It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I thought I would make life easier and just get a receiver with some speakers, plug everything into the receiver and cut the TV input and volume out of my life. As I said I am not an audio file so I don't need anything to high end. I have some limitations though.
I hate entertainment centers so the TV is actually on an antique hutch. Looks great but it does not lend itself to placing a component inside.
The TV stand is only ~2.5" tall so if the receiver is in front of the TV it needs to be short and if it is behind the TV it needs the remote IT sensor to still work.
My wife hates wires so getting wireless speakers would be great.
3.1-5.1 is probably fine.
Does anyone have any suggestions for a good receiver/speakers setup that would work well for me? If I am missing any information that would help you make a suggestion please post your questions and I will check back in a back later and update the main post or just quote you.
Thanks for your time and suggestions.
Comments
Most of them are going to be 2.1 setups, but 5.1, even wireless 5.1 - exists.
I can't speak to the quality of this - just a quick amazon search to give you an example:
https://www.amazon.com/Polk-Audio-Surround-Performance-Subwoofer/dp/B0753ZLK2H
I had a Yamaha 2.1 a few years ago, it was a decent unit. I think the YAS-109 is the nearest modern model, but that didn't have rear channels, just some virtual surround mode that kinda sorta did something. But it was set it and forget it, and worked well.
Prices range from low $100s to +++++
The alternative is as you are saying, an actual Receiver, with discrete speakers. Your getting into a lot more money and a more complicated installation there. The bonus is that it will be better sound, and you can mix/match components, and it will likely last you for your next 3 or 4 television sets before you need to upgrade anything. Wireless channels in those configurations aren't as common, but are possible, again, if you are willing to spend even more money. Your probably looking at (least) double what a sound bar will cost, and it will take up more space.
Going the receiver route, the sky is the limit, and prices are all over the map. And speakers are often sold separately, so that's an entirely separate conversation.
I've done both ways in the past. Sound bars are vastly better than built-in TV sound. And a good Receiver with good speakers is vastly better than a sound bar. It's a matter of budget, of installation space, and what you are comfortable doing. The sound bar is plug and play and forget it. The reciever is... less so and needs some tinkering and a separate remote, and a lot of wiring (I nearly killed myself running rear channel wiring through the ceiling to make it look good).
I'm currently running a Yamaha RX-V1600 (circa '05?). I don't run video through the unit, so the fact that it only has HDMI 1.0 doesn't affect me. I'm running a custom 250W dual 12" subwoofer, and Elac Debut mains, center, and rear channels. The receiver is capable of 7.1, but I'm only running 5.1 out of it. It sounds great, and my wife only complains because she can't use the TV remote to adjust the sound...
--John Ruskin
To get 4 inputs on a sound bar, you need to step it up quite a bit
Crutchfield
With your space limitations that you talk about, I do think a sound bar is probably your best bet. But if 4 HDMI inputs is a minimum - you can get receivers that have up to 8 inputs.
You could try something like this, it's pretty thin, and has 4 inputs. You would need to add speakers though.
https://www.crutchfield.com/p_164DSX3/Integra-DSX-3.html?cc=02&tp=179
There are some wireless rear speaker kits that will go on any receiver to enable wireless rears, so you could pick up anything that fits your entertainment setup. I've heard of issues with then (sound sync, dropout, hiss/pop, etc) -- YMMV. Here's an example
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/rocketfish-wireless-rear-speaker-kit/6254098.p?skuId=6254098