ToR on the other hand. has at this moment close to nothing to show for the things Bioware claimes it to be. In fact the videos that are available, show bad animations, stale gameplay and very limited environnements.
I won't get into GW2 because I think it looks boring as hell and this isn't the place to discuss it. BioWare has shown practically everything they said the game would have. The animations have improved greatly after watching the newer videos, stale gameplay? Explain, you haven't played it, so you can't. And limited environment? You can't prove anything you say. Surprise me. How you ask? Prove something for once. Good luck.
Really, you ask me to prove something yet you offer no proof for your own bold statements either.... :S
You're here telling everybody the animations are crap (which they may be to you so nothing to prove here) and then go on to say the gameplay is stale and the environment is limited? Did I tell you they wasn't? No, I asked you to prove what you was saying, I have nothing to prove because I've claimed nothing other then the animations have improved.
Wow, nice inteneded wrong interpertation of my reply! You stated that Bioware has showed nearly everything which is simply not true, that is where I was refering to. It is weird that you claim that animations might be a subjective topic yet stale gameplay does not. Again I go by what I see. The GAEMPLAY videos I saw showed stale gameplay and small enviionnements. With the environnements I was refering to the Bioware statement that there is a huge open world. The gameplay videos I saw didn't show that. I was not saying anything definite about animations, gameplay and enverionnements of this game. Just that the VIDEOS I SAW showed that. I was not saying that the game was going to be like that. I was only talking about the videos and how they NOT show the things that Bioware is claiming. That is the only thing. There is nothing to prove AS I NEVER EVEN SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THE GAME ITSELF.
I admit I might have not seen the latest videos, as I do not know about any new videos since the ones I saw a few months back. From those videos the gameplay looked very stale and boring. I am aiming at those playthrough videos were you see Jedi's swinging lightsabers at oneanother. I do not eed a full onhand experience to get and idea of the gameplay, that is were gameplay videos are for. In those videos I only saw very small limited enverionnements. None of the big landscapes that Bioware has claimed to be in the game. If you do have a video, I would really like to see it cause that would make me less worried.
I watched about 5 of them and none of these videos disprove anything I said and sadly really didn't convinced me. The screenshots contain a lot of artwork and the video's indeed show some nice enverionnements, but still not really wide or open. I see a lot of small rooms and some open environnements that arn't that big. As you look closely they seem open, but you can actually distinguish some borders that could limit the player. Please note that i say THEY COULD BE BORDERs. The thing here is that we can not know how far we can actually go in these environnements
Really I would like to see you prove the following statement: "BioWare has shown practically everything they said the game would have". uuhm, ye maybe if you mean VO since that what they have been talking about a lot. But Bioware claimed that this will be a full blown MMO and so far I have not seen anything that proves that. And I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game a a SRPG with chatbox elements (not my words).
I must say you're reaction towards me seemed quite hostile. I have no means to bash TOR, I just go by what I see.
I scrolled through this and I have no idea what you want me to look at. Really, most info here I already knew from the MMORPG.com articles of ToR. I see alot of info, yet no hard proof of most of it. That is no big deal. I'm not saying it isn't there or anything. Also I still have to see the proof of your claim that everything Bioware claimed is there. The only way to proof this is through gamemplay videos. That is also where my entire post was about which you completely took out of context by making it a hater vs fanboi battle. I am no hater and I do not think this game suck or is going to fail. My post was a reply to a claim that GW2 was more OVER hyped than ToR, which was a stupid statement as GW2 has a lot more actual gameplay footage to PROOF the hype.
This is the problem with you fanbois, you CHOOSE the things to reply to and ignore the rest and take the things you do reply to out of context for convenience. I have no hate for ToR. I do not completely dislike this game as it isn't even out yet and much can still change. Yet, I am critical of the info and actual gameplay videos released.
ToR on the other hand. has at this moment close to nothing to show for the things Bioware claimes it to be. In fact the videos that are available, show bad animations, stale gameplay and very limited environnements.
I won't get into GW2 because I think it looks boring as hell and this isn't the place to discuss it. BioWare has shown practically everything they said the game would have. The animations have improved greatly after watching the newer videos, stale gameplay? Explain, you haven't played it, so you can't. And limited environment? You can't prove anything you say. Surprise me. How you ask? Prove something for once. Good luck.
Really, you ask me to prove something yet you offer no proof for your own bold statements either.... :S
You're here telling everybody the animations are crap (which they may be to you so nothing to prove here) and then go on to say the gameplay is stale and the environment is limited? Did I tell you they wasn't? No, I asked you to prove what you was saying, I have nothing to prove because I've claimed nothing other then the animations have improved.
Wow, nice inteneded wrong interpertation of my reply! You stated that Bioware has showed nearly everything which is simply not true, that is where I was refering to. It is weird that you claim that animations might be a subjective topic yet stale gameplay does not. Again I go by what I see. The GAEMPLAY videos I saw showed stale gameplay and small enviionnements. With the environnements I was refering to the Bioware statement that there is a huge open world. The gameplay videos I saw didn't show that. I was not saying anything definite about animations, gameplay and enverionnements of this game. Just that the VIDEOS I SAW showed that. I was not saying that the game was going to be like that. I was only talking about the videos and how they NOT show the things that Bioware is claiming. That is the only thing. There is nothing to prove AS I NEVER EVEN SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THE GAME ITSELF.
I admit I might have not seen the latest videos, as I do not know about any new videos since the ones I saw a few months back. From those videos the gameplay looked very stale and boring. I am aiming at those playthrough videos were you see Jedi's swinging lightsabers at oneanother. I do not eed a full onhand experience to get and idea of the gameplay, that is were gameplay videos are for. In those videos I only saw very small limited enverionnements. None of the big landscapes that Bioware has claimed to be in the game. If you do have a video, I would really like to see it cause that would make me less worried.
I watched about 5 of them and none of these videos disprove anything I said and sadly really didn't convinced me. The screenshots contain a lot of artwork and the video's indeed show some nice enverionnements, but still not really wide or open. I see a lot of small rooms and some open environnements that arn't that big. As you look closely they seem open, but you can actually distinguish some borders that could limit the player. Please note that i say THEY COULD BE BORDERs. The thing here is that we can not know how far we can actually go in these environnements
Really I would like to see you prove the following statement: "BioWare has shown practically everything they said the game would have". uuhm, ye maybe if you mean VO since that what they have been talking about a lot. But Bioware claimed that this will be a full blown MMO and so far I have not seen anything that proves that. And I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game a a SRPG with chatbox elements (not my words).
I must say you're reaction towards me seemed quite hostile. I have no means to bash TOR, I just go by what I see.
I scrolled through this and I have no idea what you want me to look at. Really, most info here I already knew from the MMORPG.com articles of ToR. I see alot of info, yet no hard proof of most of it. That is no big deal. I'm not saying it isn't there or anything. Also I still have to see the proof of your claim that everything Bioware claimed is there. The only way to proof this is through gamemplay videos. That is also where my entire post was about which you completely took out of context by making it a hater vs fanboi battle. I am no hater and I do not think this game suck or is going to fail. My post was a reply to a claim that GW2 was more OVER hyped than ToR, which was a stupid statement as GW2 has a lot more actual gameplay footage to PROOF the hype.
This is the problem with you fanbois, you CHOOSE the things to reply to and ignore the rest and take the things you do reply to out of context for convenience. I have no hate for ToR. I do not completely dislike this game as it isn't even out yet and much can still change. Yet, I am critical of the info and actual gameplay videos released.
I'm gonna take you for what you come off as, a moron. Look, you've given me nothing to prove. What has BioWare claimed and not shown or talked about in depth, they haven't talked about Endgame or shown it, what else? I find it ironic that you're GW2 cheering ass (In the wrong forums I'll add) is here talking about fanboism. GG, moron. I have no reason to convince you, I'm offering you information, if you don't like it take your ass back to the GW2 forums. Christ, you can't be this ignorant, can you?...Oh right, mmorpg.com, it's notorious for your type.
Edit: Actually use that brain, learn to research, there are plenty of LEAKED videos that show recent gameplay and map exploration. Or do you need to be spoon fed like the rest?
But Bioware claimed that this will be a full blown MMO and so far I have not seen anything that proves that. And I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game as a SRPG with chatbox elements (not my words).
I must say you're reaction towards me seemed quite hostile. I have no means to bash TOR, I just go by what I see.
Yawn.
You go by what you see and your gut feeling tells you, while others go by the info and footage available and reports from playtesters who played early versions of the game and demo.
Besides, if you want to carry on with delusions that SW:TOR is a SRPG - frankly, that's the one argument that uninformed posters use that I find most hilarious - then you should take it up into the sticky thread that's already there for.
Apparently the mmorpg.com mods got annoyed enough to create a thread specific for that discussion
Cyphers, you should really try to turn of your raging fanboi defense mechanism that is now jumping on people who don't even say anything negative about the game itself. Like it said, their isn't much gameplay proof of most of Bioware's claims that this game is a full blown MMO with features like crafting, exploring, end game etc. Yes they said its there, but they havn't showed us yet. I have actually read about a lot of the demo sessions, and really would like to kno what you want me to find in them as I clearly missed something. Also you clearly misread me as I never claimed it was a SRPG, I merely stated that a lot of people seem to THINK this. Why do people think this? Because they havn't seen anything that proves the oposite that is why. Again I am not saying anythign negative about the game itself, I am posting in the context of the OP. I am just saying that Bioware hasn't shown everything yet, so I will still resereved about this game untill they do. I see the rational possiblity of Bioware not delivering on their claims like mythic did with WaR. That game made me very critical and made me hold back on high expectations for other new games.
This is the problem with you fanbois, you CHOOSE the things to reply to and ignore the rest and take the things you do reply to out of context for convenience. I have no hate for ToR. I do not completely dislike this game as it isn't even out yet and much can still change. Yet, I am critical of the info and actual gameplay videos released.
I'm gonna take you for what you come off as, a moron. Look, you've given me nothing to prove. What has BioWare claimed and not shown or talked about in depth, they haven't talked about Endgame or shown it, what else? I find it ironic that you're GW2 cheering ass (In the wrong forums I'll add) is here talking about fanboism. GG, moron. I have no reason to convince you, I'm offering you information, if you don't like it take your ass back to the GW2 forums. Christ, you can't be this ignorant, can you?...Oh right, mmorpg.com, it's notorious for your type.
Edit: Actually use that brain, learn to research, there are plenty of LEAKED videos that show recent gameplay and map exploration. Or do you need to be spoon fed like the rest?
I wouldn't go that far Kriosis, the problem with impiro is that he looked over the thread, but he didn't bother to track down the links at the bottom to view the information. Anyone with any genuine interest would take 5 minutes to type in something like SWTOR Gameplay into a site we call YouTube, maybe even sort by date and look at the most recent ones. Theres more then enough information out there, but those that want to downplay TOR like to be kept in the dark, and give no quarter on any gameplay features, new, improved, or otherwise. The basic stance is "We are not impressed".
Lets not bother with trying to police these kinds of people. We cannot change their opinion, just point out their misinformation.
But Bioware claimed that this will be a full blown MMO and so far I have not seen anything that proves that. And I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game as a SRPG with chatbox elements (not my words).
I must say you're reaction towards me seemed quite hostile. I have no means to bash TOR, I just go by what I see.
Yawn.
You go by what you see and your gut feeling tells you, while others go by the info and footage available and reports from playtesters who played early versions of the game and demo.
Besides, if you want to carry on with delusions that SW:TOR is a SRPG - frankly, that's the one argument that uninformed posters use that I find most hilarious - then you should take it up into the sticky thread that's already there for.
Apparently the mmorpg.com mods got annoyed enough to create a thread specific for that discussion
Cyphers, you should really try to turn of your raging fanboi defense mechanism that is now jumping on people who don't even say anything negative about the game itself. Like it said, their isn't much gameplay proof of most of Bioware's claims that this game is a full blown MMO with features like crafting, exploring, end game etc. Yes they said its there, but they havn't showed us yet. I have actually read about a lot of the demo sessions, and really would like to kno what you want me to find in them as I clearly missed something. Also you clearly misread me as I never claimed it was a SRPG, I merely stated that a lot of people seem to THINK this. Why do people think this? Because they havn't seen anything that proves the oposite that is why. Again I am not saying anythign negative about the game itself, I am posting in the context of the OP. I am just saying that Bioware hasn't shown everything yet, so I will still resereved about this game untill they do. I see the rational possiblity of Bioware not delivering on their claims like mythic did with WaR. That game made me very critical and made me hold back on high expectations for other new games.
GW2 hasn't shown crafting, exploring or end game either. Should we be asking for proof?
SWTOR has shown players playing together and grouping from level 2 onward in the newest videos, showing everyone in the open world. We've also seen maps of the entire world, and have had first hand accounts of how long it took to travel from one end of the map to the other on the smallest worlds, which still took roughly an hour.
No game will show us "everything" until we play it on release. There will always be something we will not see until we play it, and in the case of TOR even after playing it there will be plenty of content we may never get to see due to our choices and play style.
I see this possibilty being much less similar as everything BioWare claims they have released as far as information, is on items that are already in the current build of the game. Anet says the same thing with their game. If we call one a liar, why should we believe any of them?
This is the problem with you fanbois, you CHOOSE the things to reply to and ignore the rest and take the things you do reply to out of context for convenience. I have no hate for ToR. I do not completely dislike this game as it isn't even out yet and much can still change. Yet, I am critical of the info and actual gameplay videos released.
I'm gonna take you for what you come off as, a moron. Look, you've given me nothing to prove. What has BioWare claimed and not shown or talked about in depth, they haven't talked about Endgame or shown it, what else? I find it ironic that you're GW2 cheering ass (In the wrong forums I'll add) is here talking about fanboism. GG, moron. I have no reason to convince you, I'm offering you information, if you don't like it take your ass back to the GW2 forums. Christ, you can't be this ignorant, can you?...Oh right, mmorpg.com, it's notorious for your type.
Edit: Actually use that brain, learn to research, there are plenty of LEAKED videos that show recent gameplay and map exploration. Or do you need to be spoon fed like the rest?
I wouldn't go that far Kriosis, the problem with impiro is that he looked over the thread, but he didn't bother to track down the links at the bottom to view the information. Anyone with any genuine interest would take 5 minutes to type in something like SWTOR Gameplay into a site we call YouTube, maybe even sort by date and look at the most recent ones. Theres more then enough information out there, but those that want to downplay TOR like to be kept in the dark, and give no quarter on any gameplay features, new, improved, or otherwise. The basic stance is "We are not impressed".
Lets not bother with trying to police these kinds of people. We cannot change their opinion, just point out there misinformation.
Ignorance is bliss. It's a quality for them, stay ignorant and you can never be wrong because you will never know if you're right.
I hate resorting to insults, but damn, I'm gonna start using this fancy little ignore list.
ToR on the other hand. has at this moment close to nothing to show for the things Bioware claimes it to be. In fact the videos that are available, show bad animations, stale gameplay and very limited environnements.
I won't get into GW2 because I think it looks boring as hell and this isn't the place to discuss it. BioWare has shown practically everything they said the game would have. The animations have improved greatly after watching the newer videos, stale gameplay? Explain, you haven't played it, so you can't. And limited environment? You can't prove anything you say. Surprise me. How you ask? Prove something for once. Good luck.
Really, you ask me to prove something yet you offer no proof for your own bold statements either.... :S
You're here telling everybody the animations are crap (which they may be to you so nothing to prove here) and then go on to say the gameplay is stale and the environment is limited? Did I tell you they wasn't? No, I asked you to prove what you was saying, I have nothing to prove because I've claimed nothing other then the animations have improved.
Wow, nice inteneded wrong interpertation of my reply! You stated that Bioware has showed nearly everything which is simply not true, that is where I was refering to. It is weird that you claim that animations might be a subjective topic yet stale gameplay does not. Again I go by what I see. The GAEMPLAY videos I saw showed stale gameplay and small enviionnements. With the environnements I was refering to the Bioware statement that there is a huge open world. The gameplay videos I saw didn't show that. I was not saying anything definite about animations, gameplay and enverionnements of this game. Just that the VIDEOS I SAW showed that. I was not saying that the game was going to be like that. I was only talking about the videos and how they NOT show the things that Bioware is claiming. That is the only thing. There is nothing to prove AS I NEVER EVEN SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THE GAME ITSELF.
I admit I might have not seen the latest videos, as I do not know about any new videos since the ones I saw a few months back. From those videos the gameplay looked very stale and boring. I am aiming at those playthrough videos were you see Jedi's swinging lightsabers at oneanother. I do not eed a full onhand experience to get and idea of the gameplay, that is were gameplay videos are for. In those videos I only saw very small limited enverionnements. None of the big landscapes that Bioware has claimed to be in the game. If you do have a video, I would really like to see it cause that would make me less worried.
I watched about 5 of them and none of these videos disprove anything I said and sadly really didn't convinced me. The screenshots contain a lot of artwork and the video's indeed show some nice enverionnements, but still not really wide or open. I see a lot of small rooms and some open environnements that arn't that big. As you look closely they seem open, but you can actually distinguish some borders that could limit the player. Please note that i say THEY COULD BE BORDERs. The thing here is that we can not know how far we can actually go in these environnements
Really I would like to see you prove the following statement: "BioWare has shown practically everything they said the game would have". uuhm, ye maybe if you mean VO since that what they have been talking about a lot. But Bioware claimed that this will be a full blown MMO and so far I have not seen anything that proves that. And I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game a a SRPG with chatbox elements (not my words).
I must say you're reaction towards me seemed quite hostile. I have no means to bash TOR, I just go by what I see.
I scrolled through this and I have no idea what you want me to look at. Really, most info here I already knew from the MMORPG.com articles of ToR. I see alot of info, yet no hard proof of most of it. That is no big deal. I'm not saying it isn't there or anything. Also I still have to see the proof of your claim that everything Bioware claimed is there. The only way to proof this is through gamemplay videos. That is also where my entire post was about which you completely took out of context by making it a hater vs fanboi battle. I am no hater and I do not think this game suck or is going to fail. My post was a reply to a claim that GW2 was more OVER hyped than ToR, which was a stupid statement as GW2 has a lot more actual gameplay footage to PROOF the hype.
This is the problem with you fanbois, you CHOOSE the things to reply to and ignore the rest and take the things you do reply to out of context for convenience. I have no hate for ToR. I do not completely dislike this game as it isn't even out yet and much can still change. Yet, I am critical of the info and actual gameplay videos released.
I'm gonna take you for what you come off as, a moron. Look, you've given me nothing to prove. What has BioWare claimed and not shown or talked about in depth, they haven't talked about Endgame or shown it, what else?
Huh? I do not get it as you are clearly to filled up with anger to explain yourself. Let me explain myself a little better at least. People worried about the MMO aspects of ToR and BIoware replied to them that they didnt have to worry as ToR was going to have all features a normal MMO would have. So ye that is was I'm talking about kind of.
I find it ironic that you're GW2 cheering ass (In the wrong forums I'll add) is here talking about fanboism. GG, moron. I have no reason to convince you, I'm offering you information, if you don't like it take your ass back to the GW2 forums. Christ, you can't be this ignorant, can you?...Oh right, mmorpg.com, it's notorious for your type.
Really what has me liking GW2 has to do with anything. Where does if even come up in the convo?
Edit: Actually use that brain, learn to research, there are plenty of LEAKED videos that show recent gameplay and map exploration. Or do you need to be spoon fed like the rest?
Thanks for being offensive for no reason again :O. Also no sorry I didn't know about any leaked videos, should I have? I'm really sorry I missed that, I'm an idiot who likes things spoon fed.
Thank you for proving my point, as it is clear you missed it entirely. Maybe you should reread our entire conversation again and see what it was REALLY about. I do not see what my GW2 cheering ass has to do with any of it at all. I have only said that GW2 has hype because it has a lot of gameplay videos showing the game's main features and ToR hasn't. You are very angry with me clearly and you can't seem to give a good response to my response, while I replied to all the things you said to me in detail.
I'm gonna take you for what you come off as, a moron. Look, you've given me nothing to prove. What has BioWare claimed and not shown or talked about in depth, they haven't talked about Endgame or shown it, what else?
Huh? I do not get it as you are clearly to filled up with anger to explain yourself. Let me explain myself a little better at least. People worried about the MMO aspects of ToR and BIoware replied to them that they didnt have to worry as ToR was going to have all features a normal MMO would have. So ye that is was I'm talking about kind of.
I find it ironic that you're GW2 cheering ass (In the wrong forums I'll add) is here talking about fanboism. GG, moron. I have no reason to convince you, I'm offering you information, if you don't like it take your ass back to the GW2 forums. Christ, you can't be this ignorant, can you?...Oh right, mmorpg.com, it's notorious for your type.
Really what has me liking GW2 has to do with anything. Where does if even come up in the convo?
Edit: Actually use that brain, learn to research, there are plenty of LEAKED videos that show recent gameplay and map exploration. Or do you need to be spoon fed like the rest?
Thanks for being offensive for no reason again :O. Also no sorry I didn't know about any leaked videos, should I have? I'm really sorry I missed that, I'm an idiot who likes things spoon fed.
Thank you for proving my point, as it is clear you missed it entirely. Maybe you should reread our entire conversation again and see what it was REALLY about. I do not see what my GW2 cheering ass has to do with any of it at all. I have only said that GW2 has hype because it has a lot of gameplay videos showing the game's main features and ToR hasn't. You are very angry with me clearly and you can't seem to give a good response to my response, while I replied to all the things you said to me in detail.
I feel like I'm being trolled, almost like you're deliberately trying to piss me off.
Next Nobel prize can be won with a device that transforms MMO fanboy rage into a green energy Yesterday some even dreamt that the blogger would be crucified in court and prisoned. At the current moment we do not know how the game will be and some trailers or 15 minute demo plays don't clarify things either. Those who played AoC remember how well Tortage ie first 20 levels were made? I personally would like if SW:TOR succeed even if I won't play the game but this I really believe that fanboys are the plague of MMOs.
Post of the week! Could not agree more...
I wonder a bit if the fanboism is directly related to the Folks who are just now entering the MMO world, or at very least are still on their first MMO...Cause there is history here...There is reason to be wary...Be excited, but understand the hype has epically failed in the past...So never trust 100% in any Company...Hope is good...Blind faith is just...well...blind...
It is good to know that there a few sane people left on these forums. Really, I have no hate for this game, I do not like what I have seen so far, but no game is for everyone. However I'm really surprised by all these raging fanbois who do not want to listen to any reason at all. It is like they were never there with the whole WAR fiasco:
It was the developer of the awesome and much praised game DAoC,
They promised the most awesome things for WAR,
They never showed any gameplay regarding those promises,
They never delivered on any of those promises.
I'm not saying ToR will fail, I just do not have blind faith anymore since my experience with the above. I would have thought that with the WAR fiasco people would be a little more reserved with their expectations, but these fanbois seem to be different people than the WAR fanbois and are completely clueless. That means that there must be milions more of them Where are they coming from?
And how are you not a GW2 fanboi with the praise you have given that game.
It still amazes me how people still think somehow that Bioware has done or is doing something underhanded and not being forthcoming with TOR.
They have done exactly what they said they were gonna do from the beginning. They have showed and went into detail about the game that they felt was 100% gonna be in the game and was at a level of polish that meets their standards.
Of course the people that are sorely disappionted that TOR is not SWG2 have jumped on this whacked out disgruntled blogger that seems to be nothing more than a piss ant that has a axe to grind with Mythic. He even mentioned that he had no inside knowledge of TOR and it is plain to see that he only mentioned it because Mythic merged with Bioware.
That being said, why wouldn't Bioware be proud of the VO and story that will be in the game. It is something that has never been done to this extent before in any mmorpg. Adding that plus all the other systems that every other AAA mmo has will make this game stand out from the rest, and from what people have said who have played it, the game is fun even without being able to hear a single sound.
I just can't figure it out. Why do people here get so bent out of shape over an online video game. Some people like WoW, some people do not like it. Some people like Eve , some people do not like it.
Say what you do or do not like about a game and just move on. I could name some things I don't like about TOR , and some things I do like about it, and at the end of the day I am still going to play that game, regardless of what somebody else thinks.
I have some questions I would like to ask about gw2. Looks like a good game, seems like something I might like to play, but still I want to play the beta and get a feel for this game. I will probably be buying it aswell.
If you don't like the way TOR looks that is your opinion. Just say what you have and move on, no sense in arguing with people , because the funny thing is , we all like diferent things.
Cyphers, you should really try to turn of your raging fanboi defense mechanism that is now jumping on people who don't even say anything negative about the game itself.
Heh, pal, I could try to refute the flaws in your arguments but I wouldn't know where to start. Well, gonna give it a try anyway but keeping it short. Oh, nice start btw, namecalling me 'fanboi', very often a sign of weakness in someone's argumentation
Like it said, their isn't much gameplay proof of most of Bioware's claims that this game is a full blown MMO with features like crafting, exploring, end game etc. Yes they said its there, but they havn't showed us yet. I have actually read about a lot of the demo sessions, and really would like to kno what you want me to find in them as I clearly missed something.
It's there, the information, the footage, the reports. It's insanity to believe SW:TOR will just be a SRPG and not a fullblown MMO, but let's do this differently: you state what a fullblown MMO has, and we'll take it from there, we'll get back to this post in beta near launch and then we'll see how your list compares and how right or wrong you were.
Also you clearly misread me as I never claimed it was a SRPG, I merely stated that a lot of people seem to THINK this.
Really? "I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game as a SRPG with chatbox" as you said sounds pretty much like that you believe this to be the case too.
(snips the uninteresting part)
That game made me very critical and made me hold back on high expectations for other new games.
Yeah, you were another one of those that had high expectations and was thoroughly disappointed with a former game, leading now to the opposite reaction, namely distrusting anything that's being said and shown that sounds too positive.
Good for you. I mean it, you should be extra wary and hold your expectations if you know of yourself that you're easily swayed or misled by hype.
Anyway, that's it for me: you'll believe whatever you like to believe in taking your past into account and I'll believe what I like to believe in taking my own experiences and research into account, and we'll see how things will be for real closer to launch and past it. Live and let live, agree to disagree and all that stuff.
The ease with which predictions are made on these forums: Fratman: "I'm saying Spring 2012 at the earliest [for TOR release]. Anyone still clinging to 2011 is deluding themself at this point."
But Bioware claimed that this will be a full blown MMO and so far I have not seen anything that proves that. And I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game as a SRPG with chatbox elements (not my words).
I must say you're reaction towards me seemed quite hostile. I have no means to bash TOR, I just go by what I see.
Yawn.
You go by what you see and your gut feeling tells you, while others go by the info and footage available and reports from playtesters who played early versions of the game and demo.
Besides, if you want to carry on with delusions that SW:TOR is a SRPG - frankly, that's the one argument that uninformed posters use that I find most hilarious - then you should take it up into the sticky thread that's already there for.
Apparently the mmorpg.com mods got annoyed enough to create a thread specific for that discussion
Cyphers, you should really try to turn of your raging fanboi defense mechanism that is now jumping on people who don't even say anything negative about the game itself. Like it said, their isn't much gameplay proof of most of Bioware's claims that this game is a full blown MMO with features like crafting, exploring, end game etc. Yes they said its there, but they havn't showed us yet. I have actually read about a lot of the demo sessions, and really would like to kno what you want me to find in them as I clearly missed something. Also you clearly misread me as I never claimed it was a SRPG, I merely stated that a lot of people seem to THINK this. Why do people think this? Because they havn't seen anything that proves the oposite that is why. Again I am not saying anythign negative about the game itself, I am posting in the context of the OP. I am just saying that Bioware hasn't shown everything yet, so I will still resereved about this game untill they do. I see the rational possiblity of Bioware not delivering on their claims like mythic did with WaR. That game made me very critical and made me hold back on high expectations for other new games.
GW2 hasn't shown crafting, exploring or end game either. Should we be asking for proof?
SWTOR has shown players playing together and grouping from level 2 onward in the newest videos, showing everyone in the open world. We've also seen maps of the entire world, and have had first hand accounts of how long it took to travel from one end of the map to the other on the smallest worlds, which still took roughly an hour.
I did not see that. But how is this a reaction to what I said exactly?
No game will show us "everything" until we play it on release. There will always be something we will not see until we play it, and in the case of TOR even after playing it there will be plenty of content we may never get to see due to our choices and play style.
I see this possibilty being much less similar as everything BioWare claims they have released as far as information, is on items that are already in the current build of the game. Anet says the same thing with their game. If we call one a liar, why should we believe any of them?
I like the colors you used....but really you don;t need to defend ToR as I am not attacking it. If anything I would be attacking Bioware for not giving the info. GW2 has in fact shown the claims Anet made. ToR hasn't done that for Bioware imo. Crafting etc was just an example. fact remains that Bioware claimed it was a full mmo and I am only talking about the posibillity that Bioware can not deliver on these promises. If you took the time to read in on the OP, the blog claimed that Bioware had nothing to show for except VO. I am keeping this possibility in mind as it sorta happened with WAR and mythic. What is wrong with me doing so? Like I said I not understand the responses I am getting as they are out of context and seem focussed on proving me wrong on the judgements I have for this game, while in reality I am not even talking about what I think about this game.
But Bioware claimed that this will be a full blown MMO and so far I have not seen anything that proves that. And I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game as a SRPG with chatbox elements (not my words).
I must say you're reaction towards me seemed quite hostile. I have no means to bash TOR, I just go by what I see.
Yawn.
You go by what you see and your gut feeling tells you, while others go by the info and footage available and reports from playtesters who played early versions of the game and demo.
Besides, if you want to carry on with delusions that SW:TOR is a SRPG - frankly, that's the one argument that uninformed posters use that I find most hilarious - then you should take it up into the sticky thread that's already there for.
Apparently the mmorpg.com mods got annoyed enough to create a thread specific for that discussion
Cyphers, you should really try to turn of your raging fanboi defense mechanism that is now jumping on people who don't even say anything negative about the game itself. Like it said, their isn't much gameplay proof of most of Bioware's claims that this game is a full blown MMO with features like crafting, exploring, end game etc. Yes they said its there, but they havn't showed us yet. I have actually read about a lot of the demo sessions, and really would like to kno what you want me to find in them as I clearly missed something. Also you clearly misread me as I never claimed it was a SRPG, I merely stated that a lot of people seem to THINK this. Why do people think this? Because they havn't seen anything that proves the oposite that is why. Again I am not saying anythign negative about the game itself, I am posting in the context of the OP. I am just saying that Bioware hasn't shown everything yet, so I will still resereved about this game untill they do. I see the rational possiblity of Bioware not delivering on their claims like mythic did with WaR. That game made me very critical and made me hold back on high expectations for other new games.
GW2 hasn't shown crafting, exploring or end game either. Should we be asking for proof?
SWTOR has shown players playing together and grouping from level 2 onward in the newest videos, showing everyone in the open world. We've also seen maps of the entire world, and have had first hand accounts of how long it took to travel from one end of the map to the other on the smallest worlds, which still took roughly an hour.
I did not see that. But how is this a reaction to what I said exactly?
No game will show us "everything" until we play it on release. There will always be something we will not see until we play it, and in the case of TOR even after playing it there will be plenty of content we may never get to see due to our choices and play style.
I see this possibilty being much less similar as everything BioWare claims they have released as far as information, is on items that are already in the current build of the game. Anet says the same thing with their game. If we call one a liar, why should we believe any of them?
I like the colors you used....but really you don;t need to defend ToR as I am not attacking it. If anything I would be attacking Bioware for not giving the info. GW2 has in fact shown the claims Anet made. ToR hasn't done that for Bioware imo. Crafting etc was just an example. fact remains that Bioware claimed it was a full mmo and I am only talking about the posibillity that Bioware can not deliver on these promises. If you took the time to read in on the OP, the blog claimed that Bioware had nothing to show for except VO. I am keeping this possibility in mind as it sorta happened with WAR and mythic. What is wrong with me doing so? Like I said I not understand the responses I am getting as they are out of context and seem focussed on proving me wrong on the judgements I have for this game, while in reality I am not even talking about what I think about this game.
I think you misunderstand me, I'm not defending TOR, I'm posting corrections on your views. You said BioWare hasn't shown Crafting, End Game, or Exploring, but you still go on to say Arenanet has shown what they claim - yet we haven't seen these things from Anet and GW2 yet. This must have been a faux pas on your end, as you must be mistaken to hold one accountable and the other one not. Correct? This isn't an opinion, these are facts on what has or has not been shown.
BioWare claims the game is a full MMO, yet the only things they've shown are - full grouping, an open world with players running around inside it, PvP, multiple facets of multiplayer gameplay, and large explorable worlds. The original Blog knows very little about what is actually happening on BioWares end. The "employee" didn't work for BioWare, didn't play the game, and obviously doesn't pay attention to the information because if I were to tell you from my standpoint on what BioWare puts MOST of their emphasis on ... its STORY... NOT Voiceovers.
Most people aren't trying to change your opinions, but they are voicing theirs. I am doing neither, not voicing my opinion or trying to change yours. I am letting you know that what you are choosing to take an opinion on and what is actually factually being shown are two different things. We HAVE seen multiplayer gameplay. We HAVE seen the open worlds with multiple players running around. We have NOT seen crafting, we have NOT seen extensive exploring, and we have NOT seen much on End Game. This isn't just for TOR... we haven't seen it for GW2, or RIFT, or TSW.
What we do see are many hypocrites that take double standards. If you don't like the game, don't like the game, but don't try and discredit what has already been shown by saying it hasn't been shown.
Cyphers, you should really try to turn of your raging fanboi defense mechanism that is now jumping on people who don't even say anything negative about the game itself.
Heh, pal, I could try to refute the flaws in your arguments but I wouldn't know where to start. Well, gonna give it a try anyway but keeping it short. Oh, nice start btw, namecalling me 'fanboi', very often a sign of weakness in someone's argumentation
1. Please do so.
2 Sorry, but I must admit I do nto post often but do read a lot of the forums. You always jump on anyone being critical and go in full defense mode and most of the time it is totally unnecessary.....
Like it said, their isn't much gameplay proof of most of Bioware's claims that this game is a full blown MMO with features like crafting, exploring, end game etc. Yes they said its there, but they havn't showed us yet. I have actually read about a lot of the demo sessions, and really would like to kno what you want me to find in them as I clearly missed something.
It's there, the information, the footage, the reports. It's insanity to believe SW:TOR will just be a SRPG and not a fullblown MMO, but let's do this differently: you state what a fullblown MMO has, and we'll take it from there, we'll get back to this post in beta near launch and then we'll see how your list compares and how right or wrong you were.
INFORMATION is not proof, BIoware has given us information, yet I havn't seen it INGAME. Good that will be great as I already said I am not saying anything about the game. I am merely speaking about the way Bioware has PROVEN what is in the game and what is not. I am not wrong when everything is there, because I never claimed it wasn't, Again you refuse to read up to the context I posted in.
Also you clearly misread me as I never claimed it was a SRPG, I merely stated that a lot of people seem to THINK this.
Really? "I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game as a SRPG with chatbox" as you said sounds pretty much like that you believe this to be the case too.
(snips the uninteresting part)
WOW, again you prove to be someone who takes things out of context. I;m clearly not the only one was refering to the previous sentence.. I do not think this will be a SRPG at all, I do not think anything. I just havn't seen anything yet, that tells me otherwise. That doesn't me it is not there till I see it, it means I do not know till I see it. Clearly I have missed info though. So what? Is this some kind of contest? Or maybe this wasn't a discussion but a debate?
That game made me very critical and made me hold back on high expectations for other new games.
Yeah, you were another one of those that had high expectations and was thoroughly disappointed with a former game, leading now to the opposite reaction, namely distrusting anything that's being said and shown that sounds too positive.
I'm not doubting at all. I'm just saying it is possible that Bioware wont deliver, I never said I expect this to be the case....
Good for you. I mean it, you should be extra wary and hold your expectations if you know of yourself that you're easily swayed or misled by hype.
Anyway, that's it for me: you'll believe whatever you like to believe in taking your past into account and I'll believe what I like to believe in taking my own experiences and research into account, and we'll see how things will be for real closer to launch and past it. Live and let live, agree to disagree and all that stuff.
But Bioware claimed that this will be a full blown MMO and so far I have not seen anything that proves that. And I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game as a SRPG with chatbox elements (not my words).
I must say you're reaction towards me seemed quite hostile. I have no means to bash TOR, I just go by what I see.
Yawn.
You go by what you see and your gut feeling tells you, while others go by the info and footage available and reports from playtesters who played early versions of the game and demo.
Besides, if you want to carry on with delusions that SW:TOR is a SRPG - frankly, that's the one argument that uninformed posters use that I find most hilarious - then you should take it up into the sticky thread that's already there for.
Apparently the mmorpg.com mods got annoyed enough to create a thread specific for that discussion
Cyphers, you should really try to turn of your raging fanboi defense mechanism that is now jumping on people who don't even say anything negative about the game itself. Like it said, their isn't much gameplay proof of most of Bioware's claims that this game is a full blown MMO with features like crafting, exploring, end game etc. Yes they said its there, but they havn't showed us yet. I have actually read about a lot of the demo sessions, and really would like to kno what you want me to find in them as I clearly missed something. Also you clearly misread me as I never claimed it was a SRPG, I merely stated that a lot of people seem to THINK this. Why do people think this? Because they havn't seen anything that proves the oposite that is why. Again I am not saying anythign negative about the game itself, I am posting in the context of the OP. I am just saying that Bioware hasn't shown everything yet, so I will still resereved about this game untill they do. I see the rational possiblity of Bioware not delivering on their claims like mythic did with WaR. That game made me very critical and made me hold back on high expectations for other new games.
GW2 hasn't shown crafting, exploring or end game either. Should we be asking for proof?
SWTOR has shown players playing together and grouping from level 2 onward in the newest videos, showing everyone in the open world. We've also seen maps of the entire world, and have had first hand accounts of how long it took to travel from one end of the map to the other on the smallest worlds, which still took roughly an hour.
I did not see that. But how is this a reaction to what I said exactly?
No game will show us "everything" until we play it on release. There will always be something we will not see until we play it, and in the case of TOR even after playing it there will be plenty of content we may never get to see due to our choices and play style.
I see this possibilty being much less similar as everything BioWare claims they have released as far as information, is on items that are already in the current build of the game. Anet says the same thing with their game. If we call one a liar, why should we believe any of them?
I like the colors you used....but really you don;t need to defend ToR as I am not attacking it. If anything I would be attacking Bioware for not giving the info. GW2 has in fact shown the claims Anet made. ToR hasn't done that for Bioware imo. Crafting etc was just an example. fact remains that Bioware claimed it was a full mmo and I am only talking about the posibillity that Bioware can not deliver on these promises. If you took the time to read in on the OP, the blog claimed that Bioware had nothing to show for except VO. I am keeping this possibility in mind as it sorta happened with WAR and mythic. What is wrong with me doing so? Like I said I not understand the responses I am getting as they are out of context and seem focussed on proving me wrong on the judgements I have for this game, while in reality I am not even talking about what I think about this game.
The blogger already mentioned that he knew nothing that was going on with TOR and it was an opinion.
I can see right through you and your trolling attempts. Any person that is even a little interested in TOR can find all the info that is needed to make somewhat of a choice to want to play the game or not.
Even though Bioware has been tight lipped on the full details about crafting and end game content, they have shown much more gamplay than Anet has so far.
It's kinda funny that Anet can get asked the same questions that people ask Bioware and they get a pass when the answer is, we can't talk about that yet, while Bioware gets nothing but hate while doing the same.
GW2 looks ok, but there is no detailed info on crafting pvp or end game content. How does that differ from what bioware is doing with TOR.
But Bioware claimed that this will be a full blown MMO and so far I have not seen anything that proves that. And I'm clearly not the only one with all the ' wrong' ideas people have of this game as a SRPG with chatbox elements (not my words).
I must say you're reaction towards me seemed quite hostile. I have no means to bash TOR, I just go by what I see.
Yawn.
You go by what you see and your gut feeling tells you, while others go by the info and footage available and reports from playtesters who played early versions of the game and demo.
Besides, if you want to carry on with delusions that SW:TOR is a SRPG - frankly, that's the one argument that uninformed posters use that I find most hilarious - then you should take it up into the sticky thread that's already there for.
Apparently the mmorpg.com mods got annoyed enough to create a thread specific for that discussion
Cyphers, you should really try to turn of your raging fanboi defense mechanism that is now jumping on people who don't even say anything negative about the game itself. Like it said, their isn't much gameplay proof of most of Bioware's claims that this game is a full blown MMO with features like crafting, exploring, end game etc. Yes they said its there, but they havn't showed us yet. I have actually read about a lot of the demo sessions, and really would like to kno what you want me to find in them as I clearly missed something. Also you clearly misread me as I never claimed it was a SRPG, I merely stated that a lot of people seem to THINK this. Why do people think this? Because they havn't seen anything that proves the oposite that is why. Again I am not saying anythign negative about the game itself, I am posting in the context of the OP. I am just saying that Bioware hasn't shown everything yet, so I will still resereved about this game untill they do. I see the rational possiblity of Bioware not delivering on their claims like mythic did with WaR. That game made me very critical and made me hold back on high expectations for other new games.
GW2 hasn't shown crafting, exploring or end game either. Should we be asking for proof?
SWTOR has shown players playing together and grouping from level 2 onward in the newest videos, showing everyone in the open world. We've also seen maps of the entire world, and have had first hand accounts of how long it took to travel from one end of the map to the other on the smallest worlds, which still took roughly an hour.
I did not see that. But how is this a reaction to what I said exactly?
No game will show us "everything" until we play it on release. There will always be something we will not see until we play it, and in the case of TOR even after playing it there will be plenty of content we may never get to see due to our choices and play style.
I see this possibilty being much less similar as everything BioWare claims they have released as far as information, is on items that are already in the current build of the game. Anet says the same thing with their game. If we call one a liar, why should we believe any of them?
I like the colors you used....but really you don;t need to defend ToR as I am not attacking it. If anything I would be attacking Bioware for not giving the info. GW2 has in fact shown the claims Anet made. ToR hasn't done that for Bioware imo. Crafting etc was just an example. fact remains that Bioware claimed it was a full mmo and I am only talking about the posibillity that Bioware can not deliver on these promises. If you took the time to read in on the OP, the blog claimed that Bioware had nothing to show for except VO. I am keeping this possibility in mind as it sorta happened with WAR and mythic. What is wrong with me doing so? Like I said I not understand the responses I am getting as they are out of context and seem focussed on proving me wrong on the judgements I have for this game, while in reality I am not even talking about what I think about this game.
I think you misunderstand me, I'm not defending TOR, I'm posting corrections on your views. You said BioWare hasn't shown Crafting, End Game, or Exploring, but you still go on to say Arenanet has shown what they claim - yet we haven't seen these things from Anet and GW2 yet. This must have been a faux pas on your end, as you must be mistaken to hold one accountable and the other one not. Correct? This isn't an opinion, these are facts on what has or has not been shown.
No you got me all wrong. I am talking about hype in my first post please read up. ToR and GW2 are hyped for different features.... ToR has also received a lot of hate for coming of as a SRPG. Therefor the claim by Bioware that this isn't the case. The whole specifics of crafting etc is not important here, what is important is that people are worried that ToR wont have the MMO features. Anet has shown the features they promised, they havn't talked much about crafting etc. So Bioware made a claim about having features and havn't shown for it yet. Anet never even made the same claim, so it isn't weird that they havn't shown those things.
BioWare claims the game is a full MMO, yet the only things they've shown are - full grouping, an open world with players running around inside it, PvP, multiple facets of multiplayer gameplay, and large explorable worlds. The original Blog knows very little about what is actually happening on BioWares end. The "employee" didn't work for BioWare, didn't play the game, and obviously doesn't pay attention to the information because if I were to tell you from my standpoint on what BioWare puts MOST of their emphasis on ... its STORY... NOT Voiceovers.
I am sorry I missed this info. I honestly am. I actually run by previews given by gamewebsites. I really havn't seen any ingame features you just discribed. So yes in this case, Bioware has shown it. Can you give me a link where I might find this? I am kind of surprised I missed all this.
Most people aren't trying to change your opinions, but they are voicing theirs. I am doing neither, not voicing my opinion or trying to change yours. I am letting you know that what you are choosing to take an opinion on and what is actually factually being shown are two different things. We HAVE seen multiplayer gameplay. We HAVE seen the open worlds with multiple players running around. We have NOT seen crafting, we have NOT seen extensive exploring, and we have NOT seen much on End Game. This isn't just for TOR... we haven't seen it for GW2, or RIFT, or TSW.
The point is that we are talking about the possibility that ToR might end up being incomplete. I have never said what I THINK (aka opinion) about it. I have only stated that it is possible. Also I did not knwo these videos were thesre showing the features you described, so now indeed the chance of Tor being incomplete is less big. The biggest issue here is that I do not have an opinion really. I am just saying that Bioware still hasn't proved anything yet. That doesn't mean that I think that therefore the features might not be there. Im just saying that is possible that the might not be there. However, it seems I indeed am not informed enough so ye I guess that makes my point invalid about Gw2 being hyper is more legit than ToR.
However, the way Cyphers and the other guy approached me was completely out of context....
What we do see are many hypocrites that take double standards. If you don't like the game, don't like the game, but don't try and discredit what has already been shown by saying it hasn't been shown.
Sorry but here you go wrong. I never said I dislike the game. All I did was this:
I said that in a response to someone stating that GW2 was way more OVER hyped than TOR:
GW2 has at least somethign to show for it, while ToR does not. I was wrong clearly, but where do i voice my opinion about the game? I really didn;t knwo there was more footage. Also, I did say that the videos I saw had bad animation, stale combat and limited evironnements. That is no opinion about an enitre game, but about a video showing the game. Also, that opinion about those specific videos are still correct as these videos still excist. The fact is that there are more videos that might contain info that changes my opinion about the earlier vids and might prove me wrong by saying that Anet showed us more than Bioware.
The blogger already mentioned that he knew nothing that was going on with TOR and it was an opinion.
I can see right through you and your trolling attempts. Any person that is even a little interested in TOR can find all the info that is needed to make somewhat of a choice to want to play the game or not.
Ye clearly I am trolling. I am not the one falling in hostile behavior and try to motivate my thoughts as clearly as possible. I really didn't know about any leaked videos etc. I am so sorry. And no I am indeed not that interested in ToR since the first videos released. That does not mean I cant talk about it. Especially as this OP blog isn't even that much about ToR but more about BIoware, Ea and Mythic. I was merely talking about HYPE and the possibility that ToR would be incomplete at launch like WAR was. I wasn't a big deal AT ALL. But people here get really angry when you say anything that could be negative, while in fact I never made any definite judgements or claims about the game itself. Read up, you will see.
Even though Bioware has been tight lipped on the full details about crafting and end game content, they have shown much more gamplay than Anet has so far.
It's kinda funny that Anet can get asked the same questions that people ask Bioware and they get a pass when the answer is, we can't talk about that yet, while Bioware gets nothing but hate while doing the same.
Not what I am talking about. It is about the fact that people were worried that ToR wasn't a MMO and Bioware claiming it was. Anet never claimed any of those things so it is not the same thing at all. Also I am not saying that the game will not have the features. Again I was talking about something entirely different in my first post that was taken out of context entirely.
GW2 looks ok, but there is no detailed info on crafting pvp or end game content. How does that differ from what bioware is doing with TOR.
I'm gonna take you for what you come off as, a moron. Look, you've given me nothing to prove. What has BioWare claimed and not shown or talked about in depth, they haven't talked about Endgame or shown it, what else?
Huh? I do not get it as you are clearly to filled up with anger to explain yourself. Let me explain myself a little better at least. People worried about the MMO aspects of ToR and BIoware replied to them that they didnt have to worry as ToR was going to have all features a normal MMO would have. So ye that is was I'm talking about kind of.
I find it ironic that you're GW2 cheering ass (In the wrong forums I'll add) is here talking about fanboism. GG, moron. I have no reason to convince you, I'm offering you information, if you don't like it take your ass back to the GW2 forums. Christ, you can't be this ignorant, can you?...Oh right, mmorpg.com, it's notorious for your type.
Really what has me liking GW2 has to do with anything. Where does if even come up in the convo?
Edit: Actually use that brain, learn to research, there are plenty of LEAKED videos that show recent gameplay and map exploration. Or do you need to be spoon fed like the rest?
Thanks for being offensive for no reason again :O. Also no sorry I didn't know about any leaked videos, should I have? I'm really sorry I missed that, I'm an idiot who likes things spoon fed.
Thank you for proving my point, as it is clear you missed it entirely. Maybe you should reread our entire conversation again and see what it was REALLY about. I do not see what my GW2 cheering ass has to do with any of it at all. I have only said that GW2 has hype because it has a lot of gameplay videos showing the game's main features and ToR hasn't. You are very angry with me clearly and you can't seem to give a good response to my response, while I replied to all the things you said to me in detail.
I feel like I'm being trolled, almost like you're deliberately trying to piss me off.
I am sorry? Really look at your'e prvious post, It was very offensive and hostile. I didn't mean to piss you of at all. You still refuse to got to the context of my original post. You only took a little out of the post and then used that to bash me.
This is the problem with you fanbois, you CHOOSE the things to reply to and ignore the rest and take the things you do reply to out of context for convenience. I have no hate for ToR. I do not completely dislike this game as it isn't even out yet and much can still change. Yet, I am critical of the info and actual gameplay videos released.
I'm gonna take you for what you come off as, a moron. Look, you've given me nothing to prove. What has BioWare claimed and not shown or talked about in depth, they haven't talked about Endgame or shown it, what else? I find it ironic that you're GW2 cheering ass (In the wrong forums I'll add) is here talking about fanboism. GG, moron. I have no reason to convince you, I'm offering you information, if you don't like it take your ass back to the GW2 forums. Christ, you can't be this ignorant, can you?...Oh right, mmorpg.com, it's notorious for your type.
Edit: Actually use that brain, learn to research, there are plenty of LEAKED videos that show recent gameplay and map exploration. Or do you need to be spoon fed like the rest?
I wouldn't go that far Kriosis, the problem with impiro is that he looked over the thread, but he didn't bother to track down the links at the bottom to view the information. Anyone with any genuine interest would take 5 minutes to type in something like SWTOR Gameplay into a site we call YouTube, maybe even sort by date and look at the most recent ones. Theres more then enough information out there, but those that want to downplay TOR like to be kept in the dark, and give no quarter on any gameplay features, new, improved, or otherwise. The basic stance is "We are not impressed".
Lets not bother with trying to police these kinds of people. We cannot change their opinion, just point out there misinformation.
Ignorance is bliss. It's a quality for them, stay ignorant and you can never be wrong because you will never know if you're right.
I hate resorting to insults, but damn, I'm gonna start using this fancy little ignore list.
Maskedweasel really that was low especially considering you are aproving of the behavior of Kriosis which is offensive and out of line. Also the things is that still my point isn't really false at all. Again you people asume that when I say that there is no proof of something, that I automaticly think the oposite. I never did that in any of my posts at all. All i was talking about was hype of GW2 and ToR and how I felt that GW2 deserved more hype because it had more actual footage. That doesnt even say I like GW2 better and ToR less. You peopel read what you want and that is what I pointed out to Kriosis......
2 Sorry, but I must admit I do nto post often but do read a lot of the forums. You always jump on anyone being critical and go in full defense mode and most of the time it is totally unnecessary.....
Nope, uninformed gut-feeling comments, or hate campaigns as some disgruntled SWG vets and sandbox lovers hold or overtly biased repetitive criticising just because a game isn't their type, is what can get me annoyed. Sometimes it just makes me roll my eyes or chuckle, but when the annoyance reaches a threshold or when the mood strikes I post.
WOW, again you prove to be someone who takes things out of context. I;m clearly not the only one was refering to the previous sentence.. I do not think this will be a SRPG at all, I do not think anything. I just havn't seen anything yet, that tells me otherwise. That doesn't me it is not there till I see it, it means I do not know till I see it. Clearly I have missed info though. So what? Is this some kind of contest? Or maybe this wasn't a discussion but a debate?
Maybe you read my post wrong: you said you weren't convinced SW:TOR would be a full blown MMORPG, right after that you say "I'm clearly not the only one" and then you use as an example people saying SWTOR is a SRPG with some multiplay elements. The way you worded your comments highly suggest that you consider yourself to "not be the only one" but to be among other people saying that SW:TOR isn't a fullblown MMO and/or is a SRPG. That is what your post led to be concluded. If that is as you say the wrong interpretation, alright, no problem with that. That's what discussions are for, sharing insights and viewpoints and where needed clarifications.
The ease with which predictions are made on these forums: Fratman: "I'm saying Spring 2012 at the earliest [for TOR release]. Anyone still clinging to 2011 is deluding themself at this point."
I feel like I'm being trolled, almost like you're deliberately trying to piss me off.
I am sorry? Really look at your'e prvious post, It was very offensive and hostile. I didn't mean to piss you of at all. You still refuse to got to the context of my original post. You only took a little out of the post and then used that to bash me.
I'm going to display the lack of clarity in your post.
"ToR on the other hand. has at this moment close to nothing to show for the things Bioware claimes it to be."
Next time clarify. Eventually you do.
"Let me explain myself a little better at least. People worried about the MMO aspects of ToR and BIoware replied to them that they didnt have to worry as ToR was going to have all features a normal MMO would have. So ye that is was I'm talking about kind of."
Why do I feel like I'm being trolled? I gave you PLENTY of info to read into, but you've either refused to read it or just ignored most of what was said. Like I said, I'm not trying to convince you, I don't know you and could care less if you play the game.
I think you misunderstand me, I'm not defending TOR, I'm posting corrections on your views. You said BioWare hasn't shown Crafting, End Game, or Exploring, but you still go on to say Arenanet has shown what they claim - yet we haven't seen these things from Anet and GW2 yet. This must have been a faux pas on your end, as you must be mistaken to hold one accountable and the other one not. Correct? This isn't an opinion, these are facts on what has or has not been shown.
No you got me all wrong. I am talking about hype in my first post please read up. ToR and GW2 are hyped for different features.... ToR has also received a lot of hate for coming of as a SRPG. Therefor the claim by Bioware that this isn't the case. The whole specifics of crafting etc is not important here, what is important is that people are worried that ToR wont have the MMO features. Anet has shown the features they promised, they havn't talked much about crafting etc. So Bioware made a claim about having features and havn't shown for it yet. Anet never even made the same claim, so it isn't weird that they havn't shown those things.
BioWare claims the game is a full MMO, yet the only things they've shown are - full grouping, an open world with players running around inside it, PvP, multiple facets of multiplayer gameplay, and large explorable worlds. The original Blog knows very little about what is actually happening on BioWares end. The "employee" didn't work for BioWare, didn't play the game, and obviously doesn't pay attention to the information because if I were to tell you from my standpoint on what BioWare puts MOST of their emphasis on ... its STORY... NOT Voiceovers.
I am sorry I missed this info. I honestly am. I actually run by previews given by gamewebsites. I really havn't seen any ingame features you just discribed. So yes in this case, Bioware has shown it. Can you give me a link where I might find this? I am kind of surprised I missed all this.
Most people aren't trying to change your opinions, but they are voicing theirs. I am doing neither, not voicing my opinion or trying to change yours. I am letting you know that what you are choosing to take an opinion on and what is actually factually being shown are two different things. We HAVE seen multiplayer gameplay. We HAVE seen the open worlds with multiple players running around. We have NOT seen crafting, we have NOT seen extensive exploring, and we have NOT seen much on End Game. This isn't just for TOR... we haven't seen it for GW2, or RIFT, or TSW.
The point is that we are talking about the possibility that ToR might end up being incomplete. I have never said what I THINK (aka opinion) about it. I have only stated that it is possible. Also I did not knwo these videos were thesre showing the features you described, so now indeed the chance of Tor being incomplete is less big. The biggest issue here is that I do not have an opinion really. I am just saying that Bioware still hasn't proved anything yet. That doesn't mean that I think that therefore the features might not be there. Im just saying that is possible that the might not be there. However, it seems I indeed am not informed enough so ye I guess that makes my point invalid about Gw2 being hyper is more legit than ToR.
However, the way Cyphers and the other guy approached me was completely out of context....
What we do see are many hypocrites that take double standards. If you don't like the game, don't like the game, but don't try and discredit what has already been shown by saying it hasn't been shown.
Sorry but here you go wrong. I never said I dislike the game. All I did was this:
I said that in a response to someone stating that GW2 was way more OVER hyped than TOR:
GW2 has at least somethign to show for it, while ToR does not. I was wrong clearly, but where do i voice my opinion about the game? I really didn;t knwo there was more footage. Also, I did say that the videos I saw had bad animation, stale combat and limited evironnements. That is no opinion about an enitre game, but about a video showing the game. Also, that opinion about those specific videos are still correct as these videos still excist. The fact is that there are more videos that might contain info that changes my opinion about the earlier vids and might prove me wrong by saying that Anet showed us more than Bioware.
We all just get very tired of rehashing information over and over again when it comes to TOR. Many people have a specific view on the game, and voicing their opinions isn't necessarily a problem, but some 'opinions' are in direct contrast to what is being seen, and these 'opinions' are often mistaken as fact by others that can not tell the difference.
I usually don't post links that have already been posted elsewhere plenty of times, and as these links can also be found in the large thread Kriosis linked earlier, I really shouldn't as it means more when interested parties look for this information themselves, but I will post a few here.
I think you'll find plenty of nice videos. I didn't want to post too many because I also saw some videos I haven't seen before and I didn't want to post them in fear they may be leaked vids.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. If you don't like the game because of what you've already seen, thats fine, but I think its a travesty to not like a game based on what you haven't seen, or what hasn't been shown yet. Especially when you hold other games to a different standard. I'm not necessarily saying that YOU, Impiro does this, but I'm saying many people do, and although they can do whatever they want to do, I there will always be those that try to correct this kind of thought process. Hence why we have so many clashes on this site.
This is the problem with you fanbois, you CHOOSE the things to reply to and ignore the rest and take the things you do reply to out of context for convenience. I have no hate for ToR. I do not completely dislike this game as it isn't even out yet and much can still change. Yet, I am critical of the info and actual gameplay videos released.
I'm gonna take you for what you come off as, a moron. Look, you've given me nothing to prove. What has BioWare claimed and not shown or talked about in depth, they haven't talked about Endgame or shown it, what else? I find it ironic that you're GW2 cheering ass (In the wrong forums I'll add) is here talking about fanboism. GG, moron. I have no reason to convince you, I'm offering you information, if you don't like it take your ass back to the GW2 forums. Christ, you can't be this ignorant, can you?...Oh right, mmorpg.com, it's notorious for your type.
Edit: Actually use that brain, learn to research, there are plenty of LEAKED videos that show recent gameplay and map exploration. Or do you need to be spoon fed like the rest?
I wouldn't go that far Kriosis, the problem with impiro is that he looked over the thread, but he didn't bother to track down the links at the bottom to view the information. Anyone with any genuine interest would take 5 minutes to type in something like SWTOR Gameplay into a site we call YouTube, maybe even sort by date and look at the most recent ones. Theres more then enough information out there, but those that want to downplay TOR like to be kept in the dark, and give no quarter on any gameplay features, new, improved, or otherwise. The basic stance is "We are not impressed".
Lets not bother with trying to police these kinds of people. We cannot change their opinion, just point out there misinformation.
Ignorance is bliss. It's a quality for them, stay ignorant and you can never be wrong because you will never know if you're right.
I hate resorting to insults, but damn, I'm gonna start using this fancy little ignore list.
Maskedweasel really that was low especially considering you are aproving of the behavior of Kriosis which is offensive and out of line. Also the things is that still my point isn't really false at all. Again you people asume that when I say that there is no proof of something, that I automaticly think the oposite. I never did that in any of my posts at all. All i was talking about was hype of GW2 and ToR and how I felt that GW2 deserved more hype because it had more actual footage. That doesnt even say I like GW2 better and ToR less. You peopel read what you want and that is what I pointed out to Kriosis......
I doubt he agreed with my insulting, he doesn't seem like that type. I think he agreed more with you ignoring information and/or not actually looking into it. You can argue that you're not against or with TOR all you want, fact is you're in the TOR boards and wasn't here until GW2 was mentioned. Btw, you've already admitted to not looking into TOR for months, you couldn't even recall your last look at the game properly.
Comments
This is the problem with you fanbois, you CHOOSE the things to reply to and ignore the rest and take the things you do reply to out of context for convenience. I have no hate for ToR. I do not completely dislike this game as it isn't even out yet and much can still change. Yet, I am critical of the info and actual gameplay videos released.
I'm gonna take you for what you come off as, a moron. Look, you've given me nothing to prove. What has BioWare claimed and not shown or talked about in depth, they haven't talked about Endgame or shown it, what else? I find it ironic that you're GW2 cheering ass (In the wrong forums I'll add) is here talking about fanboism. GG, moron. I have no reason to convince you, I'm offering you information, if you don't like it take your ass back to the GW2 forums. Christ, you can't be this ignorant, can you?...Oh right, mmorpg.com, it's notorious for your type.
Edit: Actually use that brain, learn to research, there are plenty of LEAKED videos that show recent gameplay and map exploration. Or do you need to be spoon fed like the rest?
Cyphers, you should really try to turn of your raging fanboi defense mechanism that is now jumping on people who don't even say anything negative about the game itself. Like it said, their isn't much gameplay proof of most of Bioware's claims that this game is a full blown MMO with features like crafting, exploring, end game etc. Yes they said its there, but they havn't showed us yet. I have actually read about a lot of the demo sessions, and really would like to kno what you want me to find in them as I clearly missed something. Also you clearly misread me as I never claimed it was a SRPG, I merely stated that a lot of people seem to THINK this. Why do people think this? Because they havn't seen anything that proves the oposite that is why. Again I am not saying anythign negative about the game itself, I am posting in the context of the OP. I am just saying that Bioware hasn't shown everything yet, so I will still resereved about this game untill they do. I see the rational possiblity of Bioware not delivering on their claims like mythic did with WaR. That game made me very critical and made me hold back on high expectations for other new games.
I wouldn't go that far Kriosis, the problem with impiro is that he looked over the thread, but he didn't bother to track down the links at the bottom to view the information. Anyone with any genuine interest would take 5 minutes to type in something like SWTOR Gameplay into a site we call YouTube, maybe even sort by date and look at the most recent ones. Theres more then enough information out there, but those that want to downplay TOR like to be kept in the dark, and give no quarter on any gameplay features, new, improved, or otherwise. The basic stance is "We are not impressed".
Lets not bother with trying to police these kinds of people. We cannot change their opinion, just point out their misinformation.
GW2 hasn't shown crafting, exploring or end game either. Should we be asking for proof?
SWTOR has shown players playing together and grouping from level 2 onward in the newest videos, showing everyone in the open world. We've also seen maps of the entire world, and have had first hand accounts of how long it took to travel from one end of the map to the other on the smallest worlds, which still took roughly an hour.
No game will show us "everything" until we play it on release. There will always be something we will not see until we play it, and in the case of TOR even after playing it there will be plenty of content we may never get to see due to our choices and play style.
I see this possibilty being much less similar as everything BioWare claims they have released as far as information, is on items that are already in the current build of the game. Anet says the same thing with their game. If we call one a liar, why should we believe any of them?
Ignorance is bliss. It's a quality for them, stay ignorant and you can never be wrong because you will never know if you're right.
I hate resorting to insults, but damn, I'm gonna start using this fancy little ignore list.
Thank you for proving my point, as it is clear you missed it entirely. Maybe you should reread our entire conversation again and see what it was REALLY about. I do not see what my GW2 cheering ass has to do with any of it at all. I have only said that GW2 has hype because it has a lot of gameplay videos showing the game's main features and ToR hasn't. You are very angry with me clearly and you can't seem to give a good response to my response, while I replied to all the things you said to me in detail.
I feel like I'm being trolled, almost like you're deliberately trying to piss me off.
I just can't figure it out. Why do people here get so bent out of shape over an online video game. Some people like WoW, some people do not like it. Some people like Eve , some people do not like it.
Say what you do or do not like about a game and just move on. I could name some things I don't like about TOR , and some things I do like about it, and at the end of the day I am still going to play that game, regardless of what somebody else thinks.
I have some questions I would like to ask about gw2. Looks like a good game, seems like something I might like to play, but still I want to play the beta and get a feel for this game. I will probably be buying it aswell.
If you don't like the way TOR looks that is your opinion. Just say what you have and move on, no sense in arguing with people , because the funny thing is , we all like diferent things.
"When it comes to GW2 any game is fair game"
Yeah, you were another one of those that had high expectations and was thoroughly disappointed with a former game, leading now to the opposite reaction, namely distrusting anything that's being said and shown that sounds too positive.
Good for you. I mean it, you should be extra wary and hold your expectations if you know of yourself that you're easily swayed or misled by hype.
Anyway, that's it for me: you'll believe whatever you like to believe in taking your past into account and I'll believe what I like to believe in taking my own experiences and research into account, and we'll see how things will be for real closer to launch and past it. Live and let live, agree to disagree and all that stuff.
/back to OP topic again I guess.
The ACTUAL size of MMORPG worlds: a comparison list between MMO's
The ease with which predictions are made on these forums:
Fratman: "I'm saying Spring 2012 at the earliest [for TOR release]. Anyone still clinging to 2011 is deluding themself at this point."
I like the colors you used....but really you don;t need to defend ToR as I am not attacking it. If anything I would be attacking Bioware for not giving the info. GW2 has in fact shown the claims Anet made. ToR hasn't done that for Bioware imo. Crafting etc was just an example. fact remains that Bioware claimed it was a full mmo and I am only talking about the posibillity that Bioware can not deliver on these promises. If you took the time to read in on the OP, the blog claimed that Bioware had nothing to show for except VO. I am keeping this possibility in mind as it sorta happened with WAR and mythic. What is wrong with me doing so? Like I said I not understand the responses I am getting as they are out of context and seem focussed on proving me wrong on the judgements I have for this game, while in reality I am not even talking about what I think about this game.
Well that settles it
I think you misunderstand me, I'm not defending TOR, I'm posting corrections on your views. You said BioWare hasn't shown Crafting, End Game, or Exploring, but you still go on to say Arenanet has shown what they claim - yet we haven't seen these things from Anet and GW2 yet. This must have been a faux pas on your end, as you must be mistaken to hold one accountable and the other one not. Correct? This isn't an opinion, these are facts on what has or has not been shown.
BioWare claims the game is a full MMO, yet the only things they've shown are - full grouping, an open world with players running around inside it, PvP, multiple facets of multiplayer gameplay, and large explorable worlds. The original Blog knows very little about what is actually happening on BioWares end. The "employee" didn't work for BioWare, didn't play the game, and obviously doesn't pay attention to the information because if I were to tell you from my standpoint on what BioWare puts MOST of their emphasis on ... its STORY... NOT Voiceovers.
Most people aren't trying to change your opinions, but they are voicing theirs. I am doing neither, not voicing my opinion or trying to change yours. I am letting you know that what you are choosing to take an opinion on and what is actually factually being shown are two different things. We HAVE seen multiplayer gameplay. We HAVE seen the open worlds with multiple players running around. We have NOT seen crafting, we have NOT seen extensive exploring, and we have NOT seen much on End Game. This isn't just for TOR... we haven't seen it for GW2, or RIFT, or TSW.
What we do see are many hypocrites that take double standards. If you don't like the game, don't like the game, but don't try and discredit what has already been shown by saying it hasn't been shown.
The blogger already mentioned that he knew nothing that was going on with TOR and it was an opinion.
I can see right through you and your trolling attempts. Any person that is even a little interested in TOR can find all the info that is needed to make somewhat of a choice to want to play the game or not.
Even though Bioware has been tight lipped on the full details about crafting and end game content, they have shown much more gamplay than Anet has so far.
It's kinda funny that Anet can get asked the same questions that people ask Bioware and they get a pass when the answer is, we can't talk about that yet, while Bioware gets nothing but hate while doing the same.
GW2 looks ok, but there is no detailed info on crafting pvp or end game content. How does that differ from what bioware is doing with TOR.
I am sorry? Really look at your'e prvious post, It was very offensive and hostile. I didn't mean to piss you of at all. You still refuse to got to the context of my original post. You only took a little out of the post and then used that to bash me.
David is right on the money. Disgruntled ex employees for another project are not the best source of information.
Maskedweasel really that was low especially considering you are aproving of the behavior of Kriosis which is offensive and out of line. Also the things is that still my point isn't really false at all. Again you people asume that when I say that there is no proof of something, that I automaticly think the oposite. I never did that in any of my posts at all. All i was talking about was hype of GW2 and ToR and how I felt that GW2 deserved more hype because it had more actual footage. That doesnt even say I like GW2 better and ToR less. You peopel read what you want and that is what I pointed out to Kriosis......
In orangy
The ACTUAL size of MMORPG worlds: a comparison list between MMO's
The ease with which predictions are made on these forums:
Fratman: "I'm saying Spring 2012 at the earliest [for TOR release]. Anyone still clinging to 2011 is deluding themself at this point."
I'm going to display the lack of clarity in your post.
"ToR on the other hand. has at this moment close to nothing to show for the things Bioware claimes it to be."
Next time clarify. Eventually you do.
"Let me explain myself a little better at least. People worried about the MMO aspects of ToR and BIoware replied to them that they didnt have to worry as ToR was going to have all features a normal MMO would have. So ye that is was I'm talking about kind of."
Why do I feel like I'm being trolled? I gave you PLENTY of info to read into, but you've either refused to read it or just ignored most of what was said. Like I said, I'm not trying to convince you, I don't know you and could care less if you play the game.
We all just get very tired of rehashing information over and over again when it comes to TOR. Many people have a specific view on the game, and voicing their opinions isn't necessarily a problem, but some 'opinions' are in direct contrast to what is being seen, and these 'opinions' are often mistaken as fact by others that can not tell the difference.
I usually don't post links that have already been posted elsewhere plenty of times, and as these links can also be found in the large thread Kriosis linked earlier, I really shouldn't as it means more when interested parties look for this information themselves, but I will post a few here.
Heres one of the multiplayer demos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G18ZHWEfiNw
Here is just one instance of a player running around and you also see other players running around too
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y7yZYEvpf0
and last but not least a listing of lots of videos to further your interest if you'd like.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=videos&search_query=SWTOR+gameplay&search_sort=video_date_uploaded&suggested_categories=20&page=2
I think you'll find plenty of nice videos. I didn't want to post too many because I also saw some videos I haven't seen before and I didn't want to post them in fear they may be leaked vids.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. If you don't like the game because of what you've already seen, thats fine, but I think its a travesty to not like a game based on what you haven't seen, or what hasn't been shown yet. Especially when you hold other games to a different standard. I'm not necessarily saying that YOU, Impiro does this, but I'm saying many people do, and although they can do whatever they want to do, I there will always be those that try to correct this kind of thought process. Hence why we have so many clashes on this site.
I rather believe the blog than some clown like Paul Barnet who hyped up warhammer with 90% false info that didnt even exist in the game.
and u know its true b/c no EA has come out and defend themselve yet.
I doubt he agreed with my insulting, he doesn't seem like that type. I think he agreed more with you ignoring information and/or not actually looking into it. You can argue that you're not against or with TOR all you want, fact is you're in the TOR boards and wasn't here until GW2 was mentioned. Btw, you've already admitted to not looking into TOR for months, you couldn't even recall your last look at the game properly.