Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

After 800 Blizzard Employees Lose Their Jobs, Game Workers Unite Calls for Kotick Firing - MMORPG.c

2456789

Comments

  • HorusraHorusra Member EpicPosts: 4,411
    Horusra said:
    Horusra said:
    Horusra said:
    Gazimoff said:

    3dom said:

    By the way - worker unions and high social insurance cost remove ability for small companies to grow because they cannot provide terms and pay salaries demanded by the unions. That's the reason why there are zero to no startups in EU.



    Also in Japan CEOs often cut their salaries to keep the jobs which are often totally useless - like fax operators. That's the reason why Japanese economy stagnates for 30 years.



    This is so ridiculously wrong, I’m not sure if you’re hideously misinformed or just wilfully pig-ignorant.
    Then bring out your facts....
    The poster has certainly misattributed the economic woes.  Not tough to find that one of the largest causes was a lending frenzy akin to the housing bubble lending frenzy in America.
    Still not seeing anything with a study associated with it so show your info is better....
    You have the internet, as evidenced by your posting here.  Google it, or remain ignorant.  I don't care.  It's been a well-documented event.
    Typical of internet response with people talking out their ass on the internet and a good reason this site supposedly bans politics, but this is thread is allowed to flow with shit.
    Dude, I'm not your personal economics professor.  Cry at someone else.
    I doubt I would agree with any of your economic and in a free society I can cry where I want.  
    GdemamiKootur
  • WellspringWellspring Member EpicPosts: 1,464
    edited February 2019




    No offense, but it's convenient for the disgruntled terminated employees to NOW say he should be fired. If he was that bad of a boss, they should've spoken up sooner. He's been CEO of Activision/Blizzard since 2008.



    At this point, the only thing that would matter is if the employees that still had jobs protested.


    Which would be a good way for them to flag themselves as "problem employees."

    Your post seems to ignore the inherent inequity of bargaining power between employee and employer.



    Well, an ex-employee has about zero bargaining power (unless they're suing for wrongful termination or something).

    The bargaining power of a current employee, is to speak up and protest or quit and find a new job if they're not happy. This is how every job works. What do you suggest to balance the inequality? Someone has to captain the ship...

     My point was, it's easy to cry afoul when you have nothing left to lose.

     If they thought the CEO should've been fired BEFORE they got laid off, it takes guts to risk your job and stand up for what you believe in. This employee is who I would have sympathy for.

     If they thought the CEO should've been fired AFTER they got laid off, then it just looks like they're being bitter.
    --------------------------------------------
  • alkarionlogalkarionlog Member EpicPosts: 3,584
    Gazimoff said:

    3dom said:

    By the way - worker unions and high social insurance cost remove ability for small companies to grow because they cannot provide terms and pay salaries demanded by the unions. That's the reason why there are zero to no startups in EU.



    Also in Japan CEOs often cut their salaries to keep the jobs which are often totally useless - like fax operators. That's the reason why Japanese economy stagnates for 30 years.



    This is so ridiculously wrong, I’m not sure if you’re hideously misinformed or just wilfully pig-ignorant.
    unfortunally for you guys, he is not wrong, I deal with more then one force union, and I can tell you this, union normally make any individual advantage for you in the work hard to do, with also cut number of workers they can hire and in turn they will also demand more on people already working
    GazimoffKootur
    FOR HONOR, FOR FREEDOM.... and for some money.
  • GazimoffGazimoff Staff WriterMember UncommonPosts: 225

    Horusra said:


    Gazimoff said:



    Horusra said:




    Gazimoff said:





    3dom said:



    By the way - worker unions and high social insurance cost remove ability for small companies to grow because they cannot provide terms and pay salaries demanded by the unions. That's the reason why there are zero to no startups in EU.







    Also in Japan CEOs often cut their salaries to keep the jobs which are often totally useless - like fax operators. That's the reason why Japanese economy stagnates for 30 years.









    This is so ridiculously wrong, I’m not sure if you’re hideously misinformed or just wilfully pig-ignorant.




    Then bring out your facts....






    To quote the UK Office of National Statistics, the 2017 birth rate for new businesses in the UK was 382,000 or 13.1%. That’s a tad more than zero.



    In Japan, the workforce is shrinking as the population is in decline. They cut salaries to retain workers because employees usually stay with a firm for life, mainly because they only promote from within. If they loose employees, it is incredibly difficult to attract new talent.



    But ultimately, I don’t owe a debate to someone coming from a position of bad faith. If you can’t do your own research, that’s on you.




    Thanks for putting up some information...while his zero number is wrong the EU is still the bottom of Startup creation in the 4 major sectors of the world with America being the top and Asia second with India carrying most of that.  Both the top creators of India and America having a large non-unionized sector.





    Not sure what value you’re looking at. If you look at startups per capita, US is waaaaay down the table.

    Besides, thanks for agreeing that I’m correct that startup creation in Europe isn’t at zero, which was the point I was making. Cheers.
    Player of games, smither of words, former of opinions, and masher of keys. WildStar Columnist
    Currently playing: WildStar, Guild Wars 2, EVE Online, Vain Glory.
  • XingbairongXingbairong Member RarePosts: 927
    edited February 2019
    Looking at the post it feels like it's not a bad idea to close commenting cause things might get out of hand :)
    [Deleted User]Sabrac
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    edited February 2019
    Looking at the post it feels like it's not a bad idea to close commenting cause things might get out of hand :)
    Is it really surprising though? For all of the venom thrown at political activists, corporate executives are the real enemy, and they are one that we all rely upon.
    alkarionlogcolera1333Kootur
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Horusra said:
    Horusra said:
    Horusra said:
    Horusra said:
    Gazimoff said:

    3dom said:

    By the way - worker unions and high social insurance cost remove ability for small companies to grow because they cannot provide terms and pay salaries demanded by the unions. That's the reason why there are zero to no startups in EU.



    Also in Japan CEOs often cut their salaries to keep the jobs which are often totally useless - like fax operators. That's the reason why Japanese economy stagnates for 30 years.



    This is so ridiculously wrong, I’m not sure if you’re hideously misinformed or just wilfully pig-ignorant.
    Then bring out your facts....
    The poster has certainly misattributed the economic woes.  Not tough to find that one of the largest causes was a lending frenzy akin to the housing bubble lending frenzy in America.
    Still not seeing anything with a study associated with it so show your info is better....
    You have the internet, as evidenced by your posting here.  Google it, or remain ignorant.  I don't care.  It's been a well-documented event.
    Typical of internet response with people talking out their ass on the internet and a good reason this site supposedly bans politics, but this is thread is allowed to flow with shit.
    Dude, I'm not your personal economics professor.  Cry at someone else.
    I doubt I would agree with any of your economic and in a free society I can cry where I want.  
    The Lost Decade is a matter of economic history in Japan.  This isn't about politics.

    Your post is like demanding folks provide you links that the housing bubble crash in America was related to home lending. /facepalm

    Take two minutes to look into it instead of lazily demanding you be spoon-fed.
    Thuplicolera1333BrotherMaynardKootur

    image
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    edited February 2019




    No offense, but it's convenient for the disgruntled terminated employees to NOW say he should be fired. If he was that bad of a boss, they should've spoken up sooner. He's been CEO of Activision/Blizzard since 2008.



    At this point, the only thing that would matter is if the employees that still had jobs protested.


    Which would be a good way for them to flag themselves as "problem employees."

    Your post seems to ignore the inherent inequity of bargaining power between employee and employer.



    Well, an ex-employee has about zero bargaining power (unless they're suing for wrongful termination or something).

    The bargaining power of a current employee, is to speak up and protest or quit and find a new job if they're not happy. This is how every job works. What do you suggest to balance the inequality? Someone has to captain the ship...

     My point was, it's easy to cry afoul when you have nothing left to lose.

     If they thought the CEO should've been fired BEFORE they got laid off, it takes guts to risk your job and stand up for what you believe in. This employee is who I would have sympathy for.

     If they thought the CEO should've been fired AFTER they got laid off, then it just looks like they're being bitter.
    And what makes you think any amount of guys would lead to anything other than their being passed over for any promotion consideration and, indeed, paint a target on their backs for any considered layoffs?


    I get what you're saying, but you seem to lack perspective on the employer/employee relationship.  I get that you acknowledge it, but you certainly seem to be grossly downplaying it.

    The fact that you casually mentioned finding a new job as if it's as easy as uploading a resume on Indeed.com and choosing from a company buffet isn't reflective of reality (reality is quite the opposite).  That's part of the inherent inequity in bargaining power I mentioned.  While that's understandable in some ways due to the nature of the beast, so to speak, it still seems disingenuous/callous to act as if it's as easy as an employee going to a manager and saying "Y'know what?  Fire Kotick.  I'm done with him." and thy employee's will be done.

    The sad reality, in the professional world, is that a singular employee "standing up for what they believe in," except for very specific circumstances, is as useless as a penis on a Pope.
    Gdemami

    image
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,273
    edited February 2019

    DMKano said:

    Firing someone how is making $30million a year is not exactly going to cause much hardship as those 800 employees who were scraping by.

    Sort of a wasted effort.

    So let's say he gets fired - still has 100million+ in the bank most likely.

    The real issue are ridiculously inflated C level salaries there is no logic that can explain how 1 persons value is 200 times greater than a senior developer making $150K a year.

    You can hire 200 senior developers vs 1 C level - hello???? 

    The issue is obvious




    When gaming went from being very profitable to mega profitable the top executives moved in, be they from huge chemical companies or household name food retailers the gaming industry needed them. Or supposedly they did, they keep investors and share holders happy even if they actually do nothing but keep the company on the same course. Last at the table they demand a very big salary and remuneration where ever they go.

    But once the money starts to dry up they are never the first to leave it is always those who earn more average sums, but eventually they will move on to another big cash cow.

    Until companies start to address the issue of directors pay this will continue to be an albatross around the neck of the commercial sector.
    MendelGdemamicolera1333
  • SBFordSBFord Former Associate EditorMember LegendaryPosts: 33,129
    edited February 2019
    You know, all the bad PR could have been avoided:

    Bobby Kotick: "While we have made record profits, we need to rethink the way we make games. But rather than let our dedicated and amazing staff go, I am voluntarily cutting my personal salary in half to keep our people employed because they are what makes ATVI great."

    He would STILL make $15,000,000, more than he could spend in a lifetime (added to a doubtless huge savings in the bank) but would come out looking like the "good guy" for the gesture. He'd still be making grotesque amounts of money but would seem as if he were altruistically helping out the grunts.
    alkarionlogSovrathGdemamigervaise1Robbgobb[Deleted User]


    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 


  • SpiiderSpiider Member RarePosts: 1,135
    Any ceo that is boosting his company's profits by eliminating jobs should start from his own job. The fact that Blizzard had 800 people to fire without feeling it tells enough about bad leadership. But their punishment is a huge bonus... Duuuh. Anyone who glorified these incompetent crooks should also be fired.

    No fate but what we make, so make me a ham sandwich please.

  • Slapshot1188Slapshot1188 Member LegendaryPosts: 17,585

    Gdemami said:

    That is why we can't have nice things...

    The self-entitlement of these disgruntled ex-employees is shocking...well, not so much, seems like a good riddance...



    You post a lot of silly stuff on these forums. But this one really set the mark...
    Seriously.. a simple WTF does not suffice.

    WHAT
    THE
    FUCK
    ????
    [Deleted User]GdemamiAegirisTacticalZombeh

    All time classic  MY NEW FAVORITE POST!  (Keep laying those bricks)

    "I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator

    Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017. 

    Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018

    "Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018

  • IselinIselin Member LegendaryPosts: 18,719
    ...but the package they received seemed fair and reasonable...
    Are there details of those packages somewhere?
    "Social media gives legions of idiots the right to speak when they once only spoke at a bar after a glass of wine, without harming the community ... but now they have the same right to speak as a Nobel Prize winner. It's the invasion of the idiots”

    ― Umberto Eco

    “Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” 
    ― CD PROJEKT RED

  • SBFordSBFord Former Associate EditorMember LegendaryPosts: 33,129
    the package they received seemed fair and reasonable.    This is a nonstarter all around.
    Only the full time employees are given severance packages and only because it's required by law. Contractors and part time employees got a pink slip, a final check and a foot in the ass sending them out the door.
    PottedPlant22MadFrenchieGdemamiThahar


    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 


  • PottedPlant22PottedPlant22 Member RarePosts: 800
    People of privilege rarely understand or care what it's actually like for below the line employees.  Often in corporations today those that are in management positions get there through a different path than many that do the grunt work.  It used to be that people were promoted from within, but most often now they are promoted by being assistants or jr executives groomed for the position.  It allows them to be focused only on the numbers and rarely value or be concerned about the people affected.  I don't really know the Act/Blizz situation or the game industry as a whole, it's just something I've been seeing from a distance working as a contractor with many companies.
  • Viper482Viper482 Member LegendaryPosts: 4,099
    edited February 2019
    I think Blizzard is a pos company, but it is still their right to downsize. There are laws to assist these people who were laid off, but you cannot dictate how a company manages itself. If you want that then I can sell you a nice home in Venezuela. Good luck. It sucks, but in the end these people will find new jobs, yet people in socialist Venezuela will still be starving.
    Gdemami
    Make MMORPG's Great Again!
  • alkarionlogalkarionlog Member EpicPosts: 3,584
    SBFord said:
    You know, all the bad PR could have been avoided:

    Bobby Kotick: "While we have made record profits, we need to rethink the way we make games. But rather than let our dedicated and amazing staff go, I am voluntarily cutting my personal salary in half to keep our people employed because they are what makes ATVI great."

    He would STILL make $15,000,000, more than he could spend in a lifetime (added to a doubtless huge savings in the bank) but would come out looking like the "good guy" for the gesture. He'd still be making grotesque amounts of money but would seem as if he were altruistically helping out the grunts.
    so tell me why he would do that? for good PR? they are already on a bad PR note one more or less matter little, if in the end of the day people will still give then money

    also do tell what a company would keep 800 people who they workpalce was suposed to be closed, since more then likely they don't know how to do something else?

    ah they could train then, ok, why? its cheaper hire someone else to the job, and the bane of one is the blessing of the other
    FOR HONOR, FOR FREEDOM.... and for some money.
  • SBFordSBFord Former Associate EditorMember LegendaryPosts: 33,129
    edited February 2019
    Contractors and part timers for better or worse are expendable and should always be prepared for cut backs.  
    As someone who has worked as a contractor for the last decade -- including this particular job -- I fully appreciate that, but it doesn't make it any less disheartening or frightening to be let go. We do what we do without insurance, without guarantees, and without thanks most of the time, yet we throw our whole selves into our work. A lot of these people were working to gain full time status at Blizzard, something that's happened a lot in the past. 

    I'm not 100% on board with the whole firing of Kotick thing, but I can say that whoever their PR people are should be given a stern talking-to because they bungled this horribly.
    [Deleted User]Sovrath[Deleted User]Gdemami


    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 


  • AlverantAlverant Member RarePosts: 1,347

    Horusra said:


    Gazimoff said:



    3dom said:


    By the way - worker unions and high social insurance cost remove ability for small companies to grow because they cannot provide terms and pay salaries demanded by the unions. That's the reason why there are zero to no startups in EU.





    Also in Japan CEOs often cut their salaries to keep the jobs which are often totally useless - like fax operators. That's the reason why Japanese economy stagnates for 30 years.






    This is so ridiculously wrong, I’m not sure if you’re hideously misinformed or just wilfully pig-ignorant.


    Then bring out your facts....



    Why didn't you make the same demand as 3dom? He didn't bring out any facts either.
    Liljna
  • Slapshot1188Slapshot1188 Member LegendaryPosts: 17,585
    DMKano said:
    Side note.  Just found out when you cancel your subscription to World of Warcraft, Blizzard doesn't even ask anymore why you are cancelling.  In the past, they at least pretended to care why you were leaving and asked you the likelihood that you would be back.  Those days are gone.  
     They have gotten all the reasons after 15 years so all asking this now - they will just get more of the same.

    And they already know what they are willing to change and what they wont. At some point customer feedback is no longer productive- they are well past that point with a 15 year old product 

    Really?

    Then why would the same company so royally screw up the Diablo Immortal stuff?  I mean, Diablo launched 22 years ago... that's a lot of feedback they got over the years.  Or the new expansions they launch... no feedback required on which parts of those were good/bad?

    Customers are always changing.  This is why we went from subs being the prevalent model of online games, to F2P, to Lootboxes, now to Battle Royales...

    A company that thinks they no longer need customer feedback is a company on it's way to a painful death.

    Gdemami

    All time classic  MY NEW FAVORITE POST!  (Keep laying those bricks)

    "I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator

    Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017. 

    Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018

    "Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018

  • HatefullHatefull Member EpicPosts: 2,503


    I'm a member of GWU Triangle in North Carolina. One of the things that we push for and fight for is fair worker practices. Many game developers are treated as expendable extras with no stability. It can be hard for peace of mind not knowing what will happen day to day when involved in a bigger budget release. As in nearly all business it is a trickle down situation. Those at the top who are driving profit receive more of that profit. Those towards the bottom who drive the bottom line through projects of passion receive more of the anxiety about our livelihood. It is a tough business. Which is why many in the industry moonlight in the nongaming entertainment business as it is more lucrative and work is plentiful.

    As for Bobby getting sacked? Not going to happen. Business will be business.



    Well put. I work in a completely different industry but a very similar situation. There is talk of unions and all that, as we are treated exactly the same way expendable. Luckily I have one retirement to fall back on so moving to the next gig isn't all that bad but for younger people it is very hard. We all have savings account that ease the down time.

    You made another very good point as well, business is business and its not going to change just because people got laid off in this industry. Asking for the CEO to be fired is laughable, asking for him to step down is even more so. What people should be asking is for innovation and ideas to get the industry healthy again.

    Finally, IF these lay-offs were so unjust why didn't the rest of the employees walk out? If things were as bad as people want others to believe the rest of the crew would have picketed the place. People will only take so much and you don't have to have a union to strike. If that happens, my point of view will change, but as it stands this is just whining. Justified, it sucks people want to have stability, but there is plenty of work out there.

    If you want a new idea, go read an old book.

    In order to be insulted, I must first value your opinion.

  • gervaise1gervaise1 Member EpicPosts: 6,919
    Buying King for $5.5B - funded in large part by borrowing - raised revenues and all sorts of metrics like MAUs. Its actually amazing how good you can look after spending $5.5B! And posters will trot out yearly annual revenue figures and say look what an amazing job they did.

    Yet King's MAUs since the takeover tell a different story. Down over 200M since end-2015, a drop of nearly 50%. And still falling. With fewer games in the top 10.

    Does this mean that King has been mismanaged. Or maybe the price paid was to high? And what does this say about the current management? Absolutely not according to the results. Such things - that might cast doubt on the ability of the C team - are glossed over and any minor positive played up.

    Gdemami
  • HatefullHatefull Member EpicPosts: 2,503

    SBFord said:



    the package they received seemed fair and reasonable.    This is a nonstarter all around.


    Only the full time employees are given severance packages and only because it's required by law. Contractors and part time employees got a pink slip, a final check and a foot in the ass sending them out the door.



    Right. Exactly as they knew could happen if things went bad. Its not like you become a contract employee and expect that you have settled. If, as a contractor, you believe you are going to be in on place for your entire career then you are in for a rude awakening. These types of things are usually written into contracts, and the contractor has to be well aware of it.

    When companies start losing money the first thing to go is fluff. Contractors in most cases are fluff, and they know that.

    Again, this isn't a good situation for the people it happened to, but I am also not convinced they were not blind sided by any of this. They had time to prepare, at least the WARN time line and I would bet even more than that.

    If you want a new idea, go read an old book.

    In order to be insulted, I must first value your opinion.

  • jonrd463jonrd463 Member UncommonPosts: 607
    It may come as a shock to some of you, but the primary end goal for any company, regardless of the product or service they provide, is to make money. Money that goes to capital funding, development costs, operating costs, and reinvestment. If there is an element of the company that is not producing some intrinsic value, it's an obligation to the shareholders to remove that element. A vast majority of shareholders in any publically traded company isn't some cabal of cigar chomping fatcats; they're regular middle class types who have a diverse investment portfolio.

    Sure, CEOs make an exorbitant amount, but if one would take their pay and spread it equitably across all accounts payable in a company, it amounts to pennies on the dollar, so the argument about the CEO's pay is just a virtue signal.

    As best as I can tell, the majority of people laid off were not those who created intrinsic value. They were support staff with skillsets which are not exactly in demand. They were Social Media Strategists, Community Managers, and things like that. With all the talk of other companies extending job offers, most of them can't even apply to those, because these companies are looking for programmers and artists-- actual hands-on people who directly contribute to the development of the end product. So what exactly do these people have to offer that would benefit the companies they want to work for? Employment is a two way street-- you provide value to a company and the company provides you a salary in exchange. No one is entitled a paycheck just for being on the payroll, and it's sound fiduciary responsibility to offload waste.

    Regardless of the public outcry, I think Act/Blizz just made itself into a much healthier enterprise, and the end result is going to actually be good for gamers.
    [Deleted User]Gdemami

    "You'll never win an argument with an idiot because he is too stupid to recognize his own defeat." ~Anonymous

  • PalebanePalebane Member RarePosts: 4,011
    edited February 2019
    I wonder if there is any evidence of top-paid employees at a major game publishing company taking a pay cut in good faith for the benefit of the rest of the company. Seems like a good way to help with morale and public perception. Only one I could find was Nintendo in 2011.

    Vault-Tec analysts have concluded that the odds of worldwide nuclear armaggeddon this decade are 17,143,762... to 1.

This discussion has been closed.