Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Mainframe Raises Another $22 Million for Development of Its Cloud-Native MMORPG | MMORPG.com
System
Member UncommonPosts: 12,599
Mainframe Raises Another $22 Million for Development of Its Cloud-Native MMORPG | MMORPG.com
Mainframe Industries, which is developing a cloud-native MMORPG rumored to be published by Microsoft, has raised another $22 million in investment funding.
Comments
Is any MMO gamer dream to play a MMORPG with little to no lag, while playing solo or with hundreds of other players in the same zone.
I mean..at least this is what I understand from "cloud-native-mmorpg"., right?
Anyway, cloud gaming is the future, at least in terms of MASSIVE games.
Reporter: What's behind Blizzard success, and how do you make your gamers happy?
Blizzard Boss: Making gamers happy is not my concern, making money.. yes!
All time classic MY NEW FAVORITE POST! (Keep laying those bricks)
"I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator
Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017.
Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018
"Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018
Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.
You would have thought Amazon would have been all in on "cloud native" with AWS. But I guess MS was the next most likely...
-mklinic
"Do something right, no one remembers.
Do something wrong, no one forgets"
-from No One Remembers by In Strict Confidence
All time classic MY NEW FAVORITE POST! (Keep laying those bricks)
"I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator
Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017.
Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018
"Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018
It's also possible to have cheats that are a result of third party tools reading things from system memory but not altering them. Aimbots and some other types of bots are perhaps the most common example of this class of cheating. Being able to see things that you shouldn't by removing line of sight restrictions is another type of cheat in this class. Purely streamed games make these types of cheats massively harder to pull off. To be clear, some but not all bot programs belong in this class of cheats, as it depends on how the bot is created.
Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.
Of course, it's also likely to prevent piracy in another way. Most people don't try to pirate awful games that they aren't interested in playing.
Ofc it will be, We all want to do more with less, so if you can stream a game to a tv so that the customer has 1000,- more to spent on silly cosmetics instead of a gaming pc.
The less it takes for a user to use someting, the more likely they are to use it.
Paying for the bandwidth that it takes to do streaming right and allow you to stream games well for a few hours per day is always going to be a lot more expensive than buying the hardware to render the game well locally, even if you have to completely replace all of your hardware every few years. And buying the hardware to render the game locally will give you a better gaming experience, too, in addition to being cheaper.
Streaming only becomes the cheaper option when you're looking at people who play very demanding games (so that the cheap hardware that you'd still need to stream a game can't just render it locally), but play them very little (so that the cumulative bandwidth requirements will be low). If your idea of gaming is playing AAA games for a few hours per month, then maybe streaming genuinely will be cheaper. But I'm skeptical that that's a large market.
Take geforce now. Streaming consecutively for about 10 hours a day at 1080p and 60fps is about 20 GBs and can be done with even a 15MBPS connection.
For a month that would be about half of the usual data caps that some services put on plans.
If you want to push out costs between buying a pc and streaming. You still would need an internet connection, the only cost would then relate to the game and the service. Geforce now is about 10 per month. A new pc with a 3060 would be somewhere in the 1500 range. So by the time the pcs value came into play the graphics card would be extremely outdated.
Even if you factor in a cheap pc around 700 dollars to run the streaming game, it still would factor out cheaper for the first 4 to 5 years. But cloud games are built to run on virtually anything, so that's being generous.
There are a lot of problems when it comes to cloud based games. Costs are the wrong place to volley your dislike though.
And that's also why I said enough to do it well. Compressing your data by 99.6% is going to be quite a hit to image quality. It might seem fine when not much is changing, but that's going to be awful when the image changes fast, such as if you try to rotate the camera. A cheap computer with an integrated GPU will be able to run most games just fine these days, even if it takes greatly reducing graphical settings. Even at those reduced settings, the reliability of having the game rendered locally will still be a far superior gaming experience to streaming.
Both AMD and Intel offer integrated GPUs rated at around 2 TFLOPS these days, which is more than the GeForce GTX 580 did, and that was the top of the line GPU from a mere ten years ago. Yes, yes, a lot of people have lower end integrated GPUs than that, but don't underestimate what even low end modern hardware can do. And future low end hardware is only going to get better from here. The modern gaming potato can run just about any game at suitably reduced settings, and the only real exceptions are a handful of games made by developers who are flagrantly bad at optimization.
I use GFN all the time, and I have a 3080 desktop. Compression quality really only becomes an issue hen the connection is poor.
You may see increased ping cause some lag, or some degradation if you have a bad connection..
But let's be honest, even if you don't see the disconnection or degradation when rendering locally it doesn't mean that it's not happening. It's really not that big of a deal when playing online games because the situations are similar.
There's a case to be made for both sides. I don't feel like costs are one of them. Performance on one end, scalability and convenience on the other. I guess we will see what shakes out, but I fear you'll be surprised.
In almost every case I can think of gamers have chosen convenience over quality.