Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sony Is Acquiring Destiny and Halo Creator Bungie In $3.6 Billion Deal | MMORPG.com

SystemSystem Member UncommonPosts: 12,599
edited January 2022 in News & Features Discussion

imageSony Is Acquiring Destiny and Halo Creator Bungie In $3.6 Billion Deal | MMORPG.com

Just two weeks after Microsoft announced its intent to buy Activision Blizzard, Sony has joined the studio-buying club again, acquiring Destiny developer Bungie for $3.6 billion.

Read the full story here


«1

Comments

  • TillerTiller Member LegendaryPosts: 11,449
    So in the future MS and Sony will own most of everything. The thing that annoys me with Sony is they tend to grip more exclusive titles to try and force gamers onto their platform than Microsoft has in the past; which makes me not want to buy into their platform.
    elveoneJeroKaneTwistedSister77dragonlee66Ir1shguy
    SWG Bloodfin vet
    Elder Jedi/Elder Bounty Hunter
     
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    Microsoft now owns Sony's mascots and Sony now owns the makers of Microsoft's mascot.

    In fairness, this was an intelligent move by Sony. They lack a good fps, and this gives them leverage against MS pulling CoD. 

    And the optimist in me sees this as a potentially good marriage. Bungie gives Sony the shooting mechanics they lack, and Sony gives Bungie the storytelling they woefully lack.
    ConstantineMeruselveoneMikehaMensurIr1shguy
  • ACommonMuggerACommonMugger Member RarePosts: 558
    Sigh.
  • Tuor7Tuor7 Member RarePosts: 982
    Bungie really likes selling themselves, but they don't like being sold.
    CosmicwrathRoinIr1shguy
  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    So is this a game of attrition now?

     Instead of opening up, the reality will be closing up?

    Not looking very good for console players, maybe they should consider the PC
    RoinMallyx

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • lordsmoklordsmok Member UncommonPosts: 75
    meh bungie are greedy fs co dont care :P
    BLNX[Deleted User]SabbythIr1shguyFrodoFragins
  • BLNXBLNX Member UncommonPosts: 275
    Tiller said:
    So in the future MS and Sony will own most of everything. The thing that annoys me with Sony is they tend to grip more exclusive titles to try and force gamers onto their platform than Microsoft has in the past; which makes me not want to buy into their platform.


    While I agree with you, I think most people are forgetting another player here: Nintendo. Nintendo has been living off their exclusives (and second party developers) since they made the NES.

    I don't like exclusives, but for Microsoft and Sony to be buying companies and IP isn't outside the practice of one of the leading companies of the last 30 years. It sucks, like a lot of things in the industry.
    In the King's Court, I choose to be the Jester.
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    BLNX said:
    Tiller said:
    So in the future MS and Sony will own most of everything. The thing that annoys me with Sony is they tend to grip more exclusive titles to try and force gamers onto their platform than Microsoft has in the past; which makes me not want to buy into their platform.


    While I agree with you, I think most people are forgetting another player here: Nintendo. Nintendo has been living off their exclusives (and second party developers) since they made the NES.

    I don't like exclusives, but for Microsoft and Sony to be buying companies and IP isn't outside the practice of one of the leading companies of the last 30 years. It sucks, like a lot of things in the industry.
    Eh. There's a key difference.

    Most Nintendo and Sony exclusives enrich the industry. They are built for their platforms from the start, and they are meant to be games of such excellent quality that they sell the platform on merit.

    Microsoft's recent moves haven't been value creation - they've been value destruction. Pulling established and popular franchises away from other platforms.
    Canyen109HerithiusIr1shguyFrodoFragins
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    Torval said:
    Aeander said:
    BLNX said:
    Tiller said:
    So in the future MS and Sony will own most of everything. The thing that annoys me with Sony is they tend to grip more exclusive titles to try and force gamers onto their platform than Microsoft has in the past; which makes me not want to buy into their platform.


    While I agree with you, I think most people are forgetting another player here: Nintendo. Nintendo has been living off their exclusives (and second party developers) since they made the NES.

    I don't like exclusives, but for Microsoft and Sony to be buying companies and IP isn't outside the practice of one of the leading companies of the last 30 years. It sucks, like a lot of things in the industry.
    Eh. There's a key difference.

    Most Nintendo and Sony exclusives enrich the industry. They are built for their platforms from the start, and they are meant to be games of such excellent quality that they sell the platform on merit.

    Microsoft's recent moves haven't been value creation - they've been value destruction. Pulling established and popular franchises away from other platforms.

    lolwut? Enrich the industry? Maybe you mean line corporate pockets and push a platform, but "enriching the industry" is some serious mental gymnastics. There is nothing enriching about platform exclusives. If a platform can only compete by exclusives instead of the features or power it brings then it isn't enriching anything.
    I profoundly and completely disagree, and the evidence backs me up. Gamers care about games, not power or features. The weaker platforms have consistently won the last few generations because of better game lineups. And even on PC, was the viable competitor to Steam the feature superior GoG? No, it was the feature inferior EGS, entirely because of exclusives.

    Exclusives are good for the industry, because they are meritocracy incarnate. The best games, often with the fewest microtransactions, taking on the highest risks because they are meant to get people into a platform. I'll take that business cost over lootboxes any day.
    k61977SandmanjwSabbythIr1shguy
  • BLNXBLNX Member UncommonPosts: 275
    What about the Wii U?
    In the King's Court, I choose to be the Jester.
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    BLNX said:
    What about the Wii U?
    Was why I said weaker over weakest. Because yes, the Wii U flopped due to lack of games. The PS4 Pro was weaker than the Xbox once the One X came out, and yet dominated that generation. And did the One X become their best selling platform for its power when it was released? No, it was outsold by the One S.
    BLNX
  • emperorhades1emperorhades1 Member RarePosts: 416
    For 3.6 billion or 76 billion or name your dollar amount, I would think you could hire the best in the business for a 5 year time frame and create a game engine and a plethora of games to fit every platform. I don't understand the buying of used IP. I mean if you buy a lean mean game producing machine ok. But, buying all this corporate fat doesnt seem logical. The apple computer was built in a garage. Diablo and diablo II had less than 40 people. Everquest had about 24ish developers. If 1000 people made 200k per year for 5 years. You would still have 2.6 billion in your budget. The 76 billion activision deal, holy crap.
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,028
    For 3.6 billion or 76 billion or name your dollar amount, I would think you could hire the best in the business for a 5 year time frame and create a game engine and a plethora of games to fit every platform. I don't understand the buying of used IP. I mean if you buy a lean mean game producing machine ok. But, buying all this corporate fat doesnt seem logical. The apple computer was built in a garage. Diablo and diablo II had less than 40 people. Everquest had about 24ish developers. If 1000 people made 200k per year for 5 years. You would still have 2.6 billion in your budget. The 76 billion activision deal, holy crap.
    The complexity and technological cost of development has increased so grossly since the days of Diablo and Everquest. Like, it's not even comparable. It just makes more sense as a short term investment to secure established studios. Especially for Microsoft who have the money to throw around and want to fast track their way into competing with the lineups that others have spent decades building.

    And of course, this is a both situation. Sony and Microsoft make their own studios. They also buy them. They also make partnerships with third parties.

    Same for Nintendo. They make some small acquisitions, but they make their own studios. They also have an abnormal tendency to form exclusive second party partnerships rather than acquire studios (this is the case with Pokemon's Gamefreak and Fire Emblem's Intelligent Systems). And they've been increasingly strengthening 3rd party co-development, particularly with Bandai Namco and Koei Tecmo.
    emperorhades1
  • IceAgeIceAge Member EpicPosts: 3,200
    edited January 2022
    I would have wish this to be the other way around. Blizzard bought up by Sony and Bungie by MS, since I like Sony more.

    Anyway, hope this ..moves will make a solid "battleplayground" between MS and Sony which in the end will result in solid releases for us, the gamers.
    ConstantineMerus

    Reporter: What's behind Blizzard success, and how do you make your gamers happy?
    Blizzard Boss: Making gamers happy is not my concern, making money.. yes!

  • TillerTiller Member LegendaryPosts: 11,449

    BLNX said:


    Tiller said:

    So in the future MS and Sony will own most of everything. The thing that annoys me with Sony is they tend to grip more exclusive titles to try and force gamers onto their platform than Microsoft has in the past; which makes me not want to buy into their platform.




    While I agree with you, I think most people are forgetting another player here: Nintendo. Nintendo has been living off their exclusives (and second party developers) since they made the NES.

    I don't like exclusives, but for Microsoft and Sony to be buying companies and IP isn't outside the practice of one of the leading companies of the last 30 years. It sucks, like a lot of things in the industry.



    Oh I'm not forgetting Nintendo, they are the worst. It's why so many emulators for their games have existed since the late 90's.
    [Deleted User]
    SWG Bloodfin vet
    Elder Jedi/Elder Bounty Hunter
     
  • emperorhades1emperorhades1 Member RarePosts: 416
    Meanwhile..! At Microsoft, we have a new airplane called the Fokker FVII. Seems a bit deliberate.
  • OldKingLogOldKingLog Member RarePosts: 600
    [Deleted User]Roin
  • TwistedSister77TwistedSister77 Member EpicPosts: 1,144
    And... Amazon Game Studios:  "we're almost in worse shape than the Amazon Fire Cellphone division before closure. "



    RoinRungar
  • Slapshot1188Slapshot1188 Member LegendaryPosts: 17,585
    edited February 2022
    Tiller said:
    So in the future MS and Sony will own most of everything. 
    No... 
    Highlander quick - THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE
    CosmicwrathRoin

    All time classic  MY NEW FAVORITE POST!  (Keep laying those bricks)

    "I should point out that no other company has shipped out a beta on a disc before this." - Official Mortal Online Lead Community Moderator

    Proudly wearing the Harbinger badge since Dec 23, 2017. 

    Coined the phrase "Role-Playing a Development Team" January 2018

    "Oddly Slap is the main reason I stay in these forums." - Mystichaze April 9th 2018

  • ConstantineMerusConstantineMerus Member EpicPosts: 3,338
    There is our FPS backup plan. And we have done it relatively cheap.
    Constantine, The Console Poster

    • "One of the most difficult tasks men can perform, however much others may despise it, is the invention of good games and it cannot be done by men out of touch with their instinctive selves." - Carl Jung
  • kjempffkjempff Member RarePosts: 1,759
    Wish they would have kept SOE and spent some of that money on EqNext. Maybe we would have a mmorpg worth playing by now.
  • cheyanecheyane Member LegendaryPosts: 9,385
    kjempff said:
    Wish they would have kept SOE and spent some of that money on EqNext. Maybe we would have a mmorpg worth playing by now.
    I think SOE was costing them too much and they got rid of it.
    Garrus Signature
  • GinazGinaz Member RarePosts: 2,558



    Tiller said:

    So in the future MS and Sony will own most of everything. 


    No... 
    Highlander quick - THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE



    Yeah, if anyone is going to win the war of which company can gobble up the most game studios it's MS. They have A LOT more money than Sony does to do it.

    Is a man not entitled to the herp of his derp?

    Remember, I live in a world where juggalos and yugioh players are real things.

  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 8,164
    Ginaz said:



    Tiller said:

    So in the future MS and Sony will own most of everything. 


    No... 
    Highlander quick - THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE



    Yeah, if anyone is going to win the war of which company can gobble up the most game studios it's MS. They have A LOT more money than Sony does to do it.
    Which is terrible when there is no real competition we the consumer will lose.

  • ConstantineMerusConstantineMerus Member EpicPosts: 3,338
    Microsoft will not acquire anymore studios. Ever again. 
    [Deleted User]
    Constantine, The Console Poster

    • "One of the most difficult tasks men can perform, however much others may despise it, is the invention of good games and it cannot be done by men out of touch with their instinctive selves." - Carl Jung
Sign In or Register to comment.