in our culture at a rate that far exceeds the norm. There is nothing disrespectful about trying to create a climate in which heterosexism and homophobia are not so prevalant.

  • 1m2m3m4m1m2m3m4m Member Posts: 60

    Originally posted by eycel

    Originally posted by noncley


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by noncley


     

    You're going to have to do better than that.

    Homosexuality, as Hooker argued, isn't a sexual orientation at all. it's a sexual practice. You yourself would admit that there is not practical difference between heterosexual and homosexuals in any other sphere, would you?

    And don't be pompous - drawing attention to your appalling need for attention and approval is not ad hominem, it's the absolute res media of your posting.

    So take this hectoring, junior year argument to somewhere more appropriate.

    Flaming is not appreciated or warranted. Sexual orientation is the consensus of the legitimate psychological establishment. It goes beyond behavior. The idea that sexual orientation is merely a collection of sexual acts is false.

    I'm not flaming you. I'm disagreeing with you.  And you don't like it.

    I happen to be gay myself - and out too. But I rather resent your rather basic, rather hectoring, very sophomoric grandstanding on behalf of the LGBT community which, it seems to me, is like a B- high school essay designed to show off just how right on you are and defy the jocks who make youm feel small.

    Take it outside, kid, because this isn't about gay equality, it's about you - and you, per se, aren't tremendously interesting.

    I felt this way after a minute of reading.  Im not sure where the op is coming from, it was nice read but being homosexual it makes me feel like someone is fighting on my team for the wrong reasons.

    Similar innuendo was posted about the OP in the other topic. The key here is to address the substance, not the person.

  • just1opinionjust1opinion Member UncommonPosts: 4,641

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    Originally posted by just1opinion


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by gimmesome

    The OP is just trying to explain that when a company/production party of any sort that provides entertainment for the public by creating a world to be experiencedand  intentionally does not include a demographic such as gays, or minorities, or women, or anything related to our society's politically correct issues, it promotes the idea of genocide.

    it's the same sort of conversation that could be had regarding Sci-fi novels.    Most of them are painting a picture of the author's 'ideal world' or 'ideal lifestyle', so, you find a lot of controversy surrounding them as some people may be offended at the omittance of, say, their entire race.

     

    "So, you're ideal world, Mr./Mrs. Developer/Writer, is a world without ______ people?"

     

    ah. thankyou!

    OP, could you please erase your confusing rant with this guy's rather pleasant premise? it's much better and something we could talk about.

    though, i have to say it still doesn't explain where the genocide is at. i was not aware that being gay constituted a religious or ethnic group as such. despite their accent.

    it's a bit of an extreme view, i think. there's a lot of games where you can play green guys as much as white guys. and most guys these days can be all manner of racial colours. there's a lot you can do with the sliders in swtor, even. i was surprised by that. most games these days do a reasonable job of representing most racial groups.

    not sure what kind of slider they'd have to put in a game to represent you as gay, though. but gw2 looks like it will have a purple caster? that's pretty gay-friendly, isn't it? especially if you make your shirt purple, too. or pink. or yellow.

    though, some gays may not like purple. so, we're back to where we started.

    OP, did you have any ideas on what sliders to include to show sexual orientation? maybe a tattoo on their forehead?

    It's not surprising that people don't consider gays when considering genocide, even despite the Holocaust and such. One thing one of my professors said is that you can determine who has the power in a culture by asking yourself if there are words to insult those people -- words that specifically insult the characteristics of their group. If anyone has a more precise word to use rather than genocide, I'm interested. However, I believe the correlation is close enough to be useful.

    Genocide is the elimination of an unwanted group of people to improve a society. How is the elimination of gays any different from the elimination of racial groups on those grounds?

    ah. back to a dictionary with you! you found plenty of other words. it's time you brushed up on genocide. it's an easy mistake to make.

    i'd be interested to see which games actively encourage the mass murder of gay people in their game. although, perhaps you could argue that world of warcraft encouraged the mass murder of gay people because did you ever see a female ogre? no, you didn't! so maybe they were gay ogres? i think i begin to see your point.

    or i'm giving you more inviting content for your next rant.

    to be fair, most mmos avoid sexuality as an overt feature because they're trying to appeal to a younger generation. this includes heterosexuality. can't recall seeing thrall's wife in wow. or indeed his bedroom where he presumably banged his wife? maybe he was gay. in which case, perhaps wow also had some gay heroes, too. the crazy lady leading the undead always struck me that way. and, let's face it, you couldn't get more gay than, well, the entire alliance.

    you may think i mock you. perhaps i do. but that's because these are not just mmogames. they are mmorpgs. and in an rpg, you can be whatever you want to be.

    that's why we play them. :)

    Mass murder that happens is one type of genocide. Another is the creation of world in which the unwanted element has already been eliminated.

    The issue is not how much sexuality is present in a game. The issue is that, when a game includes hetero themes, it has a responsibility to its audience to include gay themes. This is not a niche game. This is a game that targets millions of people. Star Wars is a product that doesn't need to be restricted to heterosexuals. There is nothing in the Star Wars universe that supports that position. It's not like Star Wars is a religion that preaches against gay people.

    Unfortunately, though, the creation of a game in which gay people have been eliminated does send a social message.

     

    I was under the impression that this was being rectified.  Am I wrong?

    I'm also gay (female) and would appreciate being able to have a female companion in game and play out the romantic parts of the story.  Why?  For fun, of course.

    I do have to disagree with your use of the word "genocide" as I said in a previous post.  It does not apply to a game.  In a real world where REAL genocide happens....it's disrespectful to use that word in this way. 

    Otherwise....I hear where you're coming from.

    Gay kids are killing themselves in our culture at a rate that far exceeds the norm. There is nothing disrespectful about trying to create a climate in which heterosexism and homophobia are not so prevalant.

     

    Sorry, there is still no GENOCIDE in a game.  You're trying to use a real world term on a fantasy world.  In this case, it doesn't work.

     

    Yes, as I said, I'm gay....I get it.  You're still over-reaching on your terminology, however.  Bioware needs to take care of this problem as they promised.

     

    President of The Marvelously Meowhead Fan Club

  • 1m2m3m4m1m2m3m4m Member Posts: 60

    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Wow. That's quite the leap.

    I like the part about intelligence being a detriment. Really?

    Bioware  already generally overrepresents gays in their games. There should be a roughly 9 hetero romances for every gay romance. This is not the case. There are more gay romances in Bioware games than statistically accurate. Far from Gay's being persecuted. More close to straight's being indoctrinated by the overrepresentation of gay romance.

     

    So, your position is that a game in which gay people don't exist overrepresents gays.

  • Atlan99Atlan99 Member UncommonPosts: 1,332

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

     

    Gay kids are killing themselves in our culture at a rate that far exceeds the norm. There is nothing disrespectful about trying to create a climate in which heterosexism and homophobia are not so prevalant.

    Here is the thing.

    That we see in the world around us. At least the country I live in. Is the opposite.

    There are a billion programs for gays. There are commercials on television. There are parades.

    The country I live in is so far from the reality your brain resides in.

  • 1m2m3m4m1m2m3m4m Member Posts: 60

    Originally posted by just1opinion

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by just1opinion


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by headphones


    Originally posted by gimmesome

    The OP is just trying to explain that when a company/production party of any sort that provides entertainment for the public by creating a world to be experiencedand  intentionally does not include a demographic such as gays, or minorities, or women, or anything related to our society's politically correct issues, it promotes the idea of genocide.

    it's the same sort of conversation that could be had regarding Sci-fi novels.    Most of them are painting a picture of the author's 'ideal world' or 'ideal lifestyle', so, you find a lot of controversy surrounding them as some people may be offended at the omittance of, say, their entire race.

     

    "So, you're ideal world, Mr./Mrs. Developer/Writer, is a world without ______ people?"

     

    ah. thankyou!

    OP, could you please erase your confusing rant with this guy's rather pleasant premise? it's much better and something we could talk about.

    though, i have to say it still doesn't explain where the genocide is at. i was not aware that being gay constituted a religious or ethnic group as such. despite their accent.

    it's a bit of an extreme view, i think. there's a lot of games where you can play green guys as much as white guys. and most guys these days can be all manner of racial colours. there's a lot you can do with the sliders in swtor, even. i was surprised by that. most games these days do a reasonable job of representing most racial groups.

    not sure what kind of slider they'd have to put in a game to represent you as gay, though. but gw2 looks like it will have a purple caster? that's pretty gay-friendly, isn't it? especially if you make your shirt purple, too. or pink. or yellow.

    though, some gays may not like purple. so, we're back to where we started.

    OP, did you have any ideas on what sliders to include to show sexual orientation? maybe a tattoo on their forehead?

    It's not surprising that people don't consider gays when considering genocide, even despite the Holocaust and such. One thing one of my professors said is that you can determine who has the power in a culture by asking yourself if there are words to insult those people -- words that specifically insult the characteristics of their group. If anyone has a more precise word to use rather than genocide, I'm interested. However, I believe the correlation is close enough to be useful.

    Genocide is the elimination of an unwanted group of people to improve a society. How is the elimination of gays any different from the elimination of racial groups on those grounds?

    ah. back to a dictionary with you! you found plenty of other words. it's time you brushed up on genocide. it's an easy mistake to make.

    i'd be interested to see which games actively encourage the mass murder of gay people in their game. although, perhaps you could argue that world of warcraft encouraged the mass murder of gay people because did you ever see a female ogre? no, you didn't! so maybe they were gay ogres? i think i begin to see your point.

    or i'm giving you more inviting content for your next rant.

    to be fair, most mmos avoid sexuality as an overt feature because they're trying to appeal to a younger generation. this includes heterosexuality. can't recall seeing thrall's wife in wow. or indeed his bedroom where he presumably banged his wife? maybe he was gay. in which case, perhaps wow also had some gay heroes, too. the crazy lady leading the undead always struck me that way. and, let's face it, you couldn't get more gay than, well, the entire alliance.

    you may think i mock you. perhaps i do. but that's because these are not just mmogames. they are mmorpgs. and in an rpg, you can be whatever you want to be.

    that's why we play them. :)

    Mass murder that happens is one type of genocide. Another is the creation of world in which the unwanted element has already been eliminated.

    The issue is not how much sexuality is present in a game. The issue is that, when a game includes hetero themes, it has a responsibility to its audience to include gay themes. This is not a niche game. This is a game that targets millions of people. Star Wars is a product that doesn't need to be restricted to heterosexuals. There is nothing in the Star Wars universe that supports that position. It's not like Star Wars is a religion that preaches against gay people.

    Unfortunately, though, the creation of a game in which gay people have been eliminated does send a social message.

     

    I was under the impression that this was being rectified.  Am I wrong?

    I'm also gay (female) and would appreciate being able to have a female companion in game and play out the romantic parts of the story.  Why?  For fun, of course.

    I do have to disagree with your use of the word "genocide" as I said in a previous post.  It does not apply to a game.  In a real world where REAL genocide happens....it's disrespectful to use that word in this way. 

    Otherwise....I hear where you're coming from.

    Gay kids are killing themselves in our culture at a rate that far exceeds the norm. There is nothing disrespectful about trying to create a climate in which heterosexism and homophobia are not so prevalant.

     

    Sorry, there is still no GENOCIDE in a game.  You're trying to use a real world term on a fantasy world.  In this case, it doesn't work.

     

    Yes, as I said, I'm gay....I get it.  You're still over-reaching on your terminology, however.  Bioware needs to take care of this problem as they promised.

     

    Genocide is a strong term because the wholesale elimination of a group of people is a strong action to take. It's clear enough here that we're talking about a game, so the severity of the term is diminished in comparison with real-life situations. But, no one has presented a term that is an adequate substitute or has shown that the term doesn't apply.

    Genocide is the elimination of a group of people based on an unwanted characteristic, one that is deemed incompatible with society. How is eliminating gays from a MMORPG not applicable? It's one thing if there is no sexuality at all, despite the assumption of heterosexuality, which is a much weaker objection in that context. But, in a game in which heterosexuality is present, particularly one that is aimed at millions of customers and which has no foundational reason (such as religious affiliation) to eliminate gays -- what exactly is it then? The only word I've seen suggested so far, discrimination, carries no information about the type of discrimination. Genocide does.

  • just1opinionjust1opinion Member UncommonPosts: 4,641

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Wow. That's quite the leap.

    I like the part about intelligence being a detriment. Really?

    Bioware  already generally overrepresents gays in their games. There should be a roughly 9 hetero romances for every gay romance. This is not the case. There are more gay romances in Bioware games than statistically accurate. Far from Gay's being persecuted. More close to straight's being indoctrinated by the overrepresentation of gay romance.

     

    So, your position is that a game in which gay people don't exist overrepresents gays.

     

    I think he was referring to the Dragon Age series and convieniently forgetting SWTOR.  Because we have NO representation in SWTOR, so surely that's what he was thinking.  Or....maybe he thinks no representation is fine.  In that case....he'd just be wrong. :)

    President of The Marvelously Meowhead Fan Club

  • Atlan99Atlan99 Member UncommonPosts: 1,332

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Wow. That's quite the leap.

    I like the part about intelligence being a detriment. Really?

    Bioware  already generally overrepresents gays in their games. There should be a roughly 9 hetero romances for every gay romance. This is not the case. There are more gay romances in Bioware games than statistically accurate. Far from Gay's being persecuted. More close to straight's being indoctrinated by the overrepresentation of gay romance.

     

    So, your position is that a game in which gay people don't exist overrepresents gays.

    No SWTOR is the exception. Which they claim to be changing. When it does change it will overrepresent gays.

    Nice deflection attempt though.

  • 1m2m3m4m1m2m3m4m Member Posts: 60

    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Wow. That's quite the leap.

    I like the part about intelligence being a detriment. Really?

    Bioware  already generally overrepresents gays in their games. There should be a roughly 9 hetero romances for every gay romance. This is not the case. There are more gay romances in Bioware games than statistically accurate. Far from Gay's being persecuted. More close to straight's being indoctrinated by the overrepresentation of gay romance.

     

    When it does change it will overrepresent gays.

    I'm unclear about this.

  • HatewallHatewall Member Posts: 120

    The international definition as adopted by the United Nations is as follows:

    Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    The part underlined by myself is significant. Funny how some groups not represented by special interest are in the most danger.

  • just1opinionjust1opinion Member UncommonPosts: 4,641

    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Wow. That's quite the leap.

    I like the part about intelligence being a detriment. Really?

    Bioware  already generally overrepresents gays in their games. There should be a roughly 9 hetero romances for every gay romance. This is not the case. There are more gay romances in Bioware games than statistically accurate. Far from Gay's being persecuted. More close to straight's being indoctrinated by the overrepresentation of gay romance.

     

    So, your position is that a game in which gay people don't exist overrepresents gays.

    No SWTOR is the exception. Which they claim to be changing. When it does change it will overrepresent gays.

    Nice deflection attempt though.

     

    How do you figure it OVER-represents us?  Pray do tell.  If you don't want to see homosexual relationships roleplayed then don't MAKE ONE.  You choose the relationship and with what companion, so.....how will we be over-represented exactly?

    Kind of like if you hate gay marriage....don't marry someone gay.  Capiche?

    President of The Marvelously Meowhead Fan Club

  • Atlan99Atlan99 Member UncommonPosts: 1,332

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m

    Originally posted by Atlan99


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Wow. That's quite the leap.

    I like the part about intelligence being a detriment. Really?

    Bioware  already generally overrepresents gays in their games. There should be a roughly 9 hetero romances for every gay romance. This is not the case. There are more gay romances in Bioware games than statistically accurate. Far from Gay's being persecuted. More close to straight's being indoctrinated by the overrepresentation of gay romance.

     

    When it does change it will overrepresent gays.

    I'm unclear about this.

    The number of gays are very low compared to the number of hetero's. You would have at least 9 hetero relationships for every gay one.

    Traditional Bioware tends to have about a 3 or 4 to 1 ratio.

  • Atlan99Atlan99 Member UncommonPosts: 1,332

    Originally posted by just1opinion

    Originally posted by Atlan99


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Wow. That's quite the leap.

    I like the part about intelligence being a detriment. Really?

    Bioware  already generally overrepresents gays in their games. There should be a roughly 9 hetero romances for every gay romance. This is not the case. There are more gay romances in Bioware games than statistically accurate. Far from Gay's being persecuted. More close to straight's being indoctrinated by the overrepresentation of gay romance.

     

    So, your position is that a game in which gay people don't exist overrepresents gays.

    No SWTOR is the exception. Which they claim to be changing. When it does change it will overrepresent gays.

    Nice deflection attempt though.

     

    How do you figure it OVER-represents us?  Pray do tell.  If you don't want to see homosexual relationships roleplayed then don't MAKE ONE.  You choose the relationship and with what companion, so.....how will we be over-represented exactly?

    Kind of like if you hate gay marriage....don't marry someone gay.  Capiche?

    Because of the number of gays in the general population.

    Don't get emotional about numbers.

  • just1opinionjust1opinion Member UncommonPosts: 4,641

    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by Atlan99


    Originally posted by 1m2m3m4m


    Originally posted by Atlan99

    Wow. That's quite the leap.

    I like the part about intelligence being a detriment. Really?

    Bioware  already generally overrepresents gays in their games. There should be a roughly 9 hetero romances for every gay romance. This is not the case. There are more gay romances in Bioware games than statistically accurate. Far from Gay's being persecuted. More close to straight's being indoctrinated by the overrepresentation of gay romance.

     

    When it does change it will overrepresent gays.

    I'm unclear about this.

    The number of gays are very low compared to the number of hetero's. You would have at least 9 hetero relationships for every gay one.

    Traditional Bioware tends to have about a 3 or 4 to 1 ratio.

     

    So considering that we know only 10% of the population is gay.....you need to tell your straight friends to quit roleplaying gay relationships then.

     

    Or maybe gay folks just LOVE Bioware games?  If that's the case....not really much you can do about that other than play something else....or boycott....or whatever else will further your anti-gay cause.

     

    President of The Marvelously Meowhead Fan Club

This discussion has been closed.