My main beef with beta testers is this and I am just as guilty.
We play to get a heads up; if it is good or if it sucks (I do submit bugs, however). If it is good we want to know where the sweet spots are way before anyone else, or at least tricks of the trade. Some have more nefarious reasons. If it sucks we will scream about it sucking, then others come to the defense of the game, with the usual, it’s in beta.
My main beef with beta testers is this and I am just as guilty. We play to get a heads up; if it is good or if it sucks (I do submit bugs, however). If it is good we want to know where the sweet spots are way before anyone else, or at least tricks of the trade. Some have more nefarious reasons. If it sucks we will scream about it sucking, then others come to the defense of the game, with the usual, it’s in beta.
But really is it necessary?
I think it is...and see no reason to beta test any other way. Unless you work for the devs and are getting paid to debug.....then there is no reason not to "play" the game. As long as you participate in the end outcome...as in relay testing info.
I think of it as the game maker's getting free labor....even if it fun for us too.
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to. Relax....."
There's a difference between beta test and free trial. I'm a firm believer that beta testing should be closed with employees only so that the overly vocal twats can't influence the creators and turn the game into something it was never intenede to be.
If you want to play for free and test the game to see if it meets your "lofty" standards then by all means wait till there is a free trial. Or just find someone who bought it and go over and play it for a bit.
No required quests! And if I decide I want to be an assassin-cartographer-dancer-pastry chef who lives only to stalk and kill interior decorators, then that's who I want to be, even if it takes me four years to max all the skills and everyone else thinks I'm freaking nuts. -Madimorga-
I've beta'd a few games in the past, and it's always funny to read beta forums where people are complaining about finding bugs as though they were sub-paying players who were being personally inconvenienced by them.
In my experience, a lot of people see "beta tester" as "advance free preview" and do very little to contribute to the bug-finding process. Still, if nothing else, they're useful as stress-testers I suppose.
Playing: EVE, Final Fantasy 13, Uncharted 2, Need for Speed: Shift
Yes and the NDA would be like WARs in that you could say you were in the beta just no info. There would also be a no whiny policy. They are there to find bugs, if they whine about something that is broken and act like they are paying $15 its one time warning 2nd time ban.
Hold on Snow Leopard, imma let you finish, but Windows had one of the best operating systems of all time.
If the Powerball lottery was like Lotro, nobody would win for 2 years, and then everyone in Nebraska would win on the same day. And then Nebraska would get nerfed.-pinkwood lotro fourms
AMD 4800 2.4ghz-3GB RAM 533mhz-EVGA 9500GT 512mb-320gb HD
Comments
close or open beta testers?
Also depence on how big the QA team is.
and no NDA since i always break the nda anyways since its so pointless and funny to get those angry fanbois mad
My main beef with beta testers is this and I am just as guilty.
We play to get a heads up; if it is good or if it sucks (I do submit bugs, however). If it is good we want to know where the sweet spots are way before anyone else, or at least tricks of the trade. Some have more nefarious reasons. If it sucks we will scream about it sucking, then others come to the defense of the game, with the usual, it’s in beta.
But really is it necessary?
I think it is...and see no reason to beta test any other way. Unless you work for the devs and are getting paid to debug.....then there is no reason not to "play" the game. As long as you participate in the end outcome...as in relay testing info.
I think of it as the game maker's getting free labor....even if it fun for us too.
"This may hurt a little, but it's something you'll get used to. Relax....."
There's a difference between beta test and free trial. I'm a firm believer that beta testing should be closed with employees only so that the overly vocal twats can't influence the creators and turn the game into something it was never intenede to be.
If you want to play for free and test the game to see if it meets your "lofty" standards then by all means wait till there is a free trial. Or just find someone who bought it and go over and play it for a bit.
No required quests! And if I decide I want to be an assassin-cartographer-dancer-pastry chef who lives only to stalk and kill interior decorators, then that's who I want to be, even if it takes me four years to max all the skills and everyone else thinks I'm freaking nuts. -Madimorga-
I've beta'd a few games in the past, and it's always funny to read beta forums where people are complaining about finding bugs as though they were sub-paying players who were being personally inconvenienced by them.
In my experience, a lot of people see "beta tester" as "advance free preview" and do very little to contribute to the bug-finding process. Still, if nothing else, they're useful as stress-testers I suppose.
Playing: EVE, Final Fantasy 13, Uncharted 2, Need for Speed: Shift
Yes and the NDA would be like WARs in that you could say you were in the beta just no info. There would also be a no whiny policy. They are there to find bugs, if they whine about something that is broken and act like they are paying $15 its one time warning 2nd time ban.
Hold on Snow Leopard, imma let you finish, but Windows had one of the best operating systems of all time.
If the Powerball lottery was like Lotro, nobody would win for 2 years, and then everyone in Nebraska would win on the same day.
And then Nebraska would get nerfed.-pinkwood lotro fourms
AMD 4800 2.4ghz-3GB RAM 533mhz-EVGA 9500GT 512mb-320gb HD