...So my opinion is clearly more credible than yours.
Is this possibly the most irritating statement regularly seen on mmorpg.com, or are there others?
It's certainly up there for me, primarily because the person using it is often mistaking their exceptional knowledge of how to play them for knowledge of how they work or how to create them.
There isn't a "right" or "wrong" way to play, if you want to use a screwdriver to put nails into wood, have at it, simply don't complain when the guy next to you with the hammer is doing it much better and easier. - Allein "Graphics are often supplied by Engines that (some) MMORPG's are built in" - Spuffyre
Originally posted by fivoroth MMORPGs have not been around for 20 years? These people lose credibly instantly cause they are lying
This would be a good example that experience is more credible. You are incorrect, MUD's have been around since the late 70's and satisfy all the requirements of being a MMORPG, they were just titled something different. The term MMORPG was coined by Garriot for Ultima Online, prior to that (M59) these types of games were called graphical MUD's. Since you judge people by their facts, it seems you have just lost all credibility with yourself. RIP game-cred.
Originally posted by fivoroth MMORPGs have not been around for 20 years? These people lose credibly instantly cause they are lying
This would be a good example that experience is more credible. You are incorrect, MUD's have been around since the late 70's and satisfy all the requirements of being a MMORPG, they were just titled something different. The term MMORPG was coined by Garriot for Ultima Online, prior to that (M59) these types of games were called graphical MUD's. Since you judge people by their facts, it seems you have just lost all credibility with yourself. RIP game-cred.
MUD games are not MMORPGs. Not by a long shot. Or do you mean that 20-50 people interacting at the same time on 1 server is massively multiplayer? MUDs were online text based RPGs but they were certainly not massively multiplayer online roleplaying games.
First MMOs were Meridian 59 and UO. UO coined the term as you pointed out.
Mission in life: Vanquish all MMORPG.com trolls - especially TESO, WOW and GW2 trolls.
While time isn't always a gauge for competence it is most likely an important factor. You dont have 25 years old judge, you have to make your way to the top constantly proving that you know your shit.
Doctor don't just stop learning new stuff when they get out of school, they keep up to date with all of it. Come a stage where they can start to regress tho, I wouldn't like to have a 75 years old doctor simply because there is greater chances for mental issues.
It's mostly a case by case scenario, while experiance is not an absolute, it is an important factor.
And if mmo where that simple, none would flop.
I genuinely don't understand your last sentence.
I don't think it get much more complex than mmos in the gaming industries. So in the field it certainly isn't than simple.
Are you talking about the gameplay or the making when you say they are simple ?
gameplay.
Well yea that's a given for any form of entertainement, I doubt anyone would like it if it required 10 years of learning before you could start to enjoy a game.
I am referring to the vast majority of people on this site who play games rather than programme them. I edited my last post to include the following: -
I raised the job comparison, but I don't actually think it is synonymous with entertainment. I can see a film and decide if I like it or not regardless of having seen Citizen Kane. The same is true for mmo's, opinions are subjective.
But a movie critic wouldn't be able to do a decent job if he haven't seen other movies. You can tell if you like a movie or not, but you can't compare it to something you haven't seen. You cannot say if it's best movie of the decade if you saw only 3 movies.
It's all a matter of perspective, the more you know, the more you saw, the more you touched, then better you can compare and judge it.
'I watched Twilight and though it was vacuous, pseudo-romantic nonsense. I would rather watch Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet, which is essentially the exact same story but vastly superior.'
'But I have seen Citizen Kane and 2001: A Space Odyssey in the cinema, and I think the Twiglet movies are the pinnacle of film-making'.
Today, proclaiming you've been terrible at something for 20 years means you are an expert at it, thus, it does hold more weight than someone who has just started to be terrible. You could learn a lot from the perpetually inadequate.
Originally posted by fivoroth MMORPGs have not been around for 20 years? These people lose credibly instantly cause they are lying
This would be a good example that experience is more credible. You are incorrect, MUD's have been around since the late 70's and satisfy all the requirements of being a MMORPG, they were just titled something different. The term MMORPG was coined by Garriot for Ultima Online, prior to that (M59) these types of games were called graphical MUD's. Since you judge people by their facts, it seems you have just lost all credibility with yourself. RIP game-cred.
MUD games are not MMORPGs. Not by a long shot. Or do you mean that 20-50 people interacting at the same time on 1 server is massively multiplayer? MUDs were online text based RPGs but they were certainly not massively multiplayer online roleplaying games.
First MMOs were Meridian 59 and UO. UO coined the term as you pointed out.
So 19 years not 20 :P
Anyways having 50 peep in a MUD in 1972 is for that time MASSIVE
...So my opinion is clearly more credible than yours.
Is this possibly the most irritating statement regularly seen on mmorpg.com, or are there others?
your opinion has 0% ,why cause what you like and what i like IS 2 seperate things.this is the case in ANY opinion subject.i have seen plenty of movies that people rave about and i think they suck,THAT is my opinion.i take others opinion as a guidance,but i do not rely on OTHERS opinions.
So.. what the OP is saying is that if he/she , right now this very minute introduced a friend to MMOS that the (friend) had 0 experience with (and the OP say 6 years exp) .. that the OP wouldnt have more Experince/Knowledge and Abilities to navigate and perform at a higher level than the player just introduced to the genre... ............go figure.....
Originally posted by fivoroth MMORPGs have not been around for 20 years? These people lose credibly instantly cause they are lying
This would be a good example that experience is more credible. You are incorrect, MUD's have been around since the late 70's and satisfy all the requirements of being a MMORPG, they were just titled something different. The term MMORPG was coined by Garriot for Ultima Online, prior to that (M59) these types of games were called graphical MUD's. Since you judge people by their facts, it seems you have just lost all credibility with yourself. RIP game-cred.
MUD games are not MMORPGs. Not by a long shot. Or do you mean that 20-50 people interacting at the same time on 1 server is massively multiplayer? MUDs were online text based RPGs but they were certainly not massively multiplayer online roleplaying games.
First MMOs were Meridian 59 and UO. UO coined the term as you pointed out.
So 19 years not 20 :P
Anyways having 50 peep in a MUD in 1972 is for that time MASSIVE
Anyways u can still play m59
www.meridian59.com
mmorpg
— abbreviation for
massive(ly) multiplayer online role-playing <span id="hotword" onclk"="" name="hotword">game: an internet-based computer game set in a virtual world,which can be played by many people at the same time, each of whom can interact with the others notice the lack of how many people are playing as part of definition.ergo 50 would seem like it qualifies.most MUDS are just 1 sever,i played on a mud that had 200 online at any time.
...So my opinion is clearly more credible than yours.
Is this possibly the most irritating statement regularly seen on mmorpg.com, or are there others?
The problem here is like so many young people maybe you are only hearing what you want to hear and not what is actually being said. Or you are too busy thinking about what you are going to respond with rather than trying to even open your mind an inch.
Perhaps the older person was trying to convey to you that you were not around when the first MMOs came out and how awesome they were because they were all about community....not bis, raids, rotations, dps counters, cash shops, general chat trolling, soloing the entire game, quest grinds, etc. I could go on and on and on. We older folks got to experience something many here did not, and you will never know it....never. Blah blah blah old people blah blah blah is all you will know.
And that's okay, because I am thankful I got to experience that moment in time when this genre was the coolest freaking thing on this planet. They were more than games, they were social experiences and all about community. I doubt we will ever see it again, you will never get to experience it. Your loss, not mine.
So when we say we know more about what makes this genre great, yea....we do. Great for us.
Originally posted by Kyleran What factors make one opinion more credible than another?
Experience or knowledge in a particular subject tends to be one factor, so someone who has done something a long time or experienced a wide variety of what the field offers would likely be more credible than a relative newcomer.
Of course this isn't always true, but in general longevity is a reasonable indicator (among others) that one opinion might be more valuable than another.
For example, if someone tells me their entire MMO experience is from games created in the last 5 years it tells me they never experienced the early designs which I feel were clearly superior so I can't value their opinion nearly as much as someone who shares the same experience as I have.
Exactly.
How many times have we seen those "Pick your top 3 mmo's" threads? If you go back a look at these threads closely you would see that the majority of the answers are clearly based on thier first mmo experience. It's unlikely to see one who experienced both DaoC and SWG end up choosing GW2 for best mmo.
My point is experience plays a large factor in your opinion. If your first mmo was an earlier model it tells me that you worked hard to progress through the game and you were there before all the luxuries. If a new game were to come out without these luxuries such as fast travel, you would most likely keep an open mind.
If you tried different types of mmo's and achieved a respectable level, that tells me you aren't limited by a particular model and you played the game long enough to understand the mechanics. Also have you experienced trying to make a mmo? If you tried programming your own game you might understand that there is no "perfect launch" only a launch with the fewest problems.
Ill just put it like this... If you are giving dating advice or just talking about women in general but you've only been on the scene for 11 months and you only date Romanian girls ill still listen but not very closely.
Originally posted by VengeSunsoar They may be complex to build which is why they flop they are damn simple to learn and play. Dune of the simplest in the gaming industry imo.
As opposed to mario kart, NHL 2000, metroid and Skyrim ? Other that really deep flight simulator (which could be complex for non pilot) I don't know many really complex games...
The most complex games are usually the ones with multiple path options, EVE for example can give neophyte nightmares. But once you grab the basics it's still not hard. Older RPG with decision making, could have some thinking involved.
I think MMO are in the top complex scale compared to other games, but even the most complex of em all isn't really rocket science.
Meh it can go either way imo, would you walk into a PC shop looking for repair and listen to the guy that has 20y exp or the guy panhandling for change by the door?
Its called an educated opinion, and you need that exp to become educated.
It depends on the subject and discussion. Sometimes life experience, just like in an mmorpg, does mean something. What it all boils down to in almost any discussion here is personal opinion, so there is no right or wrong.
Death is nothing to us, since when we are, Death has not come, and when death has come, we are not.
Originally posted by Amjoco It depends on the subject and discussion. Sometimes life experience, just like in an mmorpg, does mean something. What it all boils down to in almost any discussion here is personal opinion, so there is no right or wrong.
Originally posted by Amjoco It depends on the subject and discussion. Sometimes life experience, just like in an mmorpg, does mean something. What it all boils down to in almost any discussion here is personal opinion, so there is no right or wrong.
No it does not.
So experience never means anything ? Bold statement.
Originally posted by Amjoco It depends on the subject and discussion. Sometimes life experience, just like in an mmorpg, does mean something. What it all boils down to in almost any discussion here is personal opinion, so there is no right or wrong.
No it does not.
So experience never means anything ? Bold statement.
In terms of video games? nope it doesn't. It is not some specific skill line that only few can pick up learn and then boast about their experience in terms of years. Any dick and harry can pick up a computer and console and start playing video games.
Almost everyone here who is in their 30's and 40's have 10+ years of experience with online games. It is silly to brag about something so pointless.
You played MMOS for 10 years? so did i..who gives a bloody toss really?
ya, thats what is called a lie. if they had even been out that long i would have known about it and been on one, but they havent. the only mmo games near that description that were out at that time were simple programs made by college students and were generally restricted to those campuses.
Yea 20 years ago we had MORPG, MMORPG are 18 years ago... is it really important ?
Originally posted by Amjoco It depends on the subject and discussion. Sometimes life experience, just like in an mmorpg, does mean something. What it all boils down to in almost any discussion here is personal opinion, so there is no right or wrong.
No it does not.
So experience never means anything ? Bold statement.
In terms of video games? nope it doesn't. It is not some specific skill line that only few can pick up learn and then boast about their experience in terms of years. Any dick and harry can pick up a computer and console and start playing video games.
Almost everyone here who is in their 30's and 40's have 10+ years of experience with online games. It is silly to brag about something so pointless.
You played MMOS for 10 years? so did i..who gives a bloody toss really?
I think you are missing the point. It is not a matter of bragging, it's more about knowledge of the changes that operated over the years. So yes having played more games than someone else can give you a different point of view on certain things.
No one is talking about it making you play the game better.
People who have played for longer have a worse opinion, in my opinion. They are over saturated, seen too many things.. lost the excitement and sense of discovery. The more you know about MMOs, the less you enjoy them. It's almost fact. Listening to these people is kind of pointless unless you have played as many MMOs as them. Even then, it's still down to personal taste. I've been playing MMOs for about 16 years, I know what I'm talking about
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
Comments
It's certainly up there for me, primarily because the person using it is often mistaking their exceptional knowledge of how to play them for knowledge of how they work or how to create them.
There isn't a "right" or "wrong" way to play, if you want to use a screwdriver to put nails into wood, have at it, simply don't complain when the guy next to you with the hammer is doing it much better and easier. - Allein
"Graphics are often supplied by Engines that (some) MMORPG's are built in" - Spuffyre
This would be a good example that experience is more credible. You are incorrect, MUD's have been around since the late 70's and satisfy all the requirements of being a MMORPG, they were just titled something different. The term MMORPG was coined by Garriot for Ultima Online, prior to that (M59) these types of games were called graphical MUD's. Since you judge people by their facts, it seems you have just lost all credibility with yourself. RIP game-cred.
1997 Lord British actualy made up the name :P
Before that they where called MUD's that when i started online gaming :P
(Damn u zac u beat me to it:P)
MUD games are not MMORPGs. Not by a long shot. Or do you mean that 20-50 people interacting at the same time on 1 server is massively multiplayer? MUDs were online text based RPGs but they were certainly not massively multiplayer online roleplaying games.
First MMOs were Meridian 59 and UO. UO coined the term as you pointed out.
Mission in life: Vanquish all MMORPG.com trolls - especially TESO, WOW and GW2 trolls.
'I watched Twilight and though it was vacuous, pseudo-romantic nonsense. I would rather watch Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet, which is essentially the exact same story but vastly superior.'
'But I have seen Citizen Kane and 2001: A Space Odyssey in the cinema, and I think the Twiglet movies are the pinnacle of film-making'.
Who do you trust out of these two?
So 19 years not 20 :P
Anyways having 50 peep in a MUD in 1972 is for that time MASSIVE
Anyways u can still play m59
www.meridian59.com
I am playing MMOs for 24 years therefore it does not irritate me at all...
your opinion has 0% ,why cause what you like and what i like IS 2 seperate things.this is the case in ANY opinion subject.i have seen plenty of movies that people rave about and i think they suck,THAT is my opinion.i take others opinion as a guidance,but i do not rely on OTHERS opinions.
notice the lack of how many people are playing as part of definition.ergo 50 would seem like it qualifies.most MUDS are just 1 sever,i played on a mud that had 200 online at any time.
I've been playing MMO's for 20+ years...
Now get off my lawn ya whippersnappers...
What are your other Hobbies?
Gaming is Dirt Cheap compared to this...
The problem here is like so many young people maybe you are only hearing what you want to hear and not what is actually being said. Or you are too busy thinking about what you are going to respond with rather than trying to even open your mind an inch.
Perhaps the older person was trying to convey to you that you were not around when the first MMOs came out and how awesome they were because they were all about community....not bis, raids, rotations, dps counters, cash shops, general chat trolling, soloing the entire game, quest grinds, etc. I could go on and on and on. We older folks got to experience something many here did not, and you will never know it....never. Blah blah blah old people blah blah blah is all you will know.
And that's okay, because I am thankful I got to experience that moment in time when this genre was the coolest freaking thing on this planet. They were more than games, they were social experiences and all about community. I doubt we will ever see it again, you will never get to experience it. Your loss, not mine.
So when we say we know more about what makes this genre great, yea....we do. Great for us.
Exactly.
How many times have we seen those "Pick your top 3 mmo's" threads? If you go back a look at these threads closely you would see that the majority of the answers are clearly based on thier first mmo experience. It's unlikely to see one who experienced both DaoC and SWG end up choosing GW2 for best mmo.
My point is experience plays a large factor in your opinion. If your first mmo was an earlier model it tells me that you worked hard to progress through the game and you were there before all the luxuries. If a new game were to come out without these luxuries such as fast travel, you would most likely keep an open mind.
If you tried different types of mmo's and achieved a respectable level, that tells me you aren't limited by a particular model and you played the game long enough to understand the mechanics. Also have you experienced trying to make a mmo? If you tried programming your own game you might understand that there is no "perfect launch" only a launch with the fewest problems.
Ill just put it like this... If you are giving dating advice or just talking about women in general but you've only been on the scene for 11 months and you only date Romanian girls ill still listen but not very closely.
As opposed to mario kart, NHL 2000, metroid and Skyrim ? Other that really deep flight simulator (which could be complex for non pilot) I don't know many really complex games...
The most complex games are usually the ones with multiple path options, EVE for example can give neophyte nightmares. But once you grab the basics it's still not hard. Older RPG with decision making, could have some thinking involved.
I think MMO are in the top complex scale compared to other games, but even the most complex of em all isn't really rocket science.
Meh it can go either way imo, would you walk into a PC shop looking for repair and listen to the guy that has 20y exp or the guy panhandling for change by the door?
Its called an educated opinion, and you need that exp to become educated.
Death is nothing to us, since when we are, Death has not come, and when death has come, we are not.
No it does not.
So experience never means anything ? Bold statement.
In terms of video games? nope it doesn't. It is not some specific skill line that only few can pick up learn and then boast about their experience in terms of years. Any dick and harry can pick up a computer and console and start playing video games.
Almost everyone here who is in their 30's and 40's have 10+ years of experience with online games. It is silly to brag about something so pointless.
You played MMOS for 10 years? so did i..who gives a bloody toss really?
Yea 20 years ago we had MORPG, MMORPG are 18 years ago... is it really important ?
I think you are missing the point. It is not a matter of bragging, it's more about knowledge of the changes that operated over the years. So yes having played more games than someone else can give you a different point of view on certain things.
No one is talking about it making you play the game better.