Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Player Behavior as a Predictor for IRL End of Times - MMORPG.com News

2

Comments

  • DavodtheTuttDavodtheTutt Member UncommonPosts: 415
    The thing about the end of a Beta test is that you know the game will be back and you can re-create your characters. It would be somewhat better to look at a game that's been running for years, after it's been announced that it would be discontinued. A big problem with that, though, is that players hope that if they stick together and support the game, the decision will be reversed, similar to shows that were cancelled but brought back by viewer campaigns. Still, I remember when City of Heroes was shut down, there was a much stronger end-of-the-world sentiment and sensation there, than when the beta testing was drawing to a close.

    If they want to see what the end of the world will be like, there's always reading the book of Revelation in the Bible. Just sayin' ...
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    This is a bad case study because the stakes are in no way comparable. To get an even remotely similar study scenario, one would have to observe a sunsetting game, like CoH or SWG. And even then, the effects on sane individuals would in no way resemble a pending apocalypse. There just isn't a substitute for knowing that you and everyone you know is going to die.
  • H0urg1assH0urg1ass Member EpicPosts: 2,380
    I just don't understand any of this, or how any rational human being could find any correlation.  I just finished up my Masters in Management, and I should be starting my Phd program in about two months if I get accepted.  I would never even consider submitting this kind of project for research for my dissertation or otherwise.

    But then again, these individuals may not be gamers, and may not understand the workings of gaming communities.  For instance, games are relatively consequence free, and since behaviors in society are largely constrained by the consequences that we face for engaging in said behaviors, games have much looser morals.  The correlation is tenuous at best.
  • filmoretfilmoret Member EpicPosts: 4,906
    Yes look how happy they were when beta was ending.  Then how upset they were how it didnt end the way they planned.   Yea that is probably the exact thing that will happen.
    Are you onto something or just on something?
  • SainguinSainguin Member UncommonPosts: 75

    Raquis said:


    CERN AND OPENING THE PIT, ANTHONY PATCH SEPT 12 2106
    listen to this maybe you people will learn something.



    Dude. Take that quackery somewhere else. It has no place on the MMORPG website and it has no place amongst intelligent people.

    Stop getting your "information" from Youtube people selling books.
  • PhryPhry Member LegendaryPosts: 11,004
    Archeage as a predictor for the end of times, well the good news is when the apocalypse hits we can probably buy our way out of it :p
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 43,975
    edited March 2017
    Phry said:
    Archeage as a predictor for the end of times, well the good news is when the apocalypse hits we can probably buy our way out of it :p
    Well of course, you've seen the movies, the rich and powerful always find a way to buy their way on to the space ark or whatever. ;)

    Sucks for everyone else stuck in "steerage"

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • OzmodanOzmodan Member EpicPosts: 9,726
    Comparing anything that happens in a beta situation in a game to real life is probably one of the most absurd things I have ever heard.  Whoever thought up such a ludicrous study needs to go see a shrink.

  • MrMelGibsonMrMelGibson Member EpicPosts: 3,034
    Ozmodan said:
    Comparing anything that happens in a beta situation in a game to real life is probably one of the most absurd things I have ever heard.  Whoever thought up such a ludicrous study needs to go see a shrink.

    Or at the very least, put down that pipe before posting anything lol.
  • jbladderjbladder Member UncommonPosts: 36

    Kyleran said:

    The country of Somalia would be a much more accurate predictor of how humans would behave in an end of days scenario.

    Forget increased socialization, think Walking Dead or Mad Max The Road Warrior as more likely realities

    Hell, look at player behavior in any "survival" game and you'll find your answer.





    One of the most interesting parts of what you are saying here is this has happened, is happening, and will happen more. We can see it easily all over the world every single day. Some people are forced to live a mini version of the walking dead every single day on our planet while the rest of us dirty stinking apes just sit here and do nothing as a huge group.

    The hilarity (it wasn't always funny to me at one point in life it was sorrow for me) is that we have a choice and keep making the same one generation after generation acting like we are doing everything we do for the "children" while in reality it is all just for us over and over. To a certain extent this is exactly the best behavior. However when a population surpasses that extent the consequences are "END OF TIMES".

    Sometimes I bet it was fast other times slow how we rise and fall. No matter what history says about history we cannot fully trust in what we see now compared to what was lost and the lessons not learned from 5000 years ago. Either way we have a choice.

    As a person and a group we have a damn dirty hard choice to make. Do you want to live? If the answer is yes how would you react in an end times scenario? Would you grab all the resources only to run out and have to go kill for more in a few weeks? Are you planning ahead never knowing if you will die never having seen it come to pass? Will you give of yourself and find others to trade with and try and survive? Or will you just lay down and die? If I live I can tell you what I will do...if there is water left in the ocean and its not 200deg I will surf and if I am lucky find the "big" one get the best ride ever and then be atomized on the ocean floor. With my luck though? I will be the last one standing on a burning ball of dirt... Who are you gonna be?
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 43,975
    jbladder said:

    Kyleran said:

    The country of Somalia would be a much more accurate predictor of how humans would behave in an end of days scenario.

    Forget increased socialization, think Walking Dead or Mad Max The Road Warrior as more likely realities

    Hell, look at player behavior in any "survival" game and you'll find your answer.





    One of the most interesting parts of what you are saying here is this has happened, is happening, and will happen more. We can see it easily all over the world every single day. Some people are forced to live a mini version of the walking dead every single day on our planet while the rest of us dirty stinking apes just sit here and do nothing as a huge group.

    The hilarity (it wasn't always funny to me at one point in life it was sorrow for me) is that we have a choice and keep making the same one generation after generation acting like we are doing everything we do for the "children" while in reality it is all just for us over and over. To a certain extent this is exactly the best behavior. However when a population surpasses that extent the consequences are "END OF TIMES".

    Sometimes I bet it was fast other times slow how we rise and fall. No matter what history says about history we cannot fully trust in what we see now compared to what was lost and the lessons not learned from 5000 years ago. Either way we have a choice.

    As a person and a group we have a damn dirty hard choice to make. Do you want to live? If the answer is yes how would you react in an end times scenario? Would you grab all the resources only to run out and have to go kill for more in a few weeks? Are you planning ahead never knowing if you will die never having seen it come to pass? Will you give of yourself and find others to trade with and try and survive? Or will you just lay down and die? If I live I can tell you what I will do...if there is water left in the ocean and its not 200deg I will surf and if I am lucky find the "big" one get the best ride ever and then be atomized on the ocean floor. With my luck though? I will be the last one standing on a burning ball of dirt... Who are you gonna be?
    Me? I'm planning on being raptured.  :p

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • IselinIselin Member LegendaryPosts: 18,719
    So if we only have 3 days before the end of the world we tend not to do things that take more than 3 days to accomplish? Who knew! :)
    "Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”

    ― Umberto Eco

    “Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” 
    ― CD PROJEKT RED

  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    For the 3rd world it will be just another day.

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • FlyByKnightFlyByKnight Member EpicPosts: 3,967
    3rd World poverty isn't anarchy or post-apocalypse though.
    "As far as the forum code of conduct, I would think it's a bit outdated and in need of a refre *CLOSED*" 

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    edited March 2017
    3rd World poverty isn't anarchy or post-apocalypse though.
    It isn't about poverty, it's about knowing how to survive with very little.

    If the lights went out and never came back on. Things wouldn't be much different for the 3rd world. Where as 9/10 of us would probably be dead within a month.

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • tawesstawess Member EpicPosts: 4,227
    Any researcher that used Archeage as a base of any study is a f#%king quack.
    The fact that it was Archeage is all in all irrelevant. They could have used any game in a similar state. My guess is that either it was a case of "it happened to fit the timeframe we have" or "i like to spend a part of the research grant playing my faves MMO" 

    The former being the more likely. 

    As for the scenario it self.... 

    Well it is not like they can study anything in the real world since any case that fits would spell their end long before the work was done and getting it peer reviewed would be a.. well.. challenge. =P 

    This is what one would call a good start, others can the build on this work and study different scenarios or try different vectors... Or in short... do them reserach thingies. 

    Not something i would have granted money to. But each to their own.  

    This have been a good conversation

  • FlyByKnightFlyByKnight Member EpicPosts: 3,967
    laserit said:
    3rd World poverty isn't anarchy or post-apocalypse though.
    It isn't about poverty, it's about knowing how to survive with very little.

    If the lights went out and never came back on. Things wouldn't be much different for the 3rd world. Where as 9/10 of us would probably be dead within a month.
    Absolutely correct, but the topic was end of days which is way more serious than surviving with very little. It has more to do with how mankind perceives social/political/moral structures in the face of short term demise. That's not just another day IMO.
    "As far as the forum code of conduct, I would think it's a bit outdated and in need of a refre *CLOSED*" 

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  • mgilbrtsnmgilbrtsn Member EpicPosts: 3,430
    People seem to have taken this story way to seriously.  I doubt the DSMV is gonna be updated with this study.

    I self identify as a monkey.

  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    laserit said:
    3rd World poverty isn't anarchy or post-apocalypse though.
    It isn't about poverty, it's about knowing how to survive with very little.

    If the lights went out and never came back on. Things wouldn't be much different for the 3rd world. Where as 9/10 of us would probably be dead within a month.
    Absolutely correct, but the topic was end of days which is way more serious than surviving with very little. It has more to do with how mankind perceives social/political/moral structures in the face of short term demise. That's not just another day IMO.
    All taken from our 1st world western perspective. One's demise is another's rise.

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • postlarvalpostlarval Member EpicPosts: 2,003
    This is a perfect example of why so few people take research seriously.
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ~~ postlarval ~~

  • postlarvalpostlarval Member EpicPosts: 2,003
    laserit said:
    3rd World poverty isn't anarchy or post-apocalypse though.
    It isn't about poverty, it's about knowing how to survive with very little.

    If the lights went out and never came back on. Things wouldn't be much different for the 3rd world. Where as 9/10 of us would probably be dead within a month.

    lol....yep.


    Reminds me of all the internet warriors talking about a zombie apocalypse years back and puffing up their egos with their survival plans.


    The reality is 90% wouldn't make it 6 inches out their front door and the other 10% wouldn't make it 6 feet...tops.
    ______________________________________________________________________
    ~~ postlarval ~~

  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    edited March 2017
    laserit said:
    laserit said:
    3rd World poverty isn't anarchy or post-apocalypse though.
    It isn't about poverty, it's about knowing how to survive with very little.

    If the lights went out and never came back on. Things wouldn't be much different for the 3rd world. Where as 9/10 of us would probably be dead within a month.
    Absolutely correct, but the topic was end of days which is way more serious than surviving with very little. It has more to do with how mankind perceives social/political/moral structures in the face of short term demise. That's not just another day IMO.
    All taken from our 1st world western perspective. One's demise is another's rise.
    I believe FlybyKnight was referring to an extinction level event.  In that instance, barring colonization of space or another planet, it doesn't matter if you're 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or last world...  It ends.

    However, we consider apocalypse to mean the creation of a dystopia..  I definitely see the point, and it would be interesting to think about how different groups would fare within different resulting dystopias (i.e. electricity loss versus simple collapse in the majority of world governments, etc.).

    image
  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    laserit said:
    3rd World poverty isn't anarchy or post-apocalypse though.
    It isn't about poverty, it's about knowing how to survive with very little.

    If the lights went out and never came back on. Things wouldn't be much different for the 3rd world. Where as 9/10 of us would probably be dead within a month.

    lol....yep.


    Reminds me of all the internet warriors talking about a zombie apocalypse years back and puffing up their egos with their survival plans.


    The reality is 90% wouldn't make it 6 inches out their front door and the other 10% wouldn't make it 6 feet...tops.
    And just like those zombie apocalypse survival games... the zombies are the least of our worries ;)

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    laserit said:
    laserit said:
    3rd World poverty isn't anarchy or post-apocalypse though.
    It isn't about poverty, it's about knowing how to survive with very little.

    If the lights went out and never came back on. Things wouldn't be much different for the 3rd world. Where as 9/10 of us would probably be dead within a month.
    Absolutely correct, but the topic was end of days which is way more serious than surviving with very little. It has more to do with how mankind perceives social/political/moral structures in the face of short term demise. That's not just another day IMO.
    All taken from our 1st world western perspective. One's demise is another's rise.
    I believe FlybyKnight was referring to an extinction level event.  In that instance, barring colonization of space or another planet, it doesn't matter if you're 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or last world...  It ends.

    However, we consider apocalypse to mean the creation of a dystopia..  I definitely see the point, and it would be interesting to think about how different groups would fare within different resulting dystopias (i.e. electricity loss versus simple collapse in the majority of world governments, etc.).
    We think in our perspective. Our western world is very, very fragile. All you need do is look at things like Black Friday sales, Cabbage Patch Kids and Tickle Me Elmo to get an answer as to how our society would react.

    Every event would have the same result, that result would = anarchy.

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • seeyouspacec0wboyseeyouspacec0wboy Member UncommonPosts: 714
    edited March 2017
    laserit said:
    Every event would have the same result, that result would = anarchy.
    Eh. Anarchy means "without rulers". Anarchism is essentially living autonomously. I'd argue neither of those are bad things, whether or not they seem possible to implement in the U.S. in 2017. It's far past time that the anarchy = chaos concept was debunked in mainstream discourse.  

    Originally posted by Scagweed22
    is it the graphics? the repetativenesses? i mean what is the point? you could be so much more productive in real life
    Real life brings repetition and pointlessness too. The only thing real life offers is Great graphics. Its kinda expensive too and way to dependent on the cash shop. Totally pay to win as well. No thank you. Ill stick to my games.

Sign In or Register to comment.