Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Archeage, Wildstar, and ESO: out of the 3, which are and are not worth the sub?

2

Comments

  • BoneserinoBoneserino Member UncommonPosts: 1,768

    Well if you have a big fat wallet...they all are!!

     

    Go back to Wylf's post.   He got it right.   He wins!!

    FFA Nonconsentual Full Loot PvP ...You know you want it!!

  • Leon1eLeon1e Member UncommonPosts: 791
    Originally posted by bcbully

    ESO Werewolf PvP

    Arche Age PvP

    Wildstar pvp

    GW2 pvp for giggles

    Now look at the other two. You tell me. It's pretty obvious from this pvprs perspective.

     

    Kinda terrible animations there for TESO

    On topic though, I wouldn't play TESO/WS even if they were free. ArcheAge is dope. The games I would pay for are sadly not in this list.

  • CaldrinCaldrin Member UncommonPosts: 4,505
    none of them.
  • SeravajanSeravajan Member UncommonPosts: 192

    AA is not worth the sub.

    If you like to explore and to do interesting quests then go for ESO.

    Wildstar I dunno. Is not my game.

  • YashaXYashaX Member EpicPosts: 3,100
    Originally posted by bcbully

    ESO Werewolf PvP

    Arche Age PvP

    Wildstar pvp

    GW2 pvp for giggles

    Now look at the other two. You tell me. It's pretty obvious from this pvprs perspective.

     

    That werewolf video is pretty cool, first time I have seen one in pvp - when I played there were quite a few vampires though.

     

    Watching all four videos, the difference in the animations, lighting/graphics, and intensity of combat is pretty amazing.

    ....
  • PhryPhry Member LegendaryPosts: 11,004
    None of those games are currently worth a sub, if anything its probably the state of them all that is one of the contributing reasons why WoW suddenly has over 10 million subs again image
  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 8,164
    I agree with Phry but if you want a sub game try FFXIV ARR instead.

  • YashaXYashaX Member EpicPosts: 3,100
    Originally posted by kitarad
    I agree with Phry but if you want a sub game try FFXIV ARR instead.

    I would play FFXIV ARR if it was a buy to play like GW2.

    ....
  • spizzspizz Member UncommonPosts: 1,971

    ESO would be probably the only game worth it for a subscription with all its content.

    Archeage and Wildstar = Garbage

  • None of those are worth a sub. There are only 3 games out there which worth a sub in my opinion. And they are WoW, FFXIV and Eve. That's all. There are a lot of mmos trying to be different and wants to be the best. But they're forgeting something. There is a more a important thing for the success. And that is the quality. These three games are the most polish and quality games out there. That's why these are the only successful p2p games. And the follow-ups would be Swtor and Gw2. I won't pay a dime for any other mmorpg other than these 5 out there. Maybe someday there will be a better game which deserves the money we pay.

    Edit: When I said only successful p2p games for those three I didn't talk for the whole world. Since I can't play any asian game for today I can only talk about EU and US. So I'm not talking about Lineage 1(Which I played and loved in the past) or Blade&Soul etc...

  • Octagon7711Octagon7711 Member LegendaryPosts: 9,004
    I agree that for me none of those are worth a sub.  If I had to pick one it would be AA, simply because it's free and I don't want to own land, so I can login and play for a short while from time to time.

    "We all do the best we can based on life experience, point of view, and our ability to believe in ourselves." - Naropa      "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are."  SR Covey

  • jitter77jitter77 Member UncommonPosts: 517

    Archeage is like most said a piece of crap.  The game has some potential, but it is so poorly managed its hard to justify giving them money.  Hacks have been in the game since Alpha and not fixed, along with bots everywhere and no land available.  One of the main points of AA is crafting / building stuff and you simply can not find any open land.  When land becomes available it is grabbed by land hackers.  I have seen it first hand.  The worst part is Trion does not acknowledge this or apologize they just keep on rolling on.....It is sad really.

  • sonicwhip2sonicwhip2 Member Posts: 86
    Paying for wildstar is really just money down the drain. If you wait a few months it will be free and even then it still wont be worth a download. AA is free already so might as well try it if you want. ESO is slowly becoming more worth a sub Zenimax is improving it.
  • AdamantineAdamantine Member RarePosts: 5,093
    Originally posted by DMKano
    Originally posted by Gestankfaust
    ESO if we are being honest....but so far I can see most aren't being honest

    ???

     

    QFT

    Apparently that dude (or gal) believes everyone who doesnt have their opinion must be lying.

  • timtracktimtrack Member UncommonPosts: 541
    Brown fabric, black leather or blue mocca. WHICH SHOES ARE WORTH WEARING?!
  • GoldenArrowGoldenArrow Member UncommonPosts: 1,186

    Archeage and Wildstar have no future and they are P2W.

    ESO is the only one P2P and definitely has a future (due to strong ip fans).

  • daltaniousdaltanious Member UncommonPosts: 2,381
    AA for sure not, ESO heard to many horror stories, ... would gladly resub to Wildstar ... IF they remove that SILLY 1 TOOLBAR LIMITATION! That for me is fun killer, simple as that. Sole reason I left also TSW. Leave to player if he want to have 10 toolbars with skills or just playing through whole game by pressing just one single button.
  • TheGoblinKingTheGoblinKing Member UncommonPosts: 208


    Originally posted by DMKano No game is worth a sub - I play ArcheAge for free - 2 accounts now (main and farm mule account)  
    The game that is so hacked and botted to death and mismanaged so poorly that even people won't play it for free?

     

    Yes that game is definitely not worth a subscription.

  • CelciusCelcius Member RarePosts: 1,877
    None of them are worth the sub. I would say that Ws and ESO will be F2P within 6 months anyways (especially WS) so I would just wait.
  • rojoArcueidrojoArcueid Member EpicPosts: 10,722
    In my opinion, none of the three at the moment. However, with upcoming improvements im most inclined towards ESO, but as a short term mmo.




  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,273

    I can only speak for ESO, if you have not played it I would say pick that. If you have played it and are thinking of coming back I would say wait till the new year. Players who leave inside of six months need that sort of timescale or they drop out again within a month or two.

  • AzucArSaladAzucArSalad Member UncommonPosts: 63

    - AA if you like Farmville and you can play each day to attend your farms (or each 2 days at most). If you don't, go as f2p player.

    - Wilstard if you like theme park MMORPG with action combat system and you like preparing yourself and doing big raids.

    - ESO. I have not played it since beta. I cannot give you advice. It is on sale on Steam this weekend: 18.96 €. Worth a try for this price.

    http://store.steampowered.com/app/306130/

     

    If you admit suggestions about MMORPG with subscription, try FF XIV if you like theme park MMORPG with tab combat system. Solid community and solid company, IMHO. Only sub MMORPG I would pay for currently with views on long term playing.

    ^.^'

  • sportsfansportsfan Member Posts: 431

    You know ... 

    these games are the very reason WoW is back to 10.000.000 subscriptions these days ...

    3% think otherwise, divided by 3.

  • Nicco77Nicco77 Member UncommonPosts: 145
    Originally posted by sportsfan

    You know ... 

    these games are the very reason WoW is back to 10.000.000 subscriptions these days ...

    3% think otherwise, divided by 3.

    This.

    The only game that worth a sub it's WOW,maybe ESO would have a chance if the classes and combat system would'nt sucks bad.

    If you can't stand WOW just keep your money and hope that ZOS gives ESO a fix at the ugly classes(all people running around with staves and robes regardless of the archetipe choice) and of course better end game content because time trial and dungeons are just silly now,just dps and heal spam.

  • NikaasNikaas Member UncommonPosts: 135
    I would go with AA. People that tell you that all the land is taken by bots were not playing since week 2. Now with a little persistency and few days time it's super easy to take land. And gold seller spam is less than what i see in WoW.

    [mod editI for example started as a free2play player for my first 40 days in AA, now i have 3x 16x16 farms and 1x 24x24 without spending 1$ or ever using any cheats - this on one of the busiests EU servers. And this with just few hours play a day.
Sign In or Register to comment.