Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Hype meter = Nerfed?

Yao folks!


I've been following the progress for Warhammer online since mid 2006 and now it really starts to get close to release date. At first my hype was at top, but as the months kept passing by and very little was made (progress wise, you'll understand soon) to the graphics. Now, September 22th, a year and few months after I knew it was coming, it still looks like it was made by a bunch of blind guys with no sence of beauty. Graphics's not everything, I know that but seriously, have any of you ever watched ANY of the movies they have released? I can't honestly think of a game that has THAT many edges in it (including Super Mario on SNES back in the -90).

In my small mind I though when I was looking at the pre-alpha fotage that 'OK, this is just a rough drawing of good things to come'. Today, I watched the "before-after movie" they've got on their website. Oh my god, please don't tell me they've completed this game just adding lights. Sure, it looks better but it doesen't take away the fact that it's pure buttugly beneith all that swagger.

Graphics's not everything but let's compare it to something. Like for instance a car. If you gonna pay for a car, would you go for the buttugly one with 15 radio channels or the honkey donkey awesome looking with 13 radio channels? This is insane, hmm, I need a better comparison. Anyhow, I wanna hear your thoughts on this and if someone feels the same way. I personally woulden't say that it's to early to be talking about this coz' it's like less than 2 months before release, can they really change the hole outlook of the game in that time? I prey for a miracle or my 5 cents goes to AoC :(

«1

Comments

  • FerusaFerusa Member Posts: 211

    As you said, graphics are NOT everything, so why do you plan on jumping ship to AoC if your largest interest is in the gameplay mechanics? The graphics look fine to me, in some movies the graphics look amazing, in others not so amazing...in the movies from the game expos, expect those to be the ones in the game-not the ones of poor grainy quality.

    Though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been seen associated with long delays.
    -Sun Tzu, the Art of War

  • godeda24godeda24 Member Posts: 99

    So you are comparing a before and after of only lighting not the actual graphics engine and saying the game hasnt gotten any better graphically?Makes no sense man its to show of lighting not the graphics engine.Now when they come out with a actual finish product and it doesn't look better then you can complain but  for now stop judging a game in early beta especially off graphics alone.

  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 43,975

    If you actually believe the graphics are that important (vs gameplay) you probably aren't the right sort of player for WAR....... better go with another game.

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • bleyzwunbleyzwun Member UncommonPosts: 1,087
  • MoNuMeNMoNuMeN Member Posts: 104

    Thanks for the flame Sornin. And to the rest of the responses, damn, I feel stupid my bad. I've been reading release date 2007 for over a year now LOL.

    Well then we're all good in the hood I guess, with 1 year still to go. I still think it looks like shajt, I'm sticking to it. Closing thread

  • bleyzwunbleyzwun Member UncommonPosts: 1,087

    it's said Q1 2008 for a long ass time now.  If you think it looks like shit and don't plan on playing, why the fuck do you care?  I don't understand some people.

  • StellosStellos Member UncommonPosts: 1,491

    If this isn't flaming I don't know what is?!  The graphics are amazing in WAR, not like I'm a big graphic guy, but they are amazing.

  • JavairaJavaira Member Posts: 38

    I think the game looks great. I am not sure if I would describe it as beautiful. It is beautiful in parts and gritty and ugly in other parts.

    Anyway I really like the style.

    I think this may be a matter of taste, could you let us know what you do consider beautiful and what exactly makes the warhammer graphics not up to scratch.

    Other people have said similar things, but they usually point to an exact problem.

    For this to be helpful feedback to the devs you would need to be a bit more specific than " I just don't like it".

     

    WAR is not WOW - http://javairasfolly.jandell.net/?page_id=377
    www.afkcafe.com

  • IGNEUSIGNEUS Member Posts: 31

    I think it may be too early to slam its graphics, and like you said graphics aren't everything. In the long run its the overall game that matters, concepts, options, interface, etc. Its release is not even till next year, a lot will change between now and then during the polish phase. Expecting perfection at release may be deemed short sighted as well, since most mmorpg's currently being released seem like they weren't even close to being ready to leave BETA. I'd simply be moderately impressed to see a mmorpg that upon release doesn't have you glitch in movement, ie. running up a trail several times or freezing or swimming on land.

    image

    image
  • sparkyxsparkyx Member Posts: 38
    Originally posted by MoNuMeN

    Yao folks! I've been following the progress for Warhammer online since mid 2006 and now it really starts to get close to release date. At first my hype was at top, but as the months kept passing by and very little was made (progress wise, you'll understand soon) to the graphics. Now, September 22th, a year and few months after I knew it was coming, it still looks like it was made by a bunch of blind guys with no sence of beauty. Graphics's not everything, I know that but seriously, have any of you ever watched ANY of the movies they have released? I can't honestly think of a game that has THAT many edges in it (including Super Mario on SNES back in the -90). In my small mind I though when I was looking at the pre-alpha fotage that 'OK, this is just a rough drawing of good things to come'. Today, I watched the "before-after movie" they've got on their website. Oh my god, please don't tell me they've completed this game just adding lights. Sure, it looks better but it doesen't take away the fact that it's pure buttugly beneith all that swagger. Graphics's not everything but let's compare it to something. Like for instance a car. If you gonna pay for a car, would you go for the buttugly one with 15 radio channels or the honkey donkey awesome looking with 13 radio channels? This is insane, hmm, I need a better comparison. Anyhow, I wanna hear your thoughts on this and if someone feels the same way. I personally woulden't say that it's to early to be talking about this coz' it's like less than 2 months before release, can they really change the hole outlook of the game in that time? I prey for a miracle or my 5 cents goes to AoC :(
    Um...where to start? Watching the vids on the net do not do this game justice.I played it this past June at Gamesday.Trust me,it looks far superior than any You Tube video,AND and any WoW graphics.Graphics like any art is subjective,unlike your spelling and punctuation.

       Go back into your little troll hole,and kindly go play something else.

  • FikrocFikroc Member Posts: 166

    i got as far as "honkey-donkey".

     

    =D

  • SorninSornin Member Posts: 1,133

    Originally posted by Fikroc


    i got as far as "honkey-donkey".
     
    =D

    Yeah, I was unsure whether that was a compliment or an insult, but it was rather funny. Almost sounds like a racial slur against Caucasians.

    image

  • MoNuMeNMoNuMeN Member Posts: 104

    My point is that the vids they upload on their oficial website are buttugly. Wich in my opinions seems like a bad publicity stunt. When for a fact you can find some good looking vids on ie. youtube. Honkey donkey means cool, it's not a insult lol. I think?

    But as it turnes out it's about 50/50 of the vids showing really nice stuff and half ugly as hell. But as someone said in a earlier post "i've been playing the game and it's far better than any youtube vid shows".

  • inistryinistry Member Posts: 14

    Originally posted by MoNuMeN


    My point is that the vids they upload on their oficial website are buttugly. Wich in my opinions seems like a bad publicity stunt. When for a fact you can find some good looking vids on ie. youtube. Honkey donkey means cool, it's not a insult lol. I think?
    But as it turnes out it's about 50/50 of the vids showing really nice stuff and half ugly as hell. But as someone said in a earlier post "i've been playing the game and it's far better than any youtube vid shows".

    Could you link me one such 'ugly as hell' video clip that isn't pre-alpha?

  • ArchinArchin Member Posts: 103

    OP you have NO understanding of how a game is created obviously, if when you look at each video you think 'how can then release this, it looks crap' then you must be a friggin dumbass tbh, judge it when the game is released, WHEN ITS RELEASED.. also the lighting looks amazing, as we all know the lighting is only half done, and also we know that most videos shown are about 4 months old when released.

    Imagine if you were an artist, your there drawing a painting, half way through only half the page has been sketched, and no colour added.... I then walk upto you and say 'you expect that picture to be hung in an art gallery? you suck at painting' you would think im a twat, well thats what I think of you tbh :)

    Thie only thing nerfed was your IQ my son.

  • TyfreakyTyfreaky Member Posts: 239

    In the current screen shots nad movies that I have seen of the game, it rates as high or higher among graphics as most new MMOs.

    It looks better currently than Guildwars which we all can agree is a awesome looking game.

    I currently see no reason to fret about the state of how the game will look.

  • crazyivencrazyiven Member Posts: 142

     

    Originally posted by MoNuMeN


    My point is that the vids they upload on their oficial website are buttugly. Wich in my opinions seems like a bad publicity stunt. When for a fact you can find some good looking vids on ie. youtube. Honkey donkey means cool, it's not a insult lol. I think?
    But as it turnes out it's about 50/50 of the vids showing really nice stuff and half ugly as hell. But as someone said in a earlier post "i've been playing the game and it's far better than any youtube vid shows".

     Id let it die man, these forums are very one sided.(The flamers) I have had one good discussion on these boards and thats it, rest is troll, and flame fest. To me they all look like WOW, flame away... flamers

     

     

  • SykomykeSykomyke Member Posts: 116

     

    Originally posted by crazyiven


     
     Id let it die man, these forums are very one sided.(The flamers) I have had one good discussion on these boards and thats it, rest is troll, and flame fest. To me they all look like WOW, flame away... flamers
     
     



    Here's looking at you crazyiven....

     

    "One must appreciate life's little ironies, even at one's own expense."

    ~~Internet gaming is not for the faint of heart or the dumb of mind.~~
    image

  • inistryinistry Member Posts: 14

     

    Originally posted by kebrus


     
    Originally posted by crazyiven


     
    Originally posted by MoNuMeN


    My point is that the vids they upload on their oficial website are buttugly. Wich in my opinions seems like a bad publicity stunt. When for a fact you can find some good looking vids on ie. youtube. Honkey donkey means cool, it's not a insult lol. I think?
    But as it turnes out it's about 50/50 of the vids showing really nice stuff and half ugly as hell. But as someone said in a earlier post "i've been playing the game and it's far better than any youtube vid shows".

     Id let it die man, these forums are very one sided.(The flamers) I have had one good discussion on these boards and thats it, rest is troll, and flame fest. To me they all look like WOW, flame away... flamers

     

     

    you said it all, these people are all here for the hype and if you tell them something isn't good of their favorite game, they will jump at you with thousands of excuses...

     

    WAR looks just like HALO 3... the games aren't bad but there is simply to much hype...

    just a small piece of wood for the fire: you all look like someone that has a small penis and keep saying to yourselves that "size doesn't matter"...

     

    flame on

     

     

    Both crazyiven and kebrus. Nice job with the straw men. Your arguments almost counter the chewbacca defense.

     

    Random troll: It r teh suxx0r vids look ugli it r suxx.

    person A: Yes, but those are pre-alpha videos. Please wait with the suxxors until release.

    You: PERSON A YOU ARE A WAR FANBOY1!1!1!1

     

  • inistryinistry Member Posts: 14

     

    Originally posted by kebrus


    I'm looking for a new mmo to play, so I've seen probably almost every video of WAR out there and not in a year that game will look good unless they redo it all, characters and monsters are horrible, lighting and shadows are horrible, overall lands and cities are poor in detail  and repetitive... and comparing their "evolution" in terms of graphics you all know it's gonna suck... but hey i don't want to spoil your dream game so don't mind about the *coff* horrible *coff* graphics because the game isn't out yet....
    and btw you just proven my point about the fanboysm



    Do you even know what a straw men is? You have not proven your point. Where do you proof i am a fanboy? Nice try AGAIN with the chewbacca defense.

     

     

    Link me ONE 'horrible' video of War that isn't pre-alpha. And please, no more dodging questions with your 'U R FANBOI'.

     

     

    ps: The version of War that you can play at conventions is several months old. 

  • kebruskebrus Member Posts: 5

    i was trying to make you realize it without having to tell you... the simple fact that you interpretaded my comment as complaining about fanboys proves you are one, because i wasn't complaining about the fanboys, i am complaining about the over-hype (i even gave halo 3 as comparison) because the game isn't out yet and for all you it's already the best mmo out there, people can't say "hey that looks crap" or else that guy is going to be sodomize... -_-

     

    i saw pre-alphas of halo 3 and the actual game graphics and they hardly improve... even if the war videos are all pre-alpha are they going to add reflection/refraction shaders? maybe some normal maps? shadows and light in buildings or others objects aside of characters and torchs (or is night all day?)?

     

    i'm not saying that to look good it has to have all these stuff (FFXII is good example) but the textures, the "atmosphere" the vegetation, the buildings, etc, when they aren't poor they are repetitive, every single character looks like a barbarian... i can't even tell when is night or day, it all looks the same

  • MoNuMeNMoNuMeN Member Posts: 104


    Originally posted by kebrus
    i was trying to make you realize it without having to tell you... the simple fact that you interpretaded my comment as complaining about fanboys proves you are one, because i wasn't complaining about the fanboys, i am complaining about the over-hype (i even gave halo 3 as comparison) because the game isn't out yet and for all you it's already the best mmo out there, people can't say "hey that looks crap" or else that guy is going to be sodomize... -_-

    i saw pre-alphas of halo 3 and the actual game graphics and they hardly improve... even if the war videos are all pre-alpha are they going to add reflection/refraction shaders? maybe some normal maps? shadows and light in buildings or others objects aside of characters and torchs (or is night all day?)?

    i'm not saying that to look good it has to have all these stuff (FFXII is good example) but the textures, the "atmosphere" the vegetation, the buildings, etc, when they aren't poor they are repetitive, every single character looks like a barbarian... i can't even tell when is night or day, it all looks the same

    Atleast there's some hope for people who know how to discuss. Kudos my friend

  • inistryinistry Member Posts: 14

     

    Originally posted by kebrus


    i was trying to make you realize it without having to tell you... the simple fact that you interpretaded my comment as complaining about fanboys proves you are one, because i wasn't complaining about the fanboys, i am complaining about the over-hype (i even gave halo 3 as comparison) because the game isn't out yet and for all you it's already the best mmo out there, people can't say "hey that looks crap" or else that guy is going to be sodomize... -_-
     
    i saw pre-alphas of halo 3 and the actual game graphics and they hardly improve... even if the war videos are all pre-alpha are they going to add reflection/refraction shaders? maybe some normal maps? shadows and light in buildings or others objects aside of characters and torchs (or is night all day?)?
     
    i'm not saying that to look good it has to have all these stuff (FFXII is good example) but the textures, the "atmosphere" the vegetation, the buildings, etc, when they aren't poor they are repetitive, every single character looks like a barbarian... i can't even tell when is night or day, it all looks the same

     

    Ok i'll take the bait.

    THIS IS NOT HALO 3, and then still, go check the reviews of it, they all give a good score. Thats the same as saying 'Gothic 3 is/was terribly buggy hence Need for speed Carbon is/was buggy to'. They are not related!

    And second, this is an MMO. If Wow has proven one thing is that you don't need super mega ultra graphics to make a good game that sells well. Have fun playing an MMO at 2-3 fps with your reflections and light in buildings. Yes graphics should improve, but what you are saying is not possible if you want a subscribers number higher than 10000.

    And my last point (which proofs you are just trolling/flaming)

    Every single character looks like a barbarian?  ----> Nice looking barbarians pal...

    mythicmktg.fileburst.com/war/us/media/images/screenshots/0607_SSt_03.jpg

    And you can't see the difference between day and night? Are you blind??

    Night

    mythicmktg.fileburst.com/war/us/media/images/screenshots/SST_0807_03.jpg

    Day

    mythicmktg.fileburst.com/war/us/media/screenshots/Screens20070905_16.jpg

     

     

     

  • MoNuMeNMoNuMeN Member Posts: 104

    Now with World of Warcraft released we know that it's not a great game. It's a good game when your about lvl 40 but def not a great one once you hit 70. So by all means, the game's not good. If you compare Wow's candy graphics to this then your kinda off track aswell mate. What EA lack is animation skills, and inovation to make a game look different. They have, to this point only failed in doing a great looking game.

    If we gonna look at a game with insanely nice graphics, we got Eve online for instance. They don't have the 9mil subscribers but then again, your playing on 1 server instead of 70 half full servers. I personally would rather play a game with less subscribers due to the fact that less retards find their way into the game.

    At this point, im deepely disapointed in what they have acheived but they still have another 150 days or so to fix it. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it, I don't deal with flamers so get out of my thread if anyone wanna flame instead of discussing. It's a discussion thread, not a flamefest!

  • inistryinistry Member Posts: 14

     

    Originally posted by MoNuMeN


    Now with World of Warcraft released we know that it's not a great game. It's a good game when your about lvl 40 but def not a great one once you hit 70. So by all means, the game's not good. If you compare Wow's candy graphics to this then your kinda off track aswell mate. What EA lack is animation skills, and inovation to make a game look different. They have, to this point only failed in doing a great looking game.
    If we gonna look at a game with insanely nice graphics, we got Eve online for instance. They don't have the 9mil subscribers but then again, your playing on 1 server instead of 70 half full servers. I personally would rather play a game with less subscribers due to the fact that less retards find their way into the game.
    At this point, im deepely disapointed in what they have acheived but they still have another 150 days or so to fix it. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it, I don't deal with flamers so get out of my thread if anyone wanna flame instead of discussing. It's a discussion thread, not a flamefest!



    First, i'm not comparing it to Wow. I used Wow as an example of a succesfull game without top of the art graphics.

     

    [sarcasm]

    Yeah Wow isn't a good game! That's why it is the most succesfull mmo in the history off mmo's.

    [/sarcasm]

    You are deeply dissapointed in what they have achieved? Maybe you should put your standards a little lower? You do know they only started to work on Warhammer Online since May 2005 right?  They went from 0 to what we have now in less than 2.5 years.

     

     

     

Sign In or Register to comment.