Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
[Column] Guild Wars 2: The Quest for Power
SBFord
Former Associate EditorMember LegendaryPosts: 33,129
Now that Guild Wars 2 has been out for several months, players are hitting level 80 with their first, and often second, third and fourth, characters and are wondering "What now?" In today's column, we take a look at that phenomenon. Check it out before lending your voice to the discussion in the comments.
The reason I bring this up is because I feel like ArenaNet has gone in a completely opposite direction with character progression after you’ve reached the level cap. This time, it seems to just come to a screeching halt. There are a few items players can try to grab up to gain a bit more strength than the exotic level items can give, but the increase is so minimal that it really isn’t worth the hassle. ArenaNet seems to stay with their philosophy that items shouldn’t become more important than the character, and they do so by making exotics fairly easy to obtain. I know a few people that just went and bought them! This is great, but still Ascended gear was thrown for the Fractal of the Mist dungeon, and it didn’t really add to that never ending quest for power we players crave. It just made that dungeon a bit easier.
Read more of David North's Guild Wars 2: The Quest for Power.
)
Without some sort of reward, whether its a skill or a stat bonus, killing bosses just loses its luster.
Comments
good read.
at level 80 i cant have enough of too may 'Fractals' which i think they have done an amazing job.
tha said the rewards seem a bit low- with what uve said would of been nice to earn a 'special' skill for completeing all the Fractals-or even unlocking a special small quest line with unique rewards.
iam still waiting for specific order quests which we can buy from the shop? at level 80.
that said I always look forward to Special events throughout the game-they never seem to get old becouse there are always different players attending them- and thats fun!
i have 4 alts still leveling and with them iam reflecting what they could of improved on.
extending the game Lore and accessing special level 80+ skills comes to mind.
Yes - Think of GW1 - it is still going although it is a little long in the tooth. How long do you expect to play? As long as they bring out expansions to GW2 - yes it is realistic.
Just remember many sub games are buy to play one month then subscription.
Think GW's endgame was always 'dress up' so not seeing anything new with GW2.
Gdemami -
Informing people about your thoughts and impressions is not a review, it's a blog.
I completely agree, but I am a bit torn on the subject. You see there is a reason Anet didn't include tons of skills and allow you to freely pick between them and have a secondary class like in GW1. It's because of the pvp. Therein lies the problem, you either balance for pvp and create shallower "progression" or have a hard as heck time balancing pvp and provide good horizontal progression.
I always felt GW1 was a pvp game first and foremost. That's why I didn't really care too much about pve in it after I finished the story line, besides the pvp in GW1 was pretty damn good and the pve was just ok. But when I saw their approach for skills in GW2 I was SO HAPPY that they were thinking about balance. Until I played the game and figured out that the pve in it is also super fun, but because of that design decision it is also extremely limited in progression. I could see a skill system like the one in GW1 flourish in the game that is GW2, but I would hate to see it affect pvp the way it would.
yes- becouse with no sub fee, YOU as the player get to choose what you want out of the game and not spoon fed per an expansion- Anet has doen a great job at that many different routes to leveling ( i chose personal story) but my buddy did it by exploring and zone events -hes not a fan of dungeons (a post wow player bad experiences)
my alts are beign leveled by wvw and spvp...some events and jumping puzzles- the game never feels the same!-and that i love!
so choosing what to buy and when is key with future mmo's. play at your own pace no rat race to world first=ats for kids.
Isn't GW1's longevity primarily driven by it's pvp/esport side? Whereas people are having an issue with the whole PVE/larger scale mmo side in terms of longevity with GW2.
There is no doubt a highly specific/dedicated B2P multiplayer title can have longevity (so long as it is supreme in delivering that focused content). There though is still some doubt as to whether the model (especially when applied to a themepark which is content driven) can work for a fully fledged themepark mmo trying to appeal to a broad spectrum of players. Perhaps it can, but then it is expecting a lot.
"Come and have a look at what you could have won."
This, exactly.
GW2 is build with supreme scalability in mind. PVP scales, WVW scales. There's no reason progression of skills couldn't be never-ending, as long as ArenaNet could add in tons of skills.
I'd take multi-classing in PvE and WvW. Leave it disabled for the eSports. Would love to do the multi-classing we saw in GW1, balance nightmare that it was. But that's what the controlled part of sPVP is for.
Try to be excellent to everyone you meet. You never know what someone else has seen or endured.
My Review Manifesto
Follow me on Twitter if you dare.
I have a hard time relating to the OP. His goals are not mine at all. I don't have this desire to 'prove myself' in a game, to myself or anyone else. Maybe this is a product of being in my 40's now, as when I was in my 20's to early 30's I was more concerned with the pecking order.
I am more interested in seeing the game develop and grow as opposed to my own 'power'. Grow the crafting, add some complexity and uniqueness to it, add more professions, bring some humor to the game, add housing, add mounts, add new places, create new stories, add new races. I'm interested to see my characters place within the world grow, but I'm not putting little notches on my bow to keep track of my kills: that seems inconsequential.
Looking at how I've played mmo's as opposed to fps, it's been more about how I fit in the world and community not how leet I was. I want to find a place to fit in, not stand out. I realize I may be 'different' though.
Yeah they really painted themselves into a bit of a corner with the way they tied 5 of your 10 skills to weapons.... Just starting recently I couldn't decide what class to play, not because they are all awesome, but because I just couldn't find a class/weapon combo that I really liked. They all have their skills that I like and ones that I don't, and with no way to mix and match I just couldn't find 'my' playstyle.
I really like the variaty of the Elementalist in beta, but it feels like they have nerfed the PvE pretty hard since then, as for some reason it doesn't feel the same now. I've finally settled on sword + board / hammer Guardian... just hope I can enjoy those same 5/5 skills for the next 75 levels.
As a way to fix the problem raised in the OP.. I would love to see them introduce alternative weapon skills that you can swap out like the utility skills... prehaps earning them in a similar way as you did elite skills in GW1.
yeah i wish we had more skills, and at least 2 or 3 more skill slots (not skill bars, only 2 or 3 more buttons to add weapon skills to map with mouse or other keys)
I feel the same way. I also am in my 40s, but I have felt this way for many years when it comes to MMOs. I like to have my place as a character. I like to feel important and that my actions change the world and story around me. When I play GW2 I enjoy COMPLETELY the storys around me. It does not bother me that the gear is not as leet as in say WoW. WoW gear gets laughable at the stats and the imbalance betweeen certain levels. When I play I want to feel good with my kills because I have mastered my SKILLS not for wearing over powered gear.
As GW2 progresses I would love to see more focus on story and content rather than following the "look at my awesome over powered gear" approach of most MMOs. I would love to see dynamic events get more dynamic, the world permanantly change from my efforts, and dynamic environments that change as time progresses in game would be on the top of my list.
Once I get into GW2's PvP more I am sure I will have thoughts there, but seeing I have not focused on the PvP side much I will reserve comments. All in all I am not unhappy with much in Anet's GW2. The most fun I have had in an MMO in a long long time!
I can't say I disagree there. I love GW2, as anyone on this site who's had any dealing with me can attest. However, the lack of Elite Skills, and the quest to get them, is the single biggest flaw in the game for me.
I loved not only using the skills when I got them, but hunting for them in GW1. I really wish they would bring that back. While I don't mind the "dumbing down" of the skill set for GW2, I think having the extra Elites for each profession to hunt down and aquire would satisfy most of that quest for power you were talking about.
You want me to pay to play a game I already paid for???
Be afraid.....The dragons are HERE!
Dispite the number of elites after 3 campaigns, each profession only had a couple of useful elites.
Some of them only acquired realy late in the game.
Only after many updates, nerfs, buffs and changes did you get some variety.
I don't mind more skills (and traits) but I get the impression many of these players complaining about the lack of skills are also the same that use the same build all the time and are more obsessed with numbers (stats, number of skills) than actually trying different builds and playstyles.
Especially those that hit level 30 or 40 and say they get nothing else considering there are still many things to choose from and acquire - GM traits. runes, sigils. food you using.
Currently playing: GW2
Going cardboard starter kit: Ticket to ride, Pandemic, Carcassonne, Dominion, 7 Wonders
I'll admit my question is probably naive. But why do you have to balance PVP? Shouldn't it be the strongers (or best build) survives? I can imagine today the 'best' builds would be posted to the Internet, but in the end wouldn't it come down to player experience (who could best play the class)?
I dont know. Someone who can throw fireballs should have an easier time against a guy trying to close in with a sword. It would be up to the sword-wielder to develop a strategy to win.
Then again I don't PVP so maybe my point is moot...