I fail to see what the fuss is over them using skins from one game to the other. Happens all the time. Look at COD, AC, Madden and countless other games and people could care less. You get a dev like Arks to do it and you cry foul. They said extinction was going to be the last DLC. Now this game is out and everyone cries that it should have been another. Bad thing in this world is we have a very vocal minority that complains on everything (check the news). I know it's EA so I don't run to the forums and bash it. Do I wish it was better? Hell ya, but don't buy and unfinished game and expect much.
How many delicate flowers have you met in Counterstrike?
I got a case of beer and a chainsaw waiting for me at home after work.
I'm fine with games reusing some assets. However, from a first glance it looks very similar in pretty much everything (Visually and also Sound Effects).
At least they're not asking for an AAA price. Yet...
We were having a bit of a debate on another thread on what constitutes a "cash grab."
It's looking more and more like this title can be considered one.
Yes, this looks like a cash grab. Had they polished it prior to early access, even with using ark assets I would be less inclined to say that, but they didn't. They slapped a new skin on some things and created an appealing video.
Comments
How many delicate flowers have you met in Counterstrike?
I got a case of beer and a chainsaw waiting for me at home after work.
At least they're not asking for an AAA price. Yet...