Originally posted by RexKushman Originally posted by dustyhayes
I think what being overlooked is the funding for console versions since PS4 & XB-one owner will be already paying monthly subs for PSN and XB-Live that's where the cash shop cou…
I think what being overlooked is the funding for console versions since PS4 & XB-one owner will be already paying monthly subs for PSN and XB-Live that's where the cash shop could come in
Originally posted by Brabbit1987 Originally posted by dustyhayes Originally posted by keithian Originally posted by Iselin Originally posted by Brabbit1987 Originally posted by dustyhayes
Cartoony graphics & aesthetics …
Originally posted by Loke666
I think that if they have monthly fees it is a terrible idea. The whole reason to pay monthly fees is to avoid crap like that.
I agree, either subs or cash shops both imho seems EA greedy to me.
Originally posted by keithian Originally posted by Iselin Originally posted by Brabbit1987 Originally posted by dustyhayes
Cartoony graphics & aesthetics tend to age better, just look at WoW & GW1, WoW still looks better than GW…
I watched the announcement too and I must say it definitely looks interesting enough for me to follow it, but I reserve judgment until I see some real gameplay & features info
Originally posted by Crazy_Stick Originally posted by Kreedz "Elite: Dangerous"... Really?
That's Almost as bad as "Revengeance" in terms of naming a game.
C'mon, how can you back a game when the Dev's cant even think of a good tit…
Originally posted by Kreedz "Elite: Dangerous"... Really?
That's Almost as bad as "Revengeance" in terms of naming a game.
C'mon, how can you back a game when the Dev's cant even think of a good title, makes me worry about the imaginatio…
I think online gaming its is going down the Minecraft route, single player game with well thought out, well designed & implemented multiplayer & Co-op modes for example DayZ has something like a 800k strong players which is more than the pla…