Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Pokemon Sword and Shield Impressions

SystemSystem Member UncommonPosts: 12,599
edited November 2019 in News & Features Discussion

imagePokemon Sword and Shield Impressions

It's been over a week since the latest Pokemon game hit the market, and Garrick has been putting the new RPG through its paces. Check out his impressions so far in the latest edition of The RPG Files.

Read the full story here


«1

Comments

  • valkarynvalkaryn Member UncommonPosts: 1
    Dynamax and Gigantamax are terrible. When you use moves like max steel spike and max rockfall it should literally kill the trainers in between The giant Pokémon who happen to conveniently disappear. Also, mega designs were some of the best by game freak, they died so we could get 3 turns of z moves which no one liked to begin with? Had they kept adding megas every game we’d be at least around 100, so there’s that for variety. Now we only get 25 or so gmax forms, most of which are underwhelming or stupid. Compare gmax gengar to mega gengar. It was megas that got me back into the game series and it’s sad to see what they got axed for.
    BlueThunderBearFolmenZalgotas
  • BlueThunderBearBlueThunderBear Member RarePosts: 228
    edited November 2019
    I agree with everything except your view on Dynamax. Its idiotic. Just keep mega evolutions. It made more sense and was infinitely less stupid.
    Zalgotas
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    A much higher MSRP for a grossly inferior game. Pokemon has always been a lazy franchise, but cutting half of the Pokedex was a step too far.


    No Absol, no buy.
    Folmen
  • BlueThunderBearBlueThunderBear Member RarePosts: 228

    Aeander said:

    A much higher MSRP for a grossly inferior game. Pokemon has always been a lazy franchise, but cutting half of the Pokedex was a step too far.


    No Absol, no buy.



    This game is still miles ahead of the last two games.
    FolmenAeander
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    edited November 2019

    Aeander said:

    A much higher MSRP for a grossly inferior game. Pokemon has always been a lazy franchise, but cutting half of the Pokedex was a step too far.


    No Absol, no buy.



    This game is still miles ahead of the last two games.
    I didn't like those either.


    Frankly, the designs of the new Pokemon have been incredibly mixed for the past few entries (I'm increasingly finding it difficult to make teams of Pokemon that I like and that also aren't heavily Dark or Steel without falling baci heavily on old Pokemon - y'know the ones thag have now been Thanos snapped), and the additions of stupid mechanics like mega evolutions and dynamaxing aren't helping.
    Post edited by Aeander on
  • calibekcalibek Member UncommonPosts: 300
    I didn't like the removal of half the dex but I'll live.

    Dynamaxing and gigantamaxing was an atrocious replacement.

    Personally I didn't care for mega evolutions and z-moves so I am not sad to see them go. I would have preferred instead of mega evolution they gave pokemon like Mawile and Sableye evolved forms.

    Some of the typing they give were poorly thought through. Why isn't Runerigus ghost/rock (it is a wall carving), or grapploct water/fighting. Cursola should have been ghost/water. Meowth and perserker should have been steel/fighting. I just don't understand those design choices. They could have done better with some of the typing.

    I do like most of the new pokemon but the starters are just terrible. Not only do their final forms look weird but monotyping for them is just boring. I get what they were going with on it but it was kind of bad. Should have been grass/dark, fire/electric, and water/psychic.

    They could have done a lot more with the game. I'm not going to chide then on graphics or anything like that because it plays like a pokemon game which us what I am happy but they could have taken some liberties and it just sort of falls flat.

    image
  • BlueThunderBearBlueThunderBear Member RarePosts: 228

    Aeander said:





    Aeander said:


    A much higher MSRP for a grossly inferior game. Pokemon has always been a lazy franchise, but cutting half of the Pokedex was a step too far.


    No Absol, no buy.






    This game is still miles ahead of the last two games.


    I didn't like those either.


    Frankly, the designs of the new Pokemon have been incredibly mixed for the past few entries (I'm increasingly finding it difficult to make teams of Pokemon that I like and that also aren't heavily Dark or Steel without falling baci heavily on old Pokemon - y'know the ones thag have now been Thanos snapped), and the additions of stupid mechanics like mega evolutions and dynamaxing aren't helping.



    I love mega evolution, but I'm with you in pokemon design. Also the new villain team dumb as hell. How badly have you run out of ideas when you go with Team Yell? Bad guys who cheer people on with megaphones and pokemon battles is the dumbest one yet. I mean how bad were the other (rejected) ideas that Yell seemed like the winner? Team Nosepicker? Team Stampcollector? Team Sodomy? I'm guessing the next game will feature Team Newsies.
  • RobbgobbRobbgobb Member UncommonPosts: 674
    I would give this a 5 out of 10 for me. It feels like fast food. I eat it because it is there but really would prefer a well cooked meal. I feel like I reached in 20 hours what would normally have been me having fun for 100 to 200 hours depending on the version of the game (Heart Gold Soul Silver and Diamond Pearl being 2 sets that I spend tons of time in).
    Folmen
  • BlueThunderBearBlueThunderBear Member RarePosts: 228
    I think they need to stop trying to reinvent the wheel and understand that most of their fanbase are adults who have been into pokemon for decades.

    Stop adding fancy gimmicks and just give us the national dex, a decent and challenging region, a few new pokemon and a solid experience and we'll be happy. We don't need creative new reasons to play Pokemon, we just want a decent game.
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028

    Aeander said:





    Aeander said:


    A much higher MSRP for a grossly inferior game. Pokemon has always been a lazy franchise, but cutting half of the Pokedex was a step too far.


    No Absol, no buy.






    This game is still miles ahead of the last two games.


    I didn't like those either.


    Frankly, the designs of the new Pokemon have been incredibly mixed for the past few entries (I'm increasingly finding it difficult to make teams of Pokemon that I like and that also aren't heavily Dark or Steel without falling baci heavily on old Pokemon - y'know the ones thag have now been Thanos snapped), and the additions of stupid mechanics like mega evolutions and dynamaxing aren't helping.



    I love mega evolution, but I'm with you in pokemon design. Also the new villain team dumb as hell. How badly have you run out of ideas when you go with Team Yell? Bad guys who cheer people on with megaphones and pokemon battles is the dumbest one yet. I mean how bad were the other (rejected) ideas that Yell seemed like the winner? Team Nosepicker? Team Stampcollector? Team Sodomy? I'm guessing the next game will feature Team Newsies.
    Team Sodomy would be unironically hilarious.
    Zalgotas
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    Looking at the Dexit list, I'm frankly appalled. Most of my absolute favorite team staple Pokemon, like Absol, Scizor, Skarmory, and Sandslash didn't make the cut while fuckawful trash like Garbodor and Clink did. 

    Basically, fuck Gamefreak.
    [Deleted User]
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    edited November 2019
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Looking at the Dexit list, I'm frankly appalled. Most of my absolute favorite team staple Pokemon, like Absol, Scizor, Skarmory, and Sandslash didn't make the cut while fuckawful trash like Garbodor and Clink did. 

    Basically, fuck Gamefreak.
    People just need to get over themselves man. No offense of course. Its just dang. I mean  these games are made for us. They are made for eight year olds. My eight year old has never played a pokemon game before and she is loving this game. She doesn't know about what pokemon they took out and she doesn't care. She shouldn't. Neither do I. Who wants 1,000 pokemon in what game? That's absurd. Sometimes too much is just too much. I feel like Gamefreak should have said that instead of lying about it though.

    I think if they would have said that 1,000 pokemon was alot to fit in the game world itself people would have been more accepting. As for transferring pokemon, what is the fun of that. Go catch pokemon. Thats the point.
    I actually can't stand attitudes like the one you've just shown. Basically, take that condescensing bullshit and go home. To use your words, get over yourself, man.

    They know that a large portion of their fanbase is dedicated fans well into their 20s and 30s. They know who they can count on to buy both versions of their games every few years. They are the literal largest franchise in the world because of those fans, and we should expect better of a studio with those resources.

    Just because you don't apply standards to the things you spend money on doesn't mean everyone else shouldn't.

    Also, the point is "gotta catch em all." And now you literally can't.
    BlueThunderBear
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Looking at the Dexit list, I'm frankly appalled. Most of my absolute favorite team staple Pokemon, like Absol, Scizor, Skarmory, and Sandslash didn't make the cut while fuckawful trash like Garbodor and Clink did. 

    Basically, fuck Gamefreak.
    People just need to get over themselves man. No offense of course. Its just dang. I mean  these games are made for us. They are made for eight year olds. My eight year old has never played a pokemon game before and she is loving this game. She doesn't know about what pokemon they took out and she doesn't care. She shouldn't. Neither do I. Who wants 1,000 pokemon in what game? That's absurd. Sometimes too much is just too much. I feel like Gamefreak should have said that instead of lying about it though.

    I think if they would have said that 1,000 pokemon was alot to fit in the game world itself people would have been more accepting. As for transferring pokemon, what is the fun of that. Go catch pokemon. Thats the point.
    I actually can't stand attitudes like the one you've just shown. Basically, take that condescensing bullshit and go home. To use your words, get over yourself, man.

    They know that a large portion of their fanbase is dedicated fans well into their 20s and 30s. They know who they can count on to buy both versions of their games every few years. They are the literal largest franchise in the world because of those fans, and we should expect better of a studio with those resources.

    Just because you don't apply standards to the things you spend money on doesn't mean everyone else shouldn't.

    Also, the point is "gotta catch em all." And now you literally can't.
    People are just entitled thats what it comes down too. People constantly feel like they are owed something now a days and its crazy. 
    Purchasing something does entitle you to something. That's how economics works. Throw that word in the garbage where it belongs.

    If your way was the way of things, we'd have no quality control. At all.
  • WBadgerWBadger Member RarePosts: 381
    Have you heard of the undefeated Champion Leon?  I heard that he has a Charizard!
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    edited November 2019
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Looking at the Dexit list, I'm frankly appalled. Most of my absolute favorite team staple Pokemon, like Absol, Scizor, Skarmory, and Sandslash didn't make the cut while fuckawful trash like Garbodor and Clink did. 

    Basically, fuck Gamefreak.
    People just need to get over themselves man. No offense of course. Its just dang. I mean  these games are made for us. They are made for eight year olds. My eight year old has never played a pokemon game before and she is loving this game. She doesn't know about what pokemon they took out and she doesn't care. She shouldn't. Neither do I. Who wants 1,000 pokemon in what game? That's absurd. Sometimes too much is just too much. I feel like Gamefreak should have said that instead of lying about it though.

    I think if they would have said that 1,000 pokemon was alot to fit in the game world itself people would have been more accepting. As for transferring pokemon, what is the fun of that. Go catch pokemon. Thats the point.
    I actually can't stand attitudes like the one you've just shown. Basically, take that condescensing bullshit and go home. To use your words, get over yourself, man.

    They know that a large portion of their fanbase is dedicated fans well into their 20s and 30s. They know who they can count on to buy both versions of their games every few years. They are the literal largest franchise in the world because of those fans, and we should expect better of a studio with those resources.

    Just because you don't apply standards to the things you spend money on doesn't mean everyone else shouldn't.

    Also, the point is "gotta catch em all." And now you literally can't.
    People are just entitled thats what it comes down too. People constantly feel like they are owed something now a days and its crazy. 
    Purchasing something does entitle you to something. That's how economics works. Throw that word in the garbage where it belongs.

    If your way was the way of things, we'd have no quality control. At all.
    Look I am going to step away from this because its getting heated or at least I am reading it that way and I am not one to go around just arguing with people for pages. I also want you to know that respect you and your views and I wasn't attacking you in general. I was just more speaking on the wider problem as a whole. What I saw everywhere on line. Its the reason why I put no offense on the top. I in no way was attacking you or your views. We are not robots you are allowed your own view points on a topic. Just wanted you to know that before I step away from this
    Look, I in no way begrudge you the things you enjoy. If you love this game, love it. If you love Fallout 76, I'll raise an eyebrow, but I will respect your choice to love it.

    People like me are trying to give you a better game. That is all. We're trying to make sure your Pokedex is complete and your Fallout 76 improves. That is something you should appreciate.

    I get that a lot of despicable death threats and toxicity comes out of every gaming controversy, because there are a lot of loud brats in this world, but the vast majority of those complaining are completely reasonable and justified. And attempting to paint all criticism as entitlement only contributes to a worse product. The literal largest franchise in the world just Thanos snapped its content while charging more for the end product. That's a big deal.
  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member LegendaryPosts: 12,195
    Enjoying it so far. I like the wild areas, and wish the game played that up a lot more. Story is still about as cheesy as ever.  

    Wife likes it too, though she likes Let's Go Eevee more because she enjoyed the catching without the fighting, like on Pokemon GO, which she loves. 



  • goozmaniagoozmania Member RarePosts: 394
    The game looks and feels extremely cheap. It's a significantly smaller game than previous entries in the series, but has a $20 higher price tag.
  • calibekcalibek Member UncommonPosts: 300

    People like me are trying to give you a better game. That is all. We're trying to make sure your Pokedex is complete and your Fallout 76 improves. That is something you should appreciate.


    I'm sorry but that sentence is a bunch of crap. People who are complaining about games like fallout 76 and pokemon aren't doing it for some lofty attitude or making the gaming industry better. They are doing it because they are angry or upset because something they want is gone.
    AeanderBlueThunderBear

    image
  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member LegendaryPosts: 12,195
    goozmania said:
    The game looks and feels extremely cheap. It's a significantly smaller game than previous entries in the series, but has a $20 higher price tag.
    I disagree, I feel it looks a lot better, and performs better as well.  
    BlueThunderBear



  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member LegendaryPosts: 12,195
    Arterius said:
    calibek said:

    People like me are trying to give you a better game. That is all. We're trying to make sure your Pokedex is complete and your Fallout 76 improves. That is something you should appreciate.


    I'm sorry but that sentence is a bunch of crap. People who are complaining about games like fallout 76 and pokemon aren't doing it for some lofty attitude or making the gaming industry better. They are doing it because they are angry or upset because something they want is gone. 




    I have never gave anyone a hard time for beating up on Fallout 76. I do so often myself when I playing the game and online. The game is not that great I just find it a lot of fun. Pokemon Shield/Sword are good games though. No where near the level of Fallout 76. Lets be honest here if the game had put in every pokemon I think it would be going down as the best pokemon game since gold/silver hands down. 
    I feel it's pointless though. While I agree that it would be great to have every pokemon available that ever existed, that just isn't really feasible, and it's unlikely that would even pay off.  

    At best I would maybe collect a good 200 total of them. I already spend most of my time bypassing pokemon that don't interest me... and most of the ones I do get, I never evolve or use, but have them just to have them.  I pretty much have the team I like, and focus on making it the way I'd like to make it.  

    I know the premise is that you "gotta catch'em all" but there is a limit...  I think last I checked there were over 700 pokemon, maybe more by now, who knows.... with the variants they have and all that...  I think after a while there's going to be diminishing returns on how many can be in a game and it still be considered a "good feature"... especially with the limited multiplayer aspects Pokemon games have to show off your pokedex. 
    [Deleted User]



  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Arterius said:
    Aeander said:
    Looking at the Dexit list, I'm frankly appalled. Most of my absolute favorite team staple Pokemon, like Absol, Scizor, Skarmory, and Sandslash didn't make the cut while fuckawful trash like Garbodor and Clink did. 

    Basically, fuck Gamefreak.
    People just need to get over themselves man. No offense of course. Its just dang. I mean  these games are made for us. They are made for eight year olds. My eight year old has never played a pokemon game before and she is loving this game. She doesn't know about what pokemon they took out and she doesn't care. She shouldn't. Neither do I. Who wants 1,000 pokemon in what game? That's absurd. Sometimes too much is just too much. I feel like Gamefreak should have said that instead of lying about it though.

    I think if they would have said that 1,000 pokemon was alot to fit in the game world itself people would have been more accepting. As for transferring pokemon, what is the fun of that. Go catch pokemon. Thats the point.
    I actually can't stand attitudes like the one you've just shown. Basically, take that condescensing bullshit and go home. To use your words, get over yourself, man.

    They know that a large portion of their fanbase is dedicated fans well into their 20s and 30s. They know who they can count on to buy both versions of their games every few years. They are the literal largest franchise in the world because of those fans, and we should expect better of a studio with those resources.

    Just because you don't apply standards to the things you spend money on doesn't mean everyone else shouldn't.

    Also, the point is "gotta catch em all." And now you literally can't.
    People are just entitled thats what it comes down too. People constantly feel like they are owed something now a days and its crazy. 
    Purchasing something does entitle you to something. That's how economics works. Throw that word in the garbage where it belongs.

    If your way was the way of things, we'd have no quality control. At all.
    Look I am going to step away from this because its getting heated or at least I am reading it that way and I am not one to go around just arguing with people for pages. I also want you to know that respect you and your views and I wasn't attacking you in general. I was just more speaking on the wider problem as a whole. What I saw everywhere on line. Its the reason why I put no offense on the top. I in no way was attacking you or your views. We are not robots you are allowed your own view points on a topic. Just wanted you to know that before I step away from this
    Look, I in no way begrudge you the things you enjoy. If you love this game, love it. If you love Fallout 76, I'll raise an eyebrow, but I will respect your choice to love it.

    People like me are trying to give you a better game. That is all. We're trying to make sure your Pokedex is complete and your Fallout 76 improves. That is something you should appreciate.

    I get that a lot of despicable death threats and toxicity comes out of every gaming controversy, because there are a lot of loud brats in this world, but the vast majority of those complaining are completely reasonable and justified. And attempting to paint all criticism as entitlement only contributes to a worse product. The literal largest franchise in the world just Thanos snapped its content while charging more for the end product. That's a big deal.
    Pokemon may be the biggest franchise but that doesn't equal just Gamefreak. I mean Pokemon is trading cards, Movies, TV, merch, video games, and more. I would be curious to see just how much Gamefreak makes but I am sure they wish they made what people assume they did. Not saying Gamefreak is hurting but they have also talked about making more then just pokemon games as well. So they could be using that money to expand the team so they don't rely so heavily on one franchise. 
    Worst case scenario, the game franchise itself still makes far more than it has any right to with the current level of effort put into it. There are other Nintendo franchises (most of them) that are currently pushing out their biggest and most ambitious games ever at a fraction of Pokemon's profitability and it is tragic.

    And yes, they have other games. Most of which are indie-level at best. I don't begrudge them the chance to veer off of the Pokemon treadmill, but they need to do better than Little Town Hero, to be frank.
  • goozmaniagoozmania Member RarePosts: 394



    goozmania said:

    The game looks and feels extremely cheap. It's a significantly smaller game than previous entries in the series, but has a $20 higher price tag.


    I disagree, I feel it looks a lot better, and performs better as well.  



    I played Ultra Sun on a PC Emulator (I do own the 3DS, but I wanted to play a difficulty mod) and Ultra Sun, rendered in 1080p looked nearly identical to Sword/Shield. This tells me they used the same models and textures as previous 3DS games. Their whole reason for downsizing the content of the game by half, was the scope of creating new models for everything, which they clearly didn't do.
    maskedweasel
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    edited November 2019
    Arterius said:
    calibek said:

    People like me are trying to give you a better game. That is all. We're trying to make sure your Pokedex is complete and your Fallout 76 improves. That is something you should appreciate.


    I'm sorry but that sentence is a bunch of crap. People who are complaining about games like fallout 76 and pokemon aren't doing it for some lofty attitude or making the gaming industry better. They are doing it because they are angry or upset because something they want is gone. 




    I have never gave anyone a hard time for beating up on Fallout 76. I do so often myself when I playing the game and online. The game is not that great I just find it a lot of fun. Pokemon Shield/Sword are good games though. No where near the level of Fallout 76. Lets be honest here if the game had put in every pokemon I think it would be going down as the best pokemon game since gold/silver hands down. 
    I feel it's pointless though. While I agree that it would be great to have every pokemon available that ever existed, that just isn't really feasible, and it's unlikely that would even pay off.  

    At best I would maybe collect a good 200 total of them. I already spend most of my time bypassing pokemon that don't interest me... and most of the ones I do get, I never evolve or use, but have them just to have them.  I pretty much have the team I like, and focus on making it the way I'd like to make it.  

    I know the premise is that you "gotta catch'em all" but there is a limit...  I think last I checked there were over 700 pokemon, maybe more by now, who knows.... with the variants they have and all that...  I think after a while there's going to be diminishing returns on how many can be in a game and it still be considered a "good feature"... especially with the limited multiplayer aspects Pokemon games have to show off your pokedex. 
    Even if you aren't about the collection aspect of the game (I personally only ever completed Ruby/Sapphire), not having all of them inevitably means losing out on favorites.

    Scizor and Absol are permanent staples of my team. I grew up with them. I love them, and now I can't have them for entirely arbitrary reasons. For me, the end product is inherently worse for their absence.


    One can say "just make new favorites" in response to that. But frankly, Gamefreak isn't making it easy. Every gen has its bad designs, but bad designs are increasingly becoming the rule, not the exception. For fuck's sake, Sw/Sh has 4 apple Pokemon, a teacup, a teapot, and cream. I can count the number of Pokemon I like in this new generation on my fingers, and while it's enough to make a complete team (with no regards to typing variety), it kills replayability and variety for me.
    Post edited by Aeander on
  • RobbgobbRobbgobb Member UncommonPosts: 674
    I am glad new and old players are enjoying the game. I just know that this just makes me want to go back to older games where I felt like I invested into getting things. I decided to challenge myself and I beat all gyms (except dual battles because did not think to box my other five) and rival battles including final rival battle and champion match with just my starter. I have never been able to do that in another one because they were tougher.

    I stick to this feels like fast food as just a few moments away from pretty much anything you want. No effort is truly needed. I had to stop watching one streamer as he was just checklisting where to get a pokemon and evolution requirements then spamming the XP candies to do it. It made me realize just how cheap the whole game feels to me. I don't feel love was put in the game but just the minimum work necessary for it to work.
  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member LegendaryPosts: 12,195
    Aeander said:
    Arterius said:
    calibek said:

    People like me are trying to give you a better game. That is all. We're trying to make sure your Pokedex is complete and your Fallout 76 improves. That is something you should appreciate.


    I'm sorry but that sentence is a bunch of crap. People who are complaining about games like fallout 76 and pokemon aren't doing it for some lofty attitude or making the gaming industry better. They are doing it because they are angry or upset because something they want is gone. 




    I have never gave anyone a hard time for beating up on Fallout 76. I do so often myself when I playing the game and online. The game is not that great I just find it a lot of fun. Pokemon Shield/Sword are good games though. No where near the level of Fallout 76. Lets be honest here if the game had put in every pokemon I think it would be going down as the best pokemon game since gold/silver hands down. 
    I feel it's pointless though. While I agree that it would be great to have every pokemon available that ever existed, that just isn't really feasible, and it's unlikely that would even pay off.  

    At best I would maybe collect a good 200 total of them. I already spend most of my time bypassing pokemon that don't interest me... and most of the ones I do get, I never evolve or use, but have them just to have them.  I pretty much have the team I like, and focus on making it the way I'd like to make it.  

    I know the premise is that you "gotta catch'em all" but there is a limit...  I think last I checked there were over 700 pokemon, maybe more by now, who knows.... with the variants they have and all that...  I think after a while there's going to be diminishing returns on how many can be in a game and it still be considered a "good feature"... especially with the limited multiplayer aspects Pokemon games have to show off your pokedex. 
    Even if you aren't about the collection aspect of the game (I personally only ever completed Ruby/Sapphire), not having all of them inevitably means losing out on favorites.

    Scizor and Absol are permanent staples of my team. I grew up with them. I love them, and now I can't have them for entirely arbitrary reasons. For me, the end product is inherently worse for their absence.


    One can say "just make new favorites" in response to that. But frankly, Gamefreak isn't making it easy. Every gen has its bad designs, but bad designs are increasingly becoming the rule, not the exception. For fuck's sake, Sw/Sh has 4 apple Pokemon, a teacup, a teapot, and cream. I can count the number of Pokemon I like in this new generation on my fingers, and while it's enough to make a complete team (with no regards to typing variety), it kills replayability and variety for me.
    It is a precarious situation. Pokemon is a collection RPG game with hundreds of "characters" but some of us continually choose the same pokemon for our team every time.  I always used Dragonite and Alakazam in my team. But as far as I know, neither of them are in Sword and Shield. It does suck, because they are my go to, and I use them on Pokemon GO all the time. 


    I am with you, I dislike a lot of the new pokemon as well, though I am warming up to Golurk a bit.  But finding my way through the game with new characters and exploring new pokemon is kind of exciting to me.  I don't know any of these pokemon.  When I run into one, sometimes I have no idea what its weaknesses are.  Thats not something I've had to deal with for years. It's kind of refreshing.



Sign In or Register to comment.