She was "physically abusive" to her mother. That means she assualted her Mom. You don't have the right to lay your hands on another person in an abusive manner. There is no justification for employing violence to solve a domestic problem and those that use violence are deemed criminals and must go to court.
It's up to each individual area's duly elected democratic representatives to determine the maturity level of their children and set an age of consent. They're in a far better position than you to determine what is legal for their area's children or not. If a child feels that they are an adult let that child petition the courts. Let me also estimate that the 14 year old in our case would never of been granted adult status under any circumstance.
Oh, I read the paragraph and understand it completely - you're putting the cart before the horse and I'm trying to explain the error in it, so here I go again - both law and common sense must be applied in a court of law but the rule of law needs to be strictly adhered to by police officers - they are not to determine on their own what is right and wrong, they're only to recognize a law breaker and apprehend that law breaker for the justice system to determine what is just. There is a paradox in your thinking that amuses me.
I'm really getting tired of having to state my argument many times for you to ignore it, so I'm going to pull a Wickersham and just assume that everything you post is a troll and put you on ignore.
I hope for your own sake that they don't outlaw breathing.
I think I've explained my position perfectly and I've responded to each of your points in turn.
I'm sorry that we can't agree but I find your ideas on the justice system to be immature, unbalanced, and reactionary. Don't bother to ask me to explain why because, I don't think that at this point, that there is any point to explaining anything to you - you are unwilling or incapable of understanding the basic concepts of law and law enforcement.
"They" are our duly elected representitives - "they" are our pawns that represent our will. The government belongs to us and not the other way around, but that's just another example of your immature notions...
I hope, for the sake of those around you, that your life goes very well and nothing bad ever happens to you.
"The liberties and resulting economic prosperity that YOU take for granted were granted by those "dead guys"
Comments
She was "physically abusive" to her mother. That means she assualted her Mom. You don't have the right to lay your hands on another person in an abusive manner. There is no justification for employing violence to solve a domestic problem and those that use violence are deemed criminals and must go to court.
It's up to each individual area's duly elected democratic representatives to determine the maturity level of their children and set an age of consent. They're in a far better position than you to determine what is legal for their area's children or not. If a child feels that they are an adult let that child petition the courts. Let me also estimate that the 14 year old in our case would never of been granted adult status under any circumstance.
Oh, I read the paragraph and understand it completely - you're putting the cart before the horse and I'm trying to explain the error in it, so here I go again - both law and common sense must be applied in a court of law but the rule of law needs to be strictly adhered to by police officers - they are not to determine on their own what is right and wrong, they're only to recognize a law breaker and apprehend that law breaker for the justice system to determine what is just. There is a paradox in your thinking that amuses me.
I'm really getting tired of having to state my argument many times for you to ignore it, so I'm going to pull a Wickersham and just assume that everything you post is a troll and put you on ignore.
I hope for your own sake that they don't outlaw breathing.
I think I've explained my position perfectly and I've responded to each of your points in turn.
I'm sorry that we can't agree but I find your ideas on the justice system to be immature, unbalanced, and reactionary. Don't bother to ask me to explain why because, I don't think that at this point, that there is any point to explaining anything to you - you are unwilling or incapable of understanding the basic concepts of law and law enforcement.
"They" are our duly elected representitives - "they" are our pawns that represent our will. The government belongs to us and not the other way around, but that's just another example of your immature notions...
I hope, for the sake of those around you, that your life goes very well and nothing bad ever happens to you.
"The liberties and resulting economic prosperity that YOU take for granted were granted by those "dead guys"