It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Italian site MMO.it has sent word of a new interview that editors conducted with a person named "Alphano" who is currently a player in the New World alpha and is willing to break the NDA to speak about his experiences. In it, they ask him about his impressions of the game and, most notably, his impressions of the type of game New World actually is. Up to now, many have viewed Amazon's upcoming (and very secretive) game as a survival title. However, Alphano has a different thought on the subject.
Comments
I had fun once, it was terrible.
They would be MMO's if their server size was 1000+. Amazon is saying they can expand to 10,000+ with their server tech. Most certainly an MMORPG. By definition.
Makes it an MMO by definition, remains to be seen how much of a MMORPG it is.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
I'm in the alpha as well and this part about avoiding combat is 100% bullshit. I have been pk'ed many times while just trying to chop wood, mine ore, or skin animals. Although I love the open world pvp aspect of the game, I'm hoping that they put some restrictions in to protect newbies from getting pk'ed.
The game looks and plays really good though. So far I have been impressed (considering it's alpha).
generate a world and have players pvp,not much to it,very simple,little effort,they can make these games in a year max now instead of a HQ game taking 5-7 years.
Their investment is very low compared to a HQ game,their risk is low,all they have to do is advertise heavily to get those initial sales and turn an instant profit.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
It isn't "black and white." There are clearly red banners and a torch.
@wizardry Go to the New World site or our Games List entry and check out others.
https://www.mmorpg.com/new-world/screens
https://www.instagram.com/playnewworld/
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
On a black and white monitor though its going to look black and white!
The only things I viewed that suck about the game and manages to ruin the good things is the combat which is pure unadulterated gutter trash. The other part that sucks is the "world". It's not what you think it would be given the game description. It's just people doing the whole H1Z1 thing but instead of zombies it's loose scatterings of bears, wolves, turkeys, wild pigs, some zombies, skeletons and spectres. Other bored players are more of a threat.
There's nothing to do but kill some mobs, chop trees, gather, craft just to go hit some other player upside the head because you out level/number them, then build a fort and hide in it. That's literally the game in a nutshell.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I suppose, if role-playing is the defining piece of MMORPG. I don't really see survival games as having much role-playing in them. They're basically build/destroy games with PKers running around "role-playing" being PKers.
There's always enough PvE players who don't mind PvP to get games like this off the ground, but even a hot PvP title needs a strong PvE base to survive. There's just too much we don't know yet about this title to have a clue what approach Amazon is taking.
No fate but what we make, so make me a ham sandwich please.
Not really. The closest thing you get to a quest is drops from undead that sell for semi-decent amount of money at the trading posts.
We had Empires run by Emperors, we had Kingdoms run by Kings, now we have Countries...