you pretty much on purpose did not respond to any thing I said regarding SC actually having older employees and even to the level of interviewing them on the project.
Why would you leave that critical important detail out? nope. your done
Dude, try reading. The links are there. Here, I'll even condense it down for you:
"Ideally, if you can get two people on the record saying the same thing, or at least three anonymous people saying the same thing, then the information is good to run. We got our information from nine independent sources"
But because you saw an old dude in SC's video, and you get that vibe that CIG is 'good people', nope, must be libel. That's the definitive, 100% neutral, unbiased position.
It must be tough going through life with 'ready, fire, aim' as an MO.
you ignored the key of what I said TWICE now.
just digging your hole deeper with me. Why are you so biased you will intentionally leave out key parts of a reply TWO TIMES IN A ROW...just to push your agenda?
I'm pretty sure I didn't leave anything out?
i) You watched some videos produced by CIG/RSI
ii) You watched a video that mentioned The Escapist's article
iii) You noted that some of the CIG/RSI videos included some older people
iv) You came to these forums, started a thread about "hate", while claiming to be a beacon of unbiased rationality offering a privileged outsider's perspective (my favorite: "I should remind you I am not a Star Citizen backer or follower")
Please stop polluting this forum with your drivel. If you can't be bothered to read one or two articles, why should we suffer through your posts?
"The simple is the seal of the true and beauty is the splendor of truth" -Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar Authored 139 missions in VendettaOnline and 6 tracks in Distance
you pretty much on purpose did not respond to any thing I said regarding SC actually having older employees and even to the level of interviewing them on the project.
Why would you leave that critical important detail out? nope. your done
Dude, try reading. The links are there. Here, I'll even condense it down for you:
"Ideally, if you can get two people on the record saying the same thing, or at least three anonymous people saying the same thing, then the information is good to run. We got our information from nine independent sources"
But because you saw an old dude in SC's video, and you get that vibe that CIG is 'good people', nope, must be libel. That's the definitive, 100% neutral, unbiased position.
It must be tough going through life with 'ready, fire, aim' as an MO.
you ignored the key of what I said TWICE now.
just digging your hole deeper with me. Why are you so biased you will intentionally leave out key parts of a reply TWO TIMES IN A ROW...just to push your agenda?
I'm pretty sure I didn't leave anything out?
i) You watched some videos produced by CIG/RSI
ii) You watched a video that mentioned The Escapist's article
iii) You noted that some of the CIG/RSI videos included some older people
iv) You came to these forums, started a thread about "hate", while claiming to be a beacon of unbiased rationality offering a privileged outsider's perspective (my favorite: "I should remind you I am not a Star Citizen backer or follower")
Please stop polluting this forum with your drivel. If you can't be bothered to read one or two articles, why should we suffer through your posts?
what about the fair common numbers of older employees on the SC team many of which are high up in the project that they have been interviewed multiple times and are still working there. How does that fit with age discrimination? ------------------------------STOP READING NOW--------------------
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
basically I saw this video related to the escapist article. Given that I have seen a few interviews from the SC people I found these claims to be a bit off so I decided to look into it. It took me about 5 mins to find a video of a LOT of older people working for and being interviewed on the SC team.
Given the personality types of these SC leaders and the interviews I have seen them making the comments they have been accused of making is EXTREEMLY out of pattern.
what is interesting is this video and people using this story as an example never retracted their comments after its been pretty much prooven to be a farse.
I'll do my best not to strawman here:
You're saying that because you "saw this video related to the escapist article" and had "seen a few interviews from the SC people" (that's following the game, by the way) you henceforth decided that, because of the "personality types" of those in leadership positions making discriminatory hiring comments is "out of pattern" to the degree that The Escapist's article amounts to... libel?
Have you ever considered that what you had been viewing is a PR presence? Someone that has been coached to look, dress, appear a certain way so as to present a predetermined message to an outside audience?
you intentionally left out something I said clearly on purpose and was key, I am afraid I cant trust you.
I'm not asking for your trust; I'm asking you to consider the evidence before accusing people of making "false accusations".
You seem to be refusing to consider the possibility that The Escapist's article was not a "farse".
/sits down
There was actually some really good, healthy debate over this subject when shit first hit the fan. However, there have been zero follow-ups, zero law suits and zero word from The Escapist otherwise. So how does this argument, or how do these accusations, become the basis for so many arguments, still? Should they not lose validity as time goes on, especially since The Escapist STATED they would be publishing a follow-up and then didn't? How is it that as SC pushes out more updates that show more and more progress, we still hear unwavering comments about how it won't ship? Objectivity is a two-way street and there has certainly been a lack of consideration from both camps, so maybe you shouldn't be throwing rocks in your glass house.
/drops mic
I agree. It's silly.
I guess I'm taking exception to @SEANMCAD calling out virtually everyone in this thread, all the while claiming to be 100% unbiased and "not a follower", partly over yesterday's news (The Escapist article) while ostensibly only having seen a few videos likely originating from CIG themselves.
"The simple is the seal of the true and beauty is the splendor of truth" -Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar Authored 139 missions in VendettaOnline and 6 tracks in Distance
It is about one of the richest men in the world having issues with his software during an interview. He had hundreds of employees working on it and hundreds of millions in development budgets.
Ofc most backers realize SC wont be what was promised, but does that mean it will be a bad game? Well no one knows because it isnt even released yet.
Wait and see people, once it goes gold and really sucks then rage, until then it all seems so unfounded.
I guess I'm taking exception to @SEANMCAD calling out virtually everyone in this thread, all the while claiming to be 100% unbiased and "not a follower", partly over yesterday's news (The Escapist article) while ostensibly only having seen a few videos likely originating from CIG themselves.
what about the fair common numbers of older employees on the SC team many of which are high up in the project that they have been interviewed multiple times and are still working there. How does that fit with age discrimination? ------------------------------STOP READING NOW--------------------
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
I guess I'm taking exception to @SEANMCAD calling out virtually everyone in this thread, all the while claiming to be 100% unbiased and "not a follower", partly over yesterday's news (The Escapist article) while ostensibly only having seen a few videos likely originating from CIG themselves.
what about the fair common numbers of older employees on the SC team many of which are high up in the project that they have been interviewed multiple times and are still working there. How does that fit with age discrimination? ------------------------------STOP READING NOW--------------------
I don't even understand what you are saying here. Can you reword it so that it makes sense? What does age discrimination have to do with anything? And why does it matter whether their employees are young or old?
I guess I'm taking exception to @SEANMCAD calling out virtually everyone in this thread, all the while claiming to be 100% unbiased and "not a follower", partly over yesterday's news (The Escapist article) while ostensibly only having seen a few videos likely originating from CIG themselves.
what about the fair common numbers of older employees on the SC team many of which are high up in the project that they have been interviewed multiple times and are still working there. How does that fit with age discrimination? ------------------------------STOP READING NOW--------------------
I don't even understand what you are saying here. Can you reword it so that it makes sense? What does age discrimination have to do with anything? And why does it matter whether their employees are young or old?
Its related to a conversation I am having with a specific poster. To understand the statement is to follow that conversation
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
I guess I'm taking exception to @SEANMCAD calling out virtually everyone in this thread, all the while claiming to be 100% unbiased and "not a follower", partly over yesterday's news (The Escapist article) while ostensibly only having seen a few videos likely originating from CIG themselves.
what about the fair common numbers of older employees on the SC team many of which are high up in the project that they have been interviewed multiple times and are still working there. How does that fit with age discrimination? ------------------------------STOP READING NOW--------------------
I don't even understand what you are saying here. Can you reword it so that it makes sense? What does age discrimination have to do with anything? And why does it matter whether their employees are young or old?
Its related to a conversation I am having with a specific poster. To understand the statement is to follow that conversation
I've read the thread and I've not seen anyone mention age discrimination except you. Actually, all you did is mention that you saw older people interviewed. What is your point? That they don't discriminate based on age? Who cares? No one was claiming they did.
basically I saw this video related to the escapist article. Given that I have seen a few interviews from the SC people I found these claims to be a bit off so I decided to look into it. It took me about 5 mins to find a video of a LOT of older people working for and being interviewed on the SC team.
Given the personality types of these SC leaders and the interviews I have seen them making the comments they have been accused of making is EXTREEMLY out of pattern.
what is interesting is this video and people using this story as an example never retracted their comments after its been pretty much prooven to be a farse.
I'll do my best not to strawman here:
You're saying that because you "saw this video related to the escapist article" and had "seen a few interviews from the SC people" (that's following the game, by the way) you henceforth decided that, because of the "personality types" of those in leadership positions making discriminatory hiring comments is "out of pattern" to the degree that The Escapist's article amounts to... libel?
Have you ever considered that what you had been viewing is a PR presence? Someone that has been coached to look, dress, appear a certain way so as to present a predetermined message to an outside audience?
you intentionally left out something I said clearly on purpose and was key, I am afraid I cant trust you.
I'm not asking for your trust; I'm asking you to consider the evidence before accusing people of making "false accusations".
You seem to be refusing to consider the possibility that The Escapist's article was not a "farse".
/sits down
There was actually some really good, healthy debate over this subject when shit first hit the fan. However, there have been zero follow-ups, zero law suits and zero word from The Escapist otherwise. So how does this argument, or how do these accusations, become the basis for so many arguments, still? Should they not lose validity as time goes on, especially since The Escapist STATED they would be publishing a follow-up and then didn't? How is it that as SC pushes out more updates that show more and more progress, we still hear unwavering comments about how it won't ship? Objectivity is a two-way street and there has certainly been a lack of consideration from both camps, so maybe you shouldn't be throwing rocks in your glass house.
/drops mic
I agree. It's silly.
I guess I'm taking exception to @SEANMCAD calling out virtually everyone in this thread, all the while claiming to be 100% unbiased and "not a follower", partly over yesterday's news (The Escapist article) while ostensibly only having seen a few videos likely originating from CIG themselves.
Hey, I get it. It's not difficult to get caught up in it. I sometimes feel like I could make more progress banging my head on the desk. At least then I might kill the brain cells that had to process some of the ridiculous posts I've read.
I guess I'm taking exception to @SEANMCAD calling out virtually everyone in this thread, all the while claiming to be 100% unbiased and "not a follower", partly over yesterday's news (The Escapist article) while ostensibly only having seen a few videos likely originating from CIG themselves.
what about the fair common numbers of older employees on the SC team many of which are high up in the project that they have been interviewed multiple times and are still working there. How does that fit with age discrimination? ------------------------------STOP READING NOW--------------------
I don't even understand what you are saying here. Can you reword it so that it makes sense? What does age discrimination have to do with anything? And why does it matter whether their employees are young or old?
Its related to a conversation I am having with a specific poster. To understand the statement is to follow that conversation
I've read the thread and I've not seen anyone mention age discrimination except you. Actually, all you did is mention that you saw older people interviewed. What is your point? That they don't discriminate based on age? Who cares? No one was claiming they did.
oh I am sorry my bad I thought the Escapist article did in fact do just that. I will look it up then, thanks for engaging me to do some more research.
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
uses the word discrimination and even specifically Age discrimination. All links to the 'updated version' of the source article doesnt contain the word discrimination at all.
who to believe?
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Who cares? You seem to have your panties in a right twist over something you haven't been following and apparently don't know anything about. It happened months ago, why bother banging on about it now? It's like reddit's obsession with the ID badge for an employee that wasn't even used for the article.
They keep doing "special events" which are just new ship packages to be bought, as if 100mil+ isn't enough already. And in the mean while, you got Elite: Dangerous that just rocked out it's first expansion and is just mind blowing. And E:D are where they're at today with barely 10% of the money SC has been given and SC doesn't have much to show for it, except for new ships that you need to buy. So E:D vs SC, is a no brainer. People would hate SC a lot less if they'd stop releasing new ship packages and work on releasing the game ASAP while being quiet about it. "Good news everyone!, we just finished releasing a dozen new ships! But wait! starting at 49,95$ up to 2495.95$! What a bargain!" See, that's how lame and pathetic SC has become to almost everyone. What used to be the most hyped Sy-Fy MMO ever since EVE-Online, has fallen down to a mere laughing stock. Battlefleet Gothic : Armada is another nice title being released in 2016 to also watch out for. The more SC takes it's time, the more people will move on to other titles, and by the time SC does release, nobody will care about it.
uses the word discrimination and even specifically Age discrimination. All links to the 'updated version' of the source article doesnt contain the word discrimination at all.
who to believe?
Even if it did (which you have no evidence of), what does that have to do with anything? And how do you know the age discrimination wasn't against young people? You just have no clue what you're talking about. You haven't read the Escapist article and are getting 3rd party information - likely by googling age discrimination and Star Citizen AFTER you made the claim.
uses the word discrimination and even specifically Age discrimination. All links to the 'updated version' of the source article doesnt contain the word discrimination at all.
who to believe?
Even if it did (which you have no evidence of), what does that have to do with anything? And how do you know the age discrimination wasn't against young people? You just have no clue what you're talking about. You haven't read the Escapist article and are getting 3rd part information - likely by googling age discrimination and Star Citizen AFTER you made the claim.
like I said
It feels very disgusting and untrust worthy how the updated source articles and all references to the orginal articles do not contain the word 'discrimination' in any form.
Additionally, it appears you DO know what I was talking about but instead of just disagreeing you pretend to not understanding
and finally, the source person I was talking to deliberately ignored by points multiple times..
very disgusting and this is exactly what my OP is all about.
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
uses the word discrimination and even specifically Age discrimination. All links to the 'updated version' of the source article doesnt contain the word discrimination at all.
who to believe?
Even if it did (which you have no evidence of), what does that have to do with anything? And how do you know the age discrimination wasn't against young people? You just have no clue what you're talking about. You haven't read the Escapist article and are getting 3rd part information - likely by googling age discrimination and Star Citizen AFTER you made the claim.
like I said
It feels very disgusting and untrust worthy how the updated source articles and all references to the orginal articles do not contain the word 'discrimination' in any form.
Additionally, it appears you DO know what I was talking about but instead of just disagreeing you pretend to not understanding
and finally, the source person I was talking to deliberately ignored by points multiple times..
very disgusting and this is exactly what my OP is all about.
What's very disgusting is you claiming that I DO know what you were talking about. What's very disgusting is watching you question someone else's integrity, EVEN AFTER HE PROVIDED EVIDENCE, and attempt to discredit him as a liar. Now you are making claims, based on 3rd part information that the Escapist white washed their article and you have ZERO evidence of it. You don't even have a link to the "original article" that you claim they changed. Obviously the original version would be somewhere. You are being irrational and have provided no evidence of what you are saying and are being insulting to others in the thread.
uses the word discrimination and even specifically Age discrimination. All links to the 'updated version' of the source article doesnt contain the word discrimination at all.
who to believe?
Even if it did (which you have no evidence of), what does that have to do with anything? And how do you know the age discrimination wasn't against young people? You just have no clue what you're talking about. You haven't read the Escapist article and are getting 3rd part information - likely by googling age discrimination and Star Citizen AFTER you made the claim.
like I said
It feels very disgusting and untrust worthy how the updated source articles and all references to the orginal articles do not contain the word 'discrimination' in any form.
Additionally, it appears you DO know what I was talking about but instead of just disagreeing you pretend to not understanding
and finally, the source person I was talking to deliberately ignored by points multiple times..
very disgusting and this is exactly what my OP is all about.
What's very disgusting is you claiming that I DO know what you were talking about. What's very disgusting is watching you question someone else's integrity, EVEN AFTER HE PROVIDED EVIDENCE, and attempt to discredit him as a liar. Now you are making claims, based on 3rd part information that the Escapist white washed their article and you have ZERO evidence of it. You don't even have a link to the "original article" that you claim they changed. Obviously the original version would be somewhere. You are being irrational and have provided no evidence of what you are saying and are being insulting to others in the thread.
1. are you stating that you have no idea whatsoever that I was refering to age discrimination related to the escapist article? sorry but I dont believe that, I could be wrong but you sure do seem to know a great deal about this artilce to not know the following:
2. Originally (before Escapist updated the article) the quote was 'she said do not hire people over 40' but I assume you have zero knowledge of that quote
3. He didnt 'provide evidence' on Age Discrimination in fact he completely ignored my comment on it
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
to be clear I am 100% neutral on this game. I dont follow it.
Having said that even though I dont follow it I see constant posts hating on it. including even videos that made legal claims that turned out to be nothing more than advanced form of trolling.
why? I dont get it.
Probably because its a game that favors people with alot of money.
It feels very disgusting and untrust worthy how the updated source articles and all references to the orginal articles do not contain the word 'discrimination' in any form.
Additionally, it appears you DO know what I was talking about but instead of just disagreeing you pretend to not understanding
and finally, the source person I was talking to deliberately ignored by points multiple times..
very disgusting and this is exactly what my OP is all about.
What's very disgusting is you claiming that I DO know what you were talking about. What's very disgusting is watching you question someone else's integrity, EVEN AFTER HE PROVIDED EVIDENCE, and attempt to discredit him as a liar. Now you are making claims, based on 3rd part information that the Escapist white washed their article and you have ZERO evidence of it. You don't even have a link to the "original article" that you claim they changed. Obviously the original version would be somewhere. You are being irrational and have provided no evidence of what you are saying and are being insulting to others in the thread.
Just ignore seanmcad. Fairly certain they are just trolling to get a rise out of people.
uses the word discrimination and even specifically Age discrimination. All links to the 'updated version' of the source article doesnt contain the word discrimination at all.
who to believe?
Even if it did (which you have no evidence of), what does that have to do with anything? And how do you know the age discrimination wasn't against young people? You just have no clue what you're talking about. You haven't read the Escapist article and are getting 3rd part information - likely by googling age discrimination and Star Citizen AFTER you made the claim.
like I said
It feels very disgusting and untrust worthy how the updated source articles and all references to the orginal articles do not contain the word 'discrimination' in any form.
Additionally, it appears you DO know what I was talking about but instead of just disagreeing you pretend to not understanding
and finally, the source person I was talking to deliberately ignored by points multiple times..
very disgusting and this is exactly what my OP is all about.
What's very disgusting is you claiming that I DO know what you were talking about. What's very disgusting is watching you question someone else's integrity, EVEN AFTER HE PROVIDED EVIDENCE, and attempt to discredit him as a liar. Now you are making claims, based on 3rd part information that the Escapist white washed their article and you have ZERO evidence of it. You don't even have a link to the "original article" that you claim they changed. Obviously the original version would be somewhere. You are being irrational and have provided no evidence of what you are saying and are being insulting to others in the thread.
1. are you stating that you have no idea whatsoever that I was refering to age discrimination related to the escapist article? sorry but I dont believe that, I could be wrong but you sure do seem to know a great deal about this artilce to not know the following:
2. Originally (before Escapist updated the article) the quote was 'she said do not hire people over 40' but I assume you have zero knowledge of that quote
What's even more disturbing is that you think this age discrimination things matters to anyone anyway. Even if some former employees made the claim that there was age discrimination, who cares? Some former employees said a lot of things. 2 months ago. I haven't seen anyone else except you mention age discrimination and certainly haven't seen anyone say that it is the reason they "hate" Star Citizen. What an insane and ineffective strawman.
It is about one of the richest men in the world having issues with his software during an interview. He had hundreds of employees working on it and hundreds of millions in development budgets.
Ofc most backers realize SC wont be what was promised, but does that mean it will be a bad game? Well no one knows because it isnt even released yet.
Wait and see people, once it goes gold and really sucks then rage, until then it all seems so unfounded.
I know youre not using it as an example, but there is a big difference between this a set up on the road in a studio that who knows who set up compared to a guy in his own studio on his persona computer that is assumedly set up 24/7.
Not to mention its Media Center and he is using a wireless remote, so who knows what is going on.
uses the word discrimination and even specifically Age discrimination. All links to the 'updated version' of the source article doesnt contain the word discrimination at all.
who to believe?
Even if it did (which you have no evidence of), what does that have to do with anything? And how do you know the age discrimination wasn't against young people? You just have no clue what you're talking about. You haven't read the Escapist article and are getting 3rd part information - likely by googling age discrimination and Star Citizen AFTER you made the claim.
like I said
It feels very disgusting and untrust worthy how the updated source articles and all references to the orginal articles do not contain the word 'discrimination' in any form.
Additionally, it appears you DO know what I was talking about but instead of just disagreeing you pretend to not understanding
and finally, the source person I was talking to deliberately ignored by points multiple times..
very disgusting and this is exactly what my OP is all about.
What's very disgusting is you claiming that I DO know what you were talking about. What's very disgusting is watching you question someone else's integrity, EVEN AFTER HE PROVIDED EVIDENCE, and attempt to discredit him as a liar. Now you are making claims, based on 3rd part information that the Escapist white washed their article and you have ZERO evidence of it. You don't even have a link to the "original article" that you claim they changed. Obviously the original version would be somewhere. You are being irrational and have provided no evidence of what you are saying and are being insulting to others in the thread.
1. are you stating that you have no idea whatsoever that I was refering to age discrimination related to the escapist article? sorry but I dont believe that, I could be wrong but you sure do seem to know a great deal about this artilce to not know the following:
2. Originally (before Escapist updated the article) the quote was 'she said do not hire people over 40' but I assume you have zero knowledge of that quote
What's even more disturbing is that you think this age discrimination things matters to anyone anyway. Even if some former employees made the claim that there was age discrimination, who cares? Some former employees said a lot of things. 2 months ago. I haven't seen anyone else except you mention age discrimination and certainly haven't seen anyone say that it is the reason they "hate" Star Citizen. What an insane and ineffective strawman.
ah do I take that as admitting to just overlooking comments regarding it and that escapist must have changed the original article or that just ignored something I clearly thought was important because you felt that was a good way to gain creditablity in this debate?
ignoring it and pretending to not have a clue what I am even talking about is the issue, not the possible unimportance of it. You are trying to ignore it again by chaning the frame. and doing a horrible job of it I might add
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
All other things aside, and I have kept mildly updated on this issue so I do not really know the back and forts.
The main issue for me is that when I kickstarted it, early in its conception, I spent something like 75-100 dollars on it, by any means a generous kickstarter pledge, surely one that would be appreciated and rewarded down the road.
Now some years later, or however much time has passed, I am not sure, this was when the millions was in the low single digit millions, the worth of my pledge has been reduced to almost zero in comparison to what they are selling, if selling is the right word.
Call me shallow or greedy or whatnot, but when I put in 100 dollars into a kickstarter pledge, or anything, with the understanding that what I give will give me something unique, is made mostly redundant, I feel cheated.
There are no ways around this feeling for me, be it 'true' or not, it is true to me.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Originally posted by Jerek_
I wonder if you honestly even believe what you type, or if you live in a made up world of facts. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
i) You watched some videos produced by CIG/RSI
ii) You watched a video that mentioned The Escapist's article
iii) You noted that some of the CIG/RSI videos included some older people
iv) You came to these forums, started a thread about "hate", while claiming to be a beacon of unbiased rationality offering a privileged outsider's perspective (my favorite: "I should remind you I am not a Star Citizen backer or follower")
Please stop polluting this forum with your drivel. If you can't be bothered to read one or two articles, why should we suffer through your posts?
"The simple is the seal of the true and beauty is the splendor of truth" -Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
Authored 139 missions in Vendetta Online and 6 tracks in Distance
- Albert Einstein
FOR THE THIRD TIME:
---------------------------------READ HERE-----------------------------
what about the fair common numbers of older employees on the SC team many of which are high up in the project that they have been interviewed multiple times and are still working there. How does that fit with age discrimination?
------------------------------STOP READING NOW--------------------
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
I guess I'm taking exception to @SEANMCAD calling out virtually everyone in this thread, all the while claiming to be 100% unbiased and "not a follower", partly over yesterday's news (The Escapist article) while ostensibly only having seen a few videos likely originating from CIG themselves.
"The simple is the seal of the true and beauty is the splendor of truth" -Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
Authored 139 missions in Vendetta Online and 6 tracks in Distance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHUNdye0b1Y
It is about one of the richest men in the world having issues with his software during an interview. He had hundreds of employees working on it and hundreds of millions in development budgets.
Ofc most backers realize SC wont be what was promised, but does that mean it will be a bad game? Well no one knows because it isnt even released yet.
Wait and see people, once it goes gold and really sucks then rage, until then it all seems so unfounded.
For the Fourth time
---------------------------------READ HERE-----------------------------
what about the fair common numbers of older employees on the SC team many of which are high up in the project that they have been interviewed multiple times and are still working there. How does that fit with age discrimination?
------------------------------STOP READING NOW--------------------
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
Hey, I get it. It's not difficult to get caught up in it. I sometimes feel like I could make more progress banging my head on the desk. At least then I might kill the brain cells that had to process some of the ridiculous posts I've read.
Crazkanuk
----------------
Azarelos - 90 Hunter - Emerald
Durnzig - 90 Paladin - Emerald
Demonicron - 90 Death Knight - Emerald Dream - US
Tankinpain - 90 Monk - Azjol-Nerub - US
Brindell - 90 Warrior - Emerald Dream - US
----------------
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
this article:
http://www.inquisitr.com/2469830/star-citizen-drama-escalates-the-escapist-threatened-with-lawsuit-over-inflammatory-article/
uses the word discrimination and even specifically Age discrimination. All links to the 'updated version' of the source article doesnt contain the word discrimination at all.
who to believe?
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
It's like reddit's obsession with the ID badge for an employee that wasn't even used for the article.
It feels very disgusting and untrust worthy how the updated source articles and all references to the orginal articles do not contain the word 'discrimination' in any form.
Additionally, it appears you DO know what I was talking about but instead of just disagreeing you pretend to not understanding
and finally, the source person I was talking to deliberately ignored by points multiple times..
very disgusting and this is exactly what my OP is all about.
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
2. Originally (before Escapist updated the article) the quote was 'she said do not hire people over 40' but I assume you have zero knowledge of that quote
3. He didnt 'provide evidence' on Age Discrimination in fact he completely ignored my comment on it
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
Not to mention its Media Center and he is using a wireless remote, so who knows what is going on.
Either way nice try I guess.
ignoring it and pretending to not have a clue what I am even talking about is the issue, not the possible unimportance of it. You are trying to ignore it again by chaning the frame. and doing a horrible job of it I might add
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me
How is this fun.
The main issue for me is that when I kickstarted it, early in its conception, I spent something like 75-100 dollars on it, by any means a generous kickstarter pledge, surely one that would be appreciated and rewarded down the road.
Now some years later, or however much time has passed, I am not sure, this was when the millions was in the low single digit millions, the worth of my pledge has been reduced to almost zero in comparison to what they are selling, if selling is the right word.
Call me shallow or greedy or whatnot, but when I put in 100 dollars into a kickstarter pledge, or anything, with the understanding that what I give will give me something unique, is made mostly redundant, I feel cheated.
There are no ways around this feeling for me, be it 'true' or not, it is true to me.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Jerek_
I wonder if you honestly even believe what you type, or if you live in a made up world of facts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------