It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
In an interview with Glixel, Epic Gaming's Tim Sweeney has indicated that he believes that VR will be as widely accepted and used by the end of the next decade as smart phones are today. In addition, he believes that consoles are in a "significant" downturn given the lackluster sales over the past holiday season.
Comments
I wouldn't go that far. VR is a sub-genre(?) of the technological revolution. VR will probably be more accepted once the headsets shrink down in size, such as Google Glass glasses.
I agree with him about "teleportation" though. We'll be able to wear our headsets and be instantly somewhere else in real time, such as the streets in Berlin, or a soccer stadium in Brazil. It's actually already possible, but it's very expensive. Most developers are focusing on video games though, which is a shame.
"going into arguments with idiots is a lost cause, it requires you to stoop down to their level and you can't win"
The 3 year old consoles both received lackluster refreshes. Most people who are interested in this gen of consoles already have one and aren't willing to fork over the cash for a brand new one that offers little advantage over the previous version.
On a side note, isn't this the guy that tried to get a mass boycott because he thought Microsoft was going to try to take over the world with UWP?
I'd love to see his tinfoil hat collection.
VR sales in 2016 were so bad it's expected that in 2017 one of the formerly big-name and hyped manufacturers will drop out. Even more worrisome for the VR industry is the fact mobile VR headsets (and their weak hardware) were the top sellers. Those invested in VR are especially worried that mobile VR outsold more expensive and powerful units since significant leaps in power, technical, capabilities and software were to be driven by the higher sales. And software sales across the board are so bad it's hard to find a developer/publisher who wanted to reveal the horrendous sales figures publicly.
Revenue was 80% below what it was originally predicted for 2016; revenue for 2017 has been revised down by 60% from the original 2017 forecast created during the pre-launch hype years.
So, yes, VR will technically speaking be on the 'rise' in 2017 simply because 2016 turned out to be far more niche than anyone expected; it's like driving at 2 mph and slowly increasing to 5 mph....sure your rate of speed 'rose', but it's still painfully slow.
Xbox live has over 50 million users, PS doesn't release numbers but estimates they are also over 50 million users. Both xb1 and PS4 have outsold last generation consoles that doesn't sound like they are failing...now VR sold a couple million units total in 2016?
They still don't get it... we need more games not more consoles.
That's why I have mostly gone from consoles to pc for my gaming, I just can't get my "fix" from what the console salesmen have been providing as incentives(games) to play systems that are seldom if ever backwards compatible and when they do finally release a game worthy(imo) of forking out close to a hundred bucks(and that's not even taking into consideration how they're now trying to nickel and dime us with dlc additions) you can be sure it will be "exclusive" to the next best greatest thing since sliced bread new console that cannot play the last couple of games for the previous version of console.... rant over.
Edit: btw, I still don't own a "smart" phone, I think it's smarter to leave my phone at home when I go out into the world, instead of staying shackled to the whims of whoever may feel the need to tell the world that they just had ramen for lunch or some such other "important" news...
So one console canceled without replacement ready; another a newer, more powerful but expensive model that isn't worth the extra cost until software hits the market in early 2017; and the third releasing the most powerful of all three for holiday 2017.
There is nothing 'lackluster' in terms of sales of the PS4 and Xbox One. There is also a significant of console gamers who decided to wait until 2017 to make a new hardware purchase due to all the new hardware releases.
Sony Sold 6.2 Million PS4s During Holiday Season
https://gamerant.com/sony-ps4-62-million-holiday-sales-2016/
Getting too old for this $&17!
The "gimmick"itself,i will admit is a nice gimmick,attach that to games and their sales go up but so does the cost to the developer,so it better pay for itself and then some.
IMO at least 10 years away from triple A VR gaming,geesh i am still waiting for triple gaming w/o VR.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
Is a man not entitled to the herp of his derp?
Remember, I live in a world where juggalos and yugioh players are real things.
Check out my band if you like music.. www.myspace.com/icrime
Minecraft Gear VR
Vendetta Online VR
Dreadhalls
JUMP
Quake (yes, Quake)
That's just off the top of my head, and based on personal experience. Minecraft Gear VR and Vendetta Online VR easily have thousands of hours of playability between them.
There are also plenty of beautiful experiences that don't quite fit the definition of games (or that have some overlap) but are very moving nonetheless like:
Land's End
Annie Amber
Notes on Blindness
National Parks
Viso Places
Nomads
...and this list is just getting started. Oh yeah, and Bombsquad in VR is hilarious, and therefore amazing.
"The simple is the seal of the true and beauty is the splendor of truth" -Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar
Authored 139 missions in Vendetta Online and 6 tracks in Distance
Smile
VR tech right now breaks so many product development and consumer psychology "rules" that it's unlikely to gain any further traction at this point, or even in the mid-to-long term. In order for a tech that compromises senses in such a way as VR does to gain traction, it has to be truly revolutionary. OR and Vive, beyond the hype, aren't "truly revolutionary". They're a side show, a gimmick. A high-def, fun gimmick, but a gimmick all the same.
Sweeney is talking out of his arse, frankly.
I mean... when you say it like that, you just sound like a prissy hipster rather than anything else. The wording speaks more to you having some deeply held personal issues and a rather antisocial disposition, rather than projecting any deep or meaningful criticism of modern smart phone usage or anything of the sort.
I can suggest somewhere for you to put your soapbox when you're not using it, btw.