I understand the issues with jittering, frame rate cap and so on, but nothing "went wrong" with GTX 970 vs R9 390. Usually, Nvidia has the FPS advantage, often because of drivers (like, currently playing Blade & Soul, and Nvidia is faring way better, especially with newest drivers), so why is it an issue when it's the other way round?
I'll wait to the day's end when the moon is high And then I'll rise with the tide with a lust for life, I'll Amass an army, and we'll harness a horde And then we'll limp across the land until we stand at the shore
It shouldn't be a surprise that a console port has higher frame rates on GCN hardware. The game was purposely designed to run optimally on a GCN powered console.
Comments
I'll wait to the day's end when the moon is high
And then I'll rise with the tide with a lust for life, I'll
Amass an army, and we'll harness a horde
And then we'll limp across the land until we stand at the shore
No quit button for the PC version wtf
Buy the Xbox One version of Quantum Break and you get a copy of the PC version for free? You can only buy Quantum Break from Windows Store?
Screw that.
Processor: Intel Core I5-2320
Memory: 8GB DDR3 RAM
HDD: Samsung 830 256gb SSD-SATA3
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 7950 3gb
Steam:Skuly
Warframe:Skuly1775
http://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/448873/quantum-break-benchmarks#latest
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me